HPC Funding Models Need to Encompass More Than Just the Purchase Price

By Andrew Jones

February 8, 2012

Beyond the question of how much funding should be invested in high performance computing resources, it is also important to strive for the optimum funding model: how funding is tied to the service and how it enables and drives user behavior. As it turns out, these models are wrapped up in an IT culture that is often at odds with the way HPC is used.

This article was inspired by recent topical discussions on funding and charging models for HPC in academic institutions in both the UK and the USA, including particularly a series of blog posts by Brock Palen. The issues are by no means limited to academic institutions, and in fact are equally pressing for industry users and providers of HPC resources.

For many of the biggest supercomputers in the world, there is always a separation between the big lump of cash for the machine and funding for the on-going operation, which is often due to different funding routes for each. However, the reality for most HPC systems outside the national supercomputing services, especially academic institutional and industry HPC systems, is that the funding and the service delivery are intricately linked.

To start, let’s constrain this discussion to in-house HPC resources. (I’ll come back to discuss cloud computing and other external models in a future article). The discussion takes in funding, measurement, professional experts, and finally culture changes.

Where does the funding come from?

Beyond the lump sum donation, there are essentially three models for funding HPC resources: through overheads, usage fees, or a combination of these two. I often call this latter model “baseline-plus.” Under the overheads model, the corporate or departmental HPC facility is provided to users as part of the infrastructure of the business or university and is including in the overheads of the business. There may be accounting, i.e., recording usage of the resources by each user, but not charging. Under the usage fees model, accounting leads directly to the users being billed for their actual consumption of resources.

Under the baseline-plus model, some elements of the service, like storage, may be included in the overheads whereas others, like CPU-cycle, may be charged according to consumption. Or the combination may be applied to everything, essentially subsidizing the usage fees by partially including the costs in overheads. Or a combination may be used to provide a service free of charge for “normal” consumption levels but apply charges for extreme usage, such as large storage requirements, large memory jobs, high core-count jobs, and so on.

Finding the model that keeps everyone happy

To see the benefits and issues of each model, let’s start with the viewpoint of the user – always a good place to start. The preferred model for users is almost always going to be “free,” that is, the overheads model. On the face of it, this offers the least burden on the user’s part. They just do whatever science or engineering simulations they need and pay as much attention to the costing of the HPC resources as they do to the company internet connection or the office lighting. However, this can also lead to tension when some users may suspect others of consuming an “unfair” share of the common resource.

At the other extreme, the “charge for everything” model is likely to be least favored by most users, simply because it creates a culture of having to justify every usage of the resource. That may be seen as a good thing by senior management, since the HPC resource is likely to represent a significant investment. However, it might limit the freedom of the researcher or engineer to “just try this,” that is, engage in speculative work that isn’t tied to a clear goal, but which may spark significant innovation.

In theory, the baseline-plus model allows the best of both worlds, enabling speculative work and reduced attention to monitoring consumption, whilst ensuring users who dominate consumption are seen to contribute. However, the potential complexity of the model – what is included in the core service and what is charged at usage – can lead to both confusion and debate amongst users about the “right” way to configure the complexity.

Shifting to the HPC manager’s viewpoint, the instinct is often to prefer the overheads model, as this usually works in practice as a predictable way to budget the resource. The usage fees model is often seen as least desirable because it turns every HPC manager into a sales person trying to keep their customers coming back for more, and involves an uncertain budget.

Allowing for growth and innovation

In all of this discussion so far, we have assumed a static size budget and resource. In reality, the critical aspects of these models is one in which the HPC provision evolves.

Under the overheads model, growing the resources, for example, buying a larger supercomputer or providing more support staff, usually means going back to management with a case to increase the budget. Without a direct link between the end users and the resource provided and consumed, that case is harder to make.

With usage accounting (not necessarily charging) this becomes easier. Changing the balance of the HPC provision, such as providing more large memory nodes, or more cores instead of storage space, is almost impossible because each user will see a different need.

The usage fees model solves this problem. As usage grows, the resource can be increased with the fee income. The type of resource provided can also be changed to meet the needs of users as they direct their fee-paying usage onto different elements of the service.

However, the pure usage fees model creates other problems. What about the resources that the HPC manager knows users will need but which users are resistant to paying directly for? Code performance expertise is a common example of this, as is interconnect bandwidth.

What gets measured is what gets the focus

This leads to another key aspect of the models, namely what to measure (and thus charge for in the fees or baseline-plus models).

The most common unit of consumption to measure is CPU usage. Users are accounted for how many CPU-hours they consume and are charged appropriately. The price of the CPU-hour includes the cost of running the system, but to many users, that’s not fair. For example, why should I pay a high price per CPU-hour when I don’t need that fast interconnect that is driving the price up? Or, I’ve never used the support team, so why can’t I have a discount price? That other user consumes way more memory or disk than me, surely he should pay more? And so on.

It’s temptingly easy to respond by having separate charges for different elements of the service – CPU-hours, support staff, disk usage, high memory nodes, etc. However, this rarely works well in practice for either users or HPC managers.

Measuring CPU-hours alone is horrendously bad practice though. The processors are often the cheapest part of the supercomputer to buy — behind memory and interconnect and maybe disk — and certainly small compared to operating costs, like power and staff salaries.

Idle processor cores are seen as “a bad thing,” but the memory probably cost as much to buy and nearly as much to sit there consuming electricity. Yet few HPC services monitor memory utilization. Or interconnect utilization.

Science and business output, not busy CPUs

And, speaking of utilization, there are competing interests of users and HPC managers. For users, high utilization means more contention for resource, for example, longer job queues, and is a bad thing. For HPC managers, high utilization means demand and provision are, in theory, closely matched, which is an efficient use of budget.

But efficient use of the budget should be tied to the science or engineering outputs achieved, not to the detailed consumption of the resource that enables that innovation. Which is better budget use, a low utilization system that is available on the timescales of the researchers’ or engineers’ needs (and gives them freedom to try out new ideas or support customer requests at short notice) or a high utilization system that means only planned business can be done?

The complexity of matching the model to the needs of the business, both funders and users, means that the strategy for HPC provision is rarely as simple as assumed. That’s why there is a role for professionals who have experience in finding the best model for a given situation. “HPC manager” or the equivalent is a valuable and distinct role within the organization, as is the potential support from independent experts available to provide consulting advice.

The wrong culture?

Perhaps a key part of the answer is that HPC is not really IT. It is built using computer technology but it is really a scientific instrument or engineering facility. I have written about this before. So maybe we need to move away from the funding, measuring and user cultures inherited from traditional IT.

The success of an optical telescope in astronomy might be measured by what new objects are observed, not by the amount of time an eyeball is attached to the end of it. The success of a wind tunnel might be measured by the quality and quantity of the design information gained, not necessarily the amount of time the fan is spinning. It is expected that the instrument or facility will be supported by experts whose profession is the technology of the instrument and that this will be a fundamental part of the funded resource, not an optional extra.

What can you see as cultures from the traditional IT world that are holding back HPC’s potential?

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

HPE Announces New HPC Factory in Czech Republic

May 18, 2022

A week ahead of ISC High Performance 2022 (set to be held in Hamburg, Germany), supercomputing heavyweight HPE has announced a major investment in sovereign European computing: its first European factory, housed in the C Read more…

Hyperion Study Tracks Rise and Impact of Linux Supercomputers

May 17, 2022

That supercomputers produce impactful, lasting value is a basic tenet among the HPC community. To make the point more formally, Hyperion Research has issued a new report, The Economic and Societal Benefits of Linux Super Read more…

ECP Director Doug Kothe Named ORNL Associate Laboratory Director

May 16, 2022

The Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has selected Doug Kothe to be the next Associate Laboratory Director for its Computing and Computational Sciences Directorate (CCSD), HPCwire has learned. K Read more…

Google Cloud’s New TPU v4 ML Hub Packs 9 Exaflops of AI

May 16, 2022

Almost exactly a year ago, Google launched its Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) v4 chips at Google I/O 2021, promising twice the performance compared to the TPU v3. At the time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said that Google’s datacenters would “soon have dozens of TPU v4 Pods, many of which will be... Read more…

Q&A with Candace Culhane, SC22 General Chair and an HPCwire Person to Watch in 2022

May 14, 2022

HPCwire is pleased to present our interview with SC22 General Chair Candace Culhane, program/project director at Los Alamos National Lab and an HPCwire 2022 Person to Watch. In this exclusive Q&A, Culhane covers her Read more…

AWS Solution Channel

shutterstock 1103121086

Encoding workflow dependencies in AWS Batch

Most users of HPC or Batch systems need to analyze data with multiple operations to get meaningful results. That’s really driven by the nature of scientific research or engineering processes – it’s rare that a single task generates the insight you need. Read more…

Argonne Supercomputer Advances Energy Storage Research

May 13, 2022

The lack of large-scale energy storage bottlenecks many sources of renewable energy, such as sunlight-reliant solar power and unpredictable wind power. Researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) are w Read more…

HPE Announces New HPC Factory in Czech Republic

May 18, 2022

A week ahead of ISC High Performance 2022 (set to be held in Hamburg, Germany), supercomputing heavyweight HPE has announced a major investment in sovereign Eur Read more…

Google Cloud’s New TPU v4 ML Hub Packs 9 Exaflops of AI

May 16, 2022

Almost exactly a year ago, Google launched its Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) v4 chips at Google I/O 2021, promising twice the performance compared to the TPU v3. At the time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said that Google’s datacenters would “soon have dozens of TPU v4 Pods, many of which will be... Read more…

Q&A with Candace Culhane, SC22 General Chair and an HPCwire Person to Watch in 2022

May 14, 2022

HPCwire is pleased to present our interview with SC22 General Chair Candace Culhane, program/project director at Los Alamos National Lab and an HPCwire 2022 Per Read more…

Supercomputing an Image of Our Galaxy’s Supermassive Black Hole

May 13, 2022

A supermassive black hole called Sagittarius A* (yes, the asterisk is part of it!) sits at the center of the Milky Way. Now, for the first time, we can see it. Read more…

Royalty-free stock illustration ID: 1919750255

Intel Says UCIe to Outpace PCIe in Speed Race

May 11, 2022

Intel has shared more details on a new interconnect that is the foundation of the company’s long-term plan for x86, Arm and RISC-V architectures to co-exist in a single chip package. The semiconductor company is taking a modular approach to chip design with the option for customers to cram computing blocks such as CPUs, GPUs and AI accelerators inside a single chip package. Read more…

Intel Extends IPU Roadmap Through 2026

May 10, 2022

Intel is extending its roadmap for infrastructure processors through 2026, the company said at its Vision conference being held in Grapevine, Texas. The company's IPUs (infrastructure processing units) are megachips that are designed to improve datacenter efficiency by offloading functions such as networking control, storage management and security that were traditionally... Read more…

Exascale Watch: Aurora Installation Underway, Now Open for Reservations

May 10, 2022

Installation has begun on the Aurora supercomputer, Rick Stevens (associate director of Argonne National Laboratory) revealed today during the Intel Vision event keynote taking place in Dallas, Texas, and online. Joining Intel exec Raja Koduri on stage, Stevens confirmed that the Aurora build is underway – a major development for a system that is projected to deliver more... Read more…

Intel’s Habana Labs Unveils Gaudi2, Greco AI Processors

May 10, 2022

At the hybrid Intel Vision event today, Intel’s Habana Labs team launched two major new products: Gaudi2, the second generation of the Gaudi deep learning training processor; and Greco, the successor to the Goya deep learning inference processor. Intel says that the processors offer significant speedups relative to their predecessors and the... Read more…

Nvidia R&D Chief on How AI is Improving Chip Design

April 18, 2022

Getting a glimpse into Nvidia’s R&D has become a regular feature of the spring GTC conference with Bill Dally, chief scientist and senior vice president of research, providing an overview of Nvidia’s R&D organization and a few details on current priorities. This year, Dally focused mostly on AI tools that Nvidia is both developing and using in-house to improve... Read more…

Royalty-free stock illustration ID: 1919750255

Intel Says UCIe to Outpace PCIe in Speed Race

May 11, 2022

Intel has shared more details on a new interconnect that is the foundation of the company’s long-term plan for x86, Arm and RISC-V architectures to co-exist in a single chip package. The semiconductor company is taking a modular approach to chip design with the option for customers to cram computing blocks such as CPUs, GPUs and AI accelerators inside a single chip package. Read more…

Facebook Parent Meta’s New AI Supercomputer Will Be ‘World’s Fastest’

January 24, 2022

Fresh off its rebrand last October, Meta (née Facebook) is putting muscle behind its vision of a metaversal future with a massive new AI supercomputer called the AI Research SuperCluster (RSC). Meta says that RSC will be used to help build new AI models, develop augmented reality tools, seamlessly analyze multimedia data and more. The supercomputer’s... Read more…

AMD/Xilinx Takes Aim at Nvidia with Improved VCK5000 Inferencing Card

March 8, 2022

AMD/Xilinx has released an improved version of its VCK5000 AI inferencing card along with a series of competitive benchmarks aimed directly at Nvidia’s GPU line. AMD says the new VCK5000 has 3x better performance than earlier versions and delivers 2x TCO over Nvidia T4. AMD also showed favorable benchmarks against several Nvidia GPUs, claiming its VCK5000 achieved... Read more…

In Partnership with IBM, Canada to Get Its First Universal Quantum Computer

February 3, 2022

IBM today announced it will deploy its first quantum computer in Canada, putting Canada on a short list of countries that will have access to an IBM Quantum Sys Read more…

Supercomputer Simulations Show How Paxlovid, Pfizer’s Covid Antiviral, Works

February 3, 2022

Just about a month ago, Pfizer scored its second huge win of the pandemic when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued another emergency use authorization Read more…

Nvidia Launches Hopper H100 GPU, New DGXs and Grace Superchips

March 22, 2022

The battle for datacenter dominance keeps getting hotter. Today, Nvidia kicked off its spring GTC event with new silicon, new software and a new supercomputer. Speaking from a virtual environment in the Nvidia Omniverse 3D collaboration and simulation platform, CEO Jensen Huang introduced the new Hopper GPU architecture and the H100 GPU... Read more…

PsiQuantum’s Path to 1 Million Qubits

April 21, 2022

PsiQuantum, founded in 2016 by four researchers with roots at Bristol University, Stanford University, and York University, is one of a few quantum computing startups that’s kept a moderately low PR profile. (That’s if you disregard the roughly $700 million in funding it has attracted.) The main reason is PsiQuantum has eschewed the clamorous public chase for... Read more…

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

Nvidia Dominates MLPerf Inference, Qualcomm also Shines, Where’s Everybody Else?

April 6, 2022

MLCommons today released its latest MLPerf inferencing results, with another strong showing by Nvidia accelerators inside a diverse array of systems. Roughly fo Read more…

D-Wave to Go Public with SPAC Deal; Expects ~$1.6B Market Valuation

February 8, 2022

Quantum computing pioneer D-Wave today announced plans to go public via a SPAC (special purpose acquisition company) mechanism. D-Wave will merge with DPCM Capital in a transaction expected to produce $340 million in cash and result in a roughly $1.6 billion initial market valuation. The deal is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2022 and the new company will be traded on the New York Stock... Read more…

Intel Announces Falcon Shores CPU-GPU Combo Architecture for 2024

February 18, 2022

Intel held its 2022 investor meeting yesterday, covering everything from the imminent Sapphire Rapids CPUs to the hotly anticipated (and delayed) Ponte Vecchio GPUs. But somewhat buried in its summary of the meeting was a new namedrop: “Falcon Shores,” described as “a new architecture that will bring x86 and Xe GPU together into a single socket.” The reveal was... Read more…

Industry Consortium Forms to Drive UCIe Chiplet Interconnect Standard

March 2, 2022

A new industry consortium aims to establish a die-to-die interconnect standard – Universal Chiplet Interconnect Express (UCIe) – in support of an open chipl Read more…

Julia Update: Adoption Keeps Climbing; Is It a Python Challenger?

January 13, 2021

The rapid adoption of Julia, the open source, high level programing language with roots at MIT, shows no sign of slowing according to data from Julialang.org. I Read more…

Nvidia Acquires Software-Defined Storage Provider Excelero

March 7, 2022

Nvidia has announced that it has acquired Excelero. The high-performance block storage provider, founded in 2014, will have its technology integrated into Nvidia’s enterprise software stack. Nvidia is not disclosing the value of the deal. Excelero’s core product, Excelero NVMesh, offers software-defined block storage via networked NVMe SSDs. NVMesh operates through... Read more…

India Launches Petascale ‘PARAM Ganga’ Supercomputer

March 8, 2022

Just a couple of weeks ago, the Indian government promised that it had five HPC systems in the final stages of installation and would launch nine new supercomputers this year. Now, it appears to be making good on that promise: the country’s National Supercomputing Mission (NSM) has announced the deployment of “PARAM Ganga” petascale supercomputer at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)... Read more…

Google Launches TPU v4 AI Chips

May 20, 2021

Google CEO Sundar Pichai spoke for only one minute and 42 seconds about the company’s latest TPU v4 Tensor Processing Units during his keynote at the Google I Read more…

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
HPCwire