The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
May 19, 2006
Abstract
OpenMP* was designed to unify the directive languages of shared memory multiprocessors across the industry to make it easier to write portable parallel programs. OpenMP represents a high-level language of parallelism compared to programming with Posix threads or Windows threads. It also represents a much easier programming model than does MPI. This effort has been successful and OpenMP has gained many users around the world. Yet, thus far OpenMP has only been useful for programming systems with hardware shared memories. Now, Intel is offering Cluster OpenMP*, which extends the OpenMP programming model to clusters. This article describes the extension to OpenMP that makes this possible, how the system manages to simulate a shared memory across a cluster, how the user ports an OpenMP program to Cluster OpenMP, and ends with a discussion of the amount of effort required to port a code.
Introduction
In the 1980s and 90s, multiprocessor computer manufacturers tried to address the difficulties of programming their computers by supplying directives that could be placed in serial programs that would instruct the compiler to produce parallel code. Each manufacturer produced its own unique set of directives. As programmers moved their programs from machine to machine, they found that they had to recode the directives. To remedy this situation, major players in the industry formed a working group in the mid-90s to unify the directives. The result was the 1997 OpenMP specification for Fortran and the 1998 specification for C/C++. This effort has been successful, and the OpenMP directive language has been adopted across the industry.
The OpenMP paradigm for parallel programming differs significantly from the earlier message passing solutions (such as PVM and MPI), and from explicit threading (Posix* threads or Windows* threads). The first difference that people notice is that OpenMP consists mostly of directives, whereas PVM, MPI and the threading methods consist solely of library routines. The effect of this is that OpenMP's effects can be switched off by a compiler switch, removing the OpenMP parallelism, whereas programs using library-based parallelism are permanently changed into parallel programs.
Another obvious difference versus message passing is that data movement for message passing programs must be explicitly programmed by the programmer, while data movement in OpenMP programs happens automatically when threads read and write variables. This means that in addition to the code for the problem being solved, the message passing programmer must write a program layer to move the data between processors.
Both of these differences translate directly into lower programming costs and lower maintenance costs for OpenMP programs. With OpenMP, you program "what" to do, while with message passing and explicit threading you program "how" to do it.
In this sense, OpenMP could be said to be a high-level language of parallel programming, while explicit threading and message-passing programming is more akin to an "assembly language" of parallel programming.
A drawback to OpenMP is that it requires a shared memory, so up-to-now this has limited its use to a single multiprocessor machine. Now, Intel's Cluster OpenMP removes that limitation. Cluster OpenMP makes it possible to run an OpenMP program across a cluster of multiprocessors. The shared memory is simulated by a software layer implementing a distributed shared memory (DSM).
Cluster OpenMP Extension to OpenMP
Page: 1 of 4(Digg, Technorati, more)
Appro Ready-To-Go-Clusters – Quickly deploy ANSYS & Intel Cluster Ready Solutions
Offering a fully integrated Ready-To-Go Cluster based on the Appro GreenBlade System supporting up to 28 blade nodes in a half-size standard rack cabinet, including master nodes and switches.
Feb 09 | eWeek Europe | Company says new high-end servers will deliver "intelligent performance." Read more...
Feb 09 | EE Times | Wireless technology promises energy-efficient chip-to-chip communication. Read more...
Feb 08 | eWeek | A new kind of Rocky Mountain high. Read more...
Feb 08 | Computerworld | Chip maker hopes to bring CPU-GPU processors to servers in two years. Read more...
Feb 05 | Technology Review | IBM has created graphene transistors that leave silicon ones in the dust. Read more...
Jan 12 | | In-depth look at vSMP Foundation server virtualization technology, technical implementation, use cases and capabilities. The technical whitepaper provides an architectural overview and details on the three vSMP Foundation products: vSMP Foundation for SMP, vSMP Foundation for Cluster and vSMP Foundation for Cloud.
Jan 18 | | This white paper discusses Gore’s copper cable assemblies, and how they continue to exceed the standards for providing reliable, cost-effective solutions for high-performance computer applications.
Jan 11 | | LLNL is home to some of the fastest computers in the world. In 2012, LLNL expects to have the Sequoia supercomputing cluster operational with a projected performance of over 20 PFLOP/s. These systems will focus on strengthening the foundations of predictive simulation through running large suites of complex simulations and then comparing model predictions with experimental data. To visualize this project’s large amount of data, LLNL requested an Appro Supercomputing Cluster specifically designed to support interactive data analysis.
Join this online panel discussion for live Q&A with leading industry experts, analysts, and end-users to discuss the latest innovations, best practices, barriers to implementation, and measurable benefits of server virtualization with a particular focus on today's real world solutions.
Learn about scalable fault-tolerant architectures and examples of energy efficient and scalable supercomputing clusters using dual QDR InfiniBand to combine capacity computing with network failover capabilities with the help of programming languages such as MPI and a robust Linux cluster management package.
LIVE@SCO9: The IBM team discusses new innovations in hardware, software and services that help clients better understand their workloads and get insight from their R&D efforts. Technology demonstrations include the soon-to-be-released Power7 HPC processor, the DCS990 system with 2.4 petabytes of storage, the xCAT management tool, secure HPC cloud computing and more. Winners of two HPCwire Readers' and Editors’ Choice Awards! Take the IBM virtual tour at SC09 or more information go online to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/deepcomputing/sc09.html