NSCI Discussion at HPC User Forum Shows Hunger for Details

By John Russell

April 20, 2016

Is the National Strategic Computing Initiative in trouble? Launched by Presidential Executive Order last July, there are still few public details of the draft implementation plan, which was delivered to the NSCI Executive Council back in October. Last week on the final day of the HPC User Forum being held in Tucson, Saul Gonzalez Martirena (OSTP, NSF) gave an NSCI update talk that contained, really, no new information from what was presented at SC15.

As he was heading out, and aware that a open discussion on NSCI was scheduled for later in the day, Martirena asked one of the meeting’s organizers (IDC Research VP, Bob Sorensen) to take good notes, adding “if there is any possibility send them to me by tomorrow. We are really looking for good ideas.” It’s too bad he missed the discussion.

Starved for details and perhaps becoming tone-deaf to NSCI aspirations, the late afternoon discussion was wide-ranging and concern-ridden relative to NSCI’s reality. The first member of the gathered group to venture an opinion, a very senior member of the HPC community, said simply, “It’s all [BS].” What followed was candid conversation among the forty or so attendees who stuck around for the final session of the forum.

NCSI, of course, is a grand plan to ensure the U.S. maintains a leadership position in high performance computing. It’s five objectives, bulleted below, represent frank recognition by the U.S. government, or at least the current administration, that HPC leadership is vital for advancing science, ensuring national defense, and maintaining national economic competitiveness. Now, nearly nine months after its start, there’s still not much known about the plan to operationalize the vision.

The five NSCI objectives, excerpted from the original executive order, are:

  1. “Accelerating delivery of a capable exascale computing system that integrates hardware and software capability to deliver approximately 100 times the performance of current 10 petaflop systems across a range of applications representing government needs.
  2. Increasing coherence between the technology base used for modeling and simulation and that used for data analytic computing.
  3. Establishing, over the next 15 years, a viable path forward for future HPC systems even after the limits of current semiconductor technology are reached (the “post- Moore’s Law era”).
  4. Increasing the capacity and capability of an enduring national HPC ecosystem by employing a holistic approach that addresses relevant factors such as networking technology, workflow, downward scaling, foundational algorithms and software, accessibility, and workforce development.
  5. Developing an enduring public-private collaboration to ensure that the benefits of the research and development advances are, to the greatest extent, shared between the United States Government and industrial and academic sectors.”

Sorensen was a good choice for moderator. Before joining IDC he spent 33 years in the federal government as a science and technology analyst covering HPC for DoD, Treasury, and the White House. He was involved during the early formation of NSCI and remains an advocate; that said he has since written that more must be done to ensure success (see NSCI Update: More Work Needed on Budgetary Details and Industry Outreach).

NSCI discussion points
NSCI discussion points

Views were decidedly mixed in the audience, which was mostly drawn from academia, national labs, and industry. Sorensen kicked things of with a list of discussion points (see on left) but discussion wandered extensively.

What did seemed clear is that lacking a concrete NSCI implementation plan to react to, members of the audience defaulted to ad hoc concerns and attitudes, sometimes predictably characteristic of the segment of the HPC community to which they belonged, but also often representative of the diversity of opinion within segments. Two of the more contentious issues were the picking of winners and losers by government and the challenges in creating an enduring national HPC ecosystem through pubic-private efforts.

Uncle Sam Not Good At Picking Winners
Every time an RFP goes out, there’s a winner and a loser, said Sorensen. One attendee recalled the government-funded effort to develop a national aerodynamic simulator in the 1980s as something less than successful . “They funded Control Data Corp. and Burroughs Corporation. Somebody asked Cray how come you’re not going after any of that. Seymour [Cray] said ‘when I build my machine they will decide that ‘s the machine they really want.’ And he built the Cray 2 and Burroughs dropped out of the business. [In the end] CDC supplied a dead machine and Cray won the business. The point is for years the government has tried to pick winners and losers and hasn’t been successful.”

Bob Sorensen, IDC
Bob Sorensen, IDC

Sorensen, in his introductory remarks, noted further there is an inherent “dichotomy” in the program. The folks who are doing this, DOE, NNSA want the best HPC systems in the world [because] leadership here means greater potential for greater national security. [While] at the same time we want a vibrant HPC infrastructure that builds the best equipment in the world and sells it to anyone that has money that.”

Indeed, mention was made of the recent report that China – denied Intel’s latest chips roughly one year ago by the U.S. Commerce Department– would soon bring on two 100 petaflops machines made with Chinese components and planing to benchmark one in time for the next Top500 list (June). One comment was “The Chinese are giving a gift to this program. Imagine what Trump is going to say. We are going to be portrayed as being way behind the Chinese and get out the check book because we have to catch up.”

It was hardly smooth sailing for the sprawling NSCI blueprint. Still, it would be very inaccurate to say the mood was anti-NSCI; rather so much uncertainty remains that there was little to focus on. The devil is in the details, said one attendee. Funding, HPC training, software issues (modernization and ISV interest), big box envy, the politically charged environment, clarity of NSCI goals, and program metrics were all part of the discussion mix.

Acknowledged but not discussed at length was the fact that the NSCI might not survive the charged political atmosphere of an election year and might not be supported by the next administration. During Q&A following his earlier presentation Gonzalez Martirena was cautiously optimistic that bipartisan support around national security and national competitiveness issues was possible.

Broadly, the difficulties of democratizing HPC dominated concerns. Buying and building supercomputers for national and academic purposes is a more traveled road where best practices (and stumbling blocks) are better known.

Here is a brief sampling of a few issues raised:

The “ISV Problem”
In a rare show of consensus, many thought enticing ISVs to embrace HPC would be a major hurdle. Indeed, software presents challenges on several fronts – from modernizing code to run on exascale machines to simply making HPC software more widely available to industry were discussed

Unless ISVs sees larger scale HPC as a lucrative market for they won’t have the incentive to scale their software was the general opinion. Consequently, companies who are completely dependent on commercial applications would discover to their movement into the HPC world limited by software availability and cost.

Moreover, NSCI’s seeming intense attention on hardware could become problematic. Throughput, at least for industrial HPC, is far more important than impressive machine specs. Perhaps, suggested one attendee, what’s needed is an X Prize of sorts to incentivize ISVs to go after these ‘world’s hardest’, meaningful work.

The Big Box Syndrome
A far amount of discussion was given to DoE and NSCI’s apparent focus on producing exascale machines. Talking about the early NSCI planning, Sorensen noted, “We talked long and hard about using exacale. It really came down to we don’t need an exascale machine, we need exascale technologies, that could be sitting on someone’s desktop. I remember the day the NSCI came out, the headline in Washington was ‘New Supercomputer’. It’s like no, don’t you understand. We are not talking about the top ten systems anymore; we need to at least deal with 100,000 technical servers out there.”

Certainly academia, national labs, and DoE do care about big machines. One person said these programs always make him wonder is there’s a hidden agenda by “people who just always want to get the faster system and NSCI is sort of being steered in that direction.”

HPC Workforce
The HPC skill shortage is a widely acknowledged problem. Young talent races to the start-up world, not HPC. Several approaches were bandied about, ranging from better use of formal training at the national labs and DoE to creation of new outreach programs. Even so, one attendee also wondered if a small company with limited engineering talent would be able or willing to allow those resources get needed training.

Getting the word out for existing training resources is an issue, said one attendee, who noted DoE doesn’t have a marketing budget per se to alert companies that training is available at centers. “It’s not like a company that has a marketing budget like Intel and IBM that’s going out and telling people all the time about this. That’s probably a barrier to getting the word out about resources are available.”

What Should Success Look Like?
For all its grand goals, the gathering wondered what NSCI success should look like, particularly if the idea was to achieve more than incremental success in economics or science or just build an exascale computer.

Merle Giles, director of Private Sector Programs and Economic Impact at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, and co-editor of the text, Industrial Applications of High-Performance Computing: Best Global Practices, said “Look at the game-changing events that affected the economy in this country. They were all an order of magnitude of 10X to 100X changes. It was railroad, [etc]. We don’t need to extract those last ten percent of performance of the machine. We need 10X to 100X and we can be really sloppy and still be really good. The 10X to 100x is not just the technology – it’s not exascale that will change the entire nation. It is greater access [to HPC resources] for those who can take advantage of that access.”

In that vein, another attendee added that NSCI is a projection of what was done in the past. What’s needed instead is to fundamentally think differently, saying, “Probably the biggest advantage comes from miniaturization of systems, not the biggest systems.”

One missing element to the entire program, agreed Gonzalez Martirena after his presentation, is more extensive interaction is industry. He showed a slide of responses to the RFI issued by NSF last fall (shown here) indicating roughly 200 academia/national lab responses with just eight from industry. Perhaps industry should form a group of representatives to NSCI RFIworks with NSCI, suggested Gonzalez Martirena to HPCwire.

Sorensen indicated IDC would send along the group’s comments to NASCI and Gonzalez Martirena, who recently moved back from OSTP to his position as program director of the division of physics at NSF. It seemed clear from the breadth of the discussion that the lack of a definite NSCI plan has created a something of vacuum for the HPC community and impatience for more detail.

One attendee offered, “How many people are left in the room, 40? I’d be willing to bet there are 40 different visions about what [NSCI] success looks like. We’re having lots of conversation but I think we are down in the weeds.”

NSCI Resources
NSCI Update: More Work Needed on Budgetary Details and Industry Outreach; http://www.hpcwire.com/2016/03/10/nsci-update-more-work-needed-on-budgetary-details-and-industry-outreach/

Speak Up: NSF Seeks Science Drivers for Exascale and the NSCI; http://www.hpcwire.com/off-the-wire/sc15-releases-latest-invited-talk-spotlight-randal-bryant-and-tim-polk/

HPC User Forum Presses NSCI Panelists on Plans; http://www.hpcwire.com/2015/10/06/speak-up-nsf-seeks-science-drivers-for-exascale-and-the-nsci/

Podcast: Industry Leaders on the Promise & Peril of NSCI; http://www.hpcwire.com/2015/08/27/podcast-industry-leaders-on-the-promise-peril-of-nsci/

New National HPC Strategy Is Bold, Important and More Daunting than US Moonshot; http://www.hpcwire.com/2015/08/06/new-national-hpc-strategy-is-bold-important-and-more-daunting-than-us-moonshot/

White House Launches National HPC Strategy; http://www.hpcwire.com/2015/07/30/white-house-launches-national-hpc-strategy/

President Obama’s Executive Order ‘Creating a National Strategic Computing Initiative’; http://www.hpcwire.com/off-the-wire/creating-a-national-strategic-computing-initiative/

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Battle Brews over Trump Intentions for Funding Science

February 27, 2017

The battle over science funding – how much and for what kinds of science – Read more…

By John Russell

Google Gets First Dibs on New Skylake Chips

February 27, 2017

As part of an ongoing effort to differentiate its public cloud services, Google made good this week on its intention to bring custom Xeon Skylake chips from Intel Corp. Read more…

By George Leopold

Thomas Sterling on CREST and Academia’s Role in HPC Research

February 27, 2017

The US advances in high performance computing over many decades have been a product of the combined engagement of research centers in industry, government labs, and academia. Read more…

By Thomas Sterling, Indiana University

Advancing Modular Supercomputing with DEEP and DEEP-ER Architectures

February 24, 2017

Knowing that the jump to exascale will require novel architectural approaches capable of delivering dramatic efficiency and performance gains, researchers around the world are hard at work on next-generation HPC systems. Read more…

By Sean Thielen

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Manufacturers Reaping the Benefits of Remote Visualization

Today’s manufacturers are operating in an ever-changing atmosphere, and finding new ways to boost productivity has never been more vital.

This is why manufacturers are ramping up their investments in high performance computing (HPC), a trend which has helped give rise to the “connected factory” and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) concepts that are proliferating throughout the industry today. Read more…

Weekly Twitter Roundup (Feb. 23, 2017)

February 23, 2017

Here at HPCwire, we aim to keep the HPC community apprised of the most relevant and interesting news items that get tweeted throughout the week. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

HPE Server Shows Low Latency on STAC-N1 Test

February 22, 2017

The performance of trade and match servers can be a critical differentiator for financial trading houses. Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Financial Update (Feb. 2017)

February 22, 2017

In this recurring feature, we’ll provide you with financial highlights from companies in the HPC industry. Check back in regularly for an updated list with the most pertinent fiscal information. Read more…

By Thomas Ayres

Rethinking HPC Platforms for ‘Second Gen’ Applications

February 22, 2017

Just what constitutes HPC and how best to support it is a keen topic currently. Read more…

By John Russell

Thomas Sterling on CREST and Academia’s Role in HPC Research

February 27, 2017

The US advances in high performance computing over many decades have been a product of the combined engagement of research centers in industry, government labs, and academia. Read more…

By Thomas Sterling, Indiana University

Advancing Modular Supercomputing with DEEP and DEEP-ER Architectures

February 24, 2017

Knowing that the jump to exascale will require novel architectural approaches capable of delivering dramatic efficiency and performance gains, researchers around the world are hard at work on next-generation HPC systems. Read more…

By Sean Thielen

HPC Technique Propels Deep Learning at Scale

February 21, 2017

Researchers from Baidu’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL) have adapted a well-known HPC communication technique to boost the speed and scale of their neural network training and now they are sharing their implementation with the larger deep learning community. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDC: Will the Real Exascale Race Please Stand Up?

February 21, 2017

So the exascale race is on. And lots of organizations are in the pack. Government announcements from the US, China, India, Japan, and the EU indicate that they are working hard to make it happen – some sooner, some later. Read more…

By Bob Sorensen, IDC

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Drug Developers Use Google Cloud HPC in the Fight Against ALS

February 16, 2017

Within the haystack of a lethal disease such as ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis / Lou Gehrig’s Disease) there exists, somewhere, the needle that will pierce this therapy-resistant affliction. Read more…

By Doug Black

Azure Edges AWS in Linpack Benchmark Study

February 15, 2017

The “when will clouds be ready for HPC” question has ebbed and flowed for years. Read more…

By John Russell

For IBM/OpenPOWER: Success in 2017 = (Volume) Sales

January 11, 2017

To a large degree IBM and the OpenPOWER Foundation have done what they said they would – assembling a substantial and growing ecosystem and bringing Power-based products to market, all in about three years. Read more…

By John Russell

US, China Vie for Supercomputing Supremacy

November 14, 2016

The 48th edition of the TOP500 list is fresh off the presses and while there is no new number one system, as previously teased by China, there are a number of notable entrants from the US and around the world and significant trends to report on. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Lighting up Aurora: Behind the Scenes at the Creation of the DOE’s Upcoming 200 Petaflops Supercomputer

December 1, 2016

In April 2015, U.S. Department of Energy Undersecretary Franklin Orr announced that Intel would be the prime contractor for Aurora: Read more…

By Jan Rowell

IBM Wants to be “Red Hat” of Deep Learning

January 26, 2017

IBM today announced the addition of TensorFlow and Chainer deep learning frameworks to its PowerAI suite of deep learning tools, which already includes popular offerings such as Caffe, Theano, and Torch. Read more…

By John Russell

D-Wave SC16 Update: What’s Bo Ewald Saying These Days

November 18, 2016

Tucked in a back section of the SC16 exhibit hall, quantum computing pioneer D-Wave has been talking up its new 2000-qubit processor announced in September. Forget for a moment the criticism sometimes aimed at D-Wave. This small Canadian company has sold several machines including, for example, ones to Lockheed and NASA, and has worked with Google on mapping machine learning problems to quantum computing. In July Los Alamos National Laboratory took possession of a 1000-quibit D-Wave 2X system that LANL ordered a year ago around the time of SC15. Read more…

By John Russell

Enlisting Deep Learning in the War on Cancer

December 7, 2016

Sometime in Q2 2017 the first ‘results’ of the Joint Design of Advanced Computing Solutions for Cancer (JDACS4C) will become publicly available according to Rick Stevens. He leads one of three JDACS4C pilot projects pressing deep learning (DL) into service in the War on Cancer. Read more…

By John Russell

Tokyo Tech’s TSUBAME3.0 Will Be First HPE-SGI Super

February 16, 2017

In a press event Friday afternoon local time in Japan, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) announced its plans for the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer, which will be Japan’s “fastest AI supercomputer,” Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Startup Advances Auto-Parallelization’s Promise

January 23, 2017

The shift from single core to multicore hardware has made finding parallelism in codes more important than ever, but that hasn’t made the task of parallel programming any easier. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

CPU Benchmarking: Haswell Versus POWER8

June 2, 2015

With OpenPOWER activity ramping up and IBM’s prominent role in the upcoming DOE machines Summit and Sierra, it’s a good time to look at how the IBM POWER CPU stacks up against the x86 Xeon Haswell CPU from Intel. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

BioTeam’s Berman Charts 2017 HPC Trends in Life Sciences

January 4, 2017

Twenty years ago high performance computing was nearly absent from life sciences. Today it’s used throughout life sciences and biomedical research. Genomics and the data deluge from modern lab instruments are the main drivers, but so is the longer-term desire to perform predictive simulation in support of Precision Medicine (PM). There’s even a specialized life sciences supercomputer, ‘Anton’ from D.E. Shaw Research, and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is standing up its second Anton 2 and actively soliciting project proposals. There’s a lot going on. Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Sees Bright Future for AI Supercomputing

November 23, 2016

Graphics chipmaker Nvidia made a strong showing at SC16 in Salt Lake City last week. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

TSUBAME3.0 Points to Future HPE Pascal-NVLink-OPA Server

February 17, 2017

Since our initial coverage of the TSUBAME3.0 supercomputer yesterday, more details have come to light on this innovative project. Of particular interest is a new board design for NVLink-equipped Pascal P100 GPUs that will create another entrant to the space currently occupied by Nvidia's DGX-1 system, IBM's "Minsky" platform and the Supermicro SuperServer (1028GQ-TXR). Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IDG to Be Bought by Chinese Investors; IDC to Spin Out HPC Group

January 19, 2017

US-based publishing and investment firm International Data Group, Inc. (IDG) will be acquired by a pair of Chinese investors, China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Is Liquid Cooling Ready to Go Mainstream?

February 13, 2017

Lost in the frenzy of SC16 was a substantial rise in the number of vendors showing server oriented liquid cooling technologies. Three decades ago liquid cooling was pretty much the exclusive realm of the Cray-2 and IBM mainframe class products. That’s changing. We are now seeing an emergence of x86 class server products with exotic plumbing technology ranging from Direct-to-Chip to servers and storage completely immersed in a dielectric fluid. Read more…

By Steve Campbell

Dell Knights Landing Machine Sets New STAC Records

November 2, 2016

The Securities Technology Analysis Center, commonly known as STAC, has released a new report characterizing the performance of the Knight Landing-based Dell PowerEdge C6320p server on the STAC-A2 benchmarking suite, widely used by the financial services industry to test and evaluate computing platforms. The Dell machine has set new records for both the baseline Greeks benchmark and the large Greeks benchmark. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Intel and Trump Announce $7B for Fab 42 Targeting 7nm

February 8, 2017

In what may be an attempt by President Trump to reset his turbulent relationship with the high tech industry, he and Intel CEO Brian Krzanich today announced plans to invest more than $7 billion to complete Fab 42. Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This