From the Editor | Main Blog Index
August 10, 2009
Ian Foster penned an interesting blog last week comparing the utility of a supercomputer to that of public cloud for HPC applications. Foster pointed out that while the typical supercomputer might be much faster than a generic cloud environment, the turnaround time might actually be much better for the cloud. He argues that "the relevant metric is not execution time but elapsed time from submission to the completion of execution."
Foster's premise is that the users must wait a significant amount of time for their job to run on a typical supercomputer, while the wait time for a cloud is usually much less. He writes:
For example, let's say we want to run the LU benchmark, which (based on the numbers in Ed's paper) when run on 32 processors takes ~25 secs on the supercomputer and ~100 secs on EC2. Now let's add in queue and startup time:
On EC2, I am told that it may take ~5 minutes to start 32 nodes (depending on image size), so with high probability we will finish the LU benchmark within 100 + 300 = 400 secs.
On the supercomputer, we can use Rich Wolksi's QBETS queue time estimation service to get a bound on the queue time. When I tried this in June, QBETS told me that if I wanted 32 nodes for 20 seconds, the probability of me getting those nodes within 400 secs was only 34%--not good odds.
So, based on the QBETS predictions, if I had to put money on which system my application would finish first, I would have to go for EC2.
This seems especially relevant in the case of shorter HPC jobs. In the example above, the time spent waiting for the system is the dominant metric for both the supercomputer and the cloud. But since the cloud is built for accessibility, it has the advantage over an HPC machine, which is built for raw speed. It's probably safe to say that, in general, the faster the supercomputer, the greater its demand will be, and thus the longer the wait time. If true, the purpose-built supercomputer may only be competitive for longer-running HPC jobs.
From the user's point of view, the key is to be able to estimate service times prior to selecting a platform. Ideally, you would like to be able to negotiate a service level agreement (SLA) dynamically with all potential providers, including your neighborhood supercomputer, at various price points. Right now, of course, this is science fiction. There are currently no standards in place to auto-negotiate SLAs across providers. But it's not too hard to imagine why such a feature would be a great thing for the cloud computing biz.
Posted by Michael Feldman - August 10, 2009 @ 4:10 PM, Pacific Daylight Time
![]()
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
No Recent Blog Comments
Large-scale, worldwide scientific initiatives rely on some cloud-based system to both coordinate efforts and manage computational efforts at peak times that cannot be contained within the combined in-house HPC resources. Last week at Google I/O, Brookhaven National Lab’s Sergey Panitkin discussed the role of the Google Compute Engine in providing computational support to ATLAS, a detector of high-energy particles at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
Read more...
The Xeon Phi coprocessor might be the new kid on the high performance block, but out of all first-rate kickers of the Intel tires, the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) got the first real jab with its new top ten Stampede system.We talk with the center's Karl Schultz about the challenges of programming for Phi--but more specifically, the optimization...
Read more...
Although Horst Simon was named Deputy Director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, he maintains his strong ties to the scientific computing community as an editor of the TOP500 list and as an invited speaker at conferences.
Read more...
May 16, 2013 |
When it comes to cloud, long distances mean unacceptably high latencies. Researchers from the University of Bonn in Germany examined those latency issues of doing CFD modeling in the cloud by utilizing a common CFD and its utilization in HPC instance types including both CPU and GPU cores of Amazon EC2.
Read more...
May 15, 2013 |
Supercomputers at the Department of Energy’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) have worked on important computational problems such as collapse of the atomic state, the optimization of chemical catalysts, and now modeling popping bubbles.
Read more...
May 10, 2013 |
Program provides cash awards up to $10,000 for the best open-source end-user applications deployed on 100G network.
Read more...
May 09, 2013 |
The Japanese government has revealed its plans to best its previous K Computer efforts with what they hope will be the first exascale system...
Read more...
May 08, 2013 |
For engineers looking to leverage high-performance computing, the accessibility of a cloud-based approach is a powerful draw, but there are costs that may not be readily apparent.
Read more...
05/10/2013 | Cleversafe, Cray, DDN, NetApp, & Panasas | From Wall Street to Hollywood, drug discovery to homeland security, companies and organizations of all sizes and stripes are coming face to face with the challenges – and opportunities – afforded by Big Data. Before anyone can utilize these extraordinary data repositories, however, they must first harness and manage their data stores, and do so utilizing technologies that underscore affordability, security, and scalability.
04/15/2013 | Bull | “50% of HPC users say their largest jobs scale to 120 cores or less.” How about yours? Are your codes ready to take advantage of today’s and tomorrow’s ultra-parallel HPC systems? Download this White Paper by Analysts Intersect360 Research to see what Bull and Intel’s Center for Excellence in Parallel Programming can do for your codes.
In this demonstration of SGI DMF ZeroWatt disk solution, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, SGI CTO, discusses a function of SGI DMF software to reduce costs and power consumption in an exascale (Big Data) storage datacenter.
The Cray CS300-AC cluster supercomputer offers energy efficient, air-cooled design based on modular, industry-standard platforms featuring the latest processor and network technologies and a wide range of datacenter cooling requirements.