Mapping the SLA Landscape for High Performance Clouds

By Dr. Ivona Brandic

February 7, 2011

Cloud computing represents the convergence of several concepts in IT, ranging from virtualization, distributed application design, grid computing, and enterprise IT management–resulting to be a promising paradigm for on demand provision of ICT infrastructures.

During the past few years significant effort has been made in the sub-fields of cloud research, including the development of various federation mechanisms, cloud security, virtualization and service management techniques.

While a wealth of work has been accomplished to suit the technological development of clouds, there has yet been very little work done in the area of the market mechanisms that support them.

As we learned in the past, however (consider the case of grid technologies) appropriate market models for virtual goods, ease of use of those markets, low thresholds for entering the market for traders and buyers, and the appropriate processes for the definition and management of virtual goods have remained challenging issues. The way these topics are addressed will decide whether cloud computing will take root as a self-sustaining state-of-the-art technology.
 
The current cloud landscape is characterized by two market mechanisms: either users can select products from one of the big players with their sets of well-defined, but rigid offerings; or they rely on off-line relationships to cloud providers with niche products.

This division is especially marked in the area of HPC given the comprehensive special requirements needed, including specific security infrastructures, compliance to legal guidelines, massive scalability or support for parallel code execution, among others. HPC thus suffers from a low number of comparable choices, thus resulting in low liquidity of current cloud markets and provider/vendor lock in.

Sufficient market liquidity is essential for dynamic and open cloud markets. Liquid markets are characterized by a high number of matches for bids and offers. With the low market liquidity traders have the high risk of not being able to trade resources, while users have the risks of not being able to find suitable products.

A crucial factor in achieving high market liquidity is the existence of standardized goods. Virtual goods, as this is the case in clouds, however, exhibit high variability in product description. That means, that very similar or almost identical goods can be described in various ways with different attributes and parameters.

As shown in Table 1 below, computing resources traded in a PaaS fashion can be described through different non-standardized attributes, e.g., CPU cores, incoming bandwidth, processor types, required storage. Thus, high variability in the description of goods results again in low market liquidity. Another important characteristic of virtual goods is that they change and evolve over time following various technological trends. For example the attribute number of cores appeared just with the introduction of multi core architectures.

Table 1: Example SLA parameters

Incoming Bandwidth >10 MBit/s
Outgoing Bandwidth >12 MBit/s
Storage >1024 GB
Availability >99%
CPU Cores >16

Based on aforementioned observations, two challenging questions have been identified:

  • How can users’ demand and traders’ offers be channeled towards standardized products, which can evolve and adapt over time and reflect users’ needs and traders’ capabilities?
  • Which mechanism do we need to achieve sufficient market liquidity, where traders have high probability to sell their products and where users have sufficient probability to buy products they require.

To counteract this problem we make use of Service Level Agreements (SLAs), which are traditionally used to establish contracts between cloud traders and buyers.

Table 1 shows a typical SLA with the parameters and according values expressing non-functional requirements for the service usage. SLA templates represent popular SLA formats containing all attributes and parameters but without any values and are usually used to channel demand and offer of a market. Private templates are utilized at the buyers and traders infrastructures and reflect the needs of the particular stakeholder in terms of SLA parameters they use to establish a contract. Typical SLA parameters used at the PaaS level are depicted in Table 1 and include availability, inbound bandwidth, outgoing bandwidth, etc. Considering the high variability of virtual goods in cloud markets, the probability is high that public templates used in marketplaces to attract buyers and sellers and private templates of cloud stakeholders do not match.

One could think that traditional approaches like semantic technologies, e.g., ontologies, can be used to channel variety of SLA templates. Also public templates, which can be downloaded and utilized within the local business / scientific applications could counter act the problem of the variety of SLA templates. However, usage of ontologies is a highly static approach where the dynamics of the changing demand / supply of the market and evolving products cannot be captured. Moreover, utilization of public SLA templates in private business processes or scientific applications is in many cases not possible since it requires changes of the local applications.

In the context of the Austrian national FoSII project (DSG group, Vienna University of Technology), we are investigating self-governing cloud Computing infrastructures necessary for the attainment of established Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Timely prevention of SLA violations requires advanced resource monitoring and knowledge management. In particular, we are developing novel techniques for mapping low-level resource metrics to high-level SLAs and bridging the gap between metrics monitored by the arbitrary monitoring tools and SLA metrics guaranteed to the user, which are usually application based.

We apply various knowledge management techniques, as for example Case Based Reasoning for the prevention of SLA violations before they occur while reducing energy consumption. In collaboration with the Seoul National University we are exploring novel models for SLA mapping to counteract the problem of heterogeneous public and private templates in cloud markets. SLA mapping approach facilitates market participants to define translations from their private templates to public SLA templates while keeping their private temples unchanged. The effects of the SLA mapping approach are twofold:

  • It increases market liquidity since slightly different private templates are channeled towards few publicly available public templates. Consequently, public templates can be frequently adapted based on the supplied, aggregated, and analyzed SLA mappings. Thus, publicly available SLA temples reflect the demand and supply of the markets and can be easily adapted.
  • By clustering supplied SLA mappings different groups of cloud buyers with similar demand can be identified. Thus, based on the information obtained from the clustering information, products for a specific group of users can be tailored. This includes also generation of product niches, which are usually neglected in traditional markets.

SLA mapping is used to bridge the gap between inconsistent parts of two SLA templates – usually between the publicly available template and the private template. For the implementation of the SLA mappings we use XSLT, a declarative XML-based language for the transformation of XML documents. Thereby the original document is not changed, rather the new document is created based on the content of the original document. Thus, if the original document is the private template of the cloud user, which differs from the public template, transformations based on the XSLT can be defined transforming the private into the public template.

Thereby we distinguish two different types of mappings:

1. Ad-hoc SLA mapping. Such mappings define translations between a parameter existing in both, private and public SLA template. We differ simple ad-hoc mapping i.e., mapping of different values for an SLA attribute or an SLA element, e.g., mapping between the names CPU Cores and Number Of Cores of an SLA parameter, and complex ad-hoc mapping, i.e., mapping between different functions for calculating a value of an SLA parameter. An example for the complex mapping would be a unit for expressing a value of an SLA parameter Price from EUR to USD, where translation have to be defined from one function for calculating price to another one. Although, simple and complex mappings appear to be rather trivial, contracts cannot be established between non-matching templates without human intervention of without the overhead of the semantic layer – which anyway has to be managed manually.

2. Future SLA mapping defines a wish for adding a new SLA parameter supported by the application to a public SLA template, or a wish for deleting an existing SLA parameter from a public template. Unlike ad-hoc mapping, future mapping cannot be applied immediately, but possibly in the future. For example a buyer could express the need for a specific SLA parameter, which does not exist yet, but can be integrated into the public templates after the observation of the supplied SLA mappings.

So far we have implemented the first prototype of the VieSLAF (Vienna Service Level Agreement) middleware for the management of SLA mappings allowing users and traders to define, manage, and apply their mappings. In our recent work we developed simulation models for the definition of market settings suitable for the evaluation of the SLA mapping approach in a real world scenario. Based on the applied SLA mappings we defined utility and cost models for users and providers. Thereafter, we applied three different methods for the evaluation of the supplied SLA mappings during a specific time span. We simulated market conditions with a number of market participants entering and leaving the market with different distributions of SLA parameters, thus, requiring different SLA mapping scenarios.

Our first observations show promising results where we achieve good high net utilities considering utilities and costs of doing SLA mappings vs. doing nothing (i.e., not achieving a match in the market). Moreover, in our simulations we applied clustering algorithms where we isolated clusters of SLA templates, which can be used as a starting point for the definition of various cloud products. Utilities achieved when applying clustering algorithms outperforms the costs for doing SLA mappings and doing nothing.

However, those are only preliminary results and the whole potential of SLA mappings is still not fully exploited. Integration into IDEs like Eclipse, where cloud stakeholders can define SLA mapping using suitable Domain Specific Languages, e.g., visual modeling languages, is an open research issue and could facilitate definition of SLA mapping by domains specialists.

The process of defining SLA mapping fully is still in the early stages; for now, these mappings are defined manually by the end users. However, with the development of the appropriate infrastructures and middleware mapping could be done in an automatic way. For example, if the attribute Price has to be translated to Euro a third party service delivering the current USD/Euro exchange rate could be included in an autonomic way facilitating not only mapping between different attributes, but also the proper generation of the according attribute values.

Aggregated and analyzed SLA maps can deliver important information about the demand and structure of the market, thus, facilitating development of open and dynamic cloud markets. Thereby, market rules and structures can be adapted on demand based on the current developments of the products and market participants.

About the Author

Dr. Ivona Brandic is Assistant Professor at the Distributed Systems Group, Information Systems Institute, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien).

Prior to that, she was Assistant Professor at the Department of Scientific Computing, Vienna University. She received her PhD degree from Vienna University of Technology in 2007. From 2003 to 2007 she participated in the special research project AURORA (Advanced Models, Applications and Software Systems for High Performance Computing) and the European Union’s GEMSS (Grid-Enabled Medical Simulation Services) project.

She is involved in the European Union’s SCube project and she is leading the Austrian national FoSII (Foundations of Self-governing ICT Infrastructures) project funded by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF). She is Management Committee member of the European Commission’s COST Action on Energy Efficient Large Scale Distributed Systems. From June-August 2008 she was visiting researcher at the University of Melbourne. Her interests comprise SLA and QoS management, Service-oriented architectures, autonomic computing, workflow management, and large scale distributed systems (cloud, grid, cluster, etc.).
 

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown and Spectre security updates on the performance of popular H Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fostering Lustre Advancement Through Development and Contributions

January 17, 2018

Six months after organizational changes at Intel's High Performance Data (HPDD) division, most in the Lustre community have shed any initial apprehension around the potential changes that could affect or disrupt Lustre Read more…

By Carlos Aoki Thomaz

Inventor Claims to Have Solved Floating Point Error Problem

January 17, 2018

"The decades-old floating point error problem has been solved," proclaims a press release from inventor Alan Jorgensen. The computer scientist has filed for and received a patent for a "processor design, which allows rep Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

HPE and NREL Take Steps to Create a Sustainable, Energy-Efficient Data Center with an H2 Fuel Cell

As enterprises attempt to manage rising volumes of data, unplanned data center outages are becoming more common and more expensive. As the cost of downtime rises, enterprises lose out on productivity and valuable competitive advantage without access to their critical data. Read more…

SRC Spends $200M on University Research Centers

January 16, 2018

The Semiconductor Research Corporation, as part of its JUMP initiative, has awarded $200 million to fund six research centers whose areas of focus span cognitive computing, memory-centric computing, high-speed communicat Read more…

By John Russell

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fostering Lustre Advancement Through Development and Contributions

January 17, 2018

Six months after organizational changes at Intel's High Performance Data (HPDD) division, most in the Lustre community have shed any initial apprehension aroun Read more…

By Carlos Aoki Thomaz

SRC Spends $200M on University Research Centers

January 16, 2018

The Semiconductor Research Corporation, as part of its JUMP initiative, has awarded $200 million to fund six research centers whose areas of focus span cognitiv Read more…

By John Russell

When the Chips Are Down

January 11, 2018

In the last article, "The High Stakes Semiconductor Game that Drives HPC Diversity," I alluded to the challenges facing the semiconductor industry and how that may impact the evolution of HPC systems over the next few years. I thought I’d lift the covers a little and look at some of the commercial challenges that impact the component technology we use in HPC. Read more…

By Dairsie Latimer

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

Momentum Builds for US Exascale

January 9, 2018

2018 looks to be a great year for the U.S. exascale program. The last several months of 2017 revealed a number of important developments that help put the U.S. Read more…

By Alex R. Larzelere

ANL’s Rick Stevens on CANDLE, ARM, Quantum, and More

January 8, 2018

Late last year HPCwire caught up with Rick Stevens, associate laboratory director for computing, environment and life Sciences at Argonne National Laboratory, f Read more…

By John Russell

Chip Flaws ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Loom Large

January 4, 2018

The HPC and wider tech community have been abuzz this week over the discovery of critical design flaws that impact virtually all contemporary microprocessors. T Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

US Coalesces Plans for First Exascale Supercomputer: Aurora in 2021

September 27, 2017

At the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) meeting, in Arlington, Va., yesterday (Sept. 26), it was revealed that the "Aurora" supercompute Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Japan Unveils Quantum Neural Network

November 22, 2017

The U.S. and China are leading the race toward productive quantum computing, but it's early enough that ultimate leadership is still something of an open questi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

AMD Showcases Growing Portfolio of EPYC and Radeon-based Systems at SC17

November 13, 2017

AMD’s charge back into HPC and the datacenter is on full display at SC17. Having launched the EPYC processor line in June along with its MI25 GPU the focus he Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Responds to Google TPU Benchmarking

April 10, 2017

Nvidia highlights strengths of its newest GPU silicon in response to Google's report on the performance and energy advantages of its custom tensor processor. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Begins Power9 Rollout with Backing from DOE, Google

December 6, 2017

After over a year of buildup, IBM is unveiling its first Power9 system based on the same architecture as the Department of Energy CORAL supercomputers, Summit a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fast Forward: Five HPC Predictions for 2018

December 21, 2017

What’s on your list of high (and low) lights for 2017? Volta 100’s arrival on the heels of the P100? Appearance, albeit late in the year, of IBM’s Power9? Read more…

By John Russell

GlobalFoundries Puts Wind in AMD’s Sails with 12nm FinFET

September 24, 2017

From its annual tech conference last week (Sept. 20), where GlobalFoundries welcomed more than 600 semiconductor professionals (reaching the Santa Clara venue Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Chip Flaws ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Loom Large

January 4, 2018

The HPC and wider tech community have been abuzz this week over the discovery of critical design flaws that impact virtually all contemporary microprocessors. T Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Perspective: What Really Happened at SC17?

November 22, 2017

SC is over. Now comes the myriad of follow-ups. Inboxes are filled with templated emails from vendors and other exhibitors hoping to win a place in the post-SC thinking of booth visitors. Attendees of tutorials, workshops and other technical sessions will be inundated with requests for feedback. Read more…

By Andrew Jones

Tensors Come of Age: Why the AI Revolution Will Help HPC

November 13, 2017

Thirty years ago, parallel computing was coming of age. A bitter battle began between stalwart vector computing supporters and advocates of various approaches to parallel computing. IBM skeptic Alan Karp, reacting to announcements of nCUBE’s 1024-microprocessor system and Thinking Machines’ 65,536-element array, made a public $100 wager that no one could get a parallel speedup of over 200 on real HPC workloads. Read more…

By John Gustafson & Lenore Mullin

Delays, Smoke, Records & Markets – A Candid Conversation with Cray CEO Peter Ungaro

October 5, 2017

Earlier this month, Tom Tabor, publisher of HPCwire and I had a very personal conversation with Cray CEO Peter Ungaro. Cray has been on something of a Cinderell Read more…

By Tiffany Trader & Tom Tabor

Flipping the Flops and Reading the Top500 Tea Leaves

November 13, 2017

The 50th edition of the Top500 list, the biannual publication of the world’s fastest supercomputers based on public Linpack benchmarking results, was released Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

GlobalFoundries, Ayar Labs Team Up to Commercialize Optical I/O

December 4, 2017

GlobalFoundries (GF) and Ayar Labs, a startup focused on using light, instead of electricity, to transfer data between chips, today announced they've entered in Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Chips – A Veritable Smorgasbord?

October 10, 2017

For the first time since AMD's ill-fated launch of Bulldozer the answer to the question, 'Which CPU will be in my next HPC system?' doesn't have to be 'Whichever variety of Intel Xeon E5 they are selling when we procure'. Read more…

By Dairsie Latimer

Nvidia, Partners Announce Several V100 Servers

September 27, 2017

Here come the Volta 100-based servers. Nvidia today announced an impressive line-up of servers from major partners – Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM Read more…

By John Russell

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This