The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
June 16, 2006
In the second part of our interview with Michael Levine and Ralph Roskies, the two scientific co-directors at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC), they talk about the LeMieux computer, the PSC approach to supercomputing, and the challenges that lie ahead for the center. To read part one of the interview, where they talked extensively about the center's Cray XT3 system, go to http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/686730.html.
HPCwire: LeMieux, your 3,000-processor six-teraflop HP system, which came into service in 2001, was the first NSF terascale system and for several years was the most powerful system available to NSF researchers. At soon-to-be five-years old, it's still one of the most used TeraGrid resources. What are your plans for this system and how much longer can it be useful?
Levine: It can be useful for a very long time. It's a question of how long it will continue to be cost effective. If Moore's Law holds, the amount of computing you can get from initial dollar capitalization keeps improving. On a monthly cost basis, this is a matter of maintenance costs. Likewise with the amount of computing per watt. Power is a large cost factor.
Roskies: At some point, it will no longer be cost effective and we will by then have transitioned the users to the XT3. No one will be left hanging.
Levine: Technically, LeMieux turned out to be a very good machine and continues to be a very good machine, very useful; it's not at a breaking point in any serious sense.
HPCwire: PSC has gained a reputation for its ability to take the leap with new technologies and transform them quickly into productive research tools. Going back to the CRAY Y-MP through half-a-dozen systems up to the XT3, you've received early, if not the first, models of new systems. What are the advantages of this approach? Are there disadvantages?
Roskies: The advantage is the payoff to the scientific community - because new machines will soon enough be sunsetted, as determined by the pace of technological development. So if you can get machines early in their cycle, it means you can use them longer. The earlier you get it, the more science you can get done in the useful lifetime of that machine.
Levine: Also, you bring that capability to the scientific community earlier. You could, of course, wait to introduce any new system into the open research community until it's more mature. But we can get productive use out of this early period, which means it's producing science that much sooner. And it allows us to have more influence with the vendors for the course of development of the system and its application to the NSF research community. This has certainly been the case for our involvement with the XT3 at the Sandia stage.
Roskies: The disadvantage is that there's more work by our systems staff than if we simply waited until the bugs get worked out. The machine would be better understood and it would be less effort to make it available. Of course, we're a major force in making it better understood, so not only are we improving things for our own users, we're improving it for everybody else's XT3 users. Somebody would have to discover these bugs. You can't avoid them.
A benefit to PSC is the cumulative aggregation of knowledge and experience that our staff gain in the process of birthing new systems, over and over, with various vendors and architectures.
Page: 1 of 3(Digg, Technorati, more)
New Paper: Parallel Computing Without Parallel Programming
Learn how domain experts can run VHLL programs like MATLAB® on a variety of high-performance platforms without low-level reprogramming and how to work with the largest datasets and complex algorithms without sacrificing ease of use or reducing productivity.
Jul 09 | Engineer Live | The demand for computational tools to underpin the 3D seismic interpretation process has never been more apparent. Read more...
Jul 08 | EE Times | Unemployment for U.S. engineers has reached record levels, according to government figures. Read more...
Jul 08 | Network World | Global spending for 2009 projected to drop 6 percent, for a total of $3.2 trillion. Read more...
Jul 08 | Linux Magazine | Portability or efficiency? Neither is guaranteed when writing explicit parallel code. Read more...
Jul 07 | Ars Technica | Japanese company builds custom ASIC to accelerate real-time ray traced rendering for the auto industry. Read more...
Jul 10 | | Engineers, scientists, and other domain experts depend on the productivity enabled by very high-level language (VHLL) tools like MATLAB® and Python. However, as datasets grow larger and programs get more sophisticated, ordinary desktop computers can no longer keep up. The paper explores how to run VHLL programs on high-performance platforms without low-level reprogramming. Work with large datasets and complex algorithms without sacrificing ease of use or reducing productivity.
Apr 14 | | Many HPC IT departments are feeling the rising pressure to deliver more capacity computing and performance while trying to reduce the total cost of ownership. This white paper discusses how an environmentally-friendly and open-standards HPC building block based computing system using flexible interconnect options helps address capacity computing needs.
Source: Addison Snell, GM/VP, Tabor Research; sponsored by Dell
Many organizations that could benefit from the use of HPC clusters find that it is complicated to get the systems up and running because of limited IT resources or the complexities of the clusters themselves. Learn how the Intel Cluster Ready program, for which Dell was an original partner, seeks to address this challenge for entry level and mid-range HPC users.
BlueArc's Titan architecture represents an evolutionary step in file servers by creating a hardware-based file system that can scale bandwidth, IOPS, and overall data capacity well beyond conventional software-based devices. With its ability to virtualize a massive storage pool of up to four usable petabytes of tiered storage, Titan can scale with growing data requirements, offering a competitive advantage for businesses, researchers, or other enterprises seeking to better manage data growth while still ensuring optimal performance.
Sun Studio Compilers and Tools and Sun HPC ClusterTools allow you to create high performance parallel applications for OpenSolaris, Solaris and Linux. Sun Studio Express 11/08 includes MPI performance analysis capabilities and full OpenMP 3.0 compiler support. Learn about all this and the latest in Sun HPC ClusterTools 8.1.