Visit additional Tabor Communication Publications
August 20, 2009
I was more than a bit surprised to learn on Thursday morning that RapidMind had been acquired by Intel. Surprised not so much because it happened -- 2009 has been a frenzy of acquisition activity -- but because neither Intel nor RapidMind saw fit to issue a press release about the buyout. A statement on RapidMind's Web site delivered the news as follows:
We are now part of Intel Corporation, the leader in software development tools for software parallelism and performance. This change is a great development for our customers and for easing the effort in parallel programming. With Intel, our shared vision for enabling parallelism will lead to strengthening our software developer tools for multicore and manycore processors and accelerators. Later this year, we will provide more details about the integration of the RapidMind platform and Intel software products and technologies, including the Intel Ct technology for data parallelism.
We continue to sell the RapidMind platform and we encourage you to contact us to explore your interest in solutions for software parallelism. We respect and strive to preserve and expand the investments our customers have made in our products. You are encouraged to visit the Intel Developer Forum in September 2009 to hear more about Intel software developer tools.
Please sign-up for the Intel data parallel newsletter at www.intel.com/software/data_parallel to get information direct from us.
After PeakStream was acquired by Google in 2007, RapidMind remained as the only software provider for a hardware-independent multicore development platform aimed at HPC workloads. The obvious question that now arises is if RapidMind's platform will remain neutral as far as hardware (i.e., vendor) support. The last time I looked, the RapidMind platform included support for Intel CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs, AMD (both CPUs and GPUs), and the IBM Cell processor. Since Intel has little interest in adding value to other peoples' silicon, it's a little worrisome to see RapidMind's software get swallowed like this.
The good news is that the RapidMind technology is getting funneled into Intel's software group, which does maintain a degree of vendor neutrality. For example, its compiler and library products support both Intel and AMD x86 architectures. Also, because Intel's Threading Building Blocks (TBB) is open source, support for PowerPC and SPARC architectures is now available for that technology.
According to a blog post by Intel multicore software evangelist James Reinders (hat tip to John West at insideHPC for the pointer), the company is "continuing to sell and support Rapidmind products." The plan, apparently, is to mind-meld the RapidMind technology with Intel's parallel software products and the upcoming Ct offering.
Ct (C/C++ for throughput computing) is Intel's new computer language aimed at making data parallel programming accessible to average programmers. However, Ct is not intended to support standard GPU architectures (but is tailor-made to support Intel's upcoming Larrabee architecture). And since none of Intel's other software products support NVIDIA or ATI (AMD) technology, it wouldn't be surprising to see RapidMind's GPU support fall by the wayside. This may not be a huge tragedy in itself. As far as I can tell, the RapidMind platform has little market penetration today, and for GPU programming, most high-level implementations are being built on top of CUDA and OpenCL.
Because Ct is being backed by the world's largest chipmaker, it stands to have a much brighter future than RapidMind probably could have attained on its own. In any case, we'll have a better idea of what Intel has in mind fairly soon. Reinders says Ct is on track for a beta release before the end of 2009, with the integration of RapidMind technology set to be deployed in phases shortly thereafter.
Posted by Michael Feldman - August 20, 2009 @ 6:29 PM, Pacific Daylight Time
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
No Recent Blog Comments
In quieter times, sounding the bell of funding big science with big systems tends to resonate further than when ears are already burning with sour economic and national security news. For exascale's future, however, the time could be ripe to instill some sense of urgency....
In a recent solicitation, the NSF laid out needs for furthering its scientific and engineering infrastructure with new tools to go beyond top performance, Having already delivered systems like Stampede and Blue Waters, they're turning an eye to solving data-intensive challenges. We spoke with the agency's Irene Qualters and Barry Schneider about..
Large-scale, worldwide scientific initiatives rely on some cloud-based system to both coordinate efforts and manage computational efforts at peak times that cannot be contained within the combined in-house HPC resources. Last week at Google I/O, Brookhaven National Lab’s Sergey Panitkin discussed the role of the Google Compute Engine in providing computational support to ATLAS, a detector of high-energy particles at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
May 23, 2013 |
The study of climate change is one of those scientific problems where it is almost essential to model the entire Earth to attain accurate results and make worthwhile predictions. In an attempt to make climate science more accessible to smaller research facilities, NASA introduced what they call ‘Climate in a Box,’ a system they note acts as a desktop supercomputer.
May 22, 2013 |
At some point in the not-too-distant future, building powerful, miniature computing systems will be considered a hobby for high schoolers, just as robotics or even Lego-building are today. That could be made possible through recent advancements made with the Raspberry Pi computers.
May 16, 2013 |
When it comes to cloud, long distances mean unacceptably high latencies. Researchers from the University of Bonn in Germany examined those latency issues of doing CFD modeling in the cloud by utilizing a common CFD and its utilization in HPC instance types including both CPU and GPU cores of Amazon EC2.
May 15, 2013 |
Supercomputers at the Department of Energy’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) have worked on important computational problems such as collapse of the atomic state, the optimization of chemical catalysts, and now modeling popping bubbles.
05/10/2013 | Cleversafe, Cray, DDN, NetApp, & Panasas | From Wall Street to Hollywood, drug discovery to homeland security, companies and organizations of all sizes and stripes are coming face to face with the challenges – and opportunities – afforded by Big Data. Before anyone can utilize these extraordinary data repositories, however, they must first harness and manage their data stores, and do so utilizing technologies that underscore affordability, security, and scalability.
04/15/2013 | Bull | “50% of HPC users say their largest jobs scale to 120 cores or less.” How about yours? Are your codes ready to take advantage of today’s and tomorrow’s ultra-parallel HPC systems? Download this White Paper by Analysts Intersect360 Research to see what Bull and Intel’s Center for Excellence in Parallel Programming can do for your codes.
In this demonstration of SGI DMF ZeroWatt disk solution, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, SGI CTO, discusses a function of SGI DMF software to reduce costs and power consumption in an exascale (Big Data) storage datacenter.
The Cray CS300-AC cluster supercomputer offers energy efficient, air-cooled design based on modular, industry-standard platforms featuring the latest processor and network technologies and a wide range of datacenter cooling requirements.