Core Economics

By Michael Feldman

January 11, 2008

With all major chipmakers committed to the multicore path, it seems only a matter of time before manycore (processors with greater than 8 cores) becomes the standard architecture across all computing sectors. The 128-core NVIDIA GPUs, the Cisco’s 188-core Metro network processor, and the 64-core Tilera TILE64 processor are three early examples of this trend. The 80-core prototype demonstrated by Intel is an indication that even the most mainstream segments of the computer industry are looking to enter the manycore realm.

While most discussions of manycore tend to focus on software development challenges or memory bandwidth limitations, an even more fundamental issue is the economic model that will drive these products into the marketplace. This is the topic that researchers Joseph Sloan and Rakesh Kumar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign addressed recently in a paper titled, Hardware/System Support for Four Economic Models for Many Core Computing (http://passat.crhc.uiuc.edu/rakeshk/techrep_economic.pdf).

In the current model, customers buy systems containing processors that satisfy the average or worst-case computation needs of their applications. This means when the application requirements change, either the user has to live with the pain of a performance mismatch or go through the expense of purchasing new systems (or new chips) to realign system performance with the applications. Sloan and Rakesh argue that as the number of cores increase, matching the performance needs with applications becomes increasingly difficult and the associated cost of buying unused computing power becomes more prohibitive.

The chip vendors are effected as well. As the number of cores increase, chipmakers must decide on the number of processor configurations to apply to a given market segment. If one can fit 100 cores on a die, how many different variations can be rationalized? Certainly not 100. Intel will have to deal with a smaller version of this problem in its upcoming 45nm Nehalem microarchitecture. So far, the company has described only 2-, 4- and 8-core processor designs for Nehalem. But with the combination of different cache sizes, memory controller architectures and clock speeds, the new processor family will probably end up being the largest Intel has ever supported. When tens or hundreds of cores are the norm, practical considerations will limit the number of unique designs to a very small subset of possible core layouts.

In their paper, Sloan and Kumar propose four related economic models (five actually) for manycore computing. The overall approach is that the customer will usually need fewer cores than are physically present on the chip, but at times may want to use more of them. The authors suggest that chips be developed in such a way as to allow users to pay only for the computing power they need, rather than the peak computing power that is physically present. This can be accomplished with small pieces of logic incorporated into the processor that enables the vendor to disable/enable individual cores. (Presumably, disabled cores would draw little, if any, power.) Enabling or disabling cores involves contacting the vendor, who authenticates the chip and sends activation codes that are used to unlock or lock the specified cores. The user ends up paying only for the desired computing power.

Of the models proposed, the most restrictive approach, the IntelligentBaseline model, forces the user to make a onetime decision about the number of cores needed. In this model, the vendor enables the user-selected subset of cores on the chip before shipping. Each of the other four models — UpgradesOnly, Limited Up/Downgrade, CoresOnRent and PayPerUse — offers a way to change the available processing power of the chip dynamically:

  • The UpgradesOnly model is based on the fact that computation requirements tend to increase over time. The user initially purchases enough cores to satisfy their current processing requirements. Additional cores can be enabled anytime during the processor lifetime, avoiding a system upgrade until the user needs more processing power than is physically available on the chip.
  • The Limited Up/Downgrade model recognizes the fact that average computational needs may sometimes increase temporarily. This allows the user to scale up and down as computational needs warrant. Downgrades involve disabling the number of selected cores and providing some sort of refund to the user.
  • The CoresOnRent model recognizes that there are environments where computational requirements change a lot even over a short periods of time (months). In this case, it may be more reasonable for the user to rent cores rather than own them. In this model, the user contacts the vendor to get access to a specific number of cores for a specific lease period. When the lease expires, the user has the option to renew the lease — with more or less cores.
  • The PayPerUse model is the most unrestricted model. It frees the user from estimating computing requirements at all and just bills the user based on actual core usage over a specified lease period. Like the CoresOnRent model, the user never owns the cores.

The underlying assumption to all this is that the cost of manufacturing the processor does not rise linearly with the number of cores on the die, which allows the chip vendor to sell underutilized processors at a profit. According to Kumar, this is indeed the case. His assumption is that the factors that determine the cost of manufacturing often have nothing to do with the number of cores on a die.

“Going from a one-core chip to a manycore chip may often represent increased costs — due to higher design/verification overhead,” explains Kumar. “But, multiplying the number of cores on a manycore chip will increase costs only marginally [since] the same design can be stamped multiple times to multiply the number of cores on a die. In fact, one of the main reasons for going to many cores is the high degree of IP reuse, i.e., the computational power can be multiplied without much increased cost.”

Kumar admits that chip costs are dependent upon the die area, and if the number of cores increased that area, costs would increase linearly as well. But his contention is the die area is usually fixed because of yield considerations, so the cost does not change much.

Another issue is the strong coupling of the memory system with the peak performance of the processor. Sloan and Kumar suggest that the memory architecture should be composable to support system balance.

“Designing a composable memory hierarchy may not be a big technical challenge,” contends Kumar. “It is just that a strong need was not there in the desktop and mobile domains. Composable memory hierarchies have often been designed in server systems. For example, Capacity on Demand for IBM System i offer clients the ability to non-disruptively activate (no IPL required) processors and memory. Same for Unisys as well as Sun systems too. You can simply have a middleware or microcode that allows/disallows access to certain regions of memory. Alternatively, some the techniques that we developed for supporting and enforcing the proposed models can also be used for memory hierarchies. Composability can also be attained by physically modifying the memory controller or disk controller to decouple memory regions.”

However, the authors admit that in some cases composability may be difficult to achieve because system architectures may require memory hierarchies that are closely coupled with the core count. They also point out a number of other areas of concern, including compatibility with software licensing models (already an area of contention for multicore processors) and privacy/security issues related to vendors having access to customers’ hardware.

“I think that there is no clear answer as to what are the new economic models that we need or whether we need new economic models at all,” says Kumar. “But now may be the time when a discussion needs to start among academics, industry people, and everyone else who has a stake in it. At least an awareness of the issues is needed.”

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

PRACEdays Reflects Europe’s HPC Commitment

May 25, 2017

More than 250 attendees and participants came together for PRACEdays17 in Barcelona last week, part of the European HPC Summit Week 2017, held May 15-19 at t Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Russian Researchers Claim First Quantum-Safe Blockchain

May 25, 2017

The Russian Quantum Center today announced it has overcome the threat of quantum cryptography by creating the first quantum-safe blockchain, securing cryptocurr Read more…

By Doug Black

Google Debuts TPU v2 and will Add to Google Cloud

May 25, 2017

Not long after stirring attention in the deep learning/AI community by revealing the details of its Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), Google last week announced the Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia CEO Predicts AI ‘Cambrian Explosion’

May 25, 2017

The processing power and cloud access to developer tools used to train machine-learning models are making artificial intelligence ubiquitous across computing pl Read more…

By George Leopold

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Exploring the Three Models of Remote Visualization

The explosion of data and advancement of digital technologies are dramatically changing the way many companies do business. With the help of high performance computing (HPC) solutions and data analytics platforms, manufacturers are developing products faster, healthcare providers are improving patient care, and energy companies are improving planning, exploration, and production. Read more…

PGAS Use will Rise on New H/W Trends, Says Reinders

May 25, 2017

If you have not already tried using PGAS, it is time to consider adding PGAS to the programming techniques you know. Partitioned Global Array Space, commonly kn Read more…

By James Reinders

Exascale Escapes 2018 Budget Axe; Rest of Science Suffers

May 23, 2017

President Trump's proposed $4.1 trillion FY 2018 budget is good for U.S. exascale computing development, but grim for the rest of science and technology spend Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Hedge Funds (with Supercomputing help) Rank First Among Investors

May 22, 2017

In case you didn’t know, The Quants Run Wall Street Now, or so says a headline in today’s Wall Street Journal. Quant-run hedge funds now control the largest Read more…

By John Russell

IBM, D-Wave Report Quantum Computing Advances

May 18, 2017

IBM said this week it has built and tested a pair of quantum computing processors, including a prototype of a commercial version. That progress follows an an Read more…

By George Leopold

PRACEdays Reflects Europe’s HPC Commitment

May 25, 2017

More than 250 attendees and participants came together for PRACEdays17 in Barcelona last week, part of the European HPC Summit Week 2017, held May 15-19 at t Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

PGAS Use will Rise on New H/W Trends, Says Reinders

May 25, 2017

If you have not already tried using PGAS, it is time to consider adding PGAS to the programming techniques you know. Partitioned Global Array Space, commonly kn Read more…

By James Reinders

Exascale Escapes 2018 Budget Axe; Rest of Science Suffers

May 23, 2017

President Trump's proposed $4.1 trillion FY 2018 budget is good for U.S. exascale computing development, but grim for the rest of science and technology spend Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Cray Offers Supercomputing as a Service, Targets Biotechs First

May 16, 2017

Leading supercomputer vendor Cray and datacenter/cloud provider the Markley Group today announced plans to jointly deliver supercomputing as a service. The init Read more…

By John Russell

HPE’s Memory-centric The Machine Coming into View, Opens ARMs to 3rd-party Developers

May 16, 2017

Announced three years ago, HPE’s The Machine is said to be the largest R&D program in the venerable company’s history, one that could be progressing tow Read more…

By Doug Black

What’s Up with Hyperion as It Transitions From IDC?

May 15, 2017

If you’re wondering what’s happening with Hyperion Research – formerly the IDC HPC group – apparently you are not alone, says Steve Conway, now senior V Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia’s Mammoth Volta GPU Aims High for AI, HPC

May 10, 2017

At Nvidia's GPU Technology Conference (GTC17) in San Jose, Calif., this morning, CEO Jensen Huang announced the company's much-anticipated Volta architecture a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Launches Servers, Services, and Collaboration at GTC

May 10, 2017

Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) today launched a new liquid cooled GPU-driven Apollo platform based on SGI ICE architecture, a new collaboration with NVIDIA, a Read more…

By John Russell

Quantum Bits: D-Wave and VW; Google Quantum Lab; IBM Expands Access

March 21, 2017

For a technology that’s usually characterized as far off and in a distant galaxy, quantum computing has been steadily picking up steam. Just how close real-wo Read more…

By John Russell

Trump Budget Targets NIH, DOE, and EPA; No Mention of NSF

March 16, 2017

President Trump’s proposed U.S. fiscal 2018 budget issued today sharply cuts science spending while bolstering military spending as he promised during the cam Read more…

By John Russell

Google Pulls Back the Covers on Its First Machine Learning Chip

April 6, 2017

This week Google released a report detailing the design and performance characteristics of the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), its custom ASIC for the inference Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Compiler Company PathScale Seeks Life Raft

March 23, 2017

HPCwire has learned that HPC compiler company PathScale has fallen on difficult times and is asking the community for help or actively seeking a buyer for its a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Nvidia Responds to Google TPU Benchmarking

April 10, 2017

Last week, Google reported that its custom ASIC Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) was 15-30x faster for inferencing workloads than Nvidia's K80 GPU (see our coverage Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

CPU-based Visualization Positions for Exascale Supercomputing

March 16, 2017

Since our first formal product releases of OSPRay and OpenSWR libraries in 2016, CPU-based Software Defined Visualization (SDVis) has achieved wide-spread adopt Read more…

By Jim Jeffers, Principal Engineer and Engineering Leader, Intel

Nvidia’s Mammoth Volta GPU Aims High for AI, HPC

May 10, 2017

At Nvidia's GPU Technology Conference (GTC17) in San Jose, Calif., this morning, CEO Jensen Huang announced the company's much-anticipated Volta architecture a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a ne Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Facebook Open Sources Caffe2; Nvidia, Intel Rush to Optimize

April 18, 2017

From its F8 developer conference in San Jose, Calif., today, Facebook announced Caffe2, a new open-source, cross-platform framework for deep learning. Caffe2 is Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which w Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling Read more…

By Steve Campbell

MIT Mathematician Spins Up 220,000-Core Google Compute Cluster

April 21, 2017

On Thursday, Google announced that MIT math professor and computational number theorist Andrew V. Sutherland had set a record for the largest Google Compute Eng Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

US Supercomputing Leaders Tackle the China Question

March 15, 2017

As China continues to prove its supercomputing mettle via the Top500 list and the forward march of its ambitious plans to stand up an exascale machine by 2020, Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu's Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural networ Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular Read more…

By John Russell

DOE Supercomputer Achieves Record 45-Qubit Quantum Simulation

April 13, 2017

In order to simulate larger and larger quantum systems and usher in an age of "quantum supremacy," researchers are stretching the limits of today's most advance Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This