Fine-Tuning Severe Hail Forecasting with Machine Learning

By Sean Thielen

July 20, 2017

Depending on whether you’ve been caught outside during a severe hail storm, the sight of greenish tinted clouds on the horizon may cause serious knots in the pit of your stomach, or at least give you pause. There’s good reason for that instinctive reaction. Just consider that a massive hail storm that battered the Denver metro area with golf ball-size hail on May 8, 2017, is expected to result in more than 150,000 car insurance claims and an estimated $1.4 billion in damage to property in and around Denver. The fact is that even in 2017, emergency responders, airports and everyone else going about their business must gamble with forecast uncertainties about hail. So how great would it be if you could get accurate warnings highlighting the path of severe hail storms, along with expected hail size, 1–3 hours before a storm passes through?

If the Severe Hail Analysis and Prediction (SHARP) project, which is funded through a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), accomplishes its goal of developing an accurate “warn-on-forecast” model for severe hail storms, this could happen in the next five to 10 years. Of course, there is a lot of scientific work to be done in the meantime, along with a need for significantly more computing power.

A two-pronged approach to hail research

The Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS) at the University of Oklahoma (OU) undertook the SHARP project in 2014 after hypothesizing that hail representation in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, which mathematically model atmospheric physics to predict storms, could be improved by assimilating data from a host of data sources, and that advanced data-mining techniques could improve predictions of hail size and coverage.

Nathan Snook and Amy McGovern, two of the co-principal investigators on the project, say that CAPS pursues its hail research on two fronts. On one front, large amounts of data from various weather observing systems are ingested into weather models to create very high resolution forecasts. The other uses machine learning to sift through weather model output from CAPS and the National Center for Atmospheric Research to discover new knowledge hidden in large data sets and perform post-model correction calibrations to produce more skillful forecasts. For nearly four years, these projects have relied on the Texas Advanced Computer Center’s (TACC) Stampede system, an important part of NSF’s portfolio for advanced computing infrastructure that enables cutting-edge foundational research for computational and data-intensive science and engineering.

The high-resolution modeling is currently post-event and area specific, while the machine learning analysis is done in real time on a nationwide basis. The reason for the difference comes down to workload sizes. “For the high-resolution work, we use data from interesting historical cases to try to accurately predict the size and scope of hail that passes through a specific area,” explains Snook, a CAPS research scientist who focuses on the warn-on-forecast work. “We deal with 1 to 5 TB of data for each case study that we run, and run different experiments on different days, so our computing demands are enormous and the current available resources simply aren’t powerful enough for real-time analysis.”

McGovern, an associate professor of computer science and adjunct associate professor in the School of Meteorology at OU, says that although the machine learning algorithms are computationally intensive to train, it’s no problem to run them in real time because they are at a much coarser resolution than the data sets that Snook’s team uses (3km vs. 500m) and require fewer resources. “Our resource challenges are mainly around having enough storage and bandwidth to transfer all of the data we need on a daily basis…the data sets come from all over the U.S. and they are quite large, so there are a lot of I/O challenges,” explains McGovern.

Both research efforts rely heavily on data from the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed (HWT) to support their experiments. “The HWT gathers a wealth of numerical forecast data by collecting forecasts from various research institutions for about five to six weeks every spring. We use that data for a lot of our high-resolution experiments as well for our machine learning. It’s ideal for the machine learning work because it’s a big data set that is relatively stable from year to year,” says Snook.

Chipping away at high-resolution, real time forecasts

CAPS primarily uses two models for its high-resolution research, including the Weather and Research Forecasting (WRF) model, a widely used mesoscale numerical weather prediction system, and in-house model called the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS). Snook says ARPS is also tuned for mesoscale weather analysis and is quite effective at efficiently assimilating radar and surface observations from a lot of different sources. In fact, to achieve greater accuracy in its warn-on-forecast modeling research, the CAPS team uses models with grid points spaced every 500m, as opposed to the 3km spacing typical in many operational high-resolution models. CAPS made the six-fold increase to better support probabilistic 1-3 hour forecasts of the size of hail and the specific counties and cities it will impact. Snook notes that the National Weather Service is moving toward the use of mesoscale forecasts in severe weather operations and that his team’s progress so far has been promising. In several case studies, their high-resolution forecasts have skillfully predicted the path of individual hailstorms up to three hours in advance—one such case is shown in figure 1.

Figure 1: A comparison of radar-indicated hail versus a 0–90 minute CAPS hail forecast for a May 20, 2013 storm in Oklahoma (inset photo shows image of actual hail from the storm).

While the CAPS team is wrapping up the first phase of its research, Snook and his team have identified areas where they need to further improve their model, and are submitting a new proposal to fund additional work. “As you can imagine, we’re nowhere near the computing power needed to track every hailstone and raindrop, so we’re still dealing with a lot of uncertainty in any storm… We have to make bulk estimates about the types of particles that exist in a given model volume, so when you’re talking about simulating something like an individual thunderstorm, it’s easy to introduce small errors which can then quickly grow into large errors throughout the model domain,” explains Snook. “Our new focus is on improving the microphysics within the model—that is, the parameters the model uses to define precipitation, such as cloud water, hail, snow or rain. If we are successful at that, we could see a large improvement in the quality of hail forecasts.”

Going deeper into forecast data with machine learning

Unlike with the current high-resolution research, CAPS runs the machine learning prediction portion of the project using near real-time daily forecast data from the various groups participating in the HWT. CAPS compares daily realtime forecast data against historical HWT data sets using a variety of algorithms and techniques to flush out important hidden data in forecasted storms nationwide. “Although raw forecasts provide some value, they include a lot of additional information that’s not immediately accessible. Machine learning methods are better at predicting the probability and potential size, distribution and severity of hail 24 to 48 hours in advance,” explains McGovern. “We are trying to improve the predictions from what SPC and the current models do.”

Figure 2 is a good illustration for how the machine learning models have improved the prediction of events for a specific case study. The figure, which highlights storms reported in the southern plains on May 27, 2015, compares the predictions using three different methods:

• Machine learning (left)

• A single parameter from the models, currently used to estimate hail (middle)

• A state-of-the-art algorithm currently used to estimate hail size (right)

The green circles show a 25 mile or 40 km radius around hail reports from that day, and the pink colors show the probability of severe hail, as predicted by each model. Although the updraft helicity model (middle) has the locations generally right, the probabilities are quite low. HAILCAST (right) overpredicts hail in the southeast while missing the main event in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas. The machine learning model (left) has the highest probabilities of hail exactly where it occurred. In general, this is a good example for how machine learning is now outperforming current prediction methods.

Currently, McGovern’s team is focusing on two aspects of hail forecasts: “First, we are working to get the machine learning methods into production in the Storm Prediction Center to support some high-resolution models they will be releasing. Second, we are improving the predictions by making use of the full 3D data available from the models,” explains McGovern.

Figure 2: A case study that shows the superior accuracy of the machine learning methods (left) compared to other methods.

A welcome resource boost

Snook says that the machine learning and high resolution research have generated close to 100TB of data each that they are sifting through, so access to ample computing resources is essential to ongoing progress. That’s why Snook and McGovern are looking forward to being able to utilize TACC’s Stampede2 system which, in May, began supporting early users and will be fully deployed to the research community later this summer. The new system from Dell includes 4,200 Intel Xeon Phi processors and 1,736 Intel Xeon processors as well as Intel Omni-Path Architecture Fabric, a 10GigE/40GigE management network, and more than 600 TB of memory. It is expected to double the performance of the previous Stampede system with a peak performance of up to 18 petaflops.

McGovern’s team also runs some of the machine learning work locally on the Schooner system at the OU Supercomputing Center for Education and Research (OSCER). Schooner, which includes a combination of Dell PowerEdge R430 and R730 nodes that are based on the Intel Xeon processor E5-2650 and E5-2670 product families as well as more than 450TB of storage, has a peak performance of 346.9 teraflops. “Schooner is a great resource for us because they allow ‘condo nodes’ so we can avoid lines and we also have our own disk that doesn’t get wiped every day,” says McGovern. “It’s also nice being able to collaborate directly with the HPC experts at OSCER.”

Between the two systems, Snook and McGovern expect to continue making steady progress on their research. That doesn’t mean real-time, high-resolution forecasts are right around the corner, however. “I hope that in five to 10 years, the warn-on-forecast approach becomes a reality, but it’s going to take a lot more research and computing power before we get there,” says Snook.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

UCSD, AIST Forge Tighter Alliance with AI-Focused MOU

January 18, 2018

The rich history of collaboration between UC San Diego and AIST in Japan is getting richer. The organizations entered into a five-year memorandum of understanding on January 10. The MOU represents the continuation of a 1 Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

New Blueprint for Converging HPC, Big Data

January 18, 2018

After five annual workshops on Big Data and Extreme-Scale Computing (BDEC), a group of international HPC heavyweights including Jack Dongarra (University of Tennessee), Satoshi Matsuoka (Tokyo Institute of Technology), Read more…

By John Russell

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown and Spectre security updates on the performance of popular H Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

HPE and NREL Take Steps to Create a Sustainable, Energy-Efficient Data Center with an H2 Fuel Cell

As enterprises attempt to manage rising volumes of data, unplanned data center outages are becoming more common and more expensive. As the cost of downtime rises, enterprises lose out on productivity and valuable competitive advantage without access to their critical data. Read more…

Fostering Lustre Advancement Through Development and Contributions

January 17, 2018

Six months after organizational changes at Intel's High Performance Data (HPDD) division, most in the Lustre community have shed any initial apprehension around the potential changes that could affect or disrupt Lustre Read more…

By Carlos Aoki Thomaz

UCSD, AIST Forge Tighter Alliance with AI-Focused MOU

January 18, 2018

The rich history of collaboration between UC San Diego and AIST in Japan is getting richer. The organizations entered into a five-year memorandum of understandi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

New Blueprint for Converging HPC, Big Data

January 18, 2018

After five annual workshops on Big Data and Extreme-Scale Computing (BDEC), a group of international HPC heavyweights including Jack Dongarra (University of Te Read more…

By John Russell

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fostering Lustre Advancement Through Development and Contributions

January 17, 2018

Six months after organizational changes at Intel's High Performance Data (HPDD) division, most in the Lustre community have shed any initial apprehension aroun Read more…

By Carlos Aoki Thomaz

SRC Spends $200M on University Research Centers

January 16, 2018

The Semiconductor Research Corporation, as part of its JUMP initiative, has awarded $200 million to fund six research centers whose areas of focus span cognitiv Read more…

By John Russell

When the Chips Are Down

January 11, 2018

In the last article, "The High Stakes Semiconductor Game that Drives HPC Diversity," I alluded to the challenges facing the semiconductor industry and how that may impact the evolution of HPC systems over the next few years. I thought I’d lift the covers a little and look at some of the commercial challenges that impact the component technology we use in HPC. Read more…

By Dairsie Latimer

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

Momentum Builds for US Exascale

January 9, 2018

2018 looks to be a great year for the U.S. exascale program. The last several months of 2017 revealed a number of important developments that help put the U.S. Read more…

By Alex R. Larzelere

Inventor Claims to Have Solved Floating Point Error Problem

January 17, 2018

"The decades-old floating point error problem has been solved," proclaims a press release from inventor Alan Jorgensen. The computer scientist has filed for and Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

US Coalesces Plans for First Exascale Supercomputer: Aurora in 2021

September 27, 2017

At the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) meeting, in Arlington, Va., yesterday (Sept. 26), it was revealed that the "Aurora" supercompute Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Japan Unveils Quantum Neural Network

November 22, 2017

The U.S. and China are leading the race toward productive quantum computing, but it's early enough that ultimate leadership is still something of an open questi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

AMD Showcases Growing Portfolio of EPYC and Radeon-based Systems at SC17

November 13, 2017

AMD’s charge back into HPC and the datacenter is on full display at SC17. Having launched the EPYC processor line in June along with its MI25 GPU the focus he Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Responds to Google TPU Benchmarking

April 10, 2017

Nvidia highlights strengths of its newest GPU silicon in response to Google's report on the performance and energy advantages of its custom tensor processor. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Begins Power9 Rollout with Backing from DOE, Google

December 6, 2017

After over a year of buildup, IBM is unveiling its first Power9 system based on the same architecture as the Department of Energy CORAL supercomputers, Summit a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fast Forward: Five HPC Predictions for 2018

December 21, 2017

What’s on your list of high (and low) lights for 2017? Volta 100’s arrival on the heels of the P100? Appearance, albeit late in the year, of IBM’s Power9? Read more…

By John Russell

GlobalFoundries Puts Wind in AMD’s Sails with 12nm FinFET

September 24, 2017

From its annual tech conference last week (Sept. 20), where GlobalFoundries welcomed more than 600 semiconductor professionals (reaching the Santa Clara venue Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Chip Flaws ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Loom Large

January 4, 2018

The HPC and wider tech community have been abuzz this week over the discovery of critical design flaws that impact virtually all contemporary microprocessors. T Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Perspective: What Really Happened at SC17?

November 22, 2017

SC is over. Now comes the myriad of follow-ups. Inboxes are filled with templated emails from vendors and other exhibitors hoping to win a place in the post-SC thinking of booth visitors. Attendees of tutorials, workshops and other technical sessions will be inundated with requests for feedback. Read more…

By Andrew Jones

Tensors Come of Age: Why the AI Revolution Will Help HPC

November 13, 2017

Thirty years ago, parallel computing was coming of age. A bitter battle began between stalwart vector computing supporters and advocates of various approaches to parallel computing. IBM skeptic Alan Karp, reacting to announcements of nCUBE’s 1024-microprocessor system and Thinking Machines’ 65,536-element array, made a public $100 wager that no one could get a parallel speedup of over 200 on real HPC workloads. Read more…

By John Gustafson & Lenore Mullin

Delays, Smoke, Records & Markets – A Candid Conversation with Cray CEO Peter Ungaro

October 5, 2017

Earlier this month, Tom Tabor, publisher of HPCwire and I had a very personal conversation with Cray CEO Peter Ungaro. Cray has been on something of a Cinderell Read more…

By Tiffany Trader & Tom Tabor

Flipping the Flops and Reading the Top500 Tea Leaves

November 13, 2017

The 50th edition of the Top500 list, the biannual publication of the world’s fastest supercomputers based on public Linpack benchmarking results, was released Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

GlobalFoundries, Ayar Labs Team Up to Commercialize Optical I/O

December 4, 2017

GlobalFoundries (GF) and Ayar Labs, a startup focused on using light, instead of electricity, to transfer data between chips, today announced they've entered in Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

HPC Chips – A Veritable Smorgasbord?

October 10, 2017

For the first time since AMD's ill-fated launch of Bulldozer the answer to the question, 'Which CPU will be in my next HPC system?' doesn't have to be 'Whichever variety of Intel Xeon E5 they are selling when we procure'. Read more…

By Dairsie Latimer

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This