Trusted CI Celebrates Five Years of Trustworthy Science

By Von Welch, Indiana University

May 1, 2018

Editor’s note: In this contributed piece, Von Welch, director and PI of Trusted CI and the director of Indiana University’s Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research (CACR) fields questions about the initiative, providing a high-level look at the mission of Trusted CI, which is in its sixth year of service assisting the NSF goal of creating high-quality, trusted cyberinfrastructure that supports high-quality, trusted science.

Before Trusted CI, much of the NSF community assumed cybersecurity was a barrier to the mission of science. Scientists are used to managing risks to their research – bias, data corruption, instrument failure, etc. – but the connection between computer attacks and these risks was ambiguous. Trusted CI’s flexible approach balances baseline practices with risk management and emphasizes the mission of scientific research. Science and security are not mutually exclusive, and this perspective helps the community move project practices from avoiding cybersecurity to embracing it. As the NSF Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, Trusted CI continues to develop the understanding of how cybersecurity can be a supportive, enabling tool for productive, trustworthy research.

What is Trusted CI? What sets it apart from other cybersecurity initiatives?

Trusted CI – originally known as the Center for Trustworthy Scientific Cyberinfrastructure (CTSC) – has now been around for a little over 5 years. It was established with a $4.297 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to help build community around producing trustworthy computational science. The NSF funds over $7 billion dollars of research every year, spread over 11,000 different projects. Making sure that all this scientific research is happening in a manner that is secure and trustworthy, which are the foundations to reproducible science, is a key concern.

But it’s easy to come down and do really onerous, heavyweight cybersecurity – to lock down the computers so much that they’re secure and absolutely no science is getting done. Trusted CI originally started working with individual science projects and building a community – hosting an annual conference, inviting people to come together, giving talks, and raising awareness. Then we started to produce cybersecurity practices that would manage risks to science but with enough flexibility that different projects (everything from neutrino sensors under the ice to telescopes on top of mountains) could adapt them while maintaining science productivity.

Audience members at the Understanding Risk in Shared CyberEcosystems workshop at SC17 in Denver, Colorado. Trusted CI provided an introduction to open source materials and guidance on fostering leadership and government buy-in for investing in cybersecurity for higher education.

Why don’t off-the-shelf enterprise IT solutions work in this situation?

Most of enterprise IT tends to be desktop machines or server machines in a typical office environment with typical office applications. But if you take the checklist that works for that and start applying it to the computer that runs a telescope or the computers sharing the data that’s coming out of CERN …Those types of huge data flows and large-scale collaborations would be one of the first things that break when you start talking about standard firewall (security) setups.

How does good cybersecurity boost science?

Our real concerns are: 1) If someone calls scientists onto the carpet and says ‘Hey your data has been tampered with,’ you want to be able to come back with “No, I don’t believe that’s true, and here are all the steps we take to make sure it hasn’t.” Imagine somebody calling a climate scientist and saying this data is all nonsense, making claims like “We hacked into that ten years ago and we’ve been manipulating your data for the last 10 years.” Now you’re left disproving a negative. If you don’t have a program like this in place, then you’re just in the muck of finger pointing.

The other thing we want to do is prevent a perceived vacuum in cybersecurity from spurring a really onerous program. You see some of this right now in Congress. They’re concerned about theft of intellectual property in the pre-patent stage or in an early research stage that might become classified down the road. And they may come in and impose one of these more onerous, heavyweight structured cybersecurity programs on the NSF scientific community, and say, ‘We don’t care if you’re doing genomics or physics or chemistry, you’re all going to take a one-size-fits-all cybersecurity program.’ It would just kill productivity.

These are the two things you’re always trying to balance – the risks versus your mission. Without understanding how the risks and mission relate, it’s easy to overemphasize risk eradication. You’ve got to balance safety with the productivity of the science mission. We want to make sure the community has a solid program in place, so someone doesn’t get fearful and come in and try to force something upon them.

Why is trust important?

So much of science is collaborative these days. The physics communities studying gravity waves and new particles are leaders in this. I forget how many hundred plus institutions are involved in the LHC. These institutions need to collaborate; they’re giving each other access to each other’s computers. Having these baseline cybersecurity programs in place means you can look at each other and go, okay, I don’t know all the ins and outs of your university. But I know you’re at least putting some baseline practices in place, and I can have some good marginal trust. We go a long way in establishing collaboration around that.

What can a potential Trusted CI collaborator expect?

The first thing we tell folks is we’re always open for brief consultations. If you’ve got a question or you just want to spend an hour on the phone with a cybersecurity expert, then drop us an email. A lot of effective work happens that way. People often need a quick sanity check or to know what’s normal.

Others come to us with a hairier issue or an existing program where they want somebody to come through and tell them if they’ve missed anything. That’s what we would call an engagement. We get more of those requests than we have time for, unfortunately – so we evaluate them based on the skills we think they’re going to take, the science they’re going to do, how ready they really are to work with us. Every six months we pick the ones we’re going to work with, and then we have a team that goes and works with them.

We really say, if it’s related to cybersecurity we’ll take it on. We’ve done everything from working with a group in the city of Chicago on privacy issues around their sensors (Array of Things), to a software group trying to figure out how to run this particular weird scenario on clusters that don’t run a grid software stack so we have no way of doing delegation. We worked with them to come up with the best answer that balances risk and productivity.

How does a longer Trusted CI engagement unfold?

We’ll spend about six months working with them. We expect them to be collaborative. Usually we’re spending a fair amount of the time in the beginning saying describe your problem to us – What are your use cases? Walk us through what you’re trying to do. Who are your stakeholders? Who has to be satisfied with this answer? We’ll go talk to different people in the organization. We’ll make calls. Then we sit down and perform analysis, and we’ll come up with our report.

This is not a situation where they throw a security problem over the wall to us, we fix it and deliver it to them on a silver platter. At the end of that six months, the solution needs to be sustainable. They’re going to have to take whatever we’ve given them and maintain it. What we’re really trying to do is teach everybody to fish.

What resources do you provide for the larger NSF community?

We have a couple sets of guidelines out there right now. Our most used is what we call our Cybersecurity Practice Guidelines – we just call it the Guide internally. The cybersecurity community uses a lot of scare tactics. One of the things we found working with projects early on was communities out there were already nervous about cybersecurity and what could be going wrong. They just didn’t know what to do about it.

The Guide walks you through the basic process of starting a cybersecurity program – little things like you need to designate somebody as the person responsible, and they’re going to need a budget to hire some people to give some guidance. If you have an IT budget, you’re probably looking at 5 percent of that to start with.

What are the basics of starting a cybersecurity program?

Some people just pick up the Guide and start working, in which case we’re happy to have a couple phone calls and walk through it. But mostly we’ve empowered them to do that on their own. The first thing they’re going to do is create a master information policy, which lists everything they have: What’s the acceptable use? What can you use our infrastructure for? Can you use our computers to mine bitcoin? Then, What are our key risks? Just figuring out really basic questions and walking them through things.

Then we get them to the point of “Now we’ve got the basics done, what do we do about this computer on a telescope over here? We’re constantly told we have to keep its patches up to date.” Well, it’s running a version of Solaris that’s now ten years old that hasn’t had a patch put out for, you know, nine years. So how are we supposed to keep this thing secure? We can’t change it because that’s the only computer that can run this telescope. They’re in these situations that you can’t just yell at them for – so it’s a process of walking them through developing a program, documenting how you keep things up to date and what’s the process.

Von Welch

Once a year you have to revisit this. The Guide basically provides them with a series of templates, so you can take somebody who knows the project relatively well but is not a cybersecurity expert and walk them through the process. Really what we are doing is building up cybersecurity expertise in the community through our guides. It becomes kind of a training program in the form of a set of templates and documented how-tos.

 

For more on Trusted CI, visit trustedci.org.

Von Welch is director and PI of Trusted CI, as well as the director of Indiana University’s Center for Applied Cybersecurity Research (CACR).

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

GTC 2019: Chief Scientist Bill Dally Provides Glimpse into Nvidia Research Engine

March 22, 2019

Amid the frenzy of GTC this week – Nvidia’s annual conference showcasing all things GPU (and now AI) – William Dally, chief scientist and SVP of research, provided a brief but insightful portrait of Nvidia’s rese Read more…

By John Russell

ORNL Helps Identify Challenges of Extremely Heterogeneous Architectures

March 21, 2019

Exponential growth in classical computing over the last two decades has produced hardware and software that support lightning-fast processing speeds, but advancements are topping out as computing architectures reach thei Read more…

By Laurie Varma

Interview with 2019 Person to Watch Jim Keller

March 21, 2019

On the heels of Intel's reaffirmation that it will deliver the first U.S. exascale computer in 2021, which will feature the company's new Intel Xe architecture, we bring you our interview with our 2019 Person to Watch Jim Keller, head of the Silicon Engineering Group at Intel. Read more…

By HPCwire Editorial Team

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

HPE and Intel® Omni-Path Architecture: How to Power a Cloud

Learn how HPE and Intel® Omni-Path Architecture provide critical infrastructure for leading Nordic HPC provider’s HPCFLOW cloud service.

powercloud_blog.jpgFor decades, HPE has been at the forefront of high-performance computing, and we’ve powered some of the fastest and most robust supercomputers in the world. Read more…

IBM Accelerated Insights

Insurance: Where’s the Risk?

Insurers are facing extreme competitive challenges in their core businesses. Property and Casualty (P&C) and Life and Health (L&H) firms alike are highly impacted by the ongoing globalization, increasing regulation, and digital transformation of their client bases. Read more…

What’s New in HPC Research: TensorFlow, Buddy Compression, Intel Optane & More

March 20, 2019

In this bimonthly feature, HPCwire highlights newly published research in the high-performance computing community and related domains. From parallel programming to exascale to quantum computing, the details are here. Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

GTC 2019: Chief Scientist Bill Dally Provides Glimpse into Nvidia Research Engine

March 22, 2019

Amid the frenzy of GTC this week – Nvidia’s annual conference showcasing all things GPU (and now AI) – William Dally, chief scientist and SVP of research, Read more…

By John Russell

At GTC: Nvidia Expands Scope of Its AI and Datacenter Ecosystem

March 19, 2019

In the high-stakes race to provide the AI life-cycle solution of choice, three of the biggest horses in the field are IBM, Intel and Nvidia. While the latter is only a fraction of the size of its two bigger rivals, and has been in business for only a fraction of the time, Nvidia continues to impress with an expanding array of new GPU-based hardware, software, robotics, partnerships and... Read more…

By Doug Black

Nvidia Debuts Clara AI Toolkit with Pre-Trained Models for Radiology Use

March 19, 2019

AI’s push into healthcare got a boost yesterday with Nvidia’s release of the Clara Deploy AI toolkit which includes 13 pre-trained models for use in radiolo Read more…

By John Russell

It’s Official: Aurora on Track to Be First US Exascale Computer in 2021

March 18, 2019

The U.S. Department of Energy along with Intel and Cray confirmed today that an Intel/Cray supercomputer, "Aurora," capable of sustained performance of one exaf Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Why Nvidia Bought Mellanox: ‘Future Datacenters Will Be…Like High Performance Computers’

March 14, 2019

“Future datacenters of all kinds will be built like high performance computers,” said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during a phone briefing on Monday after Nvidia revealed scooping up the high performance networking company Mellanox for $6.9 billion. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Oil and Gas Supercloud Clears Out Remaining Knights Landing Inventory: All 38,000 Wafers

March 13, 2019

The McCloud HPC service being built by Australia’s DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG) outside Houston is set to become the largest oil and gas cloud in the world th Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Quick Take: Trump’s 2020 Budget Spares DoE-funded HPC but Slams NSF and NIH

March 12, 2019

U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2020 budget request, released yesterday, proposes deep cuts in many science programs but seems to spare HPC funding by the Depar Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Wins Mellanox Stakes for $6.9 Billion

March 11, 2019

The long-rumored acquisition of Mellanox came to fruition this morning with GPU chipmaker Nvidia’s announcement that it has purchased the high-performance net Read more…

By Doug Black

Quantum Computing Will Never Work

November 27, 2018

Amid the gush of money and enthusiastic predictions being thrown at quantum computing comes a proposed cold shower in the form of an essay by physicist Mikhail Read more…

By John Russell

The Case Against ‘The Case Against Quantum Computing’

January 9, 2019

It’s not easy to be a physicist. Richard Feynman (basically the Jimi Hendrix of physicists) once said: “The first principle is that you must not fool yourse Read more…

By Ben Criger

Why Nvidia Bought Mellanox: ‘Future Datacenters Will Be…Like High Performance Computers’

March 14, 2019

“Future datacenters of all kinds will be built like high performance computers,” said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during a phone briefing on Monday after Nvidia revealed scooping up the high performance networking company Mellanox for $6.9 billion. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

ClusterVision in Bankruptcy, Fate Uncertain

February 13, 2019

ClusterVision, European HPC specialists that have built and installed over 20 Top500-ranked systems in their nearly 17-year history, appear to be in the midst o Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Intel Reportedly in $6B Bid for Mellanox

January 30, 2019

The latest rumors and reports around an acquisition of Mellanox focus on Intel, which has reportedly offered a $6 billion bid for the high performance interconn Read more…

By Doug Black

Looking for Light Reading? NSF-backed ‘Comic Books’ Tackle Quantum Computing

January 28, 2019

Still baffled by quantum computing? How about turning to comic books (graphic novels for the well-read among you) for some clarity and a little humor on QC. The Read more…

By John Russell

It’s Official: Aurora on Track to Be First US Exascale Computer in 2021

March 18, 2019

The U.S. Department of Energy along with Intel and Cray confirmed today that an Intel/Cray supercomputer, "Aurora," capable of sustained performance of one exaf Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Contract Signed for New Finnish Supercomputer

December 13, 2018

After the official contract signing yesterday, configuration details were made public for the new BullSequana system that the Finnish IT Center for Science (CSC Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

SC 18 Virtual Booth Video Tour

Advania @ SC18 AMD @ SC18
ASRock Rack @ SC18
DDN Storage @ SC18
HPE @ SC18
IBM @ SC18
Lenovo @ SC18 Mellanox Technologies @ SC18
NVIDIA @ SC18
One Stop Systems @ SC18
Oracle @ SC18 Panasas @ SC18
Supermicro @ SC18 SUSE @ SC18 TYAN @ SC18
Verne Global @ SC18

Deep500: ETH Researchers Introduce New Deep Learning Benchmark for HPC

February 5, 2019

ETH researchers have developed a new deep learning benchmarking environment – Deep500 – they say is “the first distributed and reproducible benchmarking s Read more…

By John Russell

IBM Quantum Update: Q System One Launch, New Collaborators, and QC Center Plans

January 10, 2019

IBM made three significant quantum computing announcements at CES this week. One was introduction of IBM Q System One; it’s really the integration of IBM’s Read more…

By John Russell

IBM Bets $2B Seeking 1000X AI Hardware Performance Boost

February 7, 2019

For now, AI systems are mostly machine learning-based and “narrow” – powerful as they are by today's standards, they're limited to performing a few, narro Read more…

By Doug Black

The Deep500 – Researchers Tackle an HPC Benchmark for Deep Learning

January 7, 2019

How do you know if an HPC system, particularly a larger-scale system, is well-suited for deep learning workloads? Today, that’s not an easy question to answer Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Reflections and (Mostly Hopeful) Predictions

December 19, 2018

So much ‘spaghetti’ gets tossed on walls by the technology community (vendors and researchers) to see what sticks that it is often difficult to peer through Read more…

By John Russell

Arm Unveils Neoverse N1 Platform with up to 128-Cores

February 20, 2019

Following on its Neoverse roadmap announcement last October, Arm today revealed its next-gen Neoverse microarchitecture with compute and throughput-optimized si Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

France to Deploy AI-Focused Supercomputer: Jean Zay

January 22, 2019

HPE announced today that it won the contract to build a supercomputer that will drive France’s AI and HPC efforts. The computer will be part of GENCI, the Fre Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Move Over Lustre & Spectrum Scale – Here Comes BeeGFS?

November 26, 2018

Is BeeGFS – the parallel file system with European roots – on a path to compete with Lustre and Spectrum Scale worldwide in HPC environments? Frank Herold Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This