Tuning InfiniBand Interconnects Using Congestion Control

By Adam Dorsey

July 26, 2017

InfiniBand is among the most common and well-known cluster interconnect technologies. However, the complexities of an InfiniBand (IB) network can frustrate the most experienced cluster administrators. Maintaining a balanced fabric topology, dealing with underperforming hosts and links, and chasing potential improvements keeps all of us on our toes. Sometimes, though, a little research and experimentation can find unexpected performance and stability gains.

For example, consider a 1,300-node cluster using Intel TrueScale IB for job communication and a Panasas ActiveStor filesystem for storage. Panasas only communicates to clients via Ethernet and not IB, so a group of Mellanox switches act as gateways from the Panasas Ethernet to the TrueScale IB.

Every system has bottlenecks; in our case, the links to and from these IB/Ethernet gateways showed congestion due to the large amount of disk traffic. This adversely affects the whole cluster — jobs can’t get the data they need, and the increased congestion interferes with other IB traffic as well.

Fortunately, InfiniBand provides a congestion control mechanism that can help mitigate the effects of severe congestion on the fabric. We were able to implement this feature to save the expense and trouble of adding additional IB/Ethernet gateways.

What Is InfiniBand Congestion Control?

InfiniBand is intended to be a lossless fabric. IB switches won’t drop packets for flow control unless they absolutely have to, usually in cases of hardware failure or malformed packets. Instead of dropping packets and retransmitting, like Ethernet does, InfiniBand uses a system of credits to perform flow control.

Communication occurs between IB endpoints, which in turn are issued credits based on the amount of buffer space the receiving device has. If the credit cost of the data to be transmitted is less than the credits remaining on the receiving device, the data is transmitted. Otherwise, the transmitting device holds on to the data until the receiving device has sufficient credits free.

This method of flow control works well for normal loads on well-balanced, non-oversubscribed IB fabrics. However, if the fabric is unbalanced or oversubscribed or just heavily loaded, some links may be oversaturated with traffic beyond the ability of the credit mechanism to help.

Congestion can be observed by checking the IB error counters. When an IB device attempts to transmit data but the receiving device cannot receive data due to congestion, the PortXmitWait counter is incremented. If the congestion is so bad that the data cannot be transmitted before the time-to-live on the packet expires, the packet is discarded and the PortXmitDiscards counter is incremented. If you’re seeing high values of PortXmitWait and PortXmitDiscards counters, enabling congestion control may help manage congestion on your InfiniBand fabric.

How Does InfiniBand Congestion Control Work?

When an IB switch detects congestion on a link, it enables a special bit, called the Forward Explicit Congestion Notification (FECN) bit, which informs the destination device that congestion has been detected on the link. When the destination receives a packet marked with the FECN bit, the destination device notifies the sending device of the congestion via a Backwards Explicit Congestion Notification bit (BECN.)

When the source receives the BECN bit notification from the destination, the sending (source) device begins to throttle the amount of data it sends to the destination. The mechanism it uses is the credits system – by reducing the credits available to the destination, the size and rate of the packets are effectively decreased. The sending device may also add a delay between packets to provide the destination device time to catch up on data.

Over time, the source device increases credits for the destination device, gradually increasing the amount of packets sent. If the destination device continues to receive FECN packets from its switch, it again transmits BECN packets to the source device and the throttling is increased again. Without the reception of BECN packets from the destination device, the source device eventually returns to normal packet transmission. This balancing act is managed by congestion control parameters which require tuning for each environment.

After enabling InfiniBand congestion control and proper tuning, we realized a 15 percent improvement in our Panasas file system benchmark testing. PortXmitDiscards counters were completely clear, and PortXmitWait counters were significantly smaller, indicating that congestion control was doing its job.

Given that no additional hardware or other costs were required to achieve these results, a speed increase of 15 percent plus increased stability of the IB fabric was a nice result.

How Can I Enable InfiniBand Congestion Control?

Congestion control must be enabled on all IB devices and hosts, as well as on the IB subnet manager. This process includes turning on congestion control and setting a congestion control key on each device, as well as tuning the congestion control tables and parameters on each host and switch.

After congestion control is enabled on each IB device, the OpenSM configuration file must be modified to tune the subnet manager’s congestion control manager. Please note that mistuned parameters will either wreak havoc on a fabric or be completely ineffectual, so be careful – and do plenty of testing on a safe “test” system. Never attempt this on a live or production system.

Enabling InfiniBand congestion control had an immediate positive effect on our IB fabric. If you are suffering from issues with fabric congestion, enabling congestion control may provide the similar relief for your fabric as well, without the cost of adding additional hardware.

About the Author

Adam Dorsey is a systems administrator and site lead for RedLine Performance Solutions.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Fluid HPC: How Extreme-Scale Computing Should Respond to Meltdown and Spectre

February 15, 2018

The Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities are proving difficult to fix, and initial experiments suggest security patches will cause significant performance penalties to HPC applications. Even as these patches are rolled o Read more…

By Pete Beckman

Intel Touts Silicon Spin Qubits for Quantum Computing

February 14, 2018

Debate around what makes a good qubit and how best to manufacture them is a sprawling topic. There are many insistent voices favoring one or another approach. Referencing a paper published today in Nature, Intel has offe Read more…

By John Russell

Brookhaven Ramps Up Computing for National Security Effort

February 14, 2018

Last week, Dan Coats, the director of Director of National Intelligence for the U.S., warned the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia was likely to meddle in the 2018 mid-term U.S. elections, much as it stands accused of doing in the 2016 Presidential election. Read more…

By John Russell

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Safeguard Your HPC Environment with the World’s Most Secure Industry Standard Servers

Today’s organizations operate in an environment with ever-evolving threats, and in order to protect themselves they must continuously bolster their security strategy. Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) and Intel® are addressing modern security challenges with the world’s most secure industry standard servers powered by the latest generation of Intel® Xeon® Scalable processors. Read more…

AI Cloud Competition Heats Up: Google’s TPUs, Amazon Building AI Chip

February 12, 2018

Competition in the white hot AI (and public cloud) market pits Google against Amazon this week, with Google offering AI hardware on its cloud platform intended to make it easier, faster and cheaper to train and run machi Read more…

By Doug Black

Fluid HPC: How Extreme-Scale Computing Should Respond to Meltdown and Spectre

February 15, 2018

The Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities are proving difficult to fix, and initial experiments suggest security patches will cause significant performance penal Read more…

By Pete Beckman

Brookhaven Ramps Up Computing for National Security Effort

February 14, 2018

Last week, Dan Coats, the director of Director of National Intelligence for the U.S., warned the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia was likely to meddle in the 2018 mid-term U.S. elections, much as it stands accused of doing in the 2016 Presidential election. Read more…

By John Russell

AI Cloud Competition Heats Up: Google’s TPUs, Amazon Building AI Chip

February 12, 2018

Competition in the white hot AI (and public cloud) market pits Google against Amazon this week, with Google offering AI hardware on its cloud platform intended Read more…

By Doug Black

Russian Nuclear Engineers Caught Cryptomining on Lab Supercomputer

February 12, 2018

Nuclear scientists working at the All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF) have been arrested for using lab supercomputing resources to mine crypto-currency, according to a report in Russia’s Interfax News Agency. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

The Food Industry’s Next Journey — from Mars to Exascale

February 12, 2018

Global food producer and one of the world's leading chocolate companies Mars Inc. has a unique perspective on the impact that exascale computing will have on the food industry. Read more…

By Scott Gibson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Singularity HPC Container Start-Up – Sylabs – Emerges from Stealth

February 8, 2018

The driving force behind Singularity, the popular HPC container technology, is bringing the open source platform to the enterprise with the launch of a new vent Read more…

By George Leopold

Dell EMC Debuts PowerEdge Servers with AMD EPYC Chips

February 6, 2018

AMD notched another EPYC processor win today with Dell EMC’s introduction of three PowerEdge servers (R6415, R7415, and R7425) based on the EPYC 7000-series p Read more…

By John Russell

‘Next Generation’ Universe Simulation Is Most Advanced Yet

February 5, 2018

The research group that gave us the most detailed time-lapse simulation of the universe’s evolution in 2014, spanning 13.8 billion years of cosmic evolution, is back in the spotlight with an even more advanced cosmological model that is providing new insights into how black holes influence the distribution of dark matter, how heavy elements are produced and distributed, and where magnetic fields originate. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Inventor Claims to Have Solved Floating Point Error Problem

January 17, 2018

"The decades-old floating point error problem has been solved," proclaims a press release from inventor Alan Jorgensen. The computer scientist has filed for and Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Japan Unveils Quantum Neural Network

November 22, 2017

The U.S. and China are leading the race toward productive quantum computing, but it's early enough that ultimate leadership is still something of an open questi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

AMD Showcases Growing Portfolio of EPYC and Radeon-based Systems at SC17

November 13, 2017

AMD’s charge back into HPC and the datacenter is on full display at SC17. Having launched the EPYC processor line in June along with its MI25 GPU the focus he Read more…

By John Russell

Researchers Measure Impact of ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Patches on HPC Workloads

January 17, 2018

Computer scientists from the Center for Computational Research, State University of New York (SUNY), University at Buffalo have examined the effect of Meltdown Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

IBM Begins Power9 Rollout with Backing from DOE, Google

December 6, 2017

After over a year of buildup, IBM is unveiling its first Power9 system based on the same architecture as the Department of Energy CORAL supercomputers, Summit a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Nvidia Responds to Google TPU Benchmarking

April 10, 2017

Nvidia highlights strengths of its newest GPU silicon in response to Google's report on the performance and energy advantages of its custom tensor processor. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Fast Forward: Five HPC Predictions for 2018

December 21, 2017

What’s on your list of high (and low) lights for 2017? Volta 100’s arrival on the heels of the P100? Appearance, albeit late in the year, of IBM’s Power9? Read more…

By John Russell

Russian Nuclear Engineers Caught Cryptomining on Lab Supercomputer

February 12, 2018

Nuclear scientists working at the All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF) have been arrested for using lab supercomputing resources to mine crypto-currency, according to a report in Russia’s Interfax News Agency. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Chip Flaws ‘Meltdown’ and ‘Spectre’ Loom Large

January 4, 2018

The HPC and wider tech community have been abuzz this week over the discovery of critical design flaws that impact virtually all contemporary microprocessors. T Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Perspective: What Really Happened at SC17?

November 22, 2017

SC is over. Now comes the myriad of follow-ups. Inboxes are filled with templated emails from vendors and other exhibitors hoping to win a place in the post-SC thinking of booth visitors. Attendees of tutorials, workshops and other technical sessions will be inundated with requests for feedback. Read more…

By Andrew Jones

How Meltdown and Spectre Patches Will Affect HPC Workloads

January 10, 2018

There have been claims that the fixes for the Meltdown and Spectre security vulnerabilities, named the KPTI (aka KAISER) patches, are going to affect applicatio Read more…

By Rosemary Francis

GlobalFoundries, Ayar Labs Team Up to Commercialize Optical I/O

December 4, 2017

GlobalFoundries (GF) and Ayar Labs, a startup focused on using light, instead of electricity, to transfer data between chips, today announced they've entered in Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Tensors Come of Age: Why the AI Revolution Will Help HPC

November 13, 2017

Thirty years ago, parallel computing was coming of age. A bitter battle began between stalwart vector computing supporters and advocates of various approaches to parallel computing. IBM skeptic Alan Karp, reacting to announcements of nCUBE’s 1024-microprocessor system and Thinking Machines’ 65,536-element array, made a public $100 wager that no one could get a parallel speedup of over 200 on real HPC workloads. Read more…

By John Gustafson & Lenore Mullin

Flipping the Flops and Reading the Top500 Tea Leaves

November 13, 2017

The 50th edition of the Top500 list, the biannual publication of the world’s fastest supercomputers based on public Linpack benchmarking results, was released Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

V100 Good but not Great on Select Deep Learning Aps, Says Xcelerit

November 27, 2017

Wringing optimum performance from hardware to accelerate deep learning applications is a challenge that often depends on the specific application in use. A benc Read more…

By John Russell

SC17: Singularity Preps Version 3.0, Nears 1M Containers Served Daily

November 1, 2017

Just a few months ago about half a million jobs were being run daily using Singularity containers, the LBNL-founded container platform intended for HPC. That wa Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Share This