HPCwire: PlayStations and Petaphilia

The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing

Leading HPC
Solution Providers

HPCwire >> Blogs

Blog: From the Editor

From the Editor | Main Blog Index

October 13, 2006

PlayStations and Petaphilia

Last Wednesday I got a call from Kai Staats, the CEO of Terra Soft, who told me that his company is developing a supercomputer based on Sony PlayStations. According to him, they'll be creating two clusters from a bunch of the Cell-processor-based PlayStation machines. "Really," I thought, "a cluster of PlayStations?" As I tried to visualize what this might look like, Staats explained the story:

"They are not actually the PlayStations you see at Wal-Mart. They're the 2U rackmount beta units that were used during the last two years by all the game developers. When the developers send them back to Sony, we get them. There are a thousand of them out there and we get 480 of them."

Sony Corporation paid Terra Soft to port their Yellow Dog Linux OS to the PlayStation target. The other components of the cluster software include Y-HPC v2.0, a commercial, cross-architecture Linux cluster construction suite and the Moab cluster management suite by Cluster Resources. Terra Soft's Y-Bio bioinformatics suite is being optimized for the Cell processor.

The Terra Soft announcement said that two clusters -- a test system and a production system -- will be constructed and housed in a facility near the company's headquarters in Loveland, Colorado. According to Staats, the systems will be built by the end of November and will represent the first supercomputers based solely on the Cell-processor.

"It's the most awesome project we've ever done," said Staats.

This doesn't mean that Sony is entering the supercomputing business. Staats said they basically wanted to demonstrate the power and versatility of the PlayStation and the Cell processor. In addition, the production cluster built by Terra Soft is intended to be used for real-world research. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Oak Ridge and Los Alamos and some premier universities were invited to use the clusters for bioinformatics research and development.

A 12-unit mini-version of this cluster will be showcased at next month's Supercomputing Conference in Tampa, Florida. The demo will take place in the IBM booth and will run the Y-Bio gene sequencing application.

The whole idea of reusing the PlayStation beta units got me to thinking. I wonder how hard it would be to build Cell-based clusters from discarded Sony PlayStations. Game enthusiasts upgrade their machines more often than they upgrade their wardrobe, promising a steady supply of raw hardware. Now that Terra Soft has assembled the system software, if some enterprising person could just figure out a relatively inexpensive way to recycle the guts of discarded PlayStations, they might be able to create an interesting little supercomputing business.

-----

Information Farms

"We're all petaphiles now, plugged into a world of petabytes, petaops, petaflops."

So writes George Gilder in an article published in Wired Magazine this past week. Gilder, the publisher of the Gilder Technology Report, talks about the effect of petascale computing on the Internet and how different rates of technological advancements are interacting to favor the reestablishment of centralized computing at the expense of the personal computer. Enormous data centers are being built to feed our growing appetite for computing and information.

As Moore's Law loses ground to the much more rapid advancements in storage capacity and communication bandwidth, processing data becomes more expensive relative to storing data and moving it around. According to Gilder this favors locating the computing infrastructure closer to cheaper power sources so that the scarce and energy-hungry CPU and memory resources can be used more efficiently.

Says Gilder: "In the PC era, the winners were companies that dominated the microcosm of the silicon chip. The new age of petacomputing will be ruled by the masters of the remote data center - those who optimally manage processing power, electricity, bandwidth, storage, and location."

We are certainly seeing desktop applications move on to the Internet. Just this week, Google upgraded it Web-based application suite with "Docs and Spreadsheets," joining Gmail, Google Maps, Calendar and several others. This new service not only allows you to circumvent the PC for word processing and spreadsheet development, but also enables remote collaboration with other users. Since you only need a thin browser client to do this, the traditional PC -- with its vulnerable and limited-capacity local disk, out-of-date applications and bloated OS -- becomes superfluous.

Companies like Google, Yahoo, eBay, Amazon and others are the benefactors of this paradigm shift, while Microsoft is seen as a company that is attempting to transition from the old desktop computing model to the new data center model. Gilder points to Google, in particular, as being one of the more adept companies at exploiting this new style of computing. The company's recent establishment of a 30 acre server farm on the banks of the Columbia River, where cheap hydroelectric power and access to a major fiber-optic hub give it an ideal environment for petascale-capacity computing. Microsoft and Yahoo are also apparently setting up shop along the Columbia, and Ask.com is scouting the area as well.

Not one to be overly sanguine about the rise of the data center, Gilder believes we will eventually return to the decentralized model of computing. He suggests that the technology balance that is currently eroding desktop computing will reverse when semiconductor technology takes another big leap forward -- along the lines of what Intel has recently proposed with their terascale chip, merging silicon optics with large numbers of simple computing cores.

Says Gilder: "The advantages of the new architecture may last only until the centripetal forces pulling intelligence to the core of the network give way, once again, to the silicon centrifuge dispelling it to the edges. Google has pioneered the miracle play of wringing supercomputer performance from commodity CPUs, and this strategy is likely to succeed as long as microchip progress remains in the doldrums."

Hmm... maybe. It's hard for me to imagine that the problems of desktop computing will be overcome with some buffed-out silicon. The heavy burden associated with local maintenance of software and data seems like a much bigger hurdle than adding more CPU muscle. And Gilder may also be underestimating the ability of software developers to use up ever greater amounts processing power as the hardware become available.

In developed economies, services tend to centralize as they mature to take advantage of the efficiencies of specialization. Things like power generation, food production/processing, media broadcasting have all become centralized to one degree or another. I can't think of any compelling reason why computing would be different.

-----

Decide Already!

I expect to be hearing about the DARPA High Productivity Computing Systems (HPCS) funding decision any day now. On the other hand, I've been thinking the same thing since July. The HPCS program has been stuck in neutral since the summer as the feds have procrastinated about making the vendor selections for the third and final phase of the program. Cray, IBM, and Sun Microsystems are the three candidates under consideration for developing a petascale supercomputer architecture under the direction of the HPCS program.

Since the 2007 Defense Appropriations Budget was signed into law in late September, DARPA now knows how much money is available for their myriad programs over the next fiscal year. The agency has a total of around $3 billion to play with in FY07, which is essentially unchanged from the previous year.

With that in mind, I'm guessing the HPCS vendor decision will happen by the end of this October... or by the Supercomputing Conference in mid-November... or maybe by Christmas. Obviously, I have no idea. If you think you do, write to me and give me your best guess. While you're at it, include who you think will be selected for Phase III: Cray, IBM and/or Sun. Correct entries will receive my undying respect.

-----

As always, comments about HPCwire are welcomed and encouraged. Write to me, Michael Feldman, at editor@hpcwire.com.

Posted by Michael Feldman - October 13 @ 12:00AM

Discussion

There are 0 discussion items posted.

Join the Discussion

You must be a registered user in order to comment on HPCWire stories.

Members enjoy:

	Access to Special Content, including Podcasts, Webcasts, and Whitepapers and more!
	Ability to take an active role in the discussions that are shaping the HPC technology discipline!
	Special offers available only to HPCWire members!

Become a Registered User Today!

Registered Users Log in Here to Comment

Email Address:	Password (case sensitive)

Remember me	Forgot Password?

Michael Feldman

Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.

More Michael Feldman

Feature Articles

The Linux HPC Empire Strikes Back

While the Microsoft juggernaut has been touting the joys of its new Windows HPC Server 2008, the Linux HPC contingent has been somewhat less vocal of late. But now Red Hat has come up with its version of an integrated cluster solution.
Read More...

Nexsan Looks to Scare Up HPC Customers With Storage Beast

Even though the cost of servers still dominates the datacenter budget, storage is actually on a steeper growth curve. HPC storage, in particular, is being singled out as high-growth opportunity. Vendors are scrambling to keep up.
Read More...

The Week in Review

Google datacenters most energy efficient; Cluster Resources to demo Moab Hybrid Cluster; Red Hat Linux releases HPC distro. John West recaps those stories and more in our weekly wrap-up.
Read More...

Read more HPCwire features...

Top Headlines

Lustre to Battle Corruption

Oct 07 | GCN.com | Sun Microsystems has been busy building a lot more intelligence into Lustre, a file system used for large-scale cluster computing. Read more...

Oracle and HP's Database Machine Predicated on Voltaire

Oct 06 | The Register | Does the HP Oracle Database Machine represent InfiniBand's big chance to break out its HPC niche? Read more...

3D Imaging Spreads to Fashion and Beyond

Oct 06 | BusinessWeek | A body scan can save a lot of time in the fitting room, and fields from medicine to architecture are adopting 3D computing applications. Read more...

Structural Engineers and Computer Scientists Hope to Integrate Disciplines to 'Revolutionize Building Construction'

Oct 03 | UCSD News | Despite the evolution of computer science over the past 30 years, structural engineering -- hindered by a reluctance to adapt to digital innovations -- has remained relatively unchanged as a discipline. Read more...

Credit Crisis Spreads a Pall Over Silicon Valley

Oct 02 | New York Times | Silcon Valley is starting to feel the effects of the credit crunch. Read more...

Read more headlines...

Featured Whitepapers

Panasas® Tiered Parity™ Architecture

Sep 04 | | Disk drives are approximately 250 times denser today than a decade ago. This is good news for users who are creating, manipulating and storing more data than ever before. It gives them an opportunity to derive more value from their stored data and lowers the capital acquisition and operating expense associated with that data.

View the White Paper Library

Multimedia

Video White Paper: Architecting a Better Network Storage Solution

BlueArc's Titan architecture represents an evolutionary step in file servers by creating a hardware-based file system that can scale bandwidth, IOPS, and overall data capacity well beyond conventional software-based devices. With its ability to virtualize a massive storage pool of up to four usable petabytes of tiered storage, Titan can scale with growing data requirements, offering a competitive advantage for businesses, researchers, or other enterprises seeking to better manage data growth while still ensuring optimal performance.