EL NINO FORECASTING METHOD QUESTIONED

November 17, 2000

SCIENCE & ENGINEERING NEWS

San Francisco, CALIF. — Keay Davidson reports for the San Francisco Examiner that a debate of atmospheric proportions has broken out over El Nino, raising a big question for Californians: How reliably can these quasi-cyclical weather traumas be predicted?

Until recently, sophisticated supercomputers were credited with one of the great triumphs of modern atmospheric science – the forecasting, many months in advance, of the El Nino that generated the winter storms of 1997-98 and flooded much of the Golden State.

But that triumph is looking less and less certain, a new study shows. True, El Nino arrived as scheduled, but with one catch: Forecasters who rely on supercomputers disagreed markedly on when it would arrive and how long it would last.

More embarrassing, the supercomputers’ forecasts were generally no better – and sometimes worse – than those made by a program small enough to run on a hand calculator, according to a new study by researchers from the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Colorado State University.

The finding by researchers Christopher Landsea and John Knaff has humbled some U.S. climatologists, who until recently thought they had figured out how to forecast El Nino.

“There was all the excitement in ’97 that “we’ve solved the El Nino problem!’ ” Landsea said. “But we haven’t.” Their downbeat rating of the once-praised El Nino-casts is so unexpected that Science magazine recently compared it to one’s high school teacher calling “you up at grad school to tell you that, on further thought, she was dropping your grade from an A to a C-plus.”

Their research has larger implications, too, Landsea and Knaff believe. Many climatologists have used the purported success of El Nino forecasting to champion the use of supercomputers to forecast the planetary impact of global warming. But such ambition is seriously premature, Landsea and Knaff agree, based on their glum assessment of El Nino forecasting.

Given the questionable state of El Nino forecasting, “it would be presumptuous to say we know what’s going to happen” during global warming, Landsea said.

U.S. climatologists have reacted diversely to Landsea and Knaff’s claims. On the one hand, their work “makes one good point, but otherwise is much ado about nothing,” charges Robert E. Livezey, senior meteorologist at the National Weather Service’s Climate Prediction Center in Camp Springs, Md. Livezey and Knaff debated the Landsea-Knaff thesis at a meteorological conference in May.

On the other hand, noted hurricane forecaster William Gray of Colorado State says the new study proves climatologists “have grossly over-hyped their ability to predict this phenomena (El Nino).

“They have, in general, given public claim to their few successes but kept quiet about their many busts. And most science writers have fallen for their claims,” charged Gray, who in recent years has gained fame for the reliability of his forecasts of Atlantic hurricanes.

Gray’s forecast technique relies partly on an apparent correlation between El Nino and Atlantic hurricanes: When the former is strong, the latter are few. Both Landsea and Knaff are former students of Gray, who served as their doctoral advisor.

An El Nino event involves a warming of Pacific waters that triggers meteorological upsets in California and the rest of the world. El Nino events typically occur every three to five years, with the most significant events every seven to 12 years. The last serious El Nino was in ’97-’98.

That El Nino unleashed mountainous rain clouds over the Golden State, submerging parts of it in lakes that stretched from horizon to horizon.

Landsea and Knaff analyzed 12 different computer models used to forecast the beginning, evolution and end of the ’97-98 El Nino, they say in an article for the September issue of the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

Some of those complex models contain hundreds of thousands or millions of lines of computer code, written laboriously over years.

They compared the 12 models’ forecasting performance to that of their own minuscule computer program, which they threw together in a few weeks. Their program contains a mere 729 lines of Fortran code and is dubbed ENSO-CLIPER, for El Nino-Southern Oscillation Climatology and Persistence.

To their surprise, David held his own against Goliath: ENSO-CLIPER fared better at forecasting the beginning, evolution and end of the ’97-’98 El Nino than most of the more costly, sophisticated models.

Hence, Landsea and Knaff suggest, scientists who forecast El Nino should rely less on costly, complex supercomputer models and more on cheap, simple statistical methods that Science magazine has called, only partly tongue in cheek, “automated rules of thumb.”

There’s plenty at stake besides whether coming winters will flood California coastlines. To those in the climatology business, their way of life might be at stake, or so charges the vociferously outspoken Gray.

Gray sees political motives behind climatologists’ reliance on big computers as opposed to his preference for simple statistical models. He claims that forecasters brag about great prediction accuracy to attract more federal funds – and uncritical press coverage of alleged forecasting triumphs makes their task easier, he claims.

“The real battle is over federal resource allocation,” Gray charges. “Favorable press articles help convince government officials – who are not down in the trenches and don’t understand the topic – to hand out grants to those appearing to have success and knowledge. It is a game well played by the (climate computer) modelers.”

But with equal passion, Livezey defends the big-computer approach to El Nino forecasting. Livezey acknowledges that Landsea and Knaff correctly say “the very sophisticated dynamical/ numerical models cannot yet outperform state-of-the-art statistical models for prediction of (El Nino).”

But their statement that “there were no models that provided both useful and skillful forecasts for the entirety of the 1997-98 El Nino (is) only true in the sense that different models might have been weak in representing one aspect (of El Nino) or another – like the maximum strength and the timing or rapidity of its demise,” Livezey says. Even so, the models “collectively . . . represented an unprecedented, powerful forecast tool.

“We knew early in the summer of 1997 that a strong El Nino would be in place by the early autumn and that it would maintain its strength at least through the winter,” Livezey continued. “This allowed (federal forecasters) to make confident, detailed forecasts of U.S. wintertime conditions which were largely correct, set all-time records for performance, and were the source of enormous savings by (emergency) planners and managers who heeded them.”

A middle-of-the-road view is taken by Huug van den Dool, who manages the long-term climate forecasting division at the Climate Prediction Center. “I mainly agree with Landsea and Knaff’s findings . . . (But) opinions in the scientific/ technical community are guarded (regarding their work).

“It is undeniable that big computer models did not outperform several much cheaper empirical methods – neither in ’97-’98, nor in the cold event (La Nina) following,” van den Dool said. “But one could argue until the cows come home whether that means a complete absence of (usefulness) for big models.”

============================================================

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industry updates delivered to you every week!

MLPerf Inference 4.0 Results Showcase GenAI; Nvidia Still Dominates

March 28, 2024

There were no startling surprises in the latest MLPerf Inference benchmark (4.0) results released yesterday. Two new workloads — Llama 2 and Stable Diffusion XL — were added to the benchmark suite as MLPerf continues Read more…

Q&A with Nvidia’s Chief of DGX Systems on the DGX-GB200 Rack-scale System

March 27, 2024

Pictures of Nvidia's new flagship mega-server, the DGX GB200, on the GTC show floor got favorable reactions on social media for the sheer amount of computing power it brings to artificial intelligence.  Nvidia's DGX Read more…

Call for Participation in Workshop on Potential NSF CISE Quantum Initiative

March 26, 2024

Editor’s Note: Next month there will be a workshop to discuss what a quantum initiative led by NSF’s Computer, Information Science and Engineering (CISE) directorate could entail. The details are posted below in a Ca Read more…

Waseda U. Researchers Reports New Quantum Algorithm for Speeding Optimization

March 25, 2024

Optimization problems cover a wide range of applications and are often cited as good candidates for quantum computing. However, the execution time for constrained combinatorial optimization applications on quantum device Read more…

NVLink: Faster Interconnects and Switches to Help Relieve Data Bottlenecks

March 25, 2024

Nvidia’s new Blackwell architecture may have stolen the show this week at the GPU Technology Conference in San Jose, California. But an emerging bottleneck at the network layer threatens to make bigger and brawnier pro Read more…

Who is David Blackwell?

March 22, 2024

During GTC24, co-founder and president of NVIDIA Jensen Huang unveiled the Blackwell GPU. This GPU itself is heavily optimized for AI work, boasting 192GB of HBM3E memory as well as the the ability to train 1 trillion pa Read more…

MLPerf Inference 4.0 Results Showcase GenAI; Nvidia Still Dominates

March 28, 2024

There were no startling surprises in the latest MLPerf Inference benchmark (4.0) results released yesterday. Two new workloads — Llama 2 and Stable Diffusion Read more…

Q&A with Nvidia’s Chief of DGX Systems on the DGX-GB200 Rack-scale System

March 27, 2024

Pictures of Nvidia's new flagship mega-server, the DGX GB200, on the GTC show floor got favorable reactions on social media for the sheer amount of computing po Read more…

NVLink: Faster Interconnects and Switches to Help Relieve Data Bottlenecks

March 25, 2024

Nvidia’s new Blackwell architecture may have stolen the show this week at the GPU Technology Conference in San Jose, California. But an emerging bottleneck at Read more…

Who is David Blackwell?

March 22, 2024

During GTC24, co-founder and president of NVIDIA Jensen Huang unveiled the Blackwell GPU. This GPU itself is heavily optimized for AI work, boasting 192GB of HB Read more…

Nvidia Looks to Accelerate GenAI Adoption with NIM

March 19, 2024

Today at the GPU Technology Conference, Nvidia launched a new offering aimed at helping customers quickly deploy their generative AI applications in a secure, s Read more…

The Generative AI Future Is Now, Nvidia’s Huang Says

March 19, 2024

We are in the early days of a transformative shift in how business gets done thanks to the advent of generative AI, according to Nvidia CEO and cofounder Jensen Read more…

Nvidia’s New Blackwell GPU Can Train AI Models with Trillions of Parameters

March 18, 2024

Nvidia's latest and fastest GPU, codenamed Blackwell, is here and will underpin the company's AI plans this year. The chip offers performance improvements from Read more…

Nvidia Showcases Quantum Cloud, Expanding Quantum Portfolio at GTC24

March 18, 2024

Nvidia’s barrage of quantum news at GTC24 this week includes new products, signature collaborations, and a new Nvidia Quantum Cloud for quantum developers. Wh Read more…

Alibaba Shuts Down its Quantum Computing Effort

November 30, 2023

In case you missed it, China’s e-commerce giant Alibaba has shut down its quantum computing research effort. It’s not entirely clear what drove the change. Read more…

Nvidia H100: Are 550,000 GPUs Enough for This Year?

August 17, 2023

The GPU Squeeze continues to place a premium on Nvidia H100 GPUs. In a recent Financial Times article, Nvidia reports that it expects to ship 550,000 of its lat Read more…

Shutterstock 1285747942

AMD’s Horsepower-packed MI300X GPU Beats Nvidia’s Upcoming H200

December 7, 2023

AMD and Nvidia are locked in an AI performance battle – much like the gaming GPU performance clash the companies have waged for decades. AMD has claimed it Read more…

DoD Takes a Long View of Quantum Computing

December 19, 2023

Given the large sums tied to expensive weapon systems – think $100-million-plus per F-35 fighter – it’s easy to forget the U.S. Department of Defense is a Read more…

Synopsys Eats Ansys: Does HPC Get Indigestion?

February 8, 2024

Recently, it was announced that Synopsys is buying HPC tool developer Ansys. Started in Pittsburgh, Pa., in 1970 as Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc. (SASI) by John Swanson (and eventually renamed), Ansys serves the CAE (Computer Aided Engineering)/multiphysics engineering simulation market. Read more…

Choosing the Right GPU for LLM Inference and Training

December 11, 2023

Accelerating the training and inference processes of deep learning models is crucial for unleashing their true potential and NVIDIA GPUs have emerged as a game- Read more…

Intel’s Server and PC Chip Development Will Blur After 2025

January 15, 2024

Intel's dealing with much more than chip rivals breathing down its neck; it is simultaneously integrating a bevy of new technologies such as chiplets, artificia Read more…

Baidu Exits Quantum, Closely Following Alibaba’s Earlier Move

January 5, 2024

Reuters reported this week that Baidu, China’s giant e-commerce and services provider, is exiting the quantum computing development arena. Reuters reported � Read more…

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

Comparing NVIDIA A100 and NVIDIA L40S: Which GPU is Ideal for AI and Graphics-Intensive Workloads?

October 30, 2023

With long lead times for the NVIDIA H100 and A100 GPUs, many organizations are looking at the new NVIDIA L40S GPU, which it’s a new GPU optimized for AI and g Read more…

Shutterstock 1179408610

Google Addresses the Mysteries of Its Hypercomputer 

December 28, 2023

When Google launched its Hypercomputer earlier this month (December 2023), the first reaction was, "Say what?" It turns out that the Hypercomputer is Google's t Read more…

AMD MI3000A

How AMD May Get Across the CUDA Moat

October 5, 2023

When discussing GenAI, the term "GPU" almost always enters the conversation and the topic often moves toward performance and access. Interestingly, the word "GPU" is assumed to mean "Nvidia" products. (As an aside, the popular Nvidia hardware used in GenAI are not technically... Read more…

Shutterstock 1606064203

Meta’s Zuckerberg Puts Its AI Future in the Hands of 600,000 GPUs

January 25, 2024

In under two minutes, Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, laid out the company's AI plans, which included a plan to build an artificial intelligence system with the eq Read more…

Google Introduces ‘Hypercomputer’ to Its AI Infrastructure

December 11, 2023

Google ran out of monikers to describe its new AI system released on December 7. Supercomputer perhaps wasn't an apt description, so it settled on Hypercomputer Read more…

China Is All In on a RISC-V Future

January 8, 2024

The state of RISC-V in China was discussed in a recent report released by the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The report, entitled "E Read more…

Intel Won’t Have a Xeon Max Chip with New Emerald Rapids CPU

December 14, 2023

As expected, Intel officially announced its 5th generation Xeon server chips codenamed Emerald Rapids at an event in New York City, where the focus was really o Read more…

IBM Quantum Summit: Two New QPUs, Upgraded Qiskit, 10-year Roadmap and More

December 4, 2023

IBM kicks off its annual Quantum Summit today and will announce a broad range of advances including its much-anticipated 1121-qubit Condor QPU, a smaller 133-qu Read more…

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
HPCwire