Visit additional Tabor Communication Publications
May 20, 2010
An ultra-partisan political climate and an economy that has Republican lawmakers wringing their hands over deficit spending have conspired to sink the COMPETES reauthorization bill. On Wednesday, the House GOP voted down H.R. 5325, the bill that would have committed more than $40 billion in federal science and technology programs over the next three years.
Designed to double federal spending in science and technology over the next decade, the 2007 America COMPETES Act targeted money for basic and applied science research at national research labs and universities. The US federal agencies involved in such work include the National Science Foundation, National Institute for Standards and Technology, and the Department of Energy's Office of Science, and NASA, among others. Under the proposed authorization, they would have seen some of their healthiest budgets in years.
If you've been following this saga, you'll know that COMPETES has never been fully funded. But with a very science-friendly administration and Congress in charge, this looked like the year when the government would finally get the program on track. A few weeks ago I exchanged some emails with Peter Harsha, of the Computing Research Association, who has been diligently tracking the passage of the legislation. At that time (late April), the Republicans were adding dozens of amendments to the bill and threatening even more. Harsha felt that this was just the minority looking to score some political points, but "with the full expectation that their amendments will get voted down and that they'll still support the bill when it comes to final passage." Well, it didn't quite work out that way.
Despite general bipartisan support for the bill in committee, Republicans blocked its passage with a minority of votes. The Democrats miscalculated by bringing the legislation to the floor under a procedure that kept Republicans from tacking on more amendments. Under the rules, that meant a two-thirds majority would be needed for passage. And even though 15 Republicans plus all the Democrats voted in favor of the measure, the final 261-148 vote was 12 short of the supermajority needed.
The depressing news doesn't stop there. H.R. 5325 was actually a compromise bill from the original H.R. 5116, which provided for $85 billion worth of funding for five years instead of $47 billion for three. The new bill also included banning the use of COMPETES funds to pay the salaries of federal employees caught looking at pornography at work -- because, as every good Republican knows, you can't do innovative research if you're perusing porn all day. OK, maybe that's true, but I want to see the science.
Anyway, in spite of cutting the funding by nearly half and injecting some righteousness into the bill, conservative lawmakers still voted to kill it. Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Texas), the top Republican on the House Science and Technology (ST&T) Committee, claimed the bill was still too costly, given the state of the federal deficit. Herbert Hoover would have been proud.
It's pretty easy to chalk all this up to election-year politicking, but given the GOP's general uneasiness with science -- stem cell research, global climate change, and so on -- it can't be too surprising when they balk at funding such work. According to a 2009 Pew Research poll, only six percent of scientists identify themselves as Republicans, so when the GOP votes against these types of programs, they're not exactly abandoning their base.
Fortunately, the reauthorization bill is not completely dead. ST&T Committee Chairman Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.) intends to reintroduce the bill at a later date, hoping for a more favorable outcome. You can keep tabs on this legislative soap opera over at the Computing Research Association blog.
Posted by Michael Feldman - May 20, 2010 @ 6:52 PM, Pacific Daylight Time
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
No Recent Blog Comments
In quieter times, sounding the bell of funding big science with big systems tends to resonate further than when ears are already burning with sour economic and national security news. For exascale's future, however, the time could be ripe to instill some sense of urgency....
In a recent solicitation, the NSF laid out needs for furthering its scientific and engineering infrastructure with new tools to go beyond top performance, Having already delivered systems like Stampede and Blue Waters, they're turning an eye to solving data-intensive challenges. We spoke with the agency's Irene Qualters and Barry Schneider about..
Large-scale, worldwide scientific initiatives rely on some cloud-based system to both coordinate efforts and manage computational efforts at peak times that cannot be contained within the combined in-house HPC resources. Last week at Google I/O, Brookhaven National Lab’s Sergey Panitkin discussed the role of the Google Compute Engine in providing computational support to ATLAS, a detector of high-energy particles at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
May 23, 2013 |
The study of climate change is one of those scientific problems where it is almost essential to model the entire Earth to attain accurate results and make worthwhile predictions. In an attempt to make climate science more accessible to smaller research facilities, NASA introduced what they call ‘Climate in a Box,’ a system they note acts as a desktop supercomputer.
May 22, 2013 |
At some point in the not-too-distant future, building powerful, miniature computing systems will be considered a hobby for high schoolers, just as robotics or even Lego-building are today. That could be made possible through recent advancements made with the Raspberry Pi computers.
May 16, 2013 |
When it comes to cloud, long distances mean unacceptably high latencies. Researchers from the University of Bonn in Germany examined those latency issues of doing CFD modeling in the cloud by utilizing a common CFD and its utilization in HPC instance types including both CPU and GPU cores of Amazon EC2.
May 15, 2013 |
Supercomputers at the Department of Energy’s National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) have worked on important computational problems such as collapse of the atomic state, the optimization of chemical catalysts, and now modeling popping bubbles.
05/10/2013 | Cleversafe, Cray, DDN, NetApp, & Panasas | From Wall Street to Hollywood, drug discovery to homeland security, companies and organizations of all sizes and stripes are coming face to face with the challenges – and opportunities – afforded by Big Data. Before anyone can utilize these extraordinary data repositories, however, they must first harness and manage their data stores, and do so utilizing technologies that underscore affordability, security, and scalability.
04/15/2013 | Bull | “50% of HPC users say their largest jobs scale to 120 cores or less.” How about yours? Are your codes ready to take advantage of today’s and tomorrow’s ultra-parallel HPC systems? Download this White Paper by Analysts Intersect360 Research to see what Bull and Intel’s Center for Excellence in Parallel Programming can do for your codes.
In this demonstration of SGI DMF ZeroWatt disk solution, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, SGI CTO, discusses a function of SGI DMF software to reduce costs and power consumption in an exascale (Big Data) storage datacenter.
The Cray CS300-AC cluster supercomputer offers energy efficient, air-cooled design based on modular, industry-standard platforms featuring the latest processor and network technologies and a wide range of datacenter cooling requirements.