Aspen
NCSA
HPCwire

Since 1986 - Covering the Fastest Computers
in the World and the People Who Run Them

Language Flags

Visit additional Tabor Communication Publications

Datanami
Digital Manufacturing Report
HPC in the Cloud
Green Computing Report

Tabor Communications
Corporate Video

National LambdaRail President Explains Research Focus


I have been asked: Why is National LamdbaRail (NLR) focusing so much on facilitating network research and "big" science applications as its core mission? Is it not as important to give equal or greater attention to the networking needs of the broader research and education (R&E) community?

In answering these questions, permit me to draw a comparison to the historical development and evolution of the great cities around the world.

When investing in real estate today, you are told that the principle focus should be on Location! Location! Location! The root of this principle is evident in the development and evolution of the major cities and regions around the globe. In most instances, the selection of the location for each of these cities was based on such strategic factors as: safety and security; access to basic necessities and resources; transportation; and, the potential to develop commerce. As each city's core developed and prospered, the community grew and expanded geographically. Over time, each great city not only evolves, but also periodically reinvents its core in order to stay vibrant and respond to the changing needs of the society. The cycle, never ending, continues to repeat itself as new needs drive evolutions.

From my perspective, the development and evolution of networking in our R&E community has followed a similar cyclic path over the past four decades with the start of each cycle focused on Research! Research! Research!

In the late 60s, the revolutionary developments in packet networks and related technologies came from university researchers. Combined with DARPA's funding and deployment of the ARPAnet, these innovations created the initial core technologies and seminal implementation for the Internet. From that era forward, both research inventions and the specific needs of the researchers have been the core drivers for the major advances in networking for the general R&E community as well as for society at large.

Inspired by the pioneering researcher-driven development of APRAnet, the beginning network needs of the broader university and lab community were addressed by a major expansion and evolution of the ARPAnet and by the implementations of BITNET and CSnet. Together these efforts were able to bring much larger numbers of institutions online enabling broad use by researchers, educators, students and even administrators. By leveraging additional platforms (in BITNET's case via what were often institutional IBM mainframes reconfigured by computer center folks to enable a few forms of network capabilities) and funding sources, these much larger numbers established fertile ground for creating and deriving the benefits of what Metcalf came to call "network effects."

In the late-1980s, the cycle renewed itself with the research community-driven convergence on the increasingly evolved core Internet protocols of the ARPAnet. Our research community created related usable network capabilities and applications like broadly usable email, ftp and listserv. And, to meet the growing needs of researchers, the use of networks in R&E became a key driver in the creation and rapid expansion, evolution and extension of the Internet protocol-based networks such as NSFnet, ESnet and DREN. As a companion to and major enabler of the NSFnet, regional research and education networks (the NSF Regionals) were developed as the most powerful means for extending the reach of, democratizing access to, and sustaining R&E networks by explicitly recognizing and addressing the diverse geographical and demographic realties of networks.

Advanced networking for the researchers and our larger R&E community suffered a serious setback in the early 1990's when NSFnet became a victim of its own success and was 'privatized' and the program discontinued. This came during a cycle in which many of the regional R&E networks and research community-based Internet providers were spun off, and either became or were sold off to the emerging commercial ISP's. While this helped enable the worldwide Internet revolution, it unfortunately left most of the R&E community without either a voice in (let alone control over) network capabilities and services, or direct access to innovating with (or configuring around) underlying network technology. The good news was that "our" Internet had become pervasive. The bad news was that we had lost nearly all control and were reduced to buying one-size-fits-all capabilities that were being evolved for mass market rather than research, education and clinical needs. And our network researchers had lost the ability to do network and network-based research and to innovate in those areas in big ways.

With the discontinuation of the NSFnet, the NSF sought to address the high-end advanced networking infrastructure needs and opportunities of the researchers with support for the vBNS program. This initiative, combined with the CoREN and other activities of the surviving Regionals, sustained the continuing regionals and stimulated their and other regional group's evolution into GigaPops. The GigaPops, in turn, worked for the creation of UCAID (the corporate entity underlying Internet2) and the development of the Abilene Network in a partnership with Qwest and Nortel. With this new cycle, our community enabled the formation of a state-of-the-commercial-art, packet-over-SONET shared layer 3 service and the ability to control bandwidth and topology. During this period, state/regional networks and GigaPops grew and developed rapidly to meet the burgeoning educational needs throughout the community.

Shortly after the beginning of this century, three new drivers emerged that called for a major leap forward in advanced networking to meet the needs of the researchers in the community and the community at large. These included:

Need One: More and more manageable bandwidth for "big" or specialized applications' research

  • High-end science needs terabits and petabytes

  • Predictable quality interconnect

  • Immersive (i.e. often high-resolution and low latency) presence

  • Deterministic control loops

  • Bit rate of reality-10 gigabits soon to be 40 gigabits, but more importantly given the realities of the instruments and cluster computers and storage systems many parallel 10 gigabits

Need Two: Breakable and researcher-controlled networks including waves for network research

  • New protocols

  • New devices

  • New architectures

Need Three: Underlying owned fiber

  • Ensuring that the limitations on what our communities can pursue are based on what we can imagine and afford, rather than what services telecommunications companies are willing to sell us and the conditions under which they are willing to sell them

  • Enabling partnering in truly new optical domains

  • Keeping prices from providers low

The result, National LambdaRail (NLR), has been the implementation of a fully operational national networking physical infrastructure based upon owned and lit fiber. This fiber is linked with multiple Regional Optical Network (RON) physical infrastructures that are RON-owned. By enabling the implementation of multiple networks, both experimental and production, to facilitate technology innovation, discovery and sharing of new knowledge, this new networking collaboratory is providing for the concurrent advancement of:

  • Network research;

  • Next generation network-based research applications in science, engineering, medicine and other disciplines; and,

  • Education program delivery at all levels -- K through 20.

By focusing on facilitating Research! Research! Research!, NLR, in partnership with the RONs, continues the network innovation cycle and ensures that all the participants in the research and education community reap the benefits of big, fast, customizable networks. The reality is that researchers are the innovators -- the folks who think big and drive myriad ways to create the networks of the future today. We in the R&E community can effectively learn from them and extend and recreate these innovative networks for universities, labs, the greater educational community as well as our society at large.

The cycle continues. What are the next drivers? Let's all learn together by serving and studying Research! Research! Research!

-----

Tom West is President and Chief Executive Officer of National LambdaRail, a major initiative of U.S. research universities and private sector technology companies to provide a national scale infrastructure for research and experimentation in networking technologies and applications. Over the years, West has served as an advisor and consultant to a number of higher education institutions and systems, private corporations and state governments. West has been actively involved in national research and education networking in the United States for nearly two decades.

Sponsored Links

Accelerate your science with Seneca
One of the first HPC providers installing a 4X NVIDIA Kepler K-20 cluster. Invites you to a free evaluation on Seneca’s NVIDIA K20 Kepler cluster, pre-loaded with AMBER, NAMD, LAMMPS

Webinar: Programming Heterogeneous X64+GPU Systems Using OpenACC
Join Michael Wolfe as he compares the advantages and costs of using both low-level models and the directive-based OpenACC model for programming accelerated heterogeneous systems. Registration is free.

High-Performance Computing in Action
Businesses that want to be on the cutting edge of their industries are increasingly turning to high-performance computing (HPC) solutions to handle complex compute processes and speed up their rate of innovation. Download this Executive Brief to see how businesses in energy, life sciences and entertainment put HPC solutions to work in their operations.

May 22, 2013

May 21, 2013

May 20, 2013

May 17, 2013

May 16, 2013

May 15, 2013

May 14, 2013

May 13, 2013

May 10, 2013

May 09, 2013


Most Read Features

Most Read Around the Web

Most Read This Just In

Supermicro

Short Takes

Building Supercomputers with Raspberries

May 22, 2013 | At some point in the not-too-distant future, building powerful, miniature computing systems will be considered a hobby for high schoolers, just as robotics or even Lego-building are today. That could be made possible through recent advancements made with the Raspberry Pi computers.
Read more...

Running Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Cloud

May 16, 2013 | When it comes to cloud, long distances mean unacceptably high latencies. Researchers from the University of Bonn in Germany examined those latency issues of doing CFD modeling in the cloud by utilizing a common CFD and its utilization in HPC instance types including both CPU and GPU cores of Amazon EC2.
Read more...

Computing the Physics of Bubbles

May 15, 2013 | Supercomputers at the Department of Energy’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) have worked on important computational problems such as collapse of the atomic state, the optimization of chemical catalysts, and now modeling popping bubbles.
Read more...

Internet2 Awards Program Seeks Innovative Applications

May 10, 2013 | Program provides cash awards up to $10,000 for the best open-source end-user applications deployed on 100G network.
Read more...

Floating Funding to Exascale Island

May 09, 2013 | The Japanese government has revealed its plans to best its previous K Computer efforts with what they hope will be the first exascale system...
Read more...

Sponsored Whitepapers

Best Practices in Big Data Storage

05/10/2013 | Cleversafe, Cray, DDN, NetApp, & Panasas | From Wall Street to Hollywood, drug discovery to homeland security, companies and organizations of all sizes and stripes are coming face to face with the challenges – and opportunities – afforded by Big Data. Before anyone can utilize these extraordinary data repositories, however, they must first harness and manage their data stores, and do so utilizing technologies that underscore affordability, security, and scalability.

Progress in Parallel: the Bull Parallel Programming Center

04/15/2013 | Bull | “50% of HPC users say their largest jobs scale to 120 cores or less.” How about yours? Are your codes ready to take advantage of today’s and tomorrow’s ultra-parallel HPC systems? Download this White Paper by Analysts Intersect360 Research to see what Bull and Intel’s Center for Excellence in Parallel Programming can do for your codes.

Sponsored Multimedia

SGI DMF ZeroWatt Disk Solution

In this demonstration of SGI DMF ZeroWatt disk solution, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, SGI CTO, discusses a function of SGI DMF software to reduce costs and power consumption in an exascale (Big Data) storage datacenter.

Cray CS300-AC Cluster Supercomputer Air Cooling Technology Video

The Cray CS300-AC cluster supercomputer offers energy efficient, air-cooled design based on modular, industry-standard platforms featuring the latest processor and network technologies and a wide range of datacenter cooling requirements.

SC12 Editorial Feature HPCwire Soundbite sponsored by ISC

HPC Job Bank


Featured Events


  • June 16, 2013 - June 20, 2013
    ISC'13
    Leipzig,
    Germany

  • June 17, 2013 - June 18, 2013
    Forecast 2013
    San Francisco, CA
    United States





HPCwire Events