Visit additional Tabor Communication Publications
August 03, 2007
There seems to be more talk these days about how parallel computing is changing the IT universe. Maybe this is just the result of people reflecting each other, making it look like everyone came to the same conclusion simultaneously. I've encountered enough of that not to dismiss it as a possibility. In this case though, I think there is an intersection of thought on the emergence of parallel computing that goes beyond people just hopping on the multicore bandwagon.
At least we appear to be entering the acceptance stage of parallel computing. The community has spent enough time in the denial, anger, bargaining, and depression phases. I guess this implies we were in the grieving process. But what was all the grieving about anyway? The loss of sequential processing? In retrospect, it seems like an unfortunate waste of time.
What is really encouraging is that virtually all of the big IT vendors are embracing parallel computing. There even appears to be a general consensus on where this revolution is taking us.
At the Microsoft's Financial Analyst meeting last week, Craig Mundie presented his vision of how computing is evolving away from the traditional desktop system. Mundie, the Chief Research & Strategy Officer at Microsoft, admitted that the PCs most everyone uses today are not all that productive and that this is inevitably going to change. Considering that Microsoft made its fortune on the desktop, this was a candid admission that the company is prepared to undertake some radical changes. It also gives notice to the myriad computing vendors who live in the Microsoft ecosystem that they must be prepared to do the same.
Mundie proposed that the rise of multicore processors and more powerful communication technologies will end applications as we know them and spawn a new computing paradigm. Essentially the traditional desktop will be pulled apart by client computing (mobile devices, thin client desktops, embedded computing devices) and cloud (utility) computing. Exactly where this split occurs is subject to some controversy, and Mundie offered little guidance on where the balance will be achieved.
In any case, because serial computing is not able to take advantage of multicore/multiprocessor architectures, single-threaded applications will no longer dominate the computing landscape. It's not that word processing and spreadsheet programs will disappear, they will just cease to be recognizable as such. Those kinds of functions will be incorporated into intelligent agents that act more like people. These adaptive, context-aware applications will require much more computing power than is available on a processor with just a handful of cores. Said Mundie:
[A]s the microprocessor has grown dramatically in capability, as has the whole system, the concept of the app hasn't fundamentally changed that much. And so the question that looms in my mind for Microsoft and ultimately for the industry is: What are those future applications and what might they look like? And in fact, can we move to use all of the power that's there -- not just to make them responsive to a new class of demand from you, but ultimately to do things for you that are more like what people who help you do for you?
This new application profile sounds similar to that represented by Intel's recognition, mining, and synthesis (RMS) applications, which I've written about before. Like Microsoft, Intel is predicting these new applications will start to really take hold in the next five to ten years. Perhaps not coincidentally, this dovetails nicely with Intel's other plans to deliver terascale processors and on-chip optical communications in this same general timeframe.
The world described by Mundie points to a future where HPC and traditional computing have pretty much merged. Heterogenous and highly parallel processors will be standard issue microprocessors, he says. This heterogeneity will exist to enable fine-tuning for various types of computing workloads. If I didn't know better I might think I was reading a Cray briefing on its Adaptive Computing strategy. Since Mundie himself came from a supercomputing background (co-founding Alliant Computer Systems in 1982), he should be well aware of the implications of these new technologies. Explained Mundie:
[T]he world is going to move more and more away from one CPU that is multiplexed to do everything, to many CPUs, and perhaps specialty CPUs. This is not the world that the programmers target today. This kind of complexity was historically reserved only for the wizards who wrote the core operating system; or, in the world of supercomputing in science and engineering, people who had the ultimate requirement for computational performance built big machines like this and have used them to solve some of the world's tough computational problems. That was always a niche part of the industry.
As if to prove his point, at the same time Mundie was offering his vision of the future of computing, AMD was busy filling in some of the details. At AMD's 2007 Technology Analyst Day last week, execs provided a glimpse into the company's two-year technology roadmap.
AMD is on schedule to ship its first 65nm "Barcelona" quad-core processors this month and a 45nm version named "Shanghai" in mid-2008. By 2009, the company intends to deliver octal-core processors, code-named "Sandtiger." Also in 2009, AMD is planning to release its first heterogeneous processor, a CPU-GPU hybrid, called "Falcon." It will consist of five cores: four CPUs and a single GPU.
To help ease the transition to parallel computing, AMD will deliver hardware extensions for software parallelization, called xSP. Through an open specification development process, xSP will allow software developers to access the capabilities of multicore processors. These extensions will enable acceleration for software transactional memory, accelerated cross-core communication, fast context switching for light-weight parallelism, and light-weight profiling. AMD also announced plans to deliver instruction set extensions to accelerate performance for compute-intensive workloads, including high performance computing, multimedia applications and security.
When Microsoft, Intel, AMD and Cray all seem to be heading in the same direction, it means something. And, of course, they're not the only ones. IBM, Sun, HP, SGI and many others are also pushing the parallel computing front forward. The hand-wringing and hyperventilation seems to be coming to a close. In ten years, we'll wonder what all the fuss was about.
As always, comments about HPCwire are welcomed and encouraged. Write to me, Michael Feldman, at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Posted by Michael Feldman - August 02, 2007 @ 9:00 PM, Pacific Daylight Time
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
No Recent Blog Comments
The Xeon Phi coprocessor might be the new kid on the high performance block, but out of all first-rate kickers of the Intel tires, the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) got the first real jab with its new top ten Stampede system.We talk with the center's Karl Schultz about the challenges of programming for Phi--but more specifically, the optimization...
Although Horst Simon was named Deputy Director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, he maintains his strong ties to the scientific computing community as an editor of the TOP500 list and as an invited speaker at conferences.
Supercomputing veteran, Bo Ewald, has been neck-deep in bleeding edge system development since his twelve-year stint at Cray Research back in the mid-1980s, which was followed by his tenure at large organizations like SGI and startups, including Scale Eight Corporation and Linux Networx. He has put his weight behind quantum company....
May 16, 2013 |
When it comes to cloud, long distances mean unacceptably high latencies. Researchers from the University of Bonn in Germany examined those latency issues of doing CFD modeling in the cloud by utilizing a common CFD and its utilization in HPC instance types including both CPU and GPU cores of Amazon EC2.
May 15, 2013 |
Supercomputers at the Department of Energy’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) have worked on important computational problems such as collapse of the atomic state, the optimization of chemical catalysts, and now modeling popping bubbles.
May 10, 2013 |
Program provides cash awards up to $10,000 for the best open-source end-user applications deployed on 100G network.
May 09, 2013 |
The Japanese government has revealed its plans to best its previous K Computer efforts with what they hope will be the first exascale system...
May 08, 2013 |
For engineers looking to leverage high-performance computing, the accessibility of a cloud-based approach is a powerful draw, but there are costs that may not be readily apparent.
05/10/2013 | Cleversafe, Cray, DDN, NetApp, & Panasas | From Wall Street to Hollywood, drug discovery to homeland security, companies and organizations of all sizes and stripes are coming face to face with the challenges – and opportunities – afforded by Big Data. Before anyone can utilize these extraordinary data repositories, however, they must first harness and manage their data stores, and do so utilizing technologies that underscore affordability, security, and scalability.
04/15/2013 | Bull | “50% of HPC users say their largest jobs scale to 120 cores or less.” How about yours? Are your codes ready to take advantage of today’s and tomorrow’s ultra-parallel HPC systems? Download this White Paper by Analysts Intersect360 Research to see what Bull and Intel’s Center for Excellence in Parallel Programming can do for your codes.
In this demonstration of SGI DMF ZeroWatt disk solution, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, SGI CTO, discusses a function of SGI DMF software to reduce costs and power consumption in an exascale (Big Data) storage datacenter.
The Cray CS300-AC cluster supercomputer offers energy efficient, air-cooled design based on modular, industry-standard platforms featuring the latest processor and network technologies and a wide range of datacenter cooling requirements.