How to Scale the Storage and Analysis of Business Data Using a Distributed In-Memory Data Grid

By Nicole Hemsoth

June 4, 2012

by Dr. William Bain, Ph.D, ScaleOut Software, Inc.

A hallmark of the Information Age is the incredible amount of business data that companies have to store and analyze, so-called “big data.” The ability to efficiently search data for important patterns can provide an essential competitive edge.

For example, an e-commerce Web site needs to be able to monitor online shopping carts to see which products are selling quickly. A financial services company needs to hone its equity trading strategy as it optimizes its response to fast-changing market conditions. Businesses that face challenges like these have turned to distributed, in-memory data grids (also called distributed caches) to scale their ability to manage fast-changing data and comb through data to identify patterns and trends requiring a timely response.

Distributed, in-memory data grids (IMDGs) offer two key advantages. First, they store data in memory instead of on disk for fast access, and second, they run seamlessly across a farm of servers to scale performance. But perhaps best of all, they provide a fast, easy to use platform for running near real-time “what if” analyses on the data they store. By breaking the sequential bottleneck, they can take performance to a level that stand-alone database servers and NoSQL stores cannot match.

Software architects and developers often say the following. “OK, I see the advantages, but how do I incorporate a distributed, in-memory data grid into my data storage architecture, and how could it help me to analyze my data?”

Here are three simple steps for building a fast, scalable data storage and analysis solution using a distributed, in-memory data grid.

1. Store fast-changing business data directly in a distributed, in-memory data grid instead of a database server.

Distributed, in-memory data grids, like ScaleOut StateServer, are designed to plug directly into the business logic of today’s enterprise applications and services. By storing data as collections of objects instead of relational database tables, they match the in-memory view of data already used by busi­ness logic. This makes distributed data grids exceptionally easy to integrate into existing applications using simple APIs, which are available for most modern languages, like C#, Java, and C++.

Because distributed IMDGs run on server farms, their storage capacity and throughput scale just by adding more grid servers. When hosted on a large server farm or in the cloud, a distributed, in-memory data grid’s ability to store and quickly access large volumes of data can grow well beyond that for a stand-alone database server.

2. Integrate the distributed, in-memory data grid with database servers as part of an overall storage strategy.

Of course, distributed, in-memory data grids are used to complement and not replace data­base servers, which are the authoritative repositories for transactional data and long-term storage. For example, in an ecommerce Web site, a distributed, in-memory data grid would hold shopping carts to efficiently handle a large workload of online shopping traffic, while a backend database server stores completed transactions, inventory, and customer records. The key to integrating a distributed, in-memory data grid into an enterprise application’s overall storage strategy is to carefully separate application code used for business logic from other code used for data access.

Distributed IMDGs naturally fit into business logic, which usually manages data as objects. This code is also where rapid access to data is needed, and that’s where distributed data grids provide the greatest benefit. In contrast, the data access layer typically focuses on converting objects into a relational form (or vice versa) for storage in database servers.

Interestingly, a distributed, in-memory data grid optionally can be integrated with a database server so that it can automatically access data from the database server if it’s missing from the distributed data grid. This is very useful for certain types of data, such as product or cus­tomer information, which is kept in the database server and just retrieved when needed by the application. However, most types of fast-changing, business logic data can be kept solely in a distributed, in-memory data grid and never written out to a database server.

Application server farm 

3. Analyze grid-based data using simple analysis codes and the “map/reduce” programming pattern.

Once a collection of objects, such as a Web site’s shopping carts or a financial company’s pool of stock histories, has been hosted in a distributed, in-memory data grid, it’s important to be able to scan all of this data for important patterns and trends. Over the last 25 years, re­searchers have developed a powerful, two-step method, now popularly called “map/reduce,” for analyzing large volumes of data in parallel. In the first step, each object in the collection is analyzed for an important pattern of interest by writing and running a simple algorithm that just looks at one object at a time. This algorithm is run in parallel on all objects to quickly analyze all of the data. Next, the results that were generated by running this algorithm are combined to determine an overall result, which hopefully identifies an important trend.

ScaleOut SateServer In-Memory Data Grid
For example, an e-commerce developer could write a simple code which analyzes each shopping cart to rate which product categories are generating the most interest. This code could be run on all shopping carts several times during the day (or perhaps after a marketing blitz on the Web site has been launched) to identify important shopping trends.

Distributed, in-memory data grids offer an ideal platform for analyzing data using this “map/ reduce” programming pattern. Because they store data as memory-based objects, the analy­sis code is very easy to write and debug as a simple “in-memory” code. Programmers do not need to learn parallel programming techniques or understand how the grid works. Also, distributed, in-memory data grids provide the infrastructure needed to automatically run this analysis code on all grid servers in parallel and then combine the results. The net result is that by using a distributed, in-memory data grid, application developers can easily and quickly harness the full scalability of the grid to rapidly discover data patterns and trends that are vital to a company’s success.

ScaleOut StateServer Grid Computing Edition from ScaleOut Software provides an example of built-in map/reduce (called Parallel Method Invocation). This product is an IMDG-based analytics platform that combines the popular map/reduce programming model with property-based object queries, dramatically simplifying the selection and analysis of data stored in its data grid. Fast, automatic, parallel scheduling ensures that memory-based data is analyzed at nearly real-time speeds with minimum data motion. Completely eliminated are batch scheduling and file-I/O overheads, enabling analysis of fast-changing data like network telemetry, market data, or click stream data for fast decision making. In-memory map/reduce dramatically shortens run-times compared to other approaches which analyze disk-based data, such as Hadoop. Built-in high availability ensures that analyses run to completion, even if a server or network connection fails.

As companies become ever more pressed to manage increasing data volumes and quickly respond to changing market conditions, they are turning to distributed, in-memory data grids to obtain the “scalability” boost they need. As clouds become an integral part of en­terprise infrastructures, distributed, in-memory data grids should further prove their value in harnessing the power of scalable computing to provide an essential competitive edge.

Dr. William L. Bain is founder and CEO of ScaleOut Software, Inc. Bill has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering/parallel computing from Rice University, and he has worked at Bell Labs research, Intel, and Microsoft. Bill founded and ran three start-up companies prior to joining Microsoft. In the most recent company (Valence Research), he developed a distributed Web load-balancing software solution that was acquired by Microsoft and is now called Network Load Balanc­ing within the Windows Server operating system. Dr. Bain holds several patents in computer architecture and distributed computing. As a member of the Seattle-based Alliance of Angels, Dr. Bain is actively involved in entrepreneurship and the angel community.

To learn more about ScaleOut Software’s in-memory data grids, please visit www.scaleoutsoftware.com.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Advancing Modular Supercomputing with DEEP and DEEP-ER Architectures

February 24, 2017

Knowing that the jump to exascale will require novel architectural approaches capable of delivering dramatic efficiency and performance gains, researchers around the world are hard at work on next-generation HPC systems. Read more…

By Sean Thielen

Weekly Twitter Roundup (Feb. 23, 2017)

February 23, 2017

Here at HPCwire, we aim to keep the HPC community apprised of the most relevant and interesting news items that get tweeted throughout the week. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

HPE Server Shows Low Latency on STAC-N1 Test

February 22, 2017

The performance of trade and match servers can be a critical differentiator for financial trading houses. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Financial Update (Feb. 2017)

February 22, 2017

In this recurring feature, we’ll provide you with financial highlights from companies in the HPC industry. Check back in regularly for an updated list with the most pertinent fiscal information. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

O&G Companies Create Value with High Performance Remote Visualization

Today’s oil and gas (O&G) companies are striving to process datasets that have become not only tremendously large, but extremely complex. And the larger that data becomes, the harder it is to move and analyze it – particularly with a workforce that could be distributed between drilling sites, offshore rigs, and remote offices. Read more…

Rethinking HPC Platforms for ‘Second Gen’ Applications

February 22, 2017

Just what constitutes HPC and how best to support it is a keen topic currently. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDC: Will the Real Exascale Race Please Stand Up?

February 21, 2017

So the exascale race is on. And lots of organizations are in the pack. Government announcements from the US, China, India, Japan, and the EU indicate that they are working hard to make it happen – some sooner, some later. Read more…

By Bob Sorensen, IDC

ExxonMobil, NCSA, Cray Scale Reservoir Simulation to 700,000+ Processors

February 17, 2017

In a scaling breakthrough for oil and gas discovery, ExxonMobil geoscientists report they have harnessed the power of 717,000 processors – the equivalent of 22,000 32-processor computers – to run complex oil and gas reservoir simulation models. Read more…

By Doug Black

Advancing Modular Supercomputing with DEEP and DEEP-ER Architectures

February 24, 2017

Knowing that the jump to exascale will require novel architectural approaches capable of delivering dramatic efficiency and performance gains, researchers around the world are hard at work on next-generation HPC systems. Read more…

By Sean Thielen

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDC: Will the Real Exascale Race Please Stand Up?

February 21, 2017

So the exascale race is on. And lots of organizations are in the pack. Government announcements from the US, China, India, Japan, and the EU indicate that they are working hard to make it happen – some sooner, some later. Read more…

By Bob Sorensen, IDC

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Drug Developers Use Google Cloud HPC in the Fight Against ALS

February 16, 2017

Within the haystack of a lethal disease such as ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis / Lou Gehrig’s Disease) there exists, somewhere, the needle that will pierce this therapy-resistant affliction. Read more…

By Doug Black

Azure Edges AWS in Linpack Benchmark Study

February 15, 2017

The “when will clouds be ready for HPC” question has ebbed and flowed for years. Read more…

By John Russell

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

For IBM/OpenPOWER: Success in 2017 = (Volume) Sales

January 11, 2017

To a large degree IBM and the OpenPOWER Foundation have done what they said they would – assembling a substantial and growing ecosystem and bringing Power-based products to market, all in about three years. Read more…

By John Russell

US, China Vie for Supercomputing Supremacy

November 14, 2016

The 48th edition of the TOP500 list is fresh off the presses and while there is no new number one system, as previously teased by China, there are a number of notable entrants from the US and around the world and significant trends to report on. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Lighting up Aurora: Behind the Scenes at the Creation of the DOE’s Upcoming 200 Petaflops Supercomputer

December 1, 2016

In April 2015, U.S. Department of Energy Undersecretary Franklin Orr announced that Intel would be the prime contractor for Aurora: Read more…

By Jan Rowell

D-Wave SC16 Update: What’s Bo Ewald Saying These Days

November 18, 2016

Tucked in a back section of the SC16 exhibit hall, quantum computing pioneer D-Wave has been talking up its new 2000-qubit processor announced in September. Forget for a moment the criticism sometimes aimed at D-Wave. This small Canadian company has sold several machines including, for example, ones to Lockheed and NASA, and has worked with Google on mapping machine learning problems to quantum computing. In July Los Alamos National Laboratory took possession of a 1000-quibit D-Wave 2X system that LANL ordered a year ago around the time of SC15. Read more…

By John Russell

Enlisting Deep Learning in the War on Cancer

December 7, 2016

Sometime in Q2 2017 the first ‘results’ of the Joint Design of Advanced Computing Solutions for Cancer (JDACS4C) will become publicly available according to Rick Stevens. He leads one of three JDACS4C pilot projects pressing deep learning (DL) into service in the War on Cancer. Read more…

By John Russell

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular offerings such as Caffe, Theano, and Torch. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Startup Advances Auto-Parallelization’s Promise

January 23, 2017

The shift from single core to multicore hardware has made finding parallelism in codes more important than ever, but that hasn’t made the task of parallel programming any easier. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

CPU Benchmarking: Haswell Versus POWER8

June 2, 2015

With OpenPOWER activity ramping up and IBM’s prominent role in the upcoming DOE machines Summit and Sierra, it’s a good time to look at how the IBM POWER CPU stacks up against the x86 Xeon Haswell CPU from Intel. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Nvidia Sees Bright Future for AI Supercomputing

November 23, 2016

Graphics chipmaker Nvidia made a strong showing at SC16 in Salt Lake City last week. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

BioTeam’s Berman Charts 2017 HPC Trends in Life Sciences

January 4, 2017

Twenty years ago high performance computing was nearly absent from life sciences. Today it’s used throughout life sciences and biomedical research. Genomics and the data deluge from modern lab instruments are the main drivers, but so is the longer-term desire to perform predictive simulation in support of Precision Medicine (PM). There’s even a specialized life sciences supercomputer, ‘Anton’ from D.E. Shaw Research, and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is standing up its second Anton 2 and actively soliciting project proposals. There’s a lot going on. Read more…

By John Russell

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDG to Be Bought by Chinese Investors; IDC to Spin Out HPC Group

January 19, 2017

US-based publishing and investment firm International Data Group, Inc. (IDG) will be acquired by a pair of Chinese investors, China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Dell Knights Landing Machine Sets New STAC Records

November 2, 2016

The Securities Technology Analysis Center, commonly known as STAC, has released a new report characterizing the performance of the Knight Landing-based Dell PowerEdge C6320p server on the STAC-A2 benchmarking suite, widely used by the financial services industry to test and evaluate computing platforms. The Dell machine has set new records for both the baseline Greeks benchmark and the large Greeks benchmark. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

Intel and Trump Announce $7B for Fab 42 Targeting 7nm

February 8, 2017

In what may be an attempt by President Trump to reset his turbulent relationship with the high tech industry, he and Intel CEO Brian Krzanich today announced plans to invest more than $7 billion to complete Fab 42. Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This