Introducing Software Engineering-as-a-Service

By Sudhanshu Hate

June 19, 2012

Abstract

Industry-standard cloud models such as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Software as a Service (SaaS) support only hosting software end product (software applications). However none of these existing cloud models supports real-time software engineering, maintenance activities, and enabling processes on the cloud.

The envisaged EaaS platform provides the ability to intelligently provision development environments in the cloud. Post-provisioning, it provides an environment to execute end-to-end software development lifecycle activities (SDLC), such as requirements engineering, architecture, design, development, and testing. The platform also supports continuous software maintenance in the cloud. Apart from software engineering and maintenance, the platform provides enabling processes to execute the complete SDLC.

Software development and maintenance activities in the cloud can be performed by connecting remotely to the EaaS instance using dumb terminals.

Introduction

The software application lifecycle broadly consists of two key phases, application development and application deployment. Conventionally application development and hosting happens on-premise (within the enterprise boundary). With the advent of cloud, it is leveraged only for application deployment however; the application engineering and maintenance activities continue to take place on-premise, that is, not in the cloud.

On-premise (outside of cloud and within the enterprise boundary) application development requires up-front investments and planning, in the form of procuring desktops, servers, and software applications. Not only this, it means establishing complete development and maintenance processes and adhering to them.

However, today, no turnkey solution exists which can provision an application development and maintenance ecosystem (development machines/nodes running with hardware, software, servers, processes) off-premise (in the cloud) based on inputs of certain parameters such as application size in the form of use case, function points, duration/timelines, scope, etc.

EaaS provides the turnkey solution to not only provision the complete development ecosystem (hardware, software, desktops, servers, processes) but also enables the complete application lifecycle development and deployment activities in the cloud with the ability to ramp up and ramp down resources.

The cloud-based development environment can be accessed from the in-house machines or dumb terminal by logging into the provisioned system on cloud. This in turn supports the necessary application development, and maintenance lifecycle activities such as coding, version control, check in, check out, code reviews, unit testing, code execution to name a few.

This software provisioning and execution platform will be useful for many enterprises, entrepreneurs, and individual professionals to rent it in “pay as you use” manner. By requesting the environment on demand and releasing it as soon as the work is done, a lot of lead time in conventional hardware, software procurement and money can be saved.

The platform can be accessed by logging into the system using a dumb terminal (a machine with very minimal CPU and memory configurations) that will facilitate software creation at anytime from anywhere without needing to rely on pre-configured desktops or laptops.

Challenges

There are multiple challenges with the existing model of on-premise or off-premise (cloud hosted) application development such as:

  • Current models such as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS) and associated technology vendors such as Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Salesforce, etc. support only various application deployment models which have the ability to provision hardware (nodes) and either allow software installation (IaaS) or provide software service APIs (PaaS) or finished applications (SaaS). However, none of these models supports real-time application development lifecycle (engineering), or maintenance activities including support for the associated software processes.

Platform

Service

Platform Vendor

IaaS

Infrastructure provisioning

Amazon

PaaS

Infrastructure provisioning, Platform APIs, programming language support

Microsoft, Google App Engine

SaaS

Finished product/application can be directly accessed.

Salesforce.com, Google Apps, email, etc.

EaaS

End to end application development lifecycle activities, execution support including persistence

None as yet

 

  • Application development using IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models has to be done on-premise (outside of cloud and within the enterprise boundary), which means configuring desktops with the requisite development environment.

  • The existing IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models do not have the ability to intelligently recommend provisioning environments for various activities such as development, testing, production, etc. based on specific application sizing parameters.

  • On-premise development models demand upfront investment (CAPEX) in real estate, hardware, software, and processes which makes the overall software development costly.

  • On-premise development models inhibit the ability to work anytime and from anywhere as they are tightly-coupled with and dependent on specific hardware, software, and processes. This set-up usually exists only in the enterprise boundary on a pre-configured desktop or laptop.

  • Ability to elastically ramp up, ramp down, and provision various test, development, maintenance environments is costly and time-consuming with on-premise.

  • Software needed in on-premise environment requires individual software licenses to be bought from individual vendors.

Proposed Solution – EaaS platform

As depicted in the following diagram, the proposed EaaS system consists of primarily three modules.

Figure 1

Figure 1.0: EaaS Platform Block diagram

The provisioning system is intelligent to recommend sizing for various environment such as

  • development

  • testing

  • staging

  • production environment

based on input of various parameters such as application size in the form of

  • number of use cases

  • function point

  • project timelines, etc.

The provisioning system will also allow the user to select and install specific software development packages or utility software applications for executing the main software project.

The execution environment will support day-to-day software development/maintenance lifecycle activities such as project planning, requirements gathering, architecture, design, code check-out/check-in, coding, profiling, unit testing, integration testing, version control to name a few.

The process module will provide systems and processes for executing a software project at a specific project quality standard such as CMM, ISO level and will provide necessary project management, quality measuring and tracking software systems on the cloud.

The cloud-based development environment will be accessible from on-premise machines or dumb terminals by logging into the provisioned system in the cloud. After which, necessary application development, maintenance lifecycle activities such as coding, version control, check in, check out, code reviews, unit testing, code execution, etc. can be performed.

Details of the Sub-system

The following figure depicts the platform support for key activities, functions. The platform has three key logical modules as provisioning, execution and processes as depicted and detailed in the diagram below.

Figure 2

Figure 2.0: EaaS platform components

Provisioning Environment

The following figure, in the form of block diagram, explains the high-level steps in platform provisioning.

Figure 3

Figure 3.0: Provisioning Module

The provisioning system will rely on a wizard-based workflow that will take one or more inputs from the user, such as application size in terms of function points, number of use cases, timeline within which the project needs to be executed, and associated software to be provisioned. Based on these inputs, the provisioning algorithm will compute sizing for various aspects of the development environment, such as number of nodes, server specs, software, and processes for specific environment such as dev., test, production, etc.

The user can either accept the recommended environment or tweak it based on his/her needs by going back and forth in the workflow.

After confirmation from the user, the provisioning module will provision the necessary environment.

The following are some examples of environments that can be provisioned (provisioning environments are not limited to these):

Development environment – to perform software development, engineering activities.

Performance testing environment – to perform activities such as performance testing, benchmarking.

Integration testing environment – to perform integration testing activities.

Production environment – the environment where the software application will be deployed for end users to perform actual business functions.

Maintenance environment – the environment where software maintenance activities, bug fixing and testing will be done. This environment can also be treated like a staging environment.

In real life, the software project may need more or may not need all of these. Also the configuration for each of these environments would be variable, dependent on client needs, and dependent on the needs of the particular project.

Execution Environment

The execution environment allows users to perform complete end-to-end software engineering activities in the cloud, such as:

Requirements gathering/engineering – tools to capture and document software engineering requirements in the form of use cases, workflows, business interactions, or change requests.

Architecture modelling – tools to define and depict various architectural views, such as business, technology, deployment, information view of the proposed system.

Module design – tools to design various components, sub-systems of the software application.

Coding – integrated Development Environment (IDE) to write, compile, run, and verify the actual code.

Version control – source control for versioning of code, documents, etc.

Unit testing – tools to unit-test the code for a particular use case.

Software documentation – tools to support documentation activities during the lifecycle.

Processes

While performing software engineering and support activities, various supporting processes are needed that are enabled through this module.

Project Management processes – processes to support project management activities during the software development lifecycle such as project plan creation and tracking, milestone creation, planning customer billing milestones, resource planning and allocation, etc.

Quality processes – quality processes to support software development lifecycle activities such as code review, defect logging, defect fixing, estimation, etc.

People processes – processes such as leave planning.

Development processes – processes such as version control, code back up, conducting reviews, etc.

Benefits of the Solution

  1. Ability to support an end-to-end software environment in the cloud (provisioning, execution-software engineering and deployment, ecosystem-processes).

  2. For end users, using the environment doesn’t require a large upfront investment but relies on resource or transaction-based pricing (CAPEX to OPEX).

  3. Ability to work anytime from anywhere by providing necessary credentials to enter the cloud.

  4. Ability to increase or decrease the number of development nodes as per the demand of the application development lifecycle, provision various test and release environments.

  5. Provide suggestions about distributing the load across various phases in lifecycle to help optimize and plan resources and cost.

  6. All software licenses can be either provided from the provisioning environment within the cloud or made to custom install in the cloud environment.

  7. The platform enables channels of co-creation and harnesses collective intelligence for the distributed workforce.

Summary

Conventionally, software development activities require a lot of time because of the effort involved in planning, procuring, and execution. Not only are the procurement lead times very lengthy, but also consume extraordinary upfront investments in hardware, software and at times defeat the business case in the short term.

The cloud avenue to plan, procure, and execute end-to-end software engineering activities will not only help eliminate the challenges mentioned above, by allowing enterprises to in essence “rent” only what is needed at any point in the SDLC, but also enable the anytime-anywhere development in this distributed workforce world.

Acknowledgments

Author would like to acknowledge the efforts of Naveen Kumar Principal, Infosys Ltd. and Sameer Suryakant Kulkarni, Content Architect, Infosys Ltd.

About the Author

Sudhanshu Hate (Suds) is a Senior Technology Architect at Infosys Labs, Infosys Limited. He has more than 14 years of industry experience working across various stages of SDLC. For last several years, he has been responsible for technology research, envisioning, building, and consulting on Microsoft technology based solutions.

His areas of work span across cutting-edge technology research, architecture reviews, defining technology strategy, point of views with focus around Microsoft .NET stack, cloud (Windows Azure), big data, and high performance computing

Sudhanshu has co-authored two books: ASP.NET 4 Social Networking and .NET 4 for Enterprise Architects and Developers. He has also written several papers and presented at various conferences.

Note: The author has a pending patent on this very subject.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Ohio Supercomputer Center Dedicates ‘Owens’ Cluster

March 29, 2017

In a dedication ceremony held earlier today (March 29), officials from Ohio Supercomputer Center (OSC) along with state representatives gathered to celebrate the launch of OSC’s newest cluster: Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

EU Ratchets up the Race to Exascale Computing

March 29, 2017

The race to expand HPC infrastructure, including exascale machines, to advance national and regional interests ratcheted up a notch yesterday with announcement that seven European countries – Read more…

By John Russell

Data-Hungry Algorithms and the Thirst for AI

March 29, 2017

At Tabor Communications’ Leverage Big Data + EnterpriseHPC Summit in Florida last week, esteemed HPC professional Jay Boisseau, chief HPC technology strategist at Dell EMC, engaged the audience with his presentation, “Big Computing, Big Data, Big Trends, Big Results.” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Bill Gropp – Pursuing the Next Big Thing at NCSA

March 28, 2017

About eight months ago Bill Gropp was elevated to acting director of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA). Read more…

By John Russell

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Leveraging the Power of Big Data to Improve Customer Satisfaction & Brand Loyalty

In the dynamic world of retail, retailers must find ways to recognize and effectively respond to shopping behaviors, patterns, and trends in order to succeed. Read more…

UK to Launch Six Major HPC Centers

March 27, 2017

Six high performance computing centers will be formally launched in the U.K. later this week intended to provide wider access to HPC resources to U.K. Read more…

By John Russell

AI in the News: Rao in at Intel, Ng out at Baidu, Nvidia on at Tencent Cloud

March 26, 2017

Just as AI has become the leitmotif of the advanced scale computing market, infusing much of the conversation about HPC in commercial and industrial spheres, it also is impacting high-level management changes in the industry. Read more…

By Doug Black

Scalable Informatics Ceases Operations

March 23, 2017

On the same day we reported on the uncertain future for HPC compiler company PathScale, we are sad to learn that another HPC vendor, Scalable Informatics, is closing its doors. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

‘Strategies in Biomedical Data Science’ Advances IT-Research Synergies

March 23, 2017

“Strategies in Biomedical Data Science: Driving Force for Innovation” by Jay A. Etchings is both an introductory text and a field guide for anyone working with biomedical data. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Data-Hungry Algorithms and the Thirst for AI

March 29, 2017

At Tabor Communications’ Leverage Big Data + EnterpriseHPC Summit in Florida last week, esteemed HPC professional Jay Boisseau, chief HPC technology strategist at Dell EMC, engaged the audience with his presentation, “Big Computing, Big Data, Big Trends, Big Results.” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Bill Gropp – Pursuing the Next Big Thing at NCSA

March 28, 2017

About eight months ago Bill Gropp was elevated to acting director of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA). Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Compiler Company PathScale Seeks Life Raft

March 23, 2017

HPCwire has learned that HPC compiler company PathScale has fallen on difficult times and is asking the community for help or actively seeking a buyer for its assets. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Quantum Bits: D-Wave and VW; Google Quantum Lab; IBM Expands Access

March 21, 2017

For a technology that’s usually characterized as far off and in a distant galaxy, quantum computing has been steadily picking up steam. Read more…

By John Russell

Trump Budget Targets NIH, DOE, and EPA; No Mention of NSF

March 16, 2017

President Trump’s proposed U.S. fiscal 2018 budget issued today sharply cuts science spending while bolstering military spending as he promised during the campaign. Read more…

By John Russell

CPU-based Visualization Positions for Exascale Supercomputing

March 16, 2017

In this contributed perspective piece, Intel’s Jim Jeffers makes the case that CPU-based visualization is now widely adopted and as such is no longer a contrarian view, but is rather an exascale requirement. Read more…

By Jim Jeffers, Principal Engineer and Engineering Leader, Intel

US Supercomputing Leaders Tackle the China Question

March 15, 2017

Joint DOE-NSA report responds to the increased global pressures impacting the competitiveness of U.S. supercomputing. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

New Japanese Supercomputing Project Targets Exascale

March 14, 2017

Another Japanese supercomputing project was revealed this week, this one from emerging supercomputer maker, ExaScaler Inc., and Keio University. The partners are working on an original supercomputer design with exascale aspirations. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

For IBM/OpenPOWER: Success in 2017 = (Volume) Sales

January 11, 2017

To a large degree IBM and the OpenPOWER Foundation have done what they said they would – assembling a substantial and growing ecosystem and bringing Power-based products to market, all in about three years. Read more…

By John Russell

Quantum Bits: D-Wave and VW; Google Quantum Lab; IBM Expands Access

March 21, 2017

For a technology that’s usually characterized as far off and in a distant galaxy, quantum computing has been steadily picking up steam. Read more…

By John Russell

Trump Budget Targets NIH, DOE, and EPA; No Mention of NSF

March 16, 2017

President Trump’s proposed U.S. fiscal 2018 budget issued today sharply cuts science spending while bolstering military spending as he promised during the campaign. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Compiler Company PathScale Seeks Life Raft

March 23, 2017

HPCwire has learned that HPC compiler company PathScale has fallen on difficult times and is asking the community for help or actively seeking a buyer for its assets. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular offerings such as Caffe, Theano, and Torch. Read more…

By John Russell

Lighting up Aurora: Behind the Scenes at the Creation of the DOE’s Upcoming 200 Petaflops Supercomputer

December 1, 2016

In April 2015, U.S. Department of Energy Undersecretary Franklin Orr announced that Intel would be the prime contractor for Aurora: Read more…

By Jan Rowell

Leading Solution Providers

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

Enlisting Deep Learning in the War on Cancer

December 7, 2016

Sometime in Q2 2017 the first ‘results’ of the Joint Design of Advanced Computing Solutions for Cancer (JDACS4C) will become publicly available according to Rick Stevens. He leads one of three JDACS4C pilot projects pressing deep learning (DL) into service in the War on Cancer. Read more…

By John Russell

BioTeam’s Berman Charts 2017 HPC Trends in Life Sciences

January 4, 2017

Twenty years ago high performance computing was nearly absent from life sciences. Today it’s used throughout life sciences and biomedical research. Genomics and the data deluge from modern lab instruments are the main drivers, but so is the longer-term desire to perform predictive simulation in support of Precision Medicine (PM). There’s even a specialized life sciences supercomputer, ‘Anton’ from D.E. Shaw Research, and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is standing up its second Anton 2 and actively soliciting project proposals. There’s a lot going on. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Startup Advances Auto-Parallelization’s Promise

January 23, 2017

The shift from single core to multicore hardware has made finding parallelism in codes more important than ever, but that hasn’t made the task of parallel programming any easier. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

US Supercomputing Leaders Tackle the China Question

March 15, 2017

Joint DOE-NSA report responds to the increased global pressures impacting the competitiveness of U.S. supercomputing. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

CPU Benchmarking: Haswell Versus POWER8

June 2, 2015

With OpenPOWER activity ramping up and IBM’s prominent role in the upcoming DOE machines Summit and Sierra, it’s a good time to look at how the IBM POWER CPU stacks up against the x86 Xeon Haswell CPU from Intel. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDG to Be Bought by Chinese Investors; IDC to Spin Out HPC Group

January 19, 2017

US-based publishing and investment firm International Data Group, Inc. (IDG) will be acquired by a pair of Chinese investors, China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This