The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
From the Editor | Main Blog Index
November 30, 2007
Shortly after my brief diatribe about the future of proprietary vector systems (NEC Does Some Vector Addition), NEC offered to "educate" me face-to-face at SC07 about some of the advantages of their new SX-9 machines that I somehow neglected to mention in my commentary. They also promised to give me an overview of the company's overall HPC strategy. How could I resist?
One of the points of contention from my original piece was my estimate for a fully tricked out 839 teraflop SX-9, which I had suggested would cost about a billion dollars. That estimate was based on a 39 teraflop system that was purchased by the German Weather Service (DWD) for 72 million dollars. According to NEC, the Germans actually purchased two such systems for that price -- one for production and one for backup and research. The price tag also included a 20 percent European VAT (value added tax), a petabyte of storage and some scalar systems to manage the storage network. Based on that information, I'd estimate an 839 teraflop SX-9 would probably cost less than 500 million. Yet even at that price, NEC is unlikely to be selling any fully configured SX-9 machines in the near future.
Since Cray recently abandoned its vector product line in favor of its new scalar/vector/FPGA hybrid approach via the new XT5h, NEC remains as the lone vendor producing standalone vector machines. The SX-9 architecture currently boasts the highest memory bandwidth on the market -- 4 terabytes per second per 16-CPU node. That's 256 GB/sec for each 100 gigaflop CPU. With a maximum memory configuration of 1 terabyte per node, users have access to a lot of very fast, flat memory. This is one of the main features of SX-9 systems -- and vector architectures in general -- that makes them so attractive for certain types of workloads when compared to scalar architectures. For codes that are naturally suited to vector computing, it's hard to beat these machines for pure sustained performance and user productivity.
However, as I alluded to in my previous commentary on this subject, that may not always be the case. Vector computing is in the process of becoming commoditized as SIMD units on CPUs and discrete GPUs are evolving toward a general-purpose data parallel capability. Right now, high-end vector computing is where high-end visualization was about 10-15 years ago, when SGI's proprietary Onyx machines represented the state of the art. As graphics processing became common in personal computing, users realized that visualization was not a specialized requirement, but a general-purpose one, requiring standard commodity solutions. Vector computing is going through that process today.
For the time being, though, NEC remains fully committed to its vector supercomputing strategy. According to the company, they expect to continue the SX roadmap; they even plan to deliver the next generation SX-10 machine at some point. The scalar systems that NEC sells into the HPC space are its own Itanium-based enterprise servers and Xeon-based clusters. They are typically delivered alongside their SX machines to provide access to HPC storage. But unlike in Cray's new XT5h systems, where vector and scalar computing are integrated as peers, NEC still sees their SX nodes as the stars of the show. As long as their European and Asian customers keep buying them, NEC has little reason to believe otherwise.
North America is a different story. Although NEC claims they have nine SX-6 systems on this side of the pond, I've yet to hear of one in operation. Today, the company has no illusions about selling its vector platform into Cray's backyard. A 1996 court case involving the sale of four NEC SX-4 systems to the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) still casts a shadow on Japanese supercomputer imports. At the time, Cray charged that NEC was "dumping" their machines, using artificially low pricing to gain a foothold in the American market. The U.S. International Trade Commission upheld the charges and the Department of Commerce imposed stiff punitive tariffs on such importations, effectively killing competition in the domestic vector supercomputing market. Ironically, in 2001 Cray temporarily decided to resell NEC SX-5 machines, revoking its anti-dumping petition of five years earlier.
Today NEC has a new North American HPC strategy, which is based on a partnership between itself and Sun Microsystems. The recent history of the two companies was most evident in the collaboration on the Tokyo Tech TSUBAME supercomputer, where Sun provided most of the server and storage hardware and NEC acted as the system integrator. The two also worked together to build a supercomputer for Brazil's National Institute of Space Research - Center of Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC/INPE).
On Sept. 14, the two companies signed an agreement that "allows NEC to do work on behalf of Sun for Sun clients and Sun to promote and sell NEC professional services." The agreement takes advantage of NEC software expertise in oil & gas, government research, manufacturing, and weather/climate applications, and leverages Sun's reach into the American HPC market.
Down the road, NEC may be thinking of selling its SX machines alongside of Sun clusters to North American customers. That could offer an interesting alternative to Cray's integrated vector-scalar hybrid approach. Such an arrangement doesn't seem too far-fetched when you consider Sun's recent enthusiasm for the supercomputing market. Maybe vector systems have a few good years left in them after all.
-----
As always, comments about HPCwire are welcomed and encouraged. Write to me, Michael Feldman, at editor@hpcwire.com.
Posted by Michael Feldman - November 30 @ 12:00AM
(Digg, Technorati, more)
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
More Michael Feldman
still innovative by PhoenixW
Rediculous notion! by jimmymac
The benchmark is completely wrong. by Patrick LEE
SiCortex / Betamax by KevinButerbaugh
Good Luck to Silicon Graphics by Rick_Mandahl
It's About Realism not Speed by cyberdyne
SGI, Not Alone by EricS
Re: Obama Pushes Science Agenda by lwalker701
The battleground... by rgreen1
How it went wrong for SGi by atzanov
Harder than chess by addisonsnell
Debt consolidation by EliasV
Re: Recession Takes a Bite Out of Supercomputing by CooperO
How it went wrong for SGi by shawnu
How it all went wrong for SGI by jmh900
Torn between IRIX and Linux by Merblich
Sun Microsystems by IsaacU
New Search Engine Duck Duck Go by yegg
GlobalFoundries and IBM ? by gutiea
GlobalFoundries and IBM ? by gutiea
HPC Market by Flamingo
Fusion Cloud Rendering by gary@amd
Fusion Cloud Rendering by gary@amd
Not cores, but memory! by dmpase
Are you on Intel's payroll? by jimmymac
anchos by addisonsnell
anchos? by in_the_crease
Here's to Cray accuracy over HPCwire's. by taylors
Tech community prefers Pepsi to Coke by cogsci
There was a new energy at this year's TeraGrid '09 conference thanks to an outstanding turnout for the student program. Thanks to support from the National Science Foundation, more than 100 high school, undergraduate and graduate students were able to participate in the conference.
Read More...
Paul Avery, a recognized leader in advanced grid and networking for science, delivered the first keynote address at the recent TeraGrid '09 conference in Arlington, Virginia. A professor of physics at the University of Florida, Avery is co-principal investigator and founding member of the Open Science Grid (OSG). Avery talked about the history of OSG, some of the projects that leverage its resources, and OSG's relationship with TeraGrid.
Read More...
Before he even took the podium, Ed Seidel was one of the buzz makers at the TeraGrid '09 conference. The day before his keynote, it was announced that he was stepping in as acting assistant director of the National Science Foundation's math and physical sciences directorate. For his talk at the conference, however, Seidel focused on the issues and efforts within his home at NSF, the Office of Cyberinfrastructure.
Read More...
Jul 09 | Engineer Live | The demand for computational tools to underpin the 3D seismic interpretation process has never been more apparent. Read more...
Jul 08 | EE Times | Unemployment for U.S. engineers has reached record levels, according to government figures. Read more...
Jul 08 | Network World | Global spending for 2009 projected to drop 6 percent, for a total of $3.2 trillion. Read more...
Jul 08 | Linux Magazine | Portability or efficiency? Neither is guaranteed when writing explicit parallel code. Read more...
Jul 07 | Ars Technica | Japanese company builds custom ASIC to accelerate real-time ray traced rendering for the auto industry. Read more...
Apr 14 | | Many HPC IT departments are feeling the rising pressure to deliver more capacity computing and performance while trying to reduce the total cost of ownership. This white paper discusses how an environmentally-friendly and open-standards HPC building block based computing system using flexible interconnect options helps address capacity computing needs.
Source: Addison Snell, GM/VP, Tabor Research; sponsored by Dell
Many organizations that could benefit from the use of HPC clusters find that it is complicated to get the systems up and running because of limited IT resources or the complexities of the clusters themselves. Learn how the Intel Cluster Ready program, for which Dell was an original partner, seeks to address this challenge for entry level and mid-range HPC users.
BlueArc's Titan architecture represents an evolutionary step in file servers by creating a hardware-based file system that can scale bandwidth, IOPS, and overall data capacity well beyond conventional software-based devices. With its ability to virtualize a massive storage pool of up to four usable petabytes of tiered storage, Titan can scale with growing data requirements, offering a competitive advantage for businesses, researchers, or other enterprises seeking to better manage data growth while still ensuring optimal performance.
Sun Studio Compilers and Tools and Sun HPC ClusterTools allow you to create high performance parallel applications for OpenSolaris, Solaris and Linux. Sun Studio Express 11/08 includes MPI performance analysis capabilities and full OpenMP 3.0 compiler support. Learn about all this and the latest in Sun HPC ClusterTools 8.1.