The Leading Source for Global News and Information Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing
March 14, 2008
Image processing appears in numerous application domains, including video transcoding, medicine, mapping, inspection, photography, and document processing. Due to the proliferation of image sensors and high-resolution displays, digital image processing is a staple on everything from cell phones to supercomputers.
However, whatever the hardware platform, the performance of image processing applications can significantly affect their usefulness and the user experience. Multi-core processors and many-core accelerators offer many new opportunities for radically improved performance in the area of digital imaging. Achieving maximum performance on these processors, however, requires a parallel implementation and, due to the large amount of data processed, efficient use of the memory system. In this article, we will consider a range of digital image processing applications and will discuss how they can be efficiently implemented on multi-core processors using a pattern-based approach and the use of a development platform that can translate these patterns directly into machine language.
High performance image processing has been a key enabler for many new products. Computation can be used to overcome noise limitations for handheld cameras (enabling the use of a less expensive sensor), can be used to achieve high compression rates (enabling video to be used over low bandwidth network connections), or can be used to extract metadata from images (enabling them to be indexed in a database). In fact, the use of image processing has been used to correct for diffraction effects in optical lithography masks, enabling the electronic industry itself to produce the extremely dense multi-core processors we are addressing here!
Image processing is also extremely important in the consumer space. In particular, image processing can be used to dramatically extend the capabilities of handheld photography. It can be used to reduce noise, allowing low-light photography; to create panoramas by registering and blending multiple images; to create high-dynamic range images by combining multiple exposures; to automatically focus on faces and to compensate for vibration; and to dramatically improve shots taken using natural lighting by combining them with more detailed images taken with a flash.
The keys to performance are the exploitation of parallelism and data locality. Fortunately, many image processing algorithms are based on a relatively small number of patterns of computation. Each of these patterns has a certain amount of latent parallelism and data locality. Since different processors have different mechanisms for expressing parallelism and data locality, different optimizations may be required on different systems. However, a software development platform can still exploit these patterns if image processing algorithms are expressed in terms of them. Such an approach can significantly reduce implementation complexity and costs.
Image processing algorithms can basically be classified into the map, stencil, spectral, and segmented computational patterns:
It should be noted that these are patterns, not library functions. Patterns are more about how data is accessed and managed and how tasks are applied to that data rather than about particular computations. Many possible computations can be implemented under every pattern, and image processing applications often involve a complex composition of these patterns.
The number of patterns required is surprisingly small. However, even the simplest pattern does require some processor-specific optimizations for maximum performance. Consider the map pattern. Even this "trivial" parallel pattern can benefit from blocking up operations and using these blocks to perform loop unrolling and vectorization, as well as the use of cache management strategies such as alignment, prefetching, and double buffering. Since operations may be composed, the per-element operation used in the map pattern may become arbitrarily complex, and in particular may not take a constant amount of time to execute. In this case load balancing is also required.
Other patterns require more complex optimizations. For example, in order to implement the stencil pattern effectively, data read into the processor's on-chip memory for one stencil's neighborhood should be reused, whenever possible, in other computations for which it is needed. One useful implementation strategy on a serial machine is a sliding window. On a parallel machine, tiled sliding windows can be used, but their geometry should be chosen to avoid false sharing and other negative cache effects while achieving load balancing and good alignment. When multiple opportunities for exploiting parallelism are available in the hardware, implementing high-performance versions of even these seemingly simple patterns using traditional low-level approaches can result in very complex and error-prone code.
One approach is to use a framework that embodies these patterns and allows their composition. While a framework makes it easy to write sophisticated applications quickly, it does not provide the ultimate in performance since typically only limited amounts of low-level optimization can be performed automatically. This is because a framework is "on top" of machine language implemented using a traditional compiled serial language. The framework does not have access to the finer grained versions of parallelism that only a system directly manipulating machine language can target. Conversely, with a framework the compiler sees only the serial code used to implement the framework and not the parallelism intrinsic to the pattern. A framework can also add significant amounts of overhead, depending on its implementation.
Page: 1 of 2(Digg, Technorati, more)
New Paper: Parallel Computing Without Parallel Programming
Learn how domain experts can run VHLL programs like MATLAB® on a variety of high-performance platforms without low-level reprogramming and how to work with the largest datasets and complex algorithms without sacrificing ease of use or reducing productivity.
Jul 09 | Engineer Live | The demand for computational tools to underpin the 3D seismic interpretation process has never been more apparent. Read more...
Jul 08 | EE Times | Unemployment for U.S. engineers has reached record levels, according to government figures. Read more...
Jul 08 | Network World | Global spending for 2009 projected to drop 6 percent, for a total of $3.2 trillion. Read more...
Jul 08 | Linux Magazine | Portability or efficiency? Neither is guaranteed when writing explicit parallel code. Read more...
Jul 07 | Ars Technica | Japanese company builds custom ASIC to accelerate real-time ray traced rendering for the auto industry. Read more...
Jul 10 | | Engineers, scientists, and other domain experts depend on the productivity enabled by very high-level language (VHLL) tools like MATLAB® and Python. However, as datasets grow larger and programs get more sophisticated, ordinary desktop computers can no longer keep up. The paper explores how to run VHLL programs on high-performance platforms without low-level reprogramming. Work with large datasets and complex algorithms without sacrificing ease of use or reducing productivity.
Apr 14 | | Many HPC IT departments are feeling the rising pressure to deliver more capacity computing and performance while trying to reduce the total cost of ownership. This white paper discusses how an environmentally-friendly and open-standards HPC building block based computing system using flexible interconnect options helps address capacity computing needs.
Source: Addison Snell, GM/VP, Tabor Research; sponsored by Dell
Many organizations that could benefit from the use of HPC clusters find that it is complicated to get the systems up and running because of limited IT resources or the complexities of the clusters themselves. Learn how the Intel Cluster Ready program, for which Dell was an original partner, seeks to address this challenge for entry level and mid-range HPC users.
BlueArc's Titan architecture represents an evolutionary step in file servers by creating a hardware-based file system that can scale bandwidth, IOPS, and overall data capacity well beyond conventional software-based devices. With its ability to virtualize a massive storage pool of up to four usable petabytes of tiered storage, Titan can scale with growing data requirements, offering a competitive advantage for businesses, researchers, or other enterprises seeking to better manage data growth while still ensuring optimal performance.
Sun Studio Compilers and Tools and Sun HPC ClusterTools allow you to create high performance parallel applications for OpenSolaris, Solaris and Linux. Sun Studio Express 11/08 includes MPI performance analysis capabilities and full OpenMP 3.0 compiler support. Learn about all this and the latest in Sun HPC ClusterTools 8.1.