The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
March 23, 2007
Meet the new HPC, where Productivity is our middle name. High Productivity Computing is not a whim; it is a new set of market dynamics that is more relevant to today's global economy. For a growing number of users and vendors, HPC refers not to cores, cycles, or flops but to discovery, efficiency, or time to market.
DARPA notably used the new P for the High Productivity Computing Systems (HPCS) program, stating that "value will be determined by assessing many additional factors beyond just theoretical peak flops." There is also a proliferation of vendors in the market now selling pieces of the HPC solution. Tabor Communications is not pushing the industry in a new direction; we are updating the definitions to head in the same direction the industry is already going.
It's not as if none of us cared about productivity before. Of course we did. Productivity has always been the main intended benefit of HPC, and we never suffered from abbreviation-induced heartburn. So why does P no longer stand for performance?
Performance (defined roughly as what the server could accomplish with a Utopian application load) and productivity (defined roughly as the advantage gained by the user) were at one time tightly correlated, such that an increase in raw performance would boost the speed of generating results. Thanks to a variety of immutable technical and market forces -- clustering, data explosion, and multi-core come to mind -- the correlation between raw performance and productivity has broken down.
Over time the industry has moved from uni-processor to SMP to distributed-memory clusters. Each step toward higher absolute performance has been taken at the cost of additional architectural intricacy. The newest challenge is the transition to dual-core, quad-core, and future higher-level multi-core chips. The introduction of a new level of complexity at the socket level drives another wedge in the gap between theoretical and realized performance. Most applications will not take full advantage of additional cores without changes to the codes themselves or to the productivity tools surrounding them.
We have reached a point where there are too may bottlenecks. On systems with the same processor counts and types, productivity can vary widely depending on the workload manager, file system, interconnect, or scheduler, just to name a few.
The challenge is not unique to HPC. It applies equally well to business computing and to PCs. This is both a comfort and a curse. It increases the odds that someone will develop compelling solutions for multi-core parallelism, but it decreases the odds that these solutions will be designed and built with HPC in mind.
All is not lost. There are technologies in development -- schedulers, workload managers, accelerators, tools -- that have promise in easing the multi-core productivity-performance gap. We need to give these technologies a fair chance in the market. We need constructs for analyzing the efficacy of these tools. As an industry, we need to measure and reward productivity, not performance.
Tabor Research has an inclusive view that defines High Productivity Computing as follows:
Page: 1 of 2High Productivity Computing (HPC) is the use of servers, clusters, and supercomputers -- plus associated operational components such as software tools, networks, storage subsystems, and services -- for scientific, engineering, or analytical tasks that are particularly intensive in computation, memory usage, or data management. HPC is used by scientists and engineers both in research and in production across industry, government, and academia. Within industry, HPC can frequently be distinguished from general business computing in that companies generally will use HPC applications to gain advantage in their core endeavors -- e.g., finding oil, designing automobile parts, or protecting clients' investments -- as opposed to non-core endeavors such as payroll management or resource planning.
(Digg, Technorati, more)
Appro Ready-To-Go-Clusters – Quickly deploy ANSYS & Intel Cluster Ready Solutions
Offering a fully integrated Ready-To-Go Cluster based on the Appro GreenBlade System supporting up to 28 blade nodes in a half-size standard rack cabinet, including master nodes and switches.
Feb 08 | eWeek | A new kind of Rocky Mountain high. Read more...
Feb 08 | Computerworld | Chip maker hopes to bring CPU-GPU processors to servers in two years. Read more...
Feb 05 | Technology Review | IBM has created graphene transistors that leave silicon ones in the dust. Read more...
Feb 04 | The Register | Intel will preview first 32nm Xeon chips on Monday. Read more...
Feb 03 | Linux Magazine | A couple of relatively new commodity solutions could make a huge impact in HPC. Read more...
Jan 12 | | In-depth look at vSMP Foundation server virtualization technology, technical implementation, use cases and capabilities. The technical whitepaper provides an architectural overview and details on the three vSMP Foundation products: vSMP Foundation for SMP, vSMP Foundation for Cluster and vSMP Foundation for Cloud.
Jan 18 | | This white paper discusses Gore’s copper cable assemblies, and how they continue to exceed the standards for providing reliable, cost-effective solutions for high-performance computer applications.
Jan 11 | | LLNL is home to some of the fastest computers in the world. In 2012, LLNL expects to have the Sequoia supercomputing cluster operational with a projected performance of over 20 PFLOP/s. These systems will focus on strengthening the foundations of predictive simulation through running large suites of complex simulations and then comparing model predictions with experimental data. To visualize this project’s large amount of data, LLNL requested an Appro Supercomputing Cluster specifically designed to support interactive data analysis.
Join this online panel discussion for live Q&A with leading industry experts, analysts, and end-users to discuss the latest innovations, best practices, barriers to implementation, and measurable benefits of server virtualization with a particular focus on today's real world solutions.
Learn about scalable fault-tolerant architectures and examples of energy efficient and scalable supercomputing clusters using dual QDR InfiniBand to combine capacity computing with network failover capabilities with the help of programming languages such as MPI and a robust Linux cluster management package.
LIVE@SCO9: The IBM team discusses new innovations in hardware, software and services that help clients better understand their workloads and get insight from their R&D efforts. Technology demonstrations include the soon-to-be-released Power7 HPC processor, the DCS990 system with 2.4 petabytes of storage, the xCAT management tool, secure HPC cloud computing and more. Winners of two HPCwire Readers' and Editors’ Choice Awards! Take the IBM virtual tour at SC09 or more information go online to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/deepcomputing/sc09.html