The Ultimate Debate – Interconnect Offloading Versus Onloading

By Gilad Shainer, Mellanox

April 12, 2016

The high performance computing market is going through a technology transition – the Co-Design transition. As has already been discussed in many articles, this transition has emerged in order to solve the performance bottlenecks of today’s infrastructures and applications, performance bottlenecks that were created by multi-core CPUs and the existing CPU-centric system architecture.

How are multi-core CPUs the source for today’s performance bottlenecks? In order to understand that, we need to go back in time to the era of single-core CPUs. Back then, performance gains came from increases in CPU frequency and from the reduction of networking functions (network adapter and switches). Each new generation of product brought faster CPUs and lower-latency network adapters and switches, and that combination was the main performance factor. But this could not continue forever. The CPU frequency could not be increased any more due to power limitations, and instead of increasing the speed of the application process, we began using more CPU cores in parallel, thereby executing more processes at the same time. This enabled us to continue improving application performance, not by running faster, but by running more at the same time.

This new paradigm of increasing the amount of CPU cores dramatically increased the burden on the interconnect, and, moreover, changed the interconnect into the main performance enabler of the system. The key performance concern was how fast all the CPU processes could be synchronized and how fast data could be aggregated and distributed between them.

But the native interconnect latency has also reached the point of being exceedingly small compared to the overall communication patter. Today, InfiniBand switches runs at 90 nanosecond latency and InfiniBand adapters at 100 nanosecond latency. For CPU process communication frameworks, such as MPI collective communications, latency is in the range of tens of microseconds. Even if we continue to see reduction in the interconnect latency of another 10, 20, 40, or 50 nanoseconds, this is clearly negligible compared to the process communication latency. That means that the idea that has been suggested by certain companies to merge the network adapter with the CPU in order to reduce a few nanoseconds is certainly not the right thing for the future of HPC.

It is fair to ask whether this is relevant to the debate between offloading and onloading. The answer is that it is very relevant. In the past, the debate between offloading and onloading was mainly centered around CPU efficiency. An offloading interconnect technology was more complex to design and build, but in return, it offloaded the CPU from managing network activities, which could easily result in 40-50 percent better CPU and system utilization. The onloading interconnect technology is easier to build, but it is nothing more than a simple pipe, and all the network operations still must be managed and executed by the CPU; half of the CPU’s time is wasted from the point of the application. Furthermore, offloading enables technologies like RDMA, which cannot be done with an onloading approach. We have therefore witnessed numerous application performance examples that demonstrate the clear and dominant advantage of offloading solutions over onloading products (for example, DDR InfiniBand vs. Pathscale InfiniPath and QDR InfiniBand vs. QLogic/Intel TrueScale) [see i, ii, and iii].

Nowadays, the offloading architecture has become the critical element in overcoming performance bottlenecks, and it is not just a matter of performance and cost/performance comparisons. Systems cannot continue to scale unless intelligent interconnect and offloading are used.

As the number of processes continues to grow, one can increase the parallelism of solving the complex problems we deal with in science, research, and manufacturing. Therefore, the process communications become more and more critical. It is more than just the network latency of ping pong operations, but also the communication latency of complex, critical communications – collective operations or data aggregation operations. Executing these operations on the CPU/node has reach its performance limit and cannot be accelerated any further. The only solution is actually to perform these operations on the data while its moves within the cluster; that is, they are executed by the interconnect functions (switch, adapter) as the data moves. This approach, which was developed under the global architecture of Co-Design, will take us farther down the path toward exascale computing.

This technology trend will not affect only HPC, but rather will change the world of data analytics, machine learning, and other data-intensive applications and data search-based applications. The CPU core parallelism that saved the day in the mid-2000s has become the bottleneck today, and the new intelligent offloading interconnect solutions are the new saviors. Intelligent interconnect solutions are becoming the new co-processors, and they are therefore becoming a key factor for scalable computing.

Going back to basic application performance and system return on investment, it is expected that the comparison between EDR InfiniBand and Intel Omni-Path would be similar to the previous comparisons between the two different interconnect technology approaches. While only very small setups are available today, one can already see the system performance difference in various HPC application cases, for example WIEN2K, Quantum Espresso, and LS-DYNA.

WIEN2k allows users to perform electronic structure calculations of solids using density functional theory. It is an all-electron scheme including relativistic effects and has been licensed by more than 2000 user groups. Quantum Espresso is an integrated suite of Open Source computer codes for electronic structure calculations and materials modeling at the nanoscale. It is based on density functional theory, plane waves, and pseudopotentials. LS-DYNA is an advanced general-purpose multiphysics simulation software package developed by the Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). While the package continues to contain ever more possibilities for the calculation of complex, real world problems, its origins and core-competency lie in highly non-linear transient dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) using explicit time integration. LS-DYNA is used by the automotive, aerospace, construction, military, manufacturing, and bioengineering industries.

WIEN2K Performance comparison

Quantum ESPRESSO Performance comparison

LS-DYNA Performance comparison

In all three cases, we can see a clear performance advantage of the EDR InfiniBand smart network. It should be noted that the performance difference is of the entire system, ranging from 35% to 63% higher system performance with InfiniBand. It should also be noted that the system scale for these tests is small, and the gap will increase with system size.

Furthermore, as can be seen in the LS-DYNA case, for example, InfiniBand enables higher performance with only six nodes, versus Omni-Path on 12 nodes – InfiniBand delivers higher performance with half of the system size versus Omni-Path.

The system performance difference with smart offloading interconnect is clear, and the case of InfiniBand vs. Omni-Path is no different.

References

[i] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5613096&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5613096

[ii] http://www.dynalook.com/european-conf-2007/ls-dyna-performance-and-scalability-in-the-multi.pdf

[iii] http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1278292&page_number=2

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Bill Gropp – Pursuing the Next Big Thing at NCSA

March 28, 2017

About eight months ago Bill Gropp was elevated to acting director of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA). Read more…

By John Russell

UK to Launch Six Major HPC Centers

March 27, 2017

Six high performance computing centers will be formally launched in the U.K. later this week intended to provide wider access to HPC resources to U.K. Read more…

By John Russell

AI in the News: Rao in at Intel, Ng out at Baidu, Nvidia on at Tencent Cloud

March 26, 2017

Just as AI has become the leitmotif of the advanced scale computing market, infusing much of the conversation about HPC in commercial and industrial spheres, it also is impacting high-level management changes in the industry. Read more…

By Doug Black

Scalable Informatics Ceases Operations

March 23, 2017

On the same day we reported on the uncertain future for HPC compiler company PathScale, we are sad to learn that another HPC vendor, Scalable Informatics, is closing its doors. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Quants Achieving Maximum Compute Power without the Learning Curve

The financial services industry is a fast-paced and data-intensive environment, and financial firms are realizing that they must modernize their IT infrastructures and invest in high performance computing (HPC) tools in order to survive. Read more…

‘Strategies in Biomedical Data Science’ Advances IT-Research Synergies

March 23, 2017

“Strategies in Biomedical Data Science: Driving Force for Innovation” by Jay A. Etchings is both an introductory text and a field guide for anyone working with biomedical data. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Compiler Company PathScale Seeks Life Raft

March 23, 2017

HPCwire has learned that HPC compiler company PathScale has fallen on difficult times and is asking the community for help or actively seeking a buyer for its assets. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Google Launches New Machine Learning Journal

March 22, 2017

On Monday, Google announced plans to launch a new peer review journal and “ecosystem” Read more…

By John Russell

Swiss Researchers Peer Inside Chips with Improved X-Ray Imaging

March 22, 2017

Peering inside semiconductor chips using x-ray imaging isn’t new, but the technique hasn’t been especially good or easy to accomplish. Read more…

By John Russell

Bill Gropp – Pursuing the Next Big Thing at NCSA

March 28, 2017

About eight months ago Bill Gropp was elevated to acting director of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA). Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Compiler Company PathScale Seeks Life Raft

March 23, 2017

HPCwire has learned that HPC compiler company PathScale has fallen on difficult times and is asking the community for help or actively seeking a buyer for its assets. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Quantum Bits: D-Wave and VW; Google Quantum Lab; IBM Expands Access

March 21, 2017

For a technology that’s usually characterized as far off and in a distant galaxy, quantum computing has been steadily picking up steam. Read more…

By John Russell

Trump Budget Targets NIH, DOE, and EPA; No Mention of NSF

March 16, 2017

President Trump’s proposed U.S. fiscal 2018 budget issued today sharply cuts science spending while bolstering military spending as he promised during the campaign. Read more…

By John Russell

CPU-based Visualization Positions for Exascale Supercomputing

March 16, 2017

In this contributed perspective piece, Intel’s Jim Jeffers makes the case that CPU-based visualization is now widely adopted and as such is no longer a contrarian view, but is rather an exascale requirement. Read more…

By Jim Jeffers, Principal Engineer and Engineering Leader, Intel

US Supercomputing Leaders Tackle the China Question

March 15, 2017

Joint DOE-NSA report responds to the increased global pressures impacting the competitiveness of U.S. supercomputing. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

New Japanese Supercomputing Project Targets Exascale

March 14, 2017

Another Japanese supercomputing project was revealed this week, this one from emerging supercomputer maker, ExaScaler Inc., and Keio University. The partners are working on an original supercomputer design with exascale aspirations. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Nvidia Debuts HGX-1 for Cloud; Announces Fujitsu AI Deal

March 9, 2017

On Monday Nvidia announced a major deal with Fujitsu to help build an AI supercomputer for RIKEN using 24 DGX-1 servers. Read more…

By John Russell

For IBM/OpenPOWER: Success in 2017 = (Volume) Sales

January 11, 2017

To a large degree IBM and the OpenPOWER Foundation have done what they said they would – assembling a substantial and growing ecosystem and bringing Power-based products to market, all in about three years. Read more…

By John Russell

Quantum Bits: D-Wave and VW; Google Quantum Lab; IBM Expands Access

March 21, 2017

For a technology that’s usually characterized as far off and in a distant galaxy, quantum computing has been steadily picking up steam. Read more…

By John Russell

Trump Budget Targets NIH, DOE, and EPA; No Mention of NSF

March 16, 2017

President Trump’s proposed U.S. fiscal 2018 budget issued today sharply cuts science spending while bolstering military spending as he promised during the campaign. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Compiler Company PathScale Seeks Life Raft

March 23, 2017

HPCwire has learned that HPC compiler company PathScale has fallen on difficult times and is asking the community for help or actively seeking a buyer for its assets. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular offerings such as Caffe, Theano, and Torch. Read more…

By John Russell

Lighting up Aurora: Behind the Scenes at the Creation of the DOE’s Upcoming 200 Petaflops Supercomputer

December 1, 2016

In April 2015, U.S. Department of Energy Undersecretary Franklin Orr announced that Intel would be the prime contractor for Aurora: Read more…

By Jan Rowell

Leading Solution Providers

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

Enlisting Deep Learning in the War on Cancer

December 7, 2016

Sometime in Q2 2017 the first ‘results’ of the Joint Design of Advanced Computing Solutions for Cancer (JDACS4C) will become publicly available according to Rick Stevens. He leads one of three JDACS4C pilot projects pressing deep learning (DL) into service in the War on Cancer. Read more…

By John Russell

BioTeam’s Berman Charts 2017 HPC Trends in Life Sciences

January 4, 2017

Twenty years ago high performance computing was nearly absent from life sciences. Today it’s used throughout life sciences and biomedical research. Genomics and the data deluge from modern lab instruments are the main drivers, but so is the longer-term desire to perform predictive simulation in support of Precision Medicine (PM). There’s even a specialized life sciences supercomputer, ‘Anton’ from D.E. Shaw Research, and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is standing up its second Anton 2 and actively soliciting project proposals. There’s a lot going on. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Startup Advances Auto-Parallelization’s Promise

January 23, 2017

The shift from single core to multicore hardware has made finding parallelism in codes more important than ever, but that hasn’t made the task of parallel programming any easier. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

CPU Benchmarking: Haswell Versus POWER8

June 2, 2015

With OpenPOWER activity ramping up and IBM’s prominent role in the upcoming DOE machines Summit and Sierra, it’s a good time to look at how the IBM POWER CPU stacks up against the x86 Xeon Haswell CPU from Intel. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

US Supercomputing Leaders Tackle the China Question

March 15, 2017

Joint DOE-NSA report responds to the increased global pressures impacting the competitiveness of U.S. supercomputing. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDG to Be Bought by Chinese Investors; IDC to Spin Out HPC Group

January 19, 2017

US-based publishing and investment firm International Data Group, Inc. (IDG) will be acquired by a pair of Chinese investors, China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This