RETRENCHMENT, NOT RETREAT AT IBM

January 26, 2001

COMMERCIAL NEWS

Somers, NY, — Barnaby J. Feder reported for The NY Times: What do you get if you give thousands of employees sophisticated technology, plenty of money, experienced marketing support and access to corporate and institutional customers in every corner of the planet? For the managers in charge of business software sales for IBM in the 1990’s, the answer was pretty embarrassing.

“We were offering hundreds of applications, spending close to a billion dollars a year, getting 5 percent to 10 percent market share and not making much money,” said Robert C. Timpson, general manager of IBM’s relations with outside software developers.

Finally, in the spring of 1999, IBM concluded that enough was enough. Since then, it has killed off or sold 90 percent of its business software portfolio. But no one at the company’s campus here viewed the retrenchment as a retreat.

Quite the contrary, the retrenchment cleared the decks to pursue growth through strategic alliances, a path Louis V. Gerstner Jr., IBM’s chief executive, had preached since 1995. Mr. Timpson’s group immediately set out to bring together a wide range of IBM product and service divisions to negotiate collectively with leading independent software companies.

It was an appealing project for Mr. Timpson, a 54-year-old Manhattan native who joined IBM shortly after graduating from Harvard University in 1967 and, contrary to his initial expectations, never left. A career that began with riding around Harlem with New York police officers to figure out what IBM equipment they could use had taken him to the far corners of the world – his most recent post involved overseeing 24,000 employees and all of IBM’s business in Asia.

“Now we are in a culture where it’s more important to be fast than perfect,” he said. “You have to be willing to let things go to outsiders.”

The fervor for the new approach has allowed IBM to forge 50 strategic partnerships in just over a year with various business software specialists, starting with Siebel Systems, the fastest growing vendor of programs that help businesses track and manage their relations with customers.

IBM says the alliances added $700 million last year to sales of hardware, services, database programs and middleware (a layer of software that links and manages large portfolios of software or diverse computer systems.) In public statements, IBM says it expects the partnerships already on board to funnel an extra $10 billion annually its way by 2003.

“Our internal goal is higher – and rising,” Mr. Timpson said last week.

Analysts say the strategic alliance program is too new to be having a visible effect on IBM’s market share in its battles with rivals like Sun Microsystems in server computers, Oracle in databases and BEA Systems in middleware for companies shifting large parts of their business to the Internet. But it has their attention.

“It’s got some traction and it’s got some teeth,” said John Madden, an analyst at Summit Strategies, an information technology research company in Boston.

The initiative by IBM provides insights into the challenges of competing in the software industry and forming strategic alliances. But it is doubly intriguing as a case study of playing catch-up in corporate America.

For much of its history, IBM thought that it best served customers, and its own profits, by offering ever more complete packages of products and services. Indeed, the plunge into business applications software in the early 1990’s resulted directly from the desire of IBM sales groups to offer one-stop shopping for big customers trying to use their computers to automate an expanding range of business tasks.

As a result, only 5 percent of IBM sales outside of personal computers were attributed to corporate partnerships in 1993, the year Mr. Gerstner arrived.

Today, more than a third of revenue flows from nearly 100,000 alliances of varying intensity. More impressive than the numbers, experts say, is the expertise that IBM managers have gained in making the alliances work.

“It’s a well-oiled machine,” said Peter Pekar Jr., an alliance specialist who recently worked with Lucent Technologies in negotiations to set up agreements with I.B.M, EMC and Sun Microsystems to work together on standards for high-speed data transfer products and services.

“They knew every pitfall of putting alliances together, which wasn’t the case 10, or even 5 years ago,” he said.

Indeed, IBM, long a laggard, has now become a leader, experts say, in a sector that has become notorious for its less-than-rigorous approach to cooperative ventures. Too often, they say, information-technology companies do little more than issue vague statements of intent, all the while failing to commit resources or management time to the project.

“We call them fruit fly alliances because they are gone in a minute,” said William T. Lundberg, executive director of the Association of Strategic Alliance Professionals, a two- year-old trade group.

IBM alliances are the product of weeks, sometimes months, of market analysis and negotiation of what each company will do to meet specific sales targets over a three-year period. The company has about 40 steps that precede reaching an agreement, from identifying a partner’s strengths and weaknesses to making sure that a senior executive in an IBM business group is on board as an internal sponsor.

A chart in the conference room near Mr. Timpson’s office identifies another 80 steps or so that are crucial to making the agreement work once it is signed. Eventually, Mr. Timpson said, there could be hundreds of the alliances since I.B.M is working systematically to fill in every market segment on a giant “solutions map,” an elaborate grid that breaks down the world by industry, type of business problem the software addresses and whether or not the customer is a large company.

The grid is also chopped up geographically into four regions and, in some segments, by the type of computer system running the software.

A common hurdle during negotiations is the resistance of many partners to being pigeonholed into a market segment that suits IBM’s strategic vision. “Tom Siebel will tell you he’s the only partner IBM needs,” Mr. Timpson said with a laugh, referring to the founder and chief executive of Siebel Systems.

Even after they sign on, vendors continue to jockey for a bigger piece of the pie. Take Synquest, an Atlanta- based company that IBM singled out as a leader in supply-chain management software for midsize industrial companies. Synquest, which counts the Ford Motor Company among its customers, wanted to include larger companies in the deal, but IBM insisted that such an extension would undermine another alliance with i2 Technologies to sell supply-chain products and services to the larger companies.

“We feel our value proposition is better than i2’s, and we want IBM to have a shot at learning that,” said Chris Jones, the Synquest executive who negotiated the agreement. But while IBM stuck with i2, it made concessions, too, including backing off its initial request that Synquest quickly adapt all of its applications to IBM’s DB2 database.

“That would have taken all of our development resources,” Mr. Jones said. “We wouldn’t have been able to work on any upgrades.”

The IBM-Siebel pact illustrates the benefits for both sides. Before the alliance, Siebel software packages were not sold along with IBM databases. Last year, 45 percent of them were. In addition to the $40 million joint marketing budget and joint work on developing new products, more than 5,000 IBM global services representatives were trained to work with Siebel.

“There isn’t a software company in the world that can’t benefit from IBM,” said Steve Garnett, Siebel’s vice president for alliances.

Not everyone sees it that way, of course. Some newcomers are growing so fast they see no need to join forces with IBM, Mr. Timpson said.

At the other end of the spectrum, some longtime partners like J. D. Edwards & Company, the Denver- based systems integration and software company, have bound themselves so tightly to IBM over the years that figuring out new areas for growth via the strategic alliance pacts is, Mr. Timpson said, “one of the more interesting problems.”

The two companies are talking; J. D. Edwards says the signing of some sort of strategic alliance will be a “natural evolution” in the companies’ 23-year relationship.

Then there is Oracle, IBM’s fiercest rival on the database turf. Facing a maturing database market, Oracle opted several years ago to try to grow faster by developing its own business software products in virtually every area where IBM is now matching up with a partner. And it is pitching them as a cheaper alternative because they have been designed from the outset to be used with one another. Oracle argues that IBM’s mix-and-match approach results in far higher operating and maintenance costs.

Oracle risks, of course, irritating countless innovative independent software companies by competing with them. As IBM found out in the 1990’s, betting against the skills of so many players in a rapidly changing environment does not leave much room for error.

IBM acknowledges that it is too soon to be sure that it has a much better answer with its full-bore thrust into alliances, which could lead to plenty of conflicts of its own as markets evolve. But with the alliance culture now taking root in the company, Mr. Timpson is pushing to accelerate its expansion.

The next step: a program he calls Alliances Light that encourages IBM managers in regions where a local software vendor is prominent, say banking in Thailand, to negotiate local alliance agreements in line with a template provided by his office.

============================================================

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industry updates delivered to you every week!

MLPerf Inference 4.0 Results Showcase GenAI; Nvidia Still Dominates

March 28, 2024

There were no startling surprises in the latest MLPerf Inference benchmark (4.0) results released yesterday. Two new workloads — Llama 2 and Stable Diffusion XL — were added to the benchmark suite as MLPerf continues Read more…

Q&A with Nvidia’s Chief of DGX Systems on the DGX-GB200 Rack-scale System

March 27, 2024

Pictures of Nvidia's new flagship mega-server, the DGX GB200, on the GTC show floor got favorable reactions on social media for the sheer amount of computing power it brings to artificial intelligence.  Nvidia's DGX Read more…

Call for Participation in Workshop on Potential NSF CISE Quantum Initiative

March 26, 2024

Editor’s Note: Next month there will be a workshop to discuss what a quantum initiative led by NSF’s Computer, Information Science and Engineering (CISE) directorate could entail. The details are posted below in a Ca Read more…

Waseda U. Researchers Reports New Quantum Algorithm for Speeding Optimization

March 25, 2024

Optimization problems cover a wide range of applications and are often cited as good candidates for quantum computing. However, the execution time for constrained combinatorial optimization applications on quantum device Read more…

NVLink: Faster Interconnects and Switches to Help Relieve Data Bottlenecks

March 25, 2024

Nvidia’s new Blackwell architecture may have stolen the show this week at the GPU Technology Conference in San Jose, California. But an emerging bottleneck at the network layer threatens to make bigger and brawnier pro Read more…

Who is David Blackwell?

March 22, 2024

During GTC24, co-founder and president of NVIDIA Jensen Huang unveiled the Blackwell GPU. This GPU itself is heavily optimized for AI work, boasting 192GB of HBM3E memory as well as the the ability to train 1 trillion pa Read more…

MLPerf Inference 4.0 Results Showcase GenAI; Nvidia Still Dominates

March 28, 2024

There were no startling surprises in the latest MLPerf Inference benchmark (4.0) results released yesterday. Two new workloads — Llama 2 and Stable Diffusion Read more…

Q&A with Nvidia’s Chief of DGX Systems on the DGX-GB200 Rack-scale System

March 27, 2024

Pictures of Nvidia's new flagship mega-server, the DGX GB200, on the GTC show floor got favorable reactions on social media for the sheer amount of computing po Read more…

NVLink: Faster Interconnects and Switches to Help Relieve Data Bottlenecks

March 25, 2024

Nvidia’s new Blackwell architecture may have stolen the show this week at the GPU Technology Conference in San Jose, California. But an emerging bottleneck at Read more…

Who is David Blackwell?

March 22, 2024

During GTC24, co-founder and president of NVIDIA Jensen Huang unveiled the Blackwell GPU. This GPU itself is heavily optimized for AI work, boasting 192GB of HB Read more…

Nvidia Looks to Accelerate GenAI Adoption with NIM

March 19, 2024

Today at the GPU Technology Conference, Nvidia launched a new offering aimed at helping customers quickly deploy their generative AI applications in a secure, s Read more…

The Generative AI Future Is Now, Nvidia’s Huang Says

March 19, 2024

We are in the early days of a transformative shift in how business gets done thanks to the advent of generative AI, according to Nvidia CEO and cofounder Jensen Read more…

Nvidia’s New Blackwell GPU Can Train AI Models with Trillions of Parameters

March 18, 2024

Nvidia's latest and fastest GPU, codenamed Blackwell, is here and will underpin the company's AI plans this year. The chip offers performance improvements from Read more…

Nvidia Showcases Quantum Cloud, Expanding Quantum Portfolio at GTC24

March 18, 2024

Nvidia’s barrage of quantum news at GTC24 this week includes new products, signature collaborations, and a new Nvidia Quantum Cloud for quantum developers. Wh Read more…

Alibaba Shuts Down its Quantum Computing Effort

November 30, 2023

In case you missed it, China’s e-commerce giant Alibaba has shut down its quantum computing research effort. It’s not entirely clear what drove the change. Read more…

Nvidia H100: Are 550,000 GPUs Enough for This Year?

August 17, 2023

The GPU Squeeze continues to place a premium on Nvidia H100 GPUs. In a recent Financial Times article, Nvidia reports that it expects to ship 550,000 of its lat Read more…

Shutterstock 1285747942

AMD’s Horsepower-packed MI300X GPU Beats Nvidia’s Upcoming H200

December 7, 2023

AMD and Nvidia are locked in an AI performance battle – much like the gaming GPU performance clash the companies have waged for decades. AMD has claimed it Read more…

DoD Takes a Long View of Quantum Computing

December 19, 2023

Given the large sums tied to expensive weapon systems – think $100-million-plus per F-35 fighter – it’s easy to forget the U.S. Department of Defense is a Read more…

Synopsys Eats Ansys: Does HPC Get Indigestion?

February 8, 2024

Recently, it was announced that Synopsys is buying HPC tool developer Ansys. Started in Pittsburgh, Pa., in 1970 as Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc. (SASI) by John Swanson (and eventually renamed), Ansys serves the CAE (Computer Aided Engineering)/multiphysics engineering simulation market. Read more…

Choosing the Right GPU for LLM Inference and Training

December 11, 2023

Accelerating the training and inference processes of deep learning models is crucial for unleashing their true potential and NVIDIA GPUs have emerged as a game- Read more…

Intel’s Server and PC Chip Development Will Blur After 2025

January 15, 2024

Intel's dealing with much more than chip rivals breathing down its neck; it is simultaneously integrating a bevy of new technologies such as chiplets, artificia Read more…

Baidu Exits Quantum, Closely Following Alibaba’s Earlier Move

January 5, 2024

Reuters reported this week that Baidu, China’s giant e-commerce and services provider, is exiting the quantum computing development arena. Reuters reported � Read more…

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

Comparing NVIDIA A100 and NVIDIA L40S: Which GPU is Ideal for AI and Graphics-Intensive Workloads?

October 30, 2023

With long lead times for the NVIDIA H100 and A100 GPUs, many organizations are looking at the new NVIDIA L40S GPU, which it’s a new GPU optimized for AI and g Read more…

Shutterstock 1179408610

Google Addresses the Mysteries of Its Hypercomputer 

December 28, 2023

When Google launched its Hypercomputer earlier this month (December 2023), the first reaction was, "Say what?" It turns out that the Hypercomputer is Google's t Read more…

AMD MI3000A

How AMD May Get Across the CUDA Moat

October 5, 2023

When discussing GenAI, the term "GPU" almost always enters the conversation and the topic often moves toward performance and access. Interestingly, the word "GPU" is assumed to mean "Nvidia" products. (As an aside, the popular Nvidia hardware used in GenAI are not technically... Read more…

Shutterstock 1606064203

Meta’s Zuckerberg Puts Its AI Future in the Hands of 600,000 GPUs

January 25, 2024

In under two minutes, Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, laid out the company's AI plans, which included a plan to build an artificial intelligence system with the eq Read more…

Google Introduces ‘Hypercomputer’ to Its AI Infrastructure

December 11, 2023

Google ran out of monikers to describe its new AI system released on December 7. Supercomputer perhaps wasn't an apt description, so it settled on Hypercomputer Read more…

China Is All In on a RISC-V Future

January 8, 2024

The state of RISC-V in China was discussed in a recent report released by the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The report, entitled "E Read more…

Intel Won’t Have a Xeon Max Chip with New Emerald Rapids CPU

December 14, 2023

As expected, Intel officially announced its 5th generation Xeon server chips codenamed Emerald Rapids at an event in New York City, where the focus was really o Read more…

IBM Quantum Summit: Two New QPUs, Upgraded Qiskit, 10-year Roadmap and More

December 4, 2023

IBM kicks off its annual Quantum Summit today and will announce a broad range of advances including its much-anticipated 1121-qubit Condor QPU, a smaller 133-qu Read more…

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
HPCwire