Could the “C” in HPC Stand for “Cloud”?

By Chris Porter

September 26, 2011

By Chris Porter

Now that “Cloud Computing” has become the IT buzzword du jour for professionals and vendors looking to cash in on the next big change in datacenters,  many in the HPC community are evaluating whether HPC workloads are appropriate for cloud environments.  At least a portion of this debate is associated with questions such as “What is cloud computing?” and “What qualifies a workload as HPC?”.

It’s generally accepted that HPC workloads are simply not amenable to “one size fits all” categorizations.  This was clearly demonstrated in the early 2000’s when the world started converting from centralized big iron to distributed computing clusters.  Such an approach brought with it commodities of scale and COTS hardware, but also something else—choice.  An HPC consumer could spend money on HPC in ways that benefited the bottom line and only had to spend it on HPC. Therefore, some HPC systems were small in node count, large in memory per core, narrow in bandwidth or high in latency between nodes, while other systems were designed using different sets of parameters.  All were tailored to the applications being run and limited only by the creativity of their architects and the budgets those architects were constrained to work within.

But, increasingly, the pressure to reduce the cost of doing business is an unrelenting theme for most companies and IT departments. Budgetary concerns are a constant concern for every company, so the cloud computing model of pay-as-you-go is increasingly appealing.  However, not all types of computing have been well validated on cloud infrastructures.  

In addition, most infrastructure as a service (IaaS) vendors such as Rackspace, Amazon, Savvis and others use various virtualization technologies to manage the underlying hardware upon which they build their offerings. Unfortunately the virtualization technologies used tend to vary from vendor to vendor and are sometimes kept secret (as in the case of Amazon’s EC2).  Despite the misconception in the market that “cloud=virtualization”, virtualization is often a key component to cloud infrastructures. Therefore, the question about virtual machines vs. physical machines for HPC applications is also germane to the discussion of HPC in the cloud.

The virtualization question

HPC architects have been slow to adopt virtualization technologies for two primary reasons:

1)      The common assumption that virtualization impacts application performance significantly enough that any gains in flexibility are far outweighed by the loss of application throughput.

2)      Utilization on traditional HPC infrastructure is very high (usually between 80-95 percent).  Therefore, the typical driving business case for virtualization (e.g. utilization of hardware, server consolidation or license utilization) lack sufficient merit to justify the added complexity and expense of running workload in virtualized resources. 

In many cases, however, many HPC architects would be willing to lose up to 5 percent of application performance to achieve the flexibility and resilience that virtual environments offer. But there are several reasons HPC users may make this compromise, including:

  • Security – Virtual machines (VMs) can be added and subtracted from VLANs as part of their instantiation/destruction process.  Some HPC environments require data and host isolation between groups of users or even between the users themselves.  Traditionally, VLANs are used with physical servers, creating silos of resources.  In any variable load environment, silo creation results in lower utilization of the resources.  VMs and VLANs can be used in consort to isolate users from each other and isolate data to the users who should have access to it.
  • Application Stack Control – Many applications require certain OS versions, updates, libraries, configurations, etc.  In a mixed application environment where multiple applications share the same physical hardware, such specific stack requirements can be difficult to satisfy.  Using virtualization makes that task easier since the whole stack can be deployed as part of the application.
  • High Value Asset Maximization – In a heterogeneous HPC system, the newest (and thereby fastest) machines are often in highest demand.  To handle this demand, some organizations use a reservation system to minimize conflicts between users.  Unfortunately, such reservations often go underutilized.  In comparison, when using virtual machines for computing, the migration facility available within most hypervisors allows opportunistic workloads to use high value assets even after a reservation window opens for a different user.  If the reserving user eventually submits workload against his reservation, then the opportunistic workload can be migrated to lower value assets to continue processing without losing any CPU cycles.
  • Large Execution Time Jobs – Several HPC applications offer no checkpoint restart capability. VM technology can capture and checkpoint the entire state of the virtual machine, however, allowing for checkpoint of previously non-checkpointable applications.  If jobs run long enough to be at the same MBTF for the solution as a whole, then the checkpoint facility available within virtual machines may be very attractive.  Additionally, if server maintenance is a common or predictable occurrence, then checkpoint migration or suspension of a long running job within a VM could prevent loss of compute time while removing any barriers to performing regular server maintenance. 

A business case for HPC clouds

The economic advantages a cloud-style infrastructure offers—paying only for the IT resources consumed—has been the end goal of “utility”-style computing for nearly a decade.  It’s also an extremely attractive option for HPC datacenters because workloads can vary so much—going from heavy use to idling at any giving time.

There are several key drivers for considering a cloud implementation:

  • Pay-per-use – customers pay by the hour for services such as compute instances or at the consumption level for services such as storage and data transfer
  • Near infinite infrastructure – available in near real time, as well as the contra positive—infrastructure can scale back to near zero when there is no workload
  • Provisioning based on workload –operating systems or server types can be allocated at any time based on workload, providing significant improvements in provisioning flexibility

Under the correct conditions, these factors can present major opportunities to cut costs and better serve internal users.

Barriers to cloud

Despite the advantages of cloud, there are also a number of barriers to consider when thinking about whether cloud will fit into an HPC environment.

  • Security and Intellectual Property –The data in the cloud very often represents core intellectual property for the commercial enterprise. The possibility that commercial competitors could be using the same shared computing resource, which could lead to espionage, cannot be ignored.  From a legal standpoint, published contracts for IP protection and indemnification offer potential adopters little recourse if a leak occurs.
  • Licensing – Most commercial enterprises employ third-party software from an ISV to run or manage their HPC simulations. With each of these applications comes a legal agreement about where the application can be executed, and often these agreements restrict applications to a customer’s site.  If legal issues are not barriers then licenses being consumed in the cloud and locally in a datacenter offer technical challenges for keeping the licenses available to all application instances that require them.
  • Data Movement – Until an organization adopts cloud computing and abandons their own datacenters, models for simulations (or methods for creating them) and results must be transferred between the cloud provider and the customer’s datacenter.  This is complicated, however, as Internet bandwidth is very limited for transferring large files, and for most IaaS providers, all data moved in and out of the cloud is a “for charge” service by the gigabyte.

Pricing Model – The pay-per-use model often sounds very enticing to customers because prices are based on an hour of compute time. However, for long term usage public cloud prices are typically two to three times more expensive than owning the hardware and maintaining it yourself over the course of two years.  Companies should strategically balance when it is advantageous to use the public cloud versus local servers.

Cloud for HPC

HPC datacenters must consider both the business case and the barriers that come with cloud computing to determine whether the model can fit into their organization and which model can best work for them.  Achieving HPC in a cloud environment requires a few well-chosen tools, an adequate hypervisor platform, workload manager and an infrastructure management toolkit.  A management toolkit should provide policy definition, enforcement, provisioning management, resource reservations, and reporting.  The hypervisor platform should provide a good foundation for the virtual portion of your cloud resources.  Finally, the workload manager should provide task management.

For most large HPC environments, users will want to consider either a private cloud or hybrid solution where external public clouds can be used during peak demand, otherwise known as “cloud bursting.” Smaller HPC use environments may want to consider pure, or public, cloud where all the resources will be consumed in the cloud.  No matter which flavor of cloud is used, it will be particularly important to make sure infrastructure includes a management layer that can take advantage of both physical and virtual resources since HPC applications are still primarily housed on physical machines.  Ideally, the management layer should be able to unite the hypervisor and physical environments into a single, dynamically shared infrastructure to support a heterogeneous environment, as well as multiple operating systems. 

A hybrid approach can be very advantageous for HPC environments because it can provide the extra power boost needed to complete jobs.  In particular, a cloud bursting approach should be considered for the following:

  • When local job pend time estimates for a job get very large.
  • When local time elapsed run time is large. A corollary to this condition is when the job can be parallelized, but there are insufficient resources locally to run the job quickly—then cloud bursting the job may return results to users sooner than allowing the job to run on insufficient resources.
  • When the job’s data transfer requirements into and out of the cloud are small.

Once the best cloud implementation for an organization has been determined, IaaS vendors can be evaluated based on a number of different methods, including benchmarking, to see which provider is best suited for that organization’s application and workload needs.  Evaluations should include factors such as:

  • Pure performance
  • Reliability
  • Instantiation speed
  • Pricing

The negotiation and pricing process and policies of each IaaS provider should also be considered, as well as evaluating the reliability against SLAs.  Considering each of these factors should go a long way toward helping an organization choose the best provider for their purposes.

Summary

HPC users should move beyond the “one size fits all” notion when it comes to HPC environments.  There are still lots of choices available to HPC users today, and one of those choices is cloud computing.  Under the right conditions with the right management software, the cloud can be very useful for HPC applications.

Chris Porter is Product Manager, HPC Cloud, for Platform Computing.  Chris will be speaking at SC’11 on Nov 17th 10:30 – 11 am and he’ll asking the question ‘To Burst or not to Burst?’ and weighing the benefits HPC application in the cloud.  Chris is the author of numerous whitepapers, including a recent benchmarking evaluation that compared three major providers of public cloud resources for HPC, “Harnessing public clouds in HPC: Are all infrastructure providers created equal?”

Platform Computing will be at SC’11 in Seattle, November 12-18, 2011 at Booth 1117. www.platform.com

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Battle Brews over Trump Intentions for Funding Science

February 27, 2017

The battle over science funding – how much and for what kinds of science – Read more…

By John Russell

Google Gets First Dibs on New Skylake Chips

February 27, 2017

As part of an ongoing effort to differentiate its public cloud services, Google made good this week on its intention to bring custom Xeon Skylake chips from Intel Corp. Read more…

By George Leopold

Thomas Sterling on CREST and Academia’s Role in HPC Research

February 27, 2017

The US advances in high performance computing over many decades have been a product of the combined engagement of research centers in industry, government labs, and academia. Read more…

By Thomas Sterling, Indiana University

Advancing Modular Supercomputing with DEEP and DEEP-ER Architectures

February 24, 2017

Knowing that the jump to exascale will require novel architectural approaches capable of delivering dramatic efficiency and performance gains, researchers around the world are hard at work on next-generation HPC systems. Read more…

By Sean Thielen

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Manufacturers Reaping the Benefits of Remote Visualization

Today’s manufacturers are operating in an ever-changing atmosphere, and finding new ways to boost productivity has never been more vital.

This is why manufacturers are ramping up their investments in high performance computing (HPC), a trend which has helped give rise to the “connected factory” and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) concepts that are proliferating throughout the industry today. Read more…

Weekly Twitter Roundup (Feb. 23, 2017)

February 23, 2017

Here at HPCwire, we aim to keep the HPC community apprised of the most relevant and interesting news items that get tweeted throughout the week. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

HPE Server Shows Low Latency on STAC-N1 Test

February 22, 2017

The performance of trade and match servers can be a critical differentiator for financial trading houses. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Financial Update (Feb. 2017)

February 22, 2017

In this recurring feature, we’ll provide you with financial highlights from companies in the HPC industry. Check back in regularly for an updated list with the most pertinent fiscal information. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

Rethinking HPC Platforms for ‘Second Gen’ Applications

February 22, 2017

Just what constitutes HPC and how best to support it is a keen topic currently. Read more…

By John Russell

Thomas Sterling on CREST and Academia’s Role in HPC Research

February 27, 2017

The US advances in high performance computing over many decades have been a product of the combined engagement of research centers in industry, government labs, and academia. Read more…

By Thomas Sterling, Indiana University

Advancing Modular Supercomputing with DEEP and DEEP-ER Architectures

February 24, 2017

Knowing that the jump to exascale will require novel architectural approaches capable of delivering dramatic efficiency and performance gains, researchers around the world are hard at work on next-generation HPC systems. Read more…

By Sean Thielen

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDC: Will the Real Exascale Race Please Stand Up?

February 21, 2017

So the exascale race is on. And lots of organizations are in the pack. Government announcements from the US, China, India, Japan, and the EU indicate that they are working hard to make it happen – some sooner, some later. Read more…

By Bob Sorensen, IDC

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Drug Developers Use Google Cloud HPC in the Fight Against ALS

February 16, 2017

Within the haystack of a lethal disease such as ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis / Lou Gehrig’s Disease) there exists, somewhere, the needle that will pierce this therapy-resistant affliction. Read more…

By Doug Black

Azure Edges AWS in Linpack Benchmark Study

February 15, 2017

The “when will clouds be ready for HPC” question has ebbed and flowed for years. Read more…

By John Russell

For IBM/OpenPOWER: Success in 2017 = (Volume) Sales

January 11, 2017

To a large degree IBM and the OpenPOWER Foundation have done what they said they would – assembling a substantial and growing ecosystem and bringing Power-based products to market, all in about three years. Read more…

By John Russell

US, China Vie for Supercomputing Supremacy

November 14, 2016

The 48th edition of the TOP500 list is fresh off the presses and while there is no new number one system, as previously teased by China, there are a number of notable entrants from the US and around the world and significant trends to report on. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Lighting up Aurora: Behind the Scenes at the Creation of the DOE’s Upcoming 200 Petaflops Supercomputer

December 1, 2016

In April 2015, U.S. Department of Energy Undersecretary Franklin Orr announced that Intel would be the prime contractor for Aurora: Read more…

By Jan Rowell

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular offerings such as Caffe, Theano, and Torch. Read more…

By John Russell

D-Wave SC16 Update: What’s Bo Ewald Saying These Days

November 18, 2016

Tucked in a back section of the SC16 exhibit hall, quantum computing pioneer D-Wave has been talking up its new 2000-qubit processor announced in September. Forget for a moment the criticism sometimes aimed at D-Wave. This small Canadian company has sold several machines including, for example, ones to Lockheed and NASA, and has worked with Google on mapping machine learning problems to quantum computing. In July Los Alamos National Laboratory took possession of a 1000-quibit D-Wave 2X system that LANL ordered a year ago around the time of SC15. Read more…

By John Russell

Enlisting Deep Learning in the War on Cancer

December 7, 2016

Sometime in Q2 2017 the first ‘results’ of the Joint Design of Advanced Computing Solutions for Cancer (JDACS4C) will become publicly available according to Rick Stevens. He leads one of three JDACS4C pilot projects pressing deep learning (DL) into service in the War on Cancer. Read more…

By John Russell

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Startup Advances Auto-Parallelization’s Promise

January 23, 2017

The shift from single core to multicore hardware has made finding parallelism in codes more important than ever, but that hasn’t made the task of parallel programming any easier. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

CPU Benchmarking: Haswell Versus POWER8

June 2, 2015

With OpenPOWER activity ramping up and IBM’s prominent role in the upcoming DOE machines Summit and Sierra, it’s a good time to look at how the IBM POWER CPU stacks up against the x86 Xeon Haswell CPU from Intel. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

BioTeam’s Berman Charts 2017 HPC Trends in Life Sciences

January 4, 2017

Twenty years ago high performance computing was nearly absent from life sciences. Today it’s used throughout life sciences and biomedical research. Genomics and the data deluge from modern lab instruments are the main drivers, but so is the longer-term desire to perform predictive simulation in support of Precision Medicine (PM). There’s even a specialized life sciences supercomputer, ‘Anton’ from D.E. Shaw Research, and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is standing up its second Anton 2 and actively soliciting project proposals. There’s a lot going on. Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Sees Bright Future for AI Supercomputing

November 23, 2016

Graphics chipmaker Nvidia made a strong showing at SC16 in Salt Lake City last week. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDG to Be Bought by Chinese Investors; IDC to Spin Out HPC Group

January 19, 2017

US-based publishing and investment firm International Data Group, Inc. (IDG) will be acquired by a pair of Chinese investors, China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

Dell Knights Landing Machine Sets New STAC Records

November 2, 2016

The Securities Technology Analysis Center, commonly known as STAC, has released a new report characterizing the performance of the Knight Landing-based Dell PowerEdge C6320p server on the STAC-A2 benchmarking suite, widely used by the financial services industry to test and evaluate computing platforms. The Dell machine has set new records for both the baseline Greeks benchmark and the large Greeks benchmark. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Intel and Trump Announce $7B for Fab 42 Targeting 7nm

February 8, 2017

In what may be an attempt by President Trump to reset his turbulent relationship with the high tech industry, he and Intel CEO Brian Krzanich today announced plans to invest more than $7 billion to complete Fab 42. Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This