Letter to the Editor: The Tuple Space Solution

By Nicole Hemsoth

June 16, 2006

Dear Mr Feldman:

We think you're exactly right regarding MPI: “It's hard to find a real fan of MPI today. Most people either tolerate it or hate it” [see Programming Clusters Just Got Easier, http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/663546.html]. But you also write that, “Unfortunately, writing applications for clusters means the programmer has to deal with the hard realities of distributed memory.” In fact, today's programmers can avoid these “hard realities” by using commercially supported tuple space-based software. Tuple space systems were originally introduced in 1986, when Carriero and Gelernter (undersigned) described Linda, the first efficient tuple space implementation on a distributed memory machine, at the ACM Operating System conference.

Tuple space is a virtual shared memory system that's proved to be highly efficient and (equally important) easier to use than any competing system we know. Tuple space systems make distributed programming substantially easier than message passing does; easier than any other type of system we've met. Which isn't surprising. Tuple space systems are fundamentally higher-level than the others. And the best tuple space systems are just as efficient as the low-level solutions.

Today, commercial tuple space systems are widely used in production software development. (The systems referred to here are built and supported by a New Haven software company called Scientific Computing Associates Inc – SCAI; “www/lindaspaces.com”.) Tuple space systems are used in many verticals, in academia and by ISVs. For example: the manufacturer of Gaussian, an important quantum chemistry code, offers a parallel version (Parallel Gaussian) that uses TCP-Linda to run on distributed memory Linux, UNIX, Windows and OS X platforms. Parallel Gaussian is used by chemistry research groups all over the world.

Tuple space systems are the basis, also, of proprietary parallel and distributed apps at such important companies as Lehman Brothers, UBS Warburg and CIBC in financial services, Pfizer in the Life Sciences, Hess and El Paso Natural Gas in the energy vertical; they have been used in the manufacturing and defense sectors too. And many high performance hardware vendors are Linda license-holders.

Modern tuple space implementations, especially SCAI's “NetWorkSpaces,” are significantly higher-level than Cluster OpenMP. They operate not at the level (and in the environment) of conventional programming languages; instead, NetWorkSpaces is a virtual shared-memory enhancement of rapid application development environments such as R, MATLAB, and Python. Users have already voted with their feet: these higher-level environments are displacing programming languages for most application development by working researchers, scientists and engineers (as opposed to professional programmers). Virtual shared memory is the only rational approach to distributed memory machines. And, unlike Cluster OpenMP, virtual shared memory enhancements rise to the user's level instead of dragging the user down.

Which leaves a fascinating question. Why is the parallel programming ecosystem still dominated by C or Fortran plus MPI? Tuple space systems have been judged far easier to use than MPI again and again; otherwise the tuple space apps I've mentioned wouldn't exist. No company will reject a widely-used default and choose an obscure competitor out of sentimentality! And high-level systems such as R, MATLAB and Python have user communities that keep growing too — because they make careful, sparing use of the world's most valuable resource, highly-trained human beings. And yet low-level systems designed for efficiency, not plus but instead of ease-of-use, still dominate parallel programming. Why? There are several reasons, but here is the most important one.

Parallel programming is in the middle of a major transition, from being an insider's game to a sport anyone can play — and everyone who uses computers to compute things, not just for communication and entertainment, will have to play. We saw exactly this kind of transition years ago, centered on operating systems. Once upon a time, operating systems were in the hands of trained professionals. But the rise of the PC meant that henceforth, operating systems had to be for everyone. Soon, sophisticated graphical interfaces had displaced complex, low-level command-line interfaces. Only computer professionals are willing to meet the computer on its level. Non-professionals expect the computer to rise to their levels. Non-professionals (in short) have higher, more exacting, more sophisticated software standards than professionals. (Why? Because they don't like playing with software and weren't trained for it. They have other things to do and want to get on with them.)

Once, parallel and distributed programming was in the hands of professional software developers with a high tolerance for (and the ability to understand) complex, low-level systems. (Like MPI.) But things have changed. Clusters are everywhere. Grids are everywhere (that is, multiple LAN-connected computers that are sometimes used as platforms for parallel apps). A multi-core machine is coming to a desk- or laptop near you soon. Computational demands keep growing — but the electronic speed of processor chips is no longer keeping pace. Perhaps most important, parallel programming is no longer frightening. We see hard problems solved by parallel tasking every day: you order the pizza, someone else get the soda, someone else get the beer, someone else get the napkins and plates, someone else check that the room is free… That's parallel programming; and it's not rocket science.

Operating systems made the transition from MVS/360 and its operator's console to the Mac OS. Parallel programming is on the verge of the same sort of transition: from MPI (with its fussy, low-level communication model) to the high-level simplicity of tuple spaces. Only computer professionals are willing to meet the computer on its level. Non-professionals expect the computer to rise to their levels. Tuple spaces will come out on top.

Yours,
Nicholas Carriero and David Gelernter

—–

Editor's note:

David Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale University and national fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. His interests include information management, parallel programming, software ensembles and artificial intelligence. He co-developed the “Linda” programming language with Nicholas Carriero. Gelernter is the author of many books (including “Mirror Worlds,” 1991), has published in many newspapers and magazines (serving as weekly columnist for the New York Post in 1987 and Los Angeles Times in 2005), is board member at the National Endowment for the Arts; his forthcoming book (“The Biblical Republic: America and Americanism”) will be published by Doubleday this year.

Nicholas Carriero is a computer scientist, also at Yale University, where he researches system issues in the development and deployment of software tools for parallelism. He has worked with David Gelernter and the Linda group at Yale, where Carriero has developed variants of C and Fortran that provide Linda's coordination model. This work has included the C-Linda precompiler and analyzer, and support kernels for shared-memory multiprocessors. Carriero's current work includes refinement of existing implementations of the Linda coordination model, development of new implementations, extension of the model, and exploration of parallel programming methodologies. Adaptive parallelism, distributed computing, and “non-traditional” coordination applications are topics of particular emphasis.

Both Gelernter and Carriero are consultants for Scientific Computing Associates Inc., the company that has commercialized the Linda technology.”

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industry updates delivered to you every week!

MLPerf Inference 4.0 Results Showcase GenAI; Nvidia Still Dominates

March 28, 2024

There were no startling surprises in the latest MLPerf Inference benchmark (4.0) results released yesterday. Two new workloads — Llama 2 and Stable Diffusion XL — were added to the benchmark suite as MLPerf continues Read more…

Q&A with Nvidia’s Chief of DGX Systems on the DGX-GB200 Rack-scale System

March 27, 2024

Pictures of Nvidia's new flagship mega-server, the DGX GB200, on the GTC show floor got favorable reactions on social media for the sheer amount of computing power it brings to artificial intelligence.  Nvidia's DGX Read more…

Call for Participation in Workshop on Potential NSF CISE Quantum Initiative

March 26, 2024

Editor’s Note: Next month there will be a workshop to discuss what a quantum initiative led by NSF’s Computer, Information Science and Engineering (CISE) directorate could entail. The details are posted below in a Ca Read more…

Waseda U. Researchers Reports New Quantum Algorithm for Speeding Optimization

March 25, 2024

Optimization problems cover a wide range of applications and are often cited as good candidates for quantum computing. However, the execution time for constrained combinatorial optimization applications on quantum device Read more…

NVLink: Faster Interconnects and Switches to Help Relieve Data Bottlenecks

March 25, 2024

Nvidia’s new Blackwell architecture may have stolen the show this week at the GPU Technology Conference in San Jose, California. But an emerging bottleneck at the network layer threatens to make bigger and brawnier pro Read more…

Who is David Blackwell?

March 22, 2024

During GTC24, co-founder and president of NVIDIA Jensen Huang unveiled the Blackwell GPU. This GPU itself is heavily optimized for AI work, boasting 192GB of HBM3E memory as well as the the ability to train 1 trillion pa Read more…

MLPerf Inference 4.0 Results Showcase GenAI; Nvidia Still Dominates

March 28, 2024

There were no startling surprises in the latest MLPerf Inference benchmark (4.0) results released yesterday. Two new workloads — Llama 2 and Stable Diffusion Read more…

Q&A with Nvidia’s Chief of DGX Systems on the DGX-GB200 Rack-scale System

March 27, 2024

Pictures of Nvidia's new flagship mega-server, the DGX GB200, on the GTC show floor got favorable reactions on social media for the sheer amount of computing po Read more…

NVLink: Faster Interconnects and Switches to Help Relieve Data Bottlenecks

March 25, 2024

Nvidia’s new Blackwell architecture may have stolen the show this week at the GPU Technology Conference in San Jose, California. But an emerging bottleneck at Read more…

Who is David Blackwell?

March 22, 2024

During GTC24, co-founder and president of NVIDIA Jensen Huang unveiled the Blackwell GPU. This GPU itself is heavily optimized for AI work, boasting 192GB of HB Read more…

Nvidia Looks to Accelerate GenAI Adoption with NIM

March 19, 2024

Today at the GPU Technology Conference, Nvidia launched a new offering aimed at helping customers quickly deploy their generative AI applications in a secure, s Read more…

The Generative AI Future Is Now, Nvidia’s Huang Says

March 19, 2024

We are in the early days of a transformative shift in how business gets done thanks to the advent of generative AI, according to Nvidia CEO and cofounder Jensen Read more…

Nvidia’s New Blackwell GPU Can Train AI Models with Trillions of Parameters

March 18, 2024

Nvidia's latest and fastest GPU, codenamed Blackwell, is here and will underpin the company's AI plans this year. The chip offers performance improvements from Read more…

Nvidia Showcases Quantum Cloud, Expanding Quantum Portfolio at GTC24

March 18, 2024

Nvidia’s barrage of quantum news at GTC24 this week includes new products, signature collaborations, and a new Nvidia Quantum Cloud for quantum developers. Wh Read more…

Alibaba Shuts Down its Quantum Computing Effort

November 30, 2023

In case you missed it, China’s e-commerce giant Alibaba has shut down its quantum computing research effort. It’s not entirely clear what drove the change. Read more…

Nvidia H100: Are 550,000 GPUs Enough for This Year?

August 17, 2023

The GPU Squeeze continues to place a premium on Nvidia H100 GPUs. In a recent Financial Times article, Nvidia reports that it expects to ship 550,000 of its lat Read more…

Shutterstock 1285747942

AMD’s Horsepower-packed MI300X GPU Beats Nvidia’s Upcoming H200

December 7, 2023

AMD and Nvidia are locked in an AI performance battle – much like the gaming GPU performance clash the companies have waged for decades. AMD has claimed it Read more…

DoD Takes a Long View of Quantum Computing

December 19, 2023

Given the large sums tied to expensive weapon systems – think $100-million-plus per F-35 fighter – it’s easy to forget the U.S. Department of Defense is a Read more…

Synopsys Eats Ansys: Does HPC Get Indigestion?

February 8, 2024

Recently, it was announced that Synopsys is buying HPC tool developer Ansys. Started in Pittsburgh, Pa., in 1970 as Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc. (SASI) by John Swanson (and eventually renamed), Ansys serves the CAE (Computer Aided Engineering)/multiphysics engineering simulation market. Read more…

Choosing the Right GPU for LLM Inference and Training

December 11, 2023

Accelerating the training and inference processes of deep learning models is crucial for unleashing their true potential and NVIDIA GPUs have emerged as a game- Read more…

Intel’s Server and PC Chip Development Will Blur After 2025

January 15, 2024

Intel's dealing with much more than chip rivals breathing down its neck; it is simultaneously integrating a bevy of new technologies such as chiplets, artificia Read more…

Baidu Exits Quantum, Closely Following Alibaba’s Earlier Move

January 5, 2024

Reuters reported this week that Baidu, China’s giant e-commerce and services provider, is exiting the quantum computing development arena. Reuters reported � Read more…

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

Comparing NVIDIA A100 and NVIDIA L40S: Which GPU is Ideal for AI and Graphics-Intensive Workloads?

October 30, 2023

With long lead times for the NVIDIA H100 and A100 GPUs, many organizations are looking at the new NVIDIA L40S GPU, which it’s a new GPU optimized for AI and g Read more…

Shutterstock 1179408610

Google Addresses the Mysteries of Its Hypercomputer 

December 28, 2023

When Google launched its Hypercomputer earlier this month (December 2023), the first reaction was, "Say what?" It turns out that the Hypercomputer is Google's t Read more…

AMD MI3000A

How AMD May Get Across the CUDA Moat

October 5, 2023

When discussing GenAI, the term "GPU" almost always enters the conversation and the topic often moves toward performance and access. Interestingly, the word "GPU" is assumed to mean "Nvidia" products. (As an aside, the popular Nvidia hardware used in GenAI are not technically... Read more…

Shutterstock 1606064203

Meta’s Zuckerberg Puts Its AI Future in the Hands of 600,000 GPUs

January 25, 2024

In under two minutes, Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, laid out the company's AI plans, which included a plan to build an artificial intelligence system with the eq Read more…

Google Introduces ‘Hypercomputer’ to Its AI Infrastructure

December 11, 2023

Google ran out of monikers to describe its new AI system released on December 7. Supercomputer perhaps wasn't an apt description, so it settled on Hypercomputer Read more…

China Is All In on a RISC-V Future

January 8, 2024

The state of RISC-V in China was discussed in a recent report released by the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The report, entitled "E Read more…

Intel Won’t Have a Xeon Max Chip with New Emerald Rapids CPU

December 14, 2023

As expected, Intel officially announced its 5th generation Xeon server chips codenamed Emerald Rapids at an event in New York City, where the focus was really o Read more…

IBM Quantum Summit: Two New QPUs, Upgraded Qiskit, 10-year Roadmap and More

December 4, 2023

IBM kicks off its annual Quantum Summit today and will announce a broad range of advances including its much-anticipated 1121-qubit Condor QPU, a smaller 133-qu Read more…

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
HPCwire