HPCwire

Leading HPC
Solution Providers




















HPCwire >> Blogs

Blog: From the Editor

From the Editor | Main Blog Index

AMD Pulls the Trigger on Its 45


Barcelona, we hardly knew ye. Today AMD launched its 45nm "Shanghai" quad-core Opterons, sending the ill-fated 65nm Barcelona chips into the microprocessor history books. While the company has some catching up to do with regard to Intel hardware, AMD is counting on its newly shrunk processor line to regain some lost market share from its rival. Intel has had 45nm parts on the market for a year, which has chipped away at AMD's customer base. AMD decided to lead its 45nm charge with its server lineup, leaving the corresponding mobile and desktop products for Q1 2009.

Immediately available will be the 75W versions of Shanghai, at speeds of 2.3 to 2.7 GHz. In Q1 2009, the HE (55W) and SE (105W) versions will hit the channel. The high-performance SE chips should be of special interest to the HPC crowd, but AMD hasn't yet divulged the clock speed, other than to say it will be somewhere north of 2.7 GHz. The entire line is compatible with the Rev F socket, so the new chips can be plugged into existing machines with just a BIOS upgrade.

As you might guess from a process shrink, the new CPUs will run at higher clock frequencies (up to 2.7 GHz), have more cache (8 GB), and deliver better performance/watt (great taste/less filling). AMD is claiming up to 35 percent better performance and 35 percent less power consumption at idle. The new chips also support faster DDR2 memory (800 MHz), which delivers 10 percent more bandwidth than the previous controller. An interesting new feature is the "Smart Fetch" technology, where cores automatically power down when waiting for data or instructions to arrive after some threshold time is exceeded. The cores dumps their local L1 and L2 cache to L3 before going to sleep, reversing the process upon waking up.

The Shanghai parts are being produced with a new 45nm immersion lithography process. AMD says the technology yields a tighter projection beam, which supports more precise geometry and leads to less manufacturing defects. According to Steve Demski, AMD's product manager for the Server and Workstation Division, this has a distinct cost advantage over the double-etch manufacture technology being used by Intel. It also enabled AMD to transition relatively rapidly to the new manufacturing node. "This has been the quickest process for any Opteron processors we've developed," Demski told me.

According to him, AMD moved up the launch of the Shanghai chips about three months, which he said was originally slated for Q1 2009. My recollection from last year is that AMD promised 45nm parts in the middle of 2008, which I always thought was a long shot. Certainly Intel's success with its 45nm Harpertown chips motivated AMD to push out its Opteron contender as quickly as possible. The original plan was to build HyperTransport 3.0 into Shanghai for faster (17.6 GB/s) chip-to-chip communication, but collapsing the product timeline meant it had to stick with slower HT 1.0 for the initial launch. In Q2 2009, all the Shanghai chips will move to HT 3.0, at which point AMD will also bump the clock speed across the different power bands.

Shanghai is being positioned against Intel's Harpertown (5400 series) processors. According to AMD, the new chips match the comparable Harpertowns on integer performance (SPECint_rate2006) and are about 34 percent better on floating point (SPECfp_rate2006), while memory bandwidth is nearly twice as good. Shanghai will almost certainly provide better energy efficiency than their Intel competition because of the use of power-hungry FB-DIMMs in Harpertown-based systems.

And since the 5400s use the older front-side-bus technology, AMD can still exploit the advantages of its on-chip memory controllers and HyperTransport/Direct Connect Architecture, but this will be the last time it will be able to do so. Early next year, Intel is expected to launch its first Nehalem server parts, which will incorporate on-chip memory controllers and a HyperTransport-like QuickPath Interconnect (QPI). AMD intends to answer Nehalem with its 6-core "Istanbul" processor toward the latter half of 2009, which will also be socket compatible with Rev F.

Of course, this is a tough business climate to be launching new products, given that it's the end of capitalism and all. And AMD is probably resigned to the fact that Nehalem will outperform the Shanghai, and perhaps even Istanbul. But in speaking with Demski, it sounded like AMD was hoping the recession might actually help the company's message in the server market. The theory is that customers would be more likely to plug faster Opteron processors into existing systems than perform an expensive forklift upgrade, as will be required for the new Nehalem-based machines. AMD was apparently spreading this talking point around. Over at InfoWorld, Tom Yager writes:

Intel's messaging is all about the future, but AMD takes an interesting view that's more in line with the perspective of buyers: Squeeze the longest possible life out of the gear you bought two years ago, and keep the machine you buy today upgradable to state-of-the-art performance with nothing but a CPU swap.

It's certainly a reasonable line of thinking, but the fact is that neither chipmaker is likely to have a good fourth quarter, or a good 2009. Intel recently cut its forecast for Q4 noting that "revenue is being affected by significantly weaker-than-expected demand in all geographies and market segments." That reflects this week's IDC report in which it cut its previous IT spending forecast in half -- from 5.9 percent to 2.6 percent.

So both chipmakers are likely to shed workers over the next 12 months. Even if the HPC segment remains strong during the recession, the upshot of R&D cutbacks at Intel, AMD and other big players will likely slow product innovation and development, which could have longer term effects on high performance computing.

Posted by Michael Feldman - November 13 @ 7:41PM

(Digg, Technorati, more)

Discussion

There are 0 discussion items posted.  

Michael Feldman

Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.

More Michael Feldman



Recent Comments

Feature Articles

Spider Up and Spinning Connections to All Computing Platforms at ORNL

Spider, the world's biggest Lustre-based, centerwide file system, has been fully tested to support Oak Ridge National Laboratory's new petascale Cray XT4/XT5 Jaguar supercomputer and is now offering early access to scientists.
Read More...

Wolfram Alpha: A Web-Based Application That Embraced Supercomputers

Wolfram Alpha, the Web-based computational engine introduced in May, is not a traditional supercomputing application, but relies on supercomputers to satisfy its unique requirements.
Read More...

TeraGrid '09: Student Participation Soars

There was a new energy at this year's TeraGrid '09 conference thanks to an outstanding turnout for the student program. Thanks to support from the National Science Foundation, more than 100 high school, undergraduate and graduate students were able to participate in the conference.
Read More...

Top Headlines

3D Seismic Data: Taking a Smarter Approach to Interpretation

Jul 09 | Engineer Live | The demand for computational tools to underpin the 3D seismic interpretation process has never been more apparent. Read more...

Engineering Unemployment Soared in 2Q to 8.6%

Jul 08 | EE Times | Unemployment for U.S. engineers has reached record levels, according to government figures. Read more...

Gartner Adjusts 2009 IT Spend Downward Again

Jul 08 | Network World | Global spending for 2009 projected to drop 6 percent, for a total of $3.2 trillion. Read more...

Concurrent and Parallel Are Not The Same

Jul 08 | Linux Magazine | Portability or efficiency? Neither is guaranteed when writing explicit parallel code. Read more...

800 TFLOP Real-Time Ray Tracing GPU Unveiled, Not for Gamers

Jul 07 | Ars Technica | Japanese company builds custom ASIC to accelerate real-time ray traced rendering for the auto industry. Read more...

Featured Whitepapers

Building High Performance Computing in a Green and Modular Solution Building Block

Apr 14 | | Many HPC IT departments are feeling the rising pressure to deliver more capacity computing and performance while trying to reduce the total cost of ownership. This white paper discusses how an environmentally-friendly and open-standards HPC building block based computing system using flexible interconnect options helps address capacity computing needs.

Multimedia

Webcast: Dell Expands HPC Access and Adoption with Intel Cluster Ready Program


Source: Addison Snell, GM/VP, Tabor Research; sponsored by Dell

Many organizations that could benefit from the use of HPC clusters find that it is complicated to get the systems up and running because of limited IT resources or the complexities of the clusters themselves. Learn how the Intel Cluster Ready program, for which Dell was an original partner, seeks to address this challenge for entry level and mid-range HPC users.

Video White Paper: Architecting a Better Network Storage Solution

BlueArc's Titan architecture represents an evolutionary step in file servers by creating a hardware-based file system that can scale bandwidth, IOPS, and overall data capacity well beyond conventional software-based devices. With its ability to virtualize a massive storage pool of up to four usable petabytes of tiered storage, Titan can scale with growing data requirements, offering a competitive advantage for businesses, researchers, or other enterprises seeking to better manage data growth while still ensuring optimal performance.

Webcast: HPC Development Solutions: Sun Studio & Sun HPC ClusterTools


Sun Studio Compilers and Tools and Sun HPC ClusterTools allow you to create high performance parallel applications for OpenSolaris, Solaris and Linux. Sun Studio Express 11/08 includes MPI performance analysis capabilities and full OpenMP 3.0 compiler support. Learn about all this and the latest in Sun HPC ClusterTools 8.1.

Blogs by Topics

Blogs by Author

HPC Blogroll



Featured Events

WORLDCOMP 2009
Data Mining Courses