LANL Sends Environmental Management to the Cloud

By Nicole Hemsoth

July 19, 2011

Purveyor of cloud-based environmental management software, Locus Technologies, recently announced that it had been selected to manage environmental information and data for Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL).

The company claimed the contract to manage the lab’s data in their cloud was worth up to $2 million. Their Locus EIM software will help LANL organize and manage all future environmental compliance and monitoring activities using a SaaS model. Locus says this will better position LANL to address legacy site contamination, both chemical and radioactive, across a number of locations and streamline views into the bigger picture of environmental management at the facility.

The cloud-based software will fulfill a number of functions, including organization of a number of media types, comparison of historical and new contamination levels, planning, sampling and processing environmental data and more generally handling all coordination, integration and community of that data.

Locus says they’ve designed their software  “specifically to meet challenging water-quality management issues, covering both analytical chemistry and the management of radionuclides data in a complex hydro-geological setting.” They say their EIM software will also provide a web-based GIS system for Los Alamos data that will be available to the general public, bringing ease of use and complete transparency to complex data sets. “

We recently interviewed Locus Technologies’ president and CEO, Neno Duplan about the contract and got to the heart of what is involved with these types of software solutions in cloud environments.

HPCc: Can you describe your cloud and what made this an attractive option for LANL—after all, there are a number of other possibilities. Is this an on-demand cloud or public resource like Amazon’s or SaaS or some combination of all? Please be very specific.

Duplan: Locus offers its on-demand services through its own Cloud platform that has been serving customers in this industry since 1999. Locus Cloud is true Software as a Service (SaaS) and that requires some explanation.  We have noticed over the last year or so lots of confusion about this term and it is important to define it.  The myriad terms used by software and service companies to describe the delivery of on-premise applications is confusing—and that confusion is by design. As more and more companies move to SaaS solutions and cloud computing, legacy software vendors will continue to confuse the conversation.

Cloud, software-as-a-service (SaaS), on-demand, application service provider (ASP), business process outsourcing (BPO), outsourced—what do all these words mean? Are they really all the same? Many legacy on-premise application providers would like you to believe so, but there are vast differences. The distinction between SaaS and earlier applications delivered over the Internet, or applications that environmental consultants would deliver over Internet today, is that SaaS solutions were developed specifically to leverage web technologies such as the browser, thereby making them web-native.

The data design and architecture of SaaS applications are specifically built with a single instance of software shared among all customers accessing it and ‘multi-tenant’ backend, thus enabling multiple customers or users to access a shared data model. Locus EIM is one such application.  Systems developed as client servers also could be delivered via web, but they don’t qualify as SaaS applications as they were not natively developed for the web. Those are kind of drinking of “nonalcoholic wine”. Now with definition out of the way, let’s focus on Locus Cloud apps.

Locus Cloud has the following characteristics:

•    Customer implementations off premise and in shared datacenters
•    Pay-as-you-go pricing model
•    All customers on the same software code line
•    Customer sharing of data center resources
•    Application delivery is one-to-many model (single instance, multi-tenant architecture) [as opposed to  a one-to-one model, including architecture, pricing, partnering, and management characteristics]
•    Centralized and rolling feature updating, which obviates the need for end-users to download patches and upgrades?
•    Frequent integration into a larger network of communicating software—either as part of a mashup or a plugin to a platform as a service
•    Updates included with the service

By having every customer on the same line of code and the same version of software, Locus’ SaaS provides real business value: lower cost, better service, and greater customer intimacy.

HPCc: Provide us with the hardware specs for this particular cloud service—we are a bit confused; do you have a cluster upon which you host customer data/applications? Again, be as specific and detailed as possible.

Duplan: Locus Cloud is delivered through a redundant professionally managed data centers in clustered environment. Both application(s) and data are hosted on Locus cloud. Our server farms are highly scalable and we can expand to meet any customer demand. We use standard server technology and there is nothing proprietary about hardware. It is commodity hardware.

EIM software is quite sophisticated—can you go a bit beyond the press release and tell us first what this will entail data-wise/what the software will accomplish and also, what the computational requirements are for something at the scale LANL requires.

Yes, EIM is a sophisticated application dealing with complex data sets and complex workflow processes. In addition to expected functionality to deal with complex domain of analytical chemistry and radionuclides management EIM also provides:

•    Meshups with Google Maps for GIS-based data mapping
•    Ability to quickly incorporate more feature requests from users, since there is frequently no marginal cost for requesting new features
•    Faster new feature releases, since the entire community of users benefits (the wisdom of the crowd syndrome along the rolling upgrade program)
•    Embodiment of recognized best practices, since the user community drives Locus to support best practice
•    Automation of data collection via a single file EDD (Electronic Data Deliverable) format
•    Proven record of scalability to millions analytical records managed from a single code instance in real time
•    Embedded Long Term Monitoring Optimization Module
•    Full and embedded data validation module
•    Fully integrated modules offered through Single Sign On with no third party software add-ons.

HPCc: LANL has its own clusters; why did they decide to outsource this type of computing?

Duplan: LANL has its own clusters of servers on premises. But that does not make LANL experts in environmental database development. LANL wanted off-the shelf solution delivered in the cloud to accelerate implementation and bring all their data into the single system. Locus EIM cloud allowed them to do exactly that. Another reason is cost. There is little upfront cost to deploy solution in the cloud as opposed to deploying custom applications on premises.  The third reason is subject matter knowledge. Locus has this in spades and we have the only module in the market that deals with radionuclides (See more in: Japan quake data should be stored in the cloud here or here.)

Locus’ software enabled LANL to organize and validate all key environmental information in a single system, which includes radionculides data, analytical data for water, air and soil, weather data, sustainability, compliance and environmental content. Since Locus software is delivered via Cloud there was no hardware to procure, no large, up-front license fee, and no complex set-ups.

HPCc: Let’s move outside of LANL for a moment—what are some of the most sophisticated use cases are there for your cloud computing service in terms of data size/movement/computational requirements.

Duplan: All Locus deployments are large and complex as our software is designed to deal with huge data sets in the real time. Our applications offered through the cloud are very different from the ones that we see in consumer world such as Google, Amazon, Facebook and alike. Common for consumer web and some business applications are very large number of users, high traffic, retrieving relatively simple and small data sets to perform a simple action on them such as buy or befriend or “like”. In Locus’ case, our user base is much smaller, but much more sophisticated and demanding. It is not atypical that average EIM or ePortal user performs queries that produce millions of records that need to quickly be interpreted with assistance of intelligent databases, charted, contoured, mapped and reported while making sure that myriad of requirements from many regulatory frameworks are met  in the process.

Most of Locus applications dwarf consumer web requirements in terms of complexity and size of databases. For that and other reasons companies like ExxonMobil, Chevron, Honeywell or Exelon all selected Locus’ Cloud to deal with their environmental, energy and sustainability data and information. And that is the reason that if you type in Google a common term “environmental data management”, the link to Locus’ website will be among the top few of the first page of the (unpaid) search results. Significant amount of intelligence and Expert System technology is built in the Locus apps.
 
HPCc: Do you think most users are deploying your service to replace on-site hardware or is this more of a “bursty” needs-driven market to supplement existing HPC?

Duplan: It is more “bursty” needs-driven, but not to replace existing HPC, but to replace non-existent or spreadsheet driven processes that resulted in information overflow that is impossible to manage without paying big bucks to consultants who created the problems in the first place.

Environmental and energy data is collected from a variety of sources: from consultants, contractors, labs, suppliers, customer’s own field employees, or as is more increasingly true, by remote wireless sensors. It is stored in remote locations, such as the supplier’s spreadsheets or other files on the desktop, laptop, or network server of suppliers. The customer usually has no access to, or ownership of, such data. Such large, dispersed volumes of information are difficult to track and very costly to audit without relational databases, and content or document management solutions software. If the customer does adopt environmental information management systems, the systems typically fall into one of two categories:

•    Stand-alone systems that project-level consultants and staff engineers love, but that do not enable managers to perform corporate governance, data-mining, or forecasting tasks, or share information across a large organization or the web.

•    High-end, all-encompassing extensions of ERP systems, such as SAP, that can scale to support the needs of hundreds or thousands of users, but environmental managers refuse to use because they are complex and require costly additional programming to manage environmental or energy data. Such enterprise systems are often characterized as being “a mile wide and inch deep” because they typically lack domain depth, are not offered over the web, are expensive and difficult to install and integrate, cannot be used by suppliers, and are not particularly user-friendly.

As a result, too many businesses and governmental agencies are “flying blind” when it comes to managing their environmental, water or energy information.

Companies with these types of problems should consider the Cloud Computing Model. The model exactly fits the way environmental information needs to be managed through mashups of various databases and technologies, and has the potential to completely upend the way corporations manage their environmental liability data or energy and resource consumption. 

Enterprises that have large portfolios of properties can use Cloud Computing as a very low-cost, no-commitment way to quickly take control of their mission critical environmental data and information and get new services and capabilities to take control of their compliance needs by entirely circumventing the IT department.

Many companies that do not have control or ownership of their critical environmental data, and most today don’t, and rely on an army of consultants and their spreadsheets to meet their reporting requirements, can continue trying to ignore Cloud Computing as it is just in its infancy, but doing so may be a mistake as Cloud Computing is looking more and more a classic disruptive technology.

How quickly can a company get control of its analytical data that sits scattered in consulting offices and consolidate it in to a usable database? Four weeks? Eight weeks? 10 months? For many enterprises, the answer is even longer. Today, the businesses need to respond in Internet time with new services, capabilities, and offerings to stay on top of their environmental compliance requirements. Yet, most companies aren’t well equipped to respond with speed. Most companies still have a “procure and provision” approach to the infrastructure that supports their services. Even if the decision has been made to purchase enterprise software to organize and manage large quantities of environmental and energy information and compliance activities in house, lengthy approval processes often kill many of these systems before they can be deployed.  The reason is that these can be a lengthy process of actions involving everyone from storage, networking, security, and sometimes facilities.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

HPE Server Shows Low Latency on STAC-N1 Test

February 22, 2017

The performance of trade and match servers can be a critical differentiator for financial trading houses. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Financial Update (Feb. 2017)

February 22, 2017

In this recurring feature, we’ll provide you with financial highlights from companies in the HPC industry. Check back in regularly for an updated list with the most pertinent fiscal information. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

Rethinking HPC Platforms for ‘Second Gen’ Applications

February 22, 2017

Just what constitutes HPC and how best to support it is a keen topic currently. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

O&G Companies Create Value with High Performance Remote Visualization

Today’s oil and gas (O&G) companies are striving to process datasets that have become not only tremendously large, but extremely complex. And the larger that data becomes, the harder it is to move and analyze it – particularly with a workforce that could be distributed between drilling sites, offshore rigs, and remote offices. Read more…

IDC: Will the Real Exascale Race Please Stand Up?

February 21, 2017

So the exascale race is on. And lots of organizations are in the pack. Government announcements from the US, China, India, Japan, and the EU indicate that they are working hard to make it happen – some sooner, some later. Read more…

By Bob Sorensen, IDC

ExxonMobil, NCSA, Cray Scale Reservoir Simulation to 700,000+ Processors

February 17, 2017

In a scaling breakthrough for oil and gas discovery, ExxonMobil geoscientists report they have harnessed the power of 717,000 processors – the equivalent of 22,000 32-processor computers – to run complex oil and gas reservoir simulation models. Read more…

By Doug Black

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDC: Will the Real Exascale Race Please Stand Up?

February 21, 2017

So the exascale race is on. And lots of organizations are in the pack. Government announcements from the US, China, India, Japan, and the EU indicate that they are working hard to make it happen – some sooner, some later. Read more…

By Bob Sorensen, IDC

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Drug Developers Use Google Cloud HPC in the Fight Against ALS

February 16, 2017

Within the haystack of a lethal disease such as ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis / Lou Gehrig’s Disease) there exists, somewhere, the needle that will pierce this therapy-resistant affliction. Read more…

By Doug Black

Azure Edges AWS in Linpack Benchmark Study

February 15, 2017

The “when will clouds be ready for HPC” question has ebbed and flowed for years. Read more…

By John Russell

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

Cray Posts Best-Ever Quarter, Visibility Still Limited

February 10, 2017

On its Wednesday earnings call, Cray announced the largest revenue quarter in the company’s history and the second-highest revenue year. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

For IBM/OpenPOWER: Success in 2017 = (Volume) Sales

January 11, 2017

To a large degree IBM and the OpenPOWER Foundation have done what they said they would – assembling a substantial and growing ecosystem and bringing Power-based products to market, all in about three years. Read more…

By John Russell

US, China Vie for Supercomputing Supremacy

November 14, 2016

The 48th edition of the TOP500 list is fresh off the presses and while there is no new number one system, as previously teased by China, there are a number of notable entrants from the US and around the world and significant trends to report on. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Lighting up Aurora: Behind the Scenes at the Creation of the DOE’s Upcoming 200 Petaflops Supercomputer

December 1, 2016

In April 2015, U.S. Department of Energy Undersecretary Franklin Orr announced that Intel would be the prime contractor for Aurora: Read more…

By Jan Rowell

D-Wave SC16 Update: What’s Bo Ewald Saying These Days

November 18, 2016

Tucked in a back section of the SC16 exhibit hall, quantum computing pioneer D-Wave has been talking up its new 2000-qubit processor announced in September. Forget for a moment the criticism sometimes aimed at D-Wave. This small Canadian company has sold several machines including, for example, ones to Lockheed and NASA, and has worked with Google on mapping machine learning problems to quantum computing. In July Los Alamos National Laboratory took possession of a 1000-quibit D-Wave 2X system that LANL ordered a year ago around the time of SC15. Read more…

By John Russell

Enlisting Deep Learning in the War on Cancer

December 7, 2016

Sometime in Q2 2017 the first ‘results’ of the Joint Design of Advanced Computing Solutions for Cancer (JDACS4C) will become publicly available according to Rick Stevens. He leads one of three JDACS4C pilot projects pressing deep learning (DL) into service in the War on Cancer. Read more…

By John Russell

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular offerings such as Caffe, Theano, and Torch. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Startup Advances Auto-Parallelization’s Promise

January 23, 2017

The shift from single core to multicore hardware has made finding parallelism in codes more important than ever, but that hasn’t made the task of parallel programming any easier. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

CPU Benchmarking: Haswell Versus POWER8

June 2, 2015

With OpenPOWER activity ramping up and IBM’s prominent role in the upcoming DOE machines Summit and Sierra, it’s a good time to look at how the IBM POWER CPU stacks up against the x86 Xeon Haswell CPU from Intel. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Nvidia Sees Bright Future for AI Supercomputing

November 23, 2016

Graphics chipmaker Nvidia made a strong showing at SC16 in Salt Lake City last week. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

BioTeam’s Berman Charts 2017 HPC Trends in Life Sciences

January 4, 2017

Twenty years ago high performance computing was nearly absent from life sciences. Today it’s used throughout life sciences and biomedical research. Genomics and the data deluge from modern lab instruments are the main drivers, but so is the longer-term desire to perform predictive simulation in support of Precision Medicine (PM). There’s even a specialized life sciences supercomputer, ‘Anton’ from D.E. Shaw Research, and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is standing up its second Anton 2 and actively soliciting project proposals. There’s a lot going on. Read more…

By John Russell

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDG to Be Bought by Chinese Investors; IDC to Spin Out HPC Group

January 19, 2017

US-based publishing and investment firm International Data Group, Inc. (IDG) will be acquired by a pair of Chinese investors, China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Dell Knights Landing Machine Sets New STAC Records

November 2, 2016

The Securities Technology Analysis Center, commonly known as STAC, has released a new report characterizing the performance of the Knight Landing-based Dell PowerEdge C6320p server on the STAC-A2 benchmarking suite, widely used by the financial services industry to test and evaluate computing platforms. The Dell machine has set new records for both the baseline Greeks benchmark and the large Greeks benchmark. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

What Knights Landing Is Not

June 18, 2016

As we get ready to launch the newest member of the Intel Xeon Phi family, code named Knights Landing, it is natural that there be some questions and potentially some confusion. Read more…

By James Reinders, Intel

KNUPATH Hermosa-based Commercial Boards Expected in Q1 2017

December 15, 2016

Last June tech start-up KnuEdge emerged from stealth mode to begin spreading the word about its new processor and fabric technology that’s been roughly a decade in the making. Read more…

By John Russell

Intel and Trump Announce $7B for Fab 42 Targeting 7nm

February 8, 2017

In what may be an attempt by President Trump to reset his turbulent relationship with the high tech industry, he and Intel CEO Brian Krzanich today announced plans to invest more than $7 billion to complete Fab 42. Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This