Grids are Dead! Or are they?

By By Wolfgang Gentzsch, DEISA; Duke University

June 16, 2008

It looks like we have to say goodbye to our good, old grids of the past — at least to all those beautiful features and capabilities envisioned 10 years ago, when grids were supposed to evolve toward coordinated resource sharing and problem solving in dynamic, multi-institutional virtual organizations, and even to extend beyond their scientific scope. This is a great vision, but it is becoming more and more obvious that in order to make it happen, we need much more time and effort than originally anticipated.

During the past 10 years, we have seen hundreds of grid projects come and go, passing away after government funding ran dry. Most of these projects did not have a realistic (nor pragmatic) sustainability strategy, let alone viable business and operational models for their infrastructures, tools, applications and services, or their intended users. Often, the only asset left after the project was the hands-on grid expertise of the project partners, which certainly is highly valuable but in and of itself does not justify all the effort and funding.

I’m sorry to say it, but, so far, grids have not kept their promise. We are stuck with grids in Gartner’s “Trough of Disillusionment.”

But maybe I am too pessimistic, or too impatient. Maybe grids by their very nature are so complex to design, build and maintain, and applications are so cumbersome to grid-enable and run, that it will take another 10 years of trial and error (and re-writing grid middleware?) to find the right path through the labyrinth of coming and going technologies and paradigms — utility computing, autonomic computing, ASP, SOA, SOI, SaaS, PaaS, HaaS, outsourcing, hosting, virtualization, Web 2.0, mashups … you name it. And just when we think we finally got it right, the technology, and even the cultural landscape, changes again.

So, here’s the problem, built in: many of our grids (architecture, technology) are simply so complex that it is almost impossible to adjust them fast enough to take into account the ever-changing IT landscape. Remember, five years ago, the transition from the proprietary grid middleware stacks to service-oriented architectures, and then to include Web services? This killed many grid projects (e.g., UK e-Science projects) — literally about $100 million worth — in the midst of their learning and development curve. Was it worth this $100 million? Do we really have better (in the sense of interoperable, user-friendly, flexible, dynamic, etc.) grid middleware today? Looking at Web services, for example, do we really have to expose all the details of the infrastructure to the user, for the benefit of largest-possible flexibility, which then is left to the user? Isn’t this kind of explicit flexibility the actual reason for an exponential increase in effort to adjust our grid systems to always-changing technologies and strategies?

And what about cloud computing? Clouds are easier to deploy, more user-friendly, more service-oriented, and more on-demand. Still, if clouds want to replace grids, they will face challenges similar to those that grids experienced. Even with simple clouds (like Amazon’s EC2), challenges arise when it comes to reputation and trust. Who trusts what really happens with/to your application and data, behind the portal, within the Amazon or Google clouds? Many of the grid showstoppers we discussed for a long time, they exist for clouds, too; but why are they not being discussed with as much passion this time around? Perhaps because our common sense tells us companies like Amazon and Google are not going to risk their reputations and destroy a potentially big business.

When we think of grids, we immediately think of networks, resources and middleware, in all their wonderful details. When we think of clouds, we think of an elastic service for remote computing and storage — simple, user-friendly, delivered at your fingertips. William Fellows, principal analyst at The 451 Group, says “clouds are grids done properly,” which comes close to the common thinking today. A bit closer to reality (and more in the context of grids), today’s clouds (a la Amazon) are service nodes sitting on the Internet, which tomorrow can become compute and storage nodes in your grid for simple tasks of your application workflow. Clouds can be a very useful utility that you can plug into your grid. Fellows calls them the “Third Way,” a flexible option that can sit between your in-house infrastructure services on one hand and the complete outsourcing model on the other hand: “Utility 2.0.”

But these clouds are not (yet?) ready for a full-blown, complex grid-enabled application workflow, which you usually find in enterprises and computational science today, and perhaps they never will be. Even a single grid service running in a cloud image (or using a service in the cloud) will very quickly face many of the roadblocks we know from grids today.

Concerning cloud computing, the real innovators to me are not Amazon and Google (sorry), who have tons of resources sitting idle in their datacenters while, at the same time, the community is thinking about new ways of doing computing. For me, the real innovator was Sun when, in 2004, it truly built its Sun Grid from scratch, based on the vision that “the network is the computer.” As with other technology trailblazers, however, Sun paid a high price for being first and doing all the experiments and evangelization — but its reputation as an innovator is here to stay. Sun Grid’s successor, Network.com, is very popular among its few die-hard clients. This is not only because it is an easy-to use technology, but especially because of its innovative early users (such as CDO2), and because of the instant support users get from the Sun team.

A similar promising example is DEISA (Distributed European Infrastructure for Supercomputing Applications) with its DECI (DEISA Extreme Computing Initiative). Why is DECI so successful in offering millions of supercomputing cycles to the European e-Science community? There are several reasons, in my opinion:

  • DEISA has a very targeted focus on specific (long-running) supercomputing applications, with most of the applications just running on one best-suited system.
  • It offers user-friendly access (through technology like DESHL and UNICORE).
  • It stays away from those more ambitious general-purpose grid efforts.
  • Its coordinating function leaves the consortium partners (the European supercomputer centers) fully independent; and
  • Application experts (similar to Network.com) help the users with porting their applications to the DEISA infrastructure.

If all this is here to stay, and the currently funded activities will be taken over by the individual supercomputer centers, DEISA will have a good chance to exist for a long time, even after the funding runs dry. Then we might end up with a DEISA cloud, which will become an external HPC node within your grid application workflow.

So what is needed to make grids successful? From what we learned from the recent past, we should lower our expectations in the first place. Then, we need to rethink most of our grid architectures, which often can’t match the architectures of large software projects in industry. The goal should be to reduce complexity dramatically — complexity in the middleware, services, access for the user, and in the claim for universality. We need to focus on specific e-infrastructures for well-suited applications, specific application areas, targeted communities, etc. When building larger, more general grids, we might think of a grid of grids, a hierarchy that leaves as much independence as possible for the smaller grids (or grid project partners), leaves the coordinating functions to the overarching grid, and, thus, bypasses the mental, social, and political barriers that usually arise through direct integration. In that way, the European Grid Initiative (EGI), for example, might have a chance; if the 38 National Grid Initiatives (NGI) agree on which grid layer in the hierarchy is doing what.

But what if the grids operated by the NGIs are not sustainable? Combining 38 complex things does not easily lead to simplicity and allow a cloud-like overlay. A good question for EGI (and certainly for OGF, as well): How simple would it be to have the NGIs wrap their grids as clouds, federating these clouds into a European “cloud of clouds” metasystem?

The good news is that clouds will help grids to survive. They teach grids that in order to be widely accepted and thus sustainable, they have to be simple, user-friendly, service-oriented, scalable, on-demand, SLA-driven, with simple APIs, and so on — just like clouds.

Clouds will become dynamic components of enterprise and research grids, adding an “external” dimension of business flexibility by enhancing their home capacity whenever needed, on demand. Existing businesses will use them for their peak demands and for new projects; service providers will host their applications on them and provide software-as-a-service; and start-ups will integrate them in their offerings without the need to buy resources upfront. Setting up new Web 2.0 communities will become very easy.

With this sea change ahead of us, there will be a continuous strategic importance for businesses and sciences to support the work of the Open Grid Forum (OGF) because only standards will enable the easy building of e-infrastructures from many different components and the transition toward an agile platform for a wide variety of services. Standards developed in OGF guarantee interoperation of components best suited for your infrastructure and your application, and thus reduce dependency from proprietary building blocks, keep costs under control and increase business flexibility.

What all of this means is that grids will not disappear; they will only get cloudier, making up a bright future for ICT. Concerning the naming, I suggest a cloudy grid is still a grid, as a cloudy day is still a day.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

China’s Tencent Server Design Will Use AMD Rome

November 13, 2019

Tencent, the Chinese cloud giant, said it would use AMD’s newest Epyc processor in its internally-designed server. The design win adds further momentum to AMD’s bid to erode rival Intel Corp.’s dominance of the glo Read more…

By George Leopold

NCSA Industry Conference Recap – Part 1

November 13, 2019

Industry Program Director Brendan McGinty welcomed guests to the annual National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) Industry Conference, October 8-10, on the University of Illinois campus in Urbana (UIUC). On Read more…

By Elizabeth Leake, STEM-Trek

Cray, Fujitsu Both Bringing Fujitsu A64FX-based Supercomputers to Market in 2020

November 12, 2019

The number of top-tier HPC systems makers has shrunk due to a steady march of M&A activity, but there is increased diversity and choice of processing components with Intel Xeon, AMD Epyc, IBM Power, and Arm server ch Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Intel AI Summit: New ‘Keem Bay’ Edge VPU, AI Product Roadmap

November 12, 2019

At its AI Summit today in San Francisco, Intel touted a raft of AI training and inference hardware for deployments ranging from cloud to edge and designed to support organizations at various points of their AI journeys. Read more…

By Doug Black

SIA Recognizes Robert Dennard with 2019 Noyce Award

November 12, 2019

If you don’t know what Dennard Scaling is, the chances are strong you don’t labor in electronics. Robert Dennard, longtime IBM researcher, inventor of the DRAM and the fellow for whom Dennard Scaling was named, is th Read more…

By John Russell

AWS Solution Channel

Making High Performance Computing Affordable and Accessible for Small and Medium Businesses with HPC on AWS

High performance computing (HPC) brings a powerful set of tools to a broad range of industries, helping to drive innovation and boost revenue in finance, genomics, oil and gas extraction, and other fields. Read more…

IBM Accelerated Insights

Leveraging Exaflops Performance to Remediate Nuclear Waste

November 12, 2019

Nuclear waste storage sites are a subject of intense controversy and debate; nobody wants the radioactive remnants in their backyard. Now, a collaboration between Berkeley Lab, Pacific Northwest National University (PNNL Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Cray, Fujitsu Both Bringing Fujitsu A64FX-based Supercomputers to Market in 2020

November 12, 2019

The number of top-tier HPC systems makers has shrunk due to a steady march of M&A activity, but there is increased diversity and choice of processing compon Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Adds Support for Ion Trap Quantum Technology to Qiskit

November 11, 2019

After years of percolating in the shadow of quantum computing research based on superconducting semiconductors – think IBM, Rigetti, Google, and D-Wave (quant Read more…

By John Russell

Tackling HPC’s Memory and I/O Bottlenecks with On-Node, Non-Volatile RAM

November 8, 2019

On-node, non-volatile memory (NVRAM) is a game-changing technology that can remove many I/O and memory bottlenecks and provide a key enabler for exascale. Th Read more…

By Jan Rowell

MLPerf Releases First Inference Benchmark Results; Nvidia Touts its Showing

November 6, 2019

MLPerf.org, the young AI-benchmarking consortium, today issued the first round of results for its inference test suite. Among organizations with submissions wer Read more…

By John Russell

Azure Cloud First with AMD Epyc Rome Processors

November 6, 2019

At Ignite 2019 this week, Microsoft's Azure cloud team and AMD announced an expansion of their partnership that began in 2017 when Azure debuted Epyc-backed ins Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Nvidia Launches Credit Card-Sized 21 TOPS Jetson System for Edge Devices

November 6, 2019

Nvidia has launched a new addition to its Jetson product line: a credit card-sized (70x45mm) form factor delivering up to 21 trillion operations/second (TOPS) o Read more…

By Doug Black

In Memoriam: Steve Tuecke, Globus Co-founder

November 4, 2019

HPCwire is deeply saddened to report that Steve Tuecke, longtime scientist at Argonne National Lab and University of Chicago, has passed away at age 52. Tuecke Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Spending Spree: Hyperscalers Bought $57B of IT in 2018, $10B+ by Google – But Is Cloud on Horizon?

October 31, 2019

Hyperscalers are the masters of the IT universe, gravitational centers of increasing pull in the emerging age of data-driven compute and AI.  In the high-stake Read more…

By Doug Black

Supercomputer-Powered AI Tackles a Key Fusion Energy Challenge

August 7, 2019

Fusion energy is the Holy Grail of the energy world: low-radioactivity, low-waste, zero-carbon, high-output nuclear power that can run on hydrogen or lithium. T Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Using AI to Solve One of the Most Prevailing Problems in CFD

October 17, 2019

How can artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC) solve mesh generation, one of the most commonly referenced problems in computational engineering? A new study has set out to answer this question and create an industry-first AI-mesh application... Read more…

By James Sharpe

Cray Wins NNSA-Livermore ‘El Capitan’ Exascale Contract

August 13, 2019

Cray has won the bid to build the first exascale supercomputer for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and Lawrence Livermore National Laborator Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

DARPA Looks to Propel Parallelism

September 4, 2019

As Moore’s law runs out of steam, new programming approaches are being pursued with the goal of greater hardware performance with less coding. The Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency is launching a new programming effort aimed at leveraging the benefits of massive distributed parallelism with less sweat. Read more…

By George Leopold

AMD Launches Epyc Rome, First 7nm CPU

August 8, 2019

From a gala event at the Palace of Fine Arts in San Francisco yesterday (Aug. 7), AMD launched its second-generation Epyc Rome x86 chips, based on its 7nm proce Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

D-Wave’s Path to 5000 Qubits; Google’s Quantum Supremacy Claim

September 24, 2019

On the heels of IBM’s quantum news last week come two more quantum items. D-Wave Systems today announced the name of its forthcoming 5000-qubit system, Advantage (yes the name choice isn’t serendipity), at its user conference being held this week in Newport, RI. Read more…

By John Russell

Ayar Labs to Demo Photonics Chiplet in FPGA Package at Hot Chips

August 19, 2019

Silicon startup Ayar Labs continues to gain momentum with its DARPA-backed optical chiplet technology that puts advanced electronics and optics on the same chip Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Crystal Ball Gazing: IBM’s Vision for the Future of Computing

October 14, 2019

Dario Gil, IBM’s relatively new director of research, painted a intriguing portrait of the future of computing along with a rough idea of how IBM thinks we’ Read more…

By John Russell

Leading Solution Providers

ISC 2019 Virtual Booth Video Tour

CRAY
CRAY
DDN
DDN
DELL EMC
DELL EMC
GOOGLE
GOOGLE
ONE STOP SYSTEMS
ONE STOP SYSTEMS
PANASAS
PANASAS
VERNE GLOBAL
VERNE GLOBAL

Intel Confirms Retreat on Omni-Path

August 1, 2019

Intel Corp.’s plans to make a big splash in the network fabric market for linking HPC and other workloads has apparently belly-flopped. The chipmaker confirmed to us the outlines of an earlier report by the website CRN that it has jettisoned plans for a second-generation version of its Omni-Path interconnect... Read more…

By Staff report

Kubernetes, Containers and HPC

September 19, 2019

Software containers and Kubernetes are important tools for building, deploying, running and managing modern enterprise applications at scale and delivering enterprise software faster and more reliably to the end user — while using resources more efficiently and reducing costs. Read more…

By Daniel Gruber, Burak Yenier and Wolfgang Gentzsch, UberCloud

Dell Ramps Up HPC Testing of AMD Rome Processors

October 21, 2019

Dell Technologies is wading deeper into the AMD-based systems market with a growing evaluation program for the latest Epyc (Rome) microprocessors from AMD. In a Read more…

By John Russell

Rise of NIH’s Biowulf Mirrors the Rise of Computational Biology

July 29, 2019

The story of NIH’s supercomputer Biowulf is fascinating, important, and in many ways representative of the transformation of life sciences and biomedical res Read more…

By John Russell

Intel Debuts Pohoiki Beach, Its 8M Neuron Neuromorphic Development System

July 17, 2019

Neuromorphic computing has received less fanfare of late than quantum computing whose mystery has captured public attention and which seems to have generated mo Read more…

By John Russell

Xilinx vs. Intel: FPGA Market Leaders Launch Server Accelerator Cards

August 6, 2019

The two FPGA market leaders, Intel and Xilinx, both announced new accelerator cards this week designed to handle specialized, compute-intensive workloads and un Read more…

By Doug Black

When Dense Matrix Representations Beat Sparse

September 9, 2019

In our world filled with unintended consequences, it turns out that saving memory space to help deal with GPU limitations, knowing it introduces performance pen Read more…

By James Reinders

With the Help of HPC, Astronomers Prepare to Deflect a Real Asteroid

September 26, 2019

For years, NASA has been running simulations of asteroid impacts to understand the risks (and likelihoods) of asteroids colliding with Earth. Now, NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) are preparing for the next, crucial step in planetary defense against asteroid impacts: physically deflecting a real asteroid. Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This