Could the “C” in HPC Stand for “Cloud”?

By Chris Porter

September 26, 2011

By Chris Porter

Now that “Cloud Computing” has become the IT buzzword du jour for professionals and vendors looking to cash in on the next big change in datacenters,  many in the HPC community are evaluating whether HPC workloads are appropriate for cloud environments.  At least a portion of this debate is associated with questions such as “What is cloud computing?” and “What qualifies a workload as HPC?”.

It’s generally accepted that HPC workloads are simply not amenable to “one size fits all” categorizations.  This was clearly demonstrated in the early 2000’s when the world started converting from centralized big iron to distributed computing clusters.  Such an approach brought with it commodities of scale and COTS hardware, but also something else—choice.  An HPC consumer could spend money on HPC in ways that benefited the bottom line and only had to spend it on HPC. Therefore, some HPC systems were small in node count, large in memory per core, narrow in bandwidth or high in latency between nodes, while other systems were designed using different sets of parameters.  All were tailored to the applications being run and limited only by the creativity of their architects and the budgets those architects were constrained to work within.

But, increasingly, the pressure to reduce the cost of doing business is an unrelenting theme for most companies and IT departments. Budgetary concerns are a constant concern for every company, so the cloud computing model of pay-as-you-go is increasingly appealing.  However, not all types of computing have been well validated on cloud infrastructures.  

In addition, most infrastructure as a service (IaaS) vendors such as Rackspace, Amazon, Savvis and others use various virtualization technologies to manage the underlying hardware upon which they build their offerings. Unfortunately the virtualization technologies used tend to vary from vendor to vendor and are sometimes kept secret (as in the case of Amazon’s EC2).  Despite the misconception in the market that “cloud=virtualization”, virtualization is often a key component to cloud infrastructures. Therefore, the question about virtual machines vs. physical machines for HPC applications is also germane to the discussion of HPC in the cloud.

The virtualization question

HPC architects have been slow to adopt virtualization technologies for two primary reasons:

1)      The common assumption that virtualization impacts application performance significantly enough that any gains in flexibility are far outweighed by the loss of application throughput.

2)      Utilization on traditional HPC infrastructure is very high (usually between 80-95 percent).  Therefore, the typical driving business case for virtualization (e.g. utilization of hardware, server consolidation or license utilization) lack sufficient merit to justify the added complexity and expense of running workload in virtualized resources. 

In many cases, however, many HPC architects would be willing to lose up to 5 percent of application performance to achieve the flexibility and resilience that virtual environments offer. But there are several reasons HPC users may make this compromise, including:

  • Security – Virtual machines (VMs) can be added and subtracted from VLANs as part of their instantiation/destruction process.  Some HPC environments require data and host isolation between groups of users or even between the users themselves.  Traditionally, VLANs are used with physical servers, creating silos of resources.  In any variable load environment, silo creation results in lower utilization of the resources.  VMs and VLANs can be used in consort to isolate users from each other and isolate data to the users who should have access to it.
  • Application Stack Control – Many applications require certain OS versions, updates, libraries, configurations, etc.  In a mixed application environment where multiple applications share the same physical hardware, such specific stack requirements can be difficult to satisfy.  Using virtualization makes that task easier since the whole stack can be deployed as part of the application.
  • High Value Asset Maximization – In a heterogeneous HPC system, the newest (and thereby fastest) machines are often in highest demand.  To handle this demand, some organizations use a reservation system to minimize conflicts between users.  Unfortunately, such reservations often go underutilized.  In comparison, when using virtual machines for computing, the migration facility available within most hypervisors allows opportunistic workloads to use high value assets even after a reservation window opens for a different user.  If the reserving user eventually submits workload against his reservation, then the opportunistic workload can be migrated to lower value assets to continue processing without losing any CPU cycles.
  • Large Execution Time Jobs – Several HPC applications offer no checkpoint restart capability. VM technology can capture and checkpoint the entire state of the virtual machine, however, allowing for checkpoint of previously non-checkpointable applications.  If jobs run long enough to be at the same MBTF for the solution as a whole, then the checkpoint facility available within virtual machines may be very attractive.  Additionally, if server maintenance is a common or predictable occurrence, then checkpoint migration or suspension of a long running job within a VM could prevent loss of compute time while removing any barriers to performing regular server maintenance. 

A business case for HPC clouds

The economic advantages a cloud-style infrastructure offers—paying only for the IT resources consumed—has been the end goal of “utility”-style computing for nearly a decade.  It’s also an extremely attractive option for HPC datacenters because workloads can vary so much—going from heavy use to idling at any giving time.

There are several key drivers for considering a cloud implementation:

  • Pay-per-use – customers pay by the hour for services such as compute instances or at the consumption level for services such as storage and data transfer
  • Near infinite infrastructure – available in near real time, as well as the contra positive—infrastructure can scale back to near zero when there is no workload
  • Provisioning based on workload –operating systems or server types can be allocated at any time based on workload, providing significant improvements in provisioning flexibility

Under the correct conditions, these factors can present major opportunities to cut costs and better serve internal users.

Barriers to cloud

Despite the advantages of cloud, there are also a number of barriers to consider when thinking about whether cloud will fit into an HPC environment.

  • Security and Intellectual Property –The data in the cloud very often represents core intellectual property for the commercial enterprise. The possibility that commercial competitors could be using the same shared computing resource, which could lead to espionage, cannot be ignored.  From a legal standpoint, published contracts for IP protection and indemnification offer potential adopters little recourse if a leak occurs.
  • Licensing – Most commercial enterprises employ third-party software from an ISV to run or manage their HPC simulations. With each of these applications comes a legal agreement about where the application can be executed, and often these agreements restrict applications to a customer’s site.  If legal issues are not barriers then licenses being consumed in the cloud and locally in a datacenter offer technical challenges for keeping the licenses available to all application instances that require them.
  • Data Movement – Until an organization adopts cloud computing and abandons their own datacenters, models for simulations (or methods for creating them) and results must be transferred between the cloud provider and the customer’s datacenter.  This is complicated, however, as Internet bandwidth is very limited for transferring large files, and for most IaaS providers, all data moved in and out of the cloud is a “for charge” service by the gigabyte.

Pricing Model – The pay-per-use model often sounds very enticing to customers because prices are based on an hour of compute time. However, for long term usage public cloud prices are typically two to three times more expensive than owning the hardware and maintaining it yourself over the course of two years.  Companies should strategically balance when it is advantageous to use the public cloud versus local servers.

Cloud for HPC

HPC datacenters must consider both the business case and the barriers that come with cloud computing to determine whether the model can fit into their organization and which model can best work for them.  Achieving HPC in a cloud environment requires a few well-chosen tools, an adequate hypervisor platform, workload manager and an infrastructure management toolkit.  A management toolkit should provide policy definition, enforcement, provisioning management, resource reservations, and reporting.  The hypervisor platform should provide a good foundation for the virtual portion of your cloud resources.  Finally, the workload manager should provide task management.

For most large HPC environments, users will want to consider either a private cloud or hybrid solution where external public clouds can be used during peak demand, otherwise known as “cloud bursting.” Smaller HPC use environments may want to consider pure, or public, cloud where all the resources will be consumed in the cloud.  No matter which flavor of cloud is used, it will be particularly important to make sure infrastructure includes a management layer that can take advantage of both physical and virtual resources since HPC applications are still primarily housed on physical machines.  Ideally, the management layer should be able to unite the hypervisor and physical environments into a single, dynamically shared infrastructure to support a heterogeneous environment, as well as multiple operating systems. 

A hybrid approach can be very advantageous for HPC environments because it can provide the extra power boost needed to complete jobs.  In particular, a cloud bursting approach should be considered for the following:

  • When local job pend time estimates for a job get very large.
  • When local time elapsed run time is large. A corollary to this condition is when the job can be parallelized, but there are insufficient resources locally to run the job quickly—then cloud bursting the job may return results to users sooner than allowing the job to run on insufficient resources.
  • When the job’s data transfer requirements into and out of the cloud are small.

Once the best cloud implementation for an organization has been determined, IaaS vendors can be evaluated based on a number of different methods, including benchmarking, to see which provider is best suited for that organization’s application and workload needs.  Evaluations should include factors such as:

  • Pure performance
  • Reliability
  • Instantiation speed
  • Pricing

The negotiation and pricing process and policies of each IaaS provider should also be considered, as well as evaluating the reliability against SLAs.  Considering each of these factors should go a long way toward helping an organization choose the best provider for their purposes.

Summary

HPC users should move beyond the “one size fits all” notion when it comes to HPC environments.  There are still lots of choices available to HPC users today, and one of those choices is cloud computing.  Under the right conditions with the right management software, the cloud can be very useful for HPC applications.

Chris Porter is Product Manager, HPC Cloud, for Platform Computing.  Chris will be speaking at SC’11 on Nov 17th 10:30 – 11 am and he’ll asking the question ‘To Burst or not to Burst?’ and weighing the benefits HPC application in the cloud.  Chris is the author of numerous whitepapers, including a recent benchmarking evaluation that compared three major providers of public cloud resources for HPC, “Harnessing public clouds in HPC: Are all infrastructure providers created equal?”

Platform Computing will be at SC’11 in Seattle, November 12-18, 2011 at Booth 1117. www.platform.com

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

UCSD, AIST Forge Tighter Alliance with AI-Focused MOU

January 18, 2018

The rich history of collaboration between UC San Diego and AIST in Japan is getting richer. The organizations entered into a five-year memorandum of understanding on January 10. The MOU represents the continuation of a 1 Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

New Blueprint for Converging HPC, Big Data

January 18, 2018

After five annual workshops on Big Data and Extreme-Scale Computing (BDEC), a group of international HPC heavyweights including Jack Dongarra (University of Tennessee), Satoshi Matsuoka (Tokyo Institute of Technology), Read more…

By John Russell

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown and Spectre security updates on the performance of popular H Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

HPE and NREL Take Steps to Create a Sustainable, Energy-Efficient Data Center with an H2 Fuel Cell

As enterprises attempt to manage rising volumes of data, unplanned data center outages are becoming more common and more expensive. As the cost of downtime rises, enterprises lose out on productivity and valuable competitive advantage without access to their critical data. Read more…

Fostering Lustre Advancement Through Development and Contributions

January 17, 2018

Six months after organizational changes at Intel's High Performance Data (HPDD) division, most in the Lustre community have shed any initial apprehension around the potential changes that could affect or disrupt Lustre Read more…

By Carlos Aoki Thomaz

UCSD, AIST Forge Tighter Alliance with AI-Focused MOU

January 18, 2018

The rich history of collaboration between UC San Diego and AIST in Japan is getting richer. The organizations entered into a five-year memorandum of understandi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

New Blueprint for Converging HPC, Big Data

January 18, 2018

After five annual workshops on Big Data and Extreme-Scale Computing (BDEC), a group of international HPC heavyweights including Jack Dongarra (University of Te Read more…

By John Russell

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fostering Lustre Advancement Through Development and Contributions

January 17, 2018

Six months after organizational changes at Intel's High Performance Data (HPDD) division, most in the Lustre community have shed any initial apprehension aroun Read more…

By Carlos Aoki Thomaz

When the Chips Are Down

January 11, 2018

In the last article, "The High Stakes Semiconductor Game that Drives HPC Diversity," I alluded to the challenges facing the semiconductor industry and how that may impact the evolution of HPC systems over the next few years. I thought I’d lift the covers a little and look at some of the commercial challenges that impact the component technology we use in HPC. Read more…

By Dairsie Latimer

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

Momentum Builds for US Exascale

January 9, 2018

2018 looks to be a great year for the U.S. exascale program. The last several months of 2017 revealed a number of important developments that help put the U.S. Read more…

By Alex R. Larzelere

ANL’s Rick Stevens on CANDLE, ARM, Quantum, and More

January 8, 2018

Late last year HPCwire caught up with Rick Stevens, associate laboratory director for computing, environment and life Sciences at Argonne National Laboratory, f Read more…

By John Russell

Inventor Claims to Have Solved Floating Point Error Problem

January 17, 2018

"The decades-old floating point error problem has been solved," proclaims a press release from inventor Alan Jorgensen. The computer scientist has filed for and Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

US Coalesces Plans for First Exascale Supercomputer: Aurora in 2021

September 27, 2017

At the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) meeting, in Arlington, Va., yesterday (Sept. 26), it was revealed that the "Aurora" supercompute Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Japan Unveils Quantum Neural Network

November 22, 2017

The U.S. and China are leading the race toward productive quantum computing, but it's early enough that ultimate leadership is still something of an open questi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

AMD Showcases Growing Portfolio of EPYC and Radeon-based Systems at SC17

November 13, 2017

AMD’s charge back into HPC and the datacenter is on full display at SC17. Having launched the EPYC processor line in June along with its MI25 GPU the focus he Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Responds to Google TPU Benchmarking

April 10, 2017

Nvidia highlights strengths of its newest GPU silicon in response to Google's report on the performance and energy advantages of its custom tensor processor. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Begins Power9 Rollout with Backing from DOE, Google

December 6, 2017

After over a year of buildup, IBM is unveiling its first Power9 system based on the same architecture as the Department of Energy CORAL supercomputers, Summit a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fast Forward: Five HPC Predictions for 2018

December 21, 2017

What’s on your list of high (and low) lights for 2017? Volta 100’s arrival on the heels of the P100? Appearance, albeit late in the year, of IBM’s Power9? Read more…

By John Russell

GlobalFoundries Puts Wind in AMD’s Sails with 12nm FinFET

September 24, 2017

From its annual tech conference last week (Sept. 20), where GlobalFoundries welcomed more than 600 semiconductor professionals (reaching the Santa Clara venue Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Chip Flaws ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Loom Large

January 4, 2018

The HPC and wider tech community have been abuzz this week over the discovery of critical design flaws that impact virtually all contemporary microprocessors. T Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Perspective: What Really Happened at SC17?

November 22, 2017

SC is over. Now comes the myriad of follow-ups. Inboxes are filled with templated emails from vendors and other exhibitors hoping to win a place in the post-SC thinking of booth visitors. Attendees of tutorials, workshops and other technical sessions will be inundated with requests for feedback. Read more…

By Andrew Jones

Tensors Come of Age: Why the AI Revolution Will Help HPC

November 13, 2017

Thirty years ago, parallel computing was coming of age. A bitter battle began between stalwart vector computing supporters and advocates of various approaches to parallel computing. IBM skeptic Alan Karp, reacting to announcements of nCUBE’s 1024-microprocessor system and Thinking Machines’ 65,536-element array, made a public $100 wager that no one could get a parallel speedup of over 200 on real HPC workloads. Read more…

By John Gustafson & Lenore Mullin

Delays, Smoke, Records & Markets – A Candid Conversation with Cray CEO Peter Ungaro

October 5, 2017

Earlier this month, Tom Tabor, publisher of HPCwire and I had a very personal conversation with Cray CEO Peter Ungaro. Cray has been on something of a Cinderell Read more…

By Tiffany Trader & Tom Tabor

Flipping the Flops and Reading the Top500 Tea Leaves

November 13, 2017

The 50th edition of the Top500 list, the biannual publication of the world’s fastest supercomputers based on public Linpack benchmarking results, was released Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

GlobalFoundries, Ayar Labs Team Up to Commercialize Optical I/O

December 4, 2017

GlobalFoundries (GF) and Ayar Labs, a startup focused on using light, instead of electricity, to transfer data between chips, today announced they've entered in Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

HPC Chips – A Veritable Smorgasbord?

October 10, 2017

For the first time since AMD's ill-fated launch of Bulldozer the answer to the question, 'Which CPU will be in my next HPC system?' doesn't have to be 'Whichever variety of Intel Xeon E5 they are selling when we procure'. Read more…

By Dairsie Latimer

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This