The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
March 07, 2008
John Lee, VP of Advanced Technology Solutions at Appro, sees the HPC space as a continuum with customers focused on reliable, cost effective, turnkey systems at one extreme, and engineering or scientific organizations focused solely on performance at the other end. Where does his company fit? According to Lee, closer to the turnkey end.
But turnkey doesn't mean small, or nontechnical. Appro has been in the news lately with some very high-profile wins: an aggregated 438 teraflop purchase at the three DOE weapons laboratories; a 95 teraflop system for the University of Tsukuba; and, this week, a 38 teraflop machine for the Renault Formula 1 racing team.
Appro's supercomputing system strategy is centered on its Xtreme-X Supercomputing Series. The Xtreme-X line, launched at SC07, is built on the idea of a Scalable Unit (SU), a concept that other HPC companies have incorporated into their lines. As Lee explains, "The idea of a Scalable Unit is to bring to supercomputing a Lego building block approach to assembling clusters." As with Legos, SUs are the basic building blocks of larger clusters. A single SU can hold up to 128 sockets of either quad-core Xeon, with the Xtreme-X1 system, or quad-core Opteron, with the Xtreme-X2, announced just last week. Multiple SUs are integrated to form a single system. When shipped, they arrive at the customer site integrated, pre-packaged, burned in, and ready to go.
The DOE tri-labs purchase announced last October took advantage of the SU concept; the initial procurement purchased 21 SUs to be incorporated into eight clusters. The largest of these, the 8 SU system, will have a 162 teraflop peak performance.
Appro says that building its systems out of standard, replicated units ensures it can install and integrate a new system rapidly, drawing upon the experiences of the identical SUs it has previously configured. This has been a real benefit for LLNL, one of Appro's regular customers. Brent Gorda, a system architect at LLNL, agrees, saying that the last cluster in their Peloton acquisition went from ship to customer handover in just 3 weeks. According to Gorda, Appro's service and system integration skills are very strong. "Appro is doing a better job than the tier 1 vendors would do for us," he says.
But as Appro CTO Jim Ballew explained in late 2007, the company's customers are looking for more than just rapid deployment. As the HPC market matures, customers want reliability, manageability and availability while maintaining good price/performance. This is a challenge that all HPC vendors face. Customers want to drive Cadillacs, but they want to pay for Toyotas. Appro hopes to navigate this cost/feature tension with specific design decisions in its system architecture and enhanced features in the Appro Cluster Engine (ACE), a software stack, currently in beta, that will be deployed in future systems, including Tsukuba and Renault.
As Ballew points out, the nodes in a system are inherently redundant (since there are many of them), but the network isn't. The Xtreme-X line addresses this problem by incorporating redundancy in both the management network (GigE) and data network (InfiniBand). Software has been added that allows the system to recover when one of a node's IB links fails with MPI messages already in flight. The system is able to retransmit the lost messages on the surviving link transparently to the application. Also, according to Lee, since the systems are built from more cost-effective 24-port switches rather than 288-port switches, reliability is made more affordable.
Reliability is a big motivator for the dual-rail data (and management) networks, but it isn't the primary motivator. According to Ballew, they included redundant InfiniBand networks for reliability and bandwidth, but the primary benefit is for better communication latency. Both IB channels can be used for transmit and receive, and ACE manages this by queuing messages to the shortest queue first.
"Although other systems support dual channel InfiniBand," says Ballew, "this doesn't normally help short packet performance. Traditional implementations use a primary channel for all communications, only using the second channel to sustain bandwidth on large messages."
Ballew also identifies disks as a frequent source of failures in large HPC systems, and typical system architectures that feature an operating system disk on each node can lead not only to reliability issues when individual disks fail, but also to management overhead as multiple copies of the operating system have to be maintained throughout the system.
Page: 1 of 2(Digg, Technorati, more)
Jul 09 | Engineer Live | The demand for computational tools to underpin the 3D seismic interpretation process has never been more apparent. Read more...
Jul 08 | EE Times | Unemployment for U.S. engineers has reached record levels, according to government figures. Read more...
Jul 08 | Network World | Global spending for 2009 projected to drop 6 percent, for a total of $3.2 trillion. Read more...
Jul 08 | Linux Magazine | Portability or efficiency? Neither is guaranteed when writing explicit parallel code. Read more...
Jul 07 | Ars Technica | Japanese company builds custom ASIC to accelerate real-time ray traced rendering for the auto industry. Read more...
Apr 14 | | Many HPC IT departments are feeling the rising pressure to deliver more capacity computing and performance while trying to reduce the total cost of ownership. This white paper discusses how an environmentally-friendly and open-standards HPC building block based computing system using flexible interconnect options helps address capacity computing needs.
Source: Addison Snell, GM/VP, Tabor Research; sponsored by Dell
Many organizations that could benefit from the use of HPC clusters find that it is complicated to get the systems up and running because of limited IT resources or the complexities of the clusters themselves. Learn how the Intel Cluster Ready program, for which Dell was an original partner, seeks to address this challenge for entry level and mid-range HPC users.
BlueArc's Titan architecture represents an evolutionary step in file servers by creating a hardware-based file system that can scale bandwidth, IOPS, and overall data capacity well beyond conventional software-based devices. With its ability to virtualize a massive storage pool of up to four usable petabytes of tiered storage, Titan can scale with growing data requirements, offering a competitive advantage for businesses, researchers, or other enterprises seeking to better manage data growth while still ensuring optimal performance.
Sun Studio Compilers and Tools and Sun HPC ClusterTools allow you to create high performance parallel applications for OpenSolaris, Solaris and Linux. Sun Studio Express 11/08 includes MPI performance analysis capabilities and full OpenMP 3.0 compiler support. Learn about all this and the latest in Sun HPC ClusterTools 8.1.