The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
From the Editor | Main Blog Index
January 28, 2010
After nine months of thrashing, Oracle finally completed the acquisition of Sun Microsystems. As expected, the EU approval of the deal last week cleared the way for the formal merger of the two computer industry behemoths in what is being described as the biggest IT deal of the 21st century.
Unfortunately for high performance computing lovers everywhere, there was nary a mention of HPC in Oracle's merger party on Wednesday. The five-hour event, which was intended to provide an outline of the new company's roadmap, mostly focused on Oracle's infatuation with using Sun hardware to provide "complete business systems" and thus being able to compete with other vertically-integrated systems from the likes of IBM and HP. And while nothing was explicitly said to indicate Sun's HPC customers would be ditched, Oracle's focus right now is obviously on business computing, not scientific computing.
Specifically, Ellison and company plan to leverage well-known Sun technology like Java, Solaris, Sun servers, SPARC chips, ZFS storage, StorageTek tape systems, and Sun flash memory to build high-value enterprise systems and appliances. The Sun Oracle Database Machine, which combines Sun hardware (flash memory, servers, disk storage, and InfiniBand) and Oracle software, is the model they want to use to build a whole product portfolio of Oracle-branded business machines. In fact, the plan right now is to increase investments in these core Sun technologies to accelerate this strategy.
So what's to be left behind? Not much, it seems. At the business level, Oracle wants to change the sales model so that it is selling directly to its top customers, rather than using the Sun partner model. Hardware-wise, it intends to back out of the low-end x86 server market. (According to Oracle president Charles Phillips, they're going to leave that business to companies like Dell). And while Oracle will probably cut 1,000 employees or so, the initial plan is to hire another 2,000 new engineers and sales people to support the new roadmap.
A hint of what may be in store for the HPC business came from John Fowler, who was formerly the executive vice president of Sun's systems group and is now the executive vice president of hardware engineering for Oracle. Like the other speakers at the event, Fowler reiterated the push to integrate Sun's server, storage and network technology with Oracle's enterprise software. At one point though, without mentioning names, he remarked they would "focus the product set," rather than compete in every possible application area. You can read into that what you will.
Fowler also presented a roadmap, of sorts, for the SPARC chips. Both the UltraSPARC T series and SPARC64 series chips are in line for upgrades. According to Fowler, an UltraSPARC T3 is scheduled to be released later this year, with double the cores, bigger cache, and faster memory compared to its T2 predecessor. In addition, a new SPARC64 is slated to appear in the next 12-15 months. However, both chip's lines are being groomed for enterprise duty: CRM, database, OLTP, and so on. Although HPC'ers have dabbled with SPARC servers from time to time, it's difficult to imagine Oracle putting much effort into SPARC-based machines aimed at the high performance computing market.
It looks like Oracle will keep the Lustre file system software, at least for the time being. But there wasn't much talk about it at the event. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Lustre effort spun off to someone else if the company can't find a way to leverage it in its business products.
In fact, it's difficult to imagine an Oracle regime making a strong commitment to HPC in the near term. Certainly, if big customers want to upgrade their supers with Sun gear, Oracle will be glad to close those deals, as long as it can turn a profit. But in general, selling HPC servers is not the kind of high-margin business Oracle is used to and wants to continue. And right now, there's no example of a public company that appears to be generating consistent profits from just selling HPC systems. (IBM, HP and Dell may be profitable as a whole, but don't split out HPC revenue and profit numbers.)
If Oracle decides to make a push into HPC, I think that's going to be down the road, after it's matured its business portfolio a bit. If they prove me wrong tomorrow, so be it. But for now, color me skeptical.
Posted by Michael Feldman - January 28 @ 5:49PM
(Digg, Technorati, more)
There are 6 discussion items posted.
Sun & HPC != Oracle & HPC
Submitted by Merblich on 01/28/2010 - 8:29PM
The original HPC was enbodied by the 1st generation of Cray. They were profitable for a period of time. Since then it has evolved into the ability to support massive server nodes interconnected via Ethernet. SGI used OpenGL for the core software environment. Sun used to be known to invest large dollar amounts to attempt to accelerate their hardware performance curves for their servers. However, now Oracle software is the primary focus of IP and accelerared hardware investments assumes a target market of early adopters who are financially healthy (normally the gov or via a grant),. Thus to target core business investments pure performance is second to uptime / reliabillity and affordability and proper support of business applications. So, given an intelligent integrator, turning multiple Sun nodes into parts of a HPC environment is still a possibility for some environments. MErblich
Post #1
Oracle SPARC != Fujitsu SPARC
Submitted by Alan M. Feldstein on 01/31/2010 - 6:37PM
SPARC64 is a family of microprocessors designed by Fujitsu. The SPARC64 roadmap is not controlled by Oracle. On the SPECfp_base2006 metric, a SPARC64 VII is 7 times faster than Oracle's fastest reported SPARC, an UltraSPARC IIIi.
Note that there are no published SPECfp_base2006 results for any of the UltraSPARC T series. That fact invites us to make our own guesses about floating-point speed (UltraSPARC T series marketing focuses throughput).
In HPC, one can often achieve high system throughput by using lots of microprocessors, but it is still advantageous to have low latency (i.e. high speed) at each node.
Let's see what Oracle comes up with, but Fujitsu already has it.
Alan M. Feldstein
Post #2
HPC = servers but a lot more
Submitted by truly64 on 02/08/2010 - 8:57AM
It is pretty obvious by now that SUN has abandoned the HPC market now that Oracle has swallowed it. The AMD line of 1U servers went end of sale in January, and none of the Oracle announcements say anything about x86, linux, or HPC.
Perhaps the margins were not high enough for Oracle to stomach, but once an organization bought a cluster from SUN, there always seemed to be file servers, storage, tape libraries, and other high margin items sold to support the cluster.
Looks like the only 1st tier vendors left are HP and Dell, with HP the most knowledgeable (IMHO).
Post #3
SGI = graphics + HPC
Submitted by johnbarr on 02/15/2010 - 2:12AM
"SGI used OpenGL for the core software environment." OpenGL was for graphics - not primarily HPC. SGI had parallel tools and libraries (and people) that drove significant business in the Power Challenge and Origin days. The HPC world has changed significantly since then as commodity components and software have become the norm.
Post #4
HPC = servers but a lot more
Submitted by lawries on 03/08/2010 - 6:28AM
Your Comment:-
Looks like the only 1st tier vendors left are HP and Dell, with HP the most knowledgeable (IMHO).
Think you forgot IBM when mentioning HP and DELL. HP have more systems in the Top500 while IBM have more in the Top100 so they have to be considered a player in the HPC market with more than one platform to offer.
Post #5
Re: IBM and HPC
Submitted by truly64 on 03/10/2010 - 12:19PM
I didn't forget IBM... they forgot me. Unless your organization has a Google, Livermore, or Citibank like stature, IBM doesn't return the call. They only go after the large players... mid size installations like mine are not on their radar.
Post #6
PGI Accelerator™ Fortran 95/03 and C99 compilers for x64+NVIDIA
Accelerate applications on x64+GPU platforms by adding OpenMP-like compiler directives to existing Fortran and C programs. Available now for Linux, MacOS and Windows. Download a free 15 day trial.
Platform HPC Workgroup Manager
Platform HPC Workgroup Manager integrates all the cluster productivity tools you need to deploy, run and manage your HPC environment.
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
More Michael Feldman
Compairson to Core i7-980X by rsingle
HPC? not so much by ewahl
Re: IBM and HPC by truly64
HPC = servers but a lot more by lawries
Multi core deployment becomes a memory game by truly64
Re: Venture Capital Drought? Not So Much. by Ron Van Holst
Re: Podcast: Cray Awarded Defense Deal; SGI Makes Storage Buy; IBM Invents New Algorithm by Nastyanna
Painful Truth by jeffrey.mcallister
SGI = graphics + HPC by johnbarr
HPC = servers but a lot more by truly64
Oracle SPARC != Fujitsu SPARC by Alan M. Feldstein
Sun & HPC != Oracle & HPC by Merblich
a third vendor for lossless low latency 10GbE fabric by lee.fisher@hp.com
Response to GAH by KevinButerbaugh
Response to KevinButerbaugh by GAH
Response to KevinButerbaugh by GAH
Response to GAH by KevinButerbaugh
Response to bdrupp by KevinButerbaugh
Climate Crisis and Exaflops by bdrupp
Climate Crisis and Exaflops by John Hules
Climate Crisis and Exaflops by GAH
Climate Crisis by KevinButerbaugh
IBM "Brain Simulation" article is not properly presented. by Merritt
563 out of 1206 by vvolkov
Little Iron by gadunk
At least it's not "cloud" by KevinButerbaugh
Native QPI Interface? by commike
Mmmmmm by hellcats
New transistorized IC chip scales. by symmecon
Itanium at IDF by Alan M. Feldstein
Communication time by jnapper
"The financial meltdown and computing" by donpellegrino
Human Models by mdgabriel
High-End SPARC Chip for Scientific Applications by Alan M. Feldstein
RapidMind by Mr LolO
Rapidmind by dminor
Longer run times by JohnWest
re: Algo trading Angst by jshore
Results of Testing by in_the_crease
C-DAC announces plans for a petaflop system; IBM researchers are working on vertical integration techniques to extend Moore's Law another 15 years. We recap those stories and more in our weekly wrapup.
Read More...
The Moscow State University supercomputer, Lomonosov, has been selected for a high-performance makeover, with the goal of tripling its processing power to achieve petaflop-level performance in 2010. T-Platforms, who developed and manufactured the supercomputer, is the odds-on favorite to lead the project.
Read More...
Right on schedule, Intel has launched its Xeon 5600 processors, codenamed "Westmere EP." The 5600 represents the 32nm sequel to the Xeon 5500 (Nehalem EP) for dual-socket servers. Intel is touting better performance and energy efficiency, along with new security features, as the big selling points of the new Xeons.
Read More...
Mar 19 | OfficialWire | New super to support intelligence work Down Under. Read more...
Mar 18 | ChannelWeb | Westmere parts already showing up in HPC machines. Read more...
Mar 17 | The Register | But what about the tier ones? Read more...
Mar 17 | Cadalyst Magazine | A new generation of workstations is changing the nature of technical computing. Read more...
Mar 17 | Linux Magazine | Latest iteration of Sun Grid Engine able to tap into Cloud. Read more...
Jan 12 | | In-depth look at vSMP Foundation server virtualization technology, technical implementation, use cases and capabilities. The technical whitepaper provides an architectural overview and details on the three vSMP Foundation products: vSMP Foundation for SMP, vSMP Foundation for Cluster and vSMP Foundation for Cloud.
Jan 18 | | This white paper discusses Gore’s copper cable assemblies, and how they continue to exceed the standards for providing reliable, cost-effective solutions for high-performance computer applications.
Join this online panel discussion for live Q&A with leading industry experts, analysts, and end-users to discuss the latest innovations, best practices, barriers to implementation, and measurable benefits of server virtualization with a particular focus on today's real world solutions.
Learn about scalable fault-tolerant architectures and examples of energy efficient and scalable supercomputing clusters using dual QDR InfiniBand to combine capacity computing with network failover capabilities with the help of programming languages such as MPI and a robust Linux cluster management package.
LIVE@SCO9: The IBM team discusses new innovations in hardware, software and services that help clients better understand their workloads and get insight from their R&D efforts. Technology demonstrations include the soon-to-be-released Power7 HPC processor, the DCS990 system with 2.4 petabytes of storage, the xCAT management tool, secure HPC cloud computing and more. Winners of two HPCwire Readers' and Editors’ Choice Awards! Take the IBM virtual tour at SC09 or more information go online to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/deepcomputing/sc09.html