The Machine Learning Hype Cycle and HPC

By Dairsie Latimer

June 14, 2018

Like many other HPC professionals I’m following the hype cycle[1] around Machine Learning/Deep Learning with interest. I subscribe to the view that we’re probably approaching the ‘peak of inflated expectations’ but not quite yet starting the descent into the ‘trough of disillusionment.’

This still raises the probability that we are seeing the emergence of a truly disruptive presence in the HPC space – but perhaps not for the reasons you might expect. We’ve already seen how the current dominance of GPUs in the training of current ML/DL techniques has powered Nvidia to record revenues in the datacenter.

But is that hegemony set to be challenged? At last count there were 25 or more start-ups emerging from stealth or already within a few quarters of shipping hardware implementations aimed directly at accelerating aspects of training and inference.

They will be looking to capture market share from the current incumbents (Intel and Nvidia) as well as positioning themselves for the expected growth in ML/DL for edge computing applications. These companies are also going up against several of the hyperscalers and behemoths of the consumer market that are also rolling their own inference engines (thought admittedly mostly aimed at the mobile/edge space).

Gartner Hype Cycle shows five key phases of a technology’s life cycle (source: Gartner)

Since we seem to have accepted that HPC and big data are two elements of the same problem, how will the fact that research and development for ML/DL (regardless of domain) is often carried out on HPC systems skew procurements in the next few years? Looking at the latest crop of petascale and exascale pathfinders their performance stems mostly from Nvidia’s V100s. However smaller scale more general purpose systems are still predominantly homogeneous in composition with modest if any GPU deployment.

What’s interesting about this is that accelerators are now mainstream at the upper end of the market. While both CPUs and GPUs work well with the existing ML frameworks it’s clear that the new entrants are likely to bring significant advantages in performance and power efficiency even when measured against Nvidia’s mighty V100. What odds on Nvidia having to split their Tesla line to produce pure ML/DL targeted accelerators? How will this affect the way in which we procure heterogeneous HPC systems?

I personally think ML/DL methodology is and will continue to have a more immediate practical impact at the ‘edge’ than in scientific simulation (and there are lots of reasons for this) but there is no doubt that ML/DL will cohabit with more traditional HPC applications on many research systems.

Can we please stop abusing the term AI?

Like many I have a pet peeve which is the tendency to conflate traditional meaning of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with ML and DL. If we must use the term AI to encompass the various techniques by which machines can build models that approximate and in some cases outperform humans also expert in a problem area, can we at least start using the term Artificial Generalized Intelligence (AGI) more widely. There’s a useful primer on the subject on EnterpriseTech which saved me from having to write it myself.

So what will AI be good for in HPC and Big Data?

There are of course many arrows to the AI quiver and many are already successfully deployed as part of various HPC workflows, but most are essentially used for automation of data analysis and visualization tasks that can be performed by humans (or at least programs written by humans). The models have been conceived, built and trained by humans to replicate or improve upon some data analytics task.

Source: Shutterstock

The pursuit of new knowledge from discrete data is still something that is currently very much beyond us in the field of AGI let alone AI, and it also speaks to the method of scientific enquiry and human nature.

When we run simulations for well understood, or at least well defined scientific domain area, we already know how to extract value from the data that is generated. We’ve set up the numerical simulation after all so we know what to expect within certain bounds and we can interpret the results within that framework and mental model.

For new science we often don’t know the right questions to pose in advance, and as a result we can’t set up a precise or well defined process to extract value from it. The discovery process is more in the form of a dialog with the data, where a series of ‘what if’ questions are posed and the results scrutinized to see what value or insights they deliver. It is by nature an iterative process and it still requires a human to judge the value of the results.

If conceivably we could turn over the automation of this process to an AI it would bump up against a significant issue, which is that an AI model almost certainly won’t’ solve a problem in the same way as a scientist. The scientist would not necessarily have the ability to build a mental model that allows the transfer of knowledge and as a result it becomes an unverifiable black box. In science this acts as a red flag, and if a process is not well understood then someone will inevitably set out to document and postulate a theory that can be confirmed by experimental observation.

Now for those computational scientists I have spoken to about this, we accept that we routinely deploy fudge factors, or approximations, which we know are imperfect but serve a purpose, but we console ourselves that there is usually published science behind their use. As humans we are actually quite limited by the scope of the information we can process in pursuit of a solution and this is what DL models are exceedingly good at.

Now take the case of a DL model that has been trained to approximate some computationally expensive part of a time critical simulation. We know what data went into training it, though we many not understand the significance of some of it. We have observed the outputs and at some point they will meet a set criterion which means they are ‘good enough’ to use. But all models have corner cases; you can call them bugs if you like. In the event that a DL model produces a result that trips some sanity check how do you debug or verify a DL model, especially one that a human hasn’t explicitly guided the creation of?

It’s not so much that these models won’t be able to do the job, but we will naturally start to question how comfortable we are as scientists replying on a model that we don’t understand or can’t verify. Like most scientists and engineers I prefer to have a mental model of a process that is a bit more sophisticated than ’it just works.’

As a result, I do think that the uptake of AI in HPC will be tempered by the natural reluctance of many to see too many black boxes in their workflows. Perhaps there will be moves to ensure that the AI frameworks support some sort of human-verifiable intermediate representation rather than rather than us just making the leap of faith that the AI is right.

As humans we also rely on intuition which often requires an equivalent leap of faith but as scientists we’re on the brink of creating systems whose operation we don’t understand and can’t trace. The power of deep learning models and their ability to ingest prodigious quantities of widely different data and provide insights can’t be ignored but the temptation to waive the explainability factor should also be resisted.

[1] https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/top-trends-in-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2017/

About the Author

Dairsie Latimer, Technical Advisor at Red Oak Consulting, has a somewhat eclectic background, having worked in a variety of roles on supplier side and client side across the commercial and public sectors as an consultant and software engineer. Following an early career in computer graphics, micro-architecture design and full stack software development, he has over twelve years’ specialist experience in the HPC sector, ranging from developing low-level libraries and software for novel computing architectures to porting complex HPC applications to a range of accelerators. Dairise joined Red Oak Consulting (@redoakHPC) in 2010 bringing his wealth of experience to both the business and customers.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

GTC 2019: Chief Scientist Bill Dally Provides Glimpse into Nvidia Research Engine

March 22, 2019

Amid the frenzy of GTC this week – Nvidia’s annual conference showcasing all things GPU (and now AI) – William Dally, chief scientist and SVP of research, provided a brief but insightful portrait of Nvidia’s rese Read more…

By John Russell

ORNL Helps Identify Challenges of Extremely Heterogeneous Architectures

March 21, 2019

Exponential growth in classical computing over the last two decades has produced hardware and software that support lightning-fast processing speeds, but advancements are topping out as computing architectures reach thei Read more…

By Laurie Varma

Interview with 2019 Person to Watch Jim Keller

March 21, 2019

On the heels of Intel's reaffirmation that it will deliver the first U.S. exascale computer in 2021, which will feature the company's new Intel Xe architecture, we bring you our interview with our 2019 Person to Watch Jim Keller, head of the Silicon Engineering Group at Intel. Read more…

By HPCwire Editorial Team

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

HPE and Intel® Omni-Path Architecture: How to Power a Cloud

Learn how HPE and Intel® Omni-Path Architecture provide critical infrastructure for leading Nordic HPC provider’s HPCFLOW cloud service.

powercloud_blog.jpgFor decades, HPE has been at the forefront of high-performance computing, and we’ve powered some of the fastest and most robust supercomputers in the world. Read more…

IBM Accelerated Insights

Insurance: Where’s the Risk?

Insurers are facing extreme competitive challenges in their core businesses. Property and Casualty (P&C) and Life and Health (L&H) firms alike are highly impacted by the ongoing globalization, increasing regulation, and digital transformation of their client bases. Read more…

What’s New in HPC Research: TensorFlow, Buddy Compression, Intel Optane & More

March 20, 2019

In this bimonthly feature, HPCwire highlights newly published research in the high-performance computing community and related domains. From parallel programming to exascale to quantum computing, the details are here. Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

GTC 2019: Chief Scientist Bill Dally Provides Glimpse into Nvidia Research Engine

March 22, 2019

Amid the frenzy of GTC this week – Nvidia’s annual conference showcasing all things GPU (and now AI) – William Dally, chief scientist and SVP of research, Read more…

By John Russell

At GTC: Nvidia Expands Scope of Its AI and Datacenter Ecosystem

March 19, 2019

In the high-stakes race to provide the AI life-cycle solution of choice, three of the biggest horses in the field are IBM, Intel and Nvidia. While the latter is only a fraction of the size of its two bigger rivals, and has been in business for only a fraction of the time, Nvidia continues to impress with an expanding array of new GPU-based hardware, software, robotics, partnerships and... Read more…

By Doug Black

Nvidia Debuts Clara AI Toolkit with Pre-Trained Models for Radiology Use

March 19, 2019

AI’s push into healthcare got a boost yesterday with Nvidia’s release of the Clara Deploy AI toolkit which includes 13 pre-trained models for use in radiolo Read more…

By John Russell

It’s Official: Aurora on Track to Be First US Exascale Computer in 2021

March 18, 2019

The U.S. Department of Energy along with Intel and Cray confirmed today that an Intel/Cray supercomputer, "Aurora," capable of sustained performance of one exaf Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Why Nvidia Bought Mellanox: ‘Future Datacenters Will Be…Like High Performance Computers’

March 14, 2019

“Future datacenters of all kinds will be built like high performance computers,” said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during a phone briefing on Monday after Nvidia revealed scooping up the high performance networking company Mellanox for $6.9 billion. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Oil and Gas Supercloud Clears Out Remaining Knights Landing Inventory: All 38,000 Wafers

March 13, 2019

The McCloud HPC service being built by Australia’s DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG) outside Houston is set to become the largest oil and gas cloud in the world th Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Quick Take: Trump’s 2020 Budget Spares DoE-funded HPC but Slams NSF and NIH

March 12, 2019

U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2020 budget request, released yesterday, proposes deep cuts in many science programs but seems to spare HPC funding by the Depar Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Wins Mellanox Stakes for $6.9 Billion

March 11, 2019

The long-rumored acquisition of Mellanox came to fruition this morning with GPU chipmaker Nvidia’s announcement that it has purchased the high-performance net Read more…

By Doug Black

Quantum Computing Will Never Work

November 27, 2018

Amid the gush of money and enthusiastic predictions being thrown at quantum computing comes a proposed cold shower in the form of an essay by physicist Mikhail Read more…

By John Russell

The Case Against ‘The Case Against Quantum Computing’

January 9, 2019

It’s not easy to be a physicist. Richard Feynman (basically the Jimi Hendrix of physicists) once said: “The first principle is that you must not fool yourse Read more…

By Ben Criger

Why Nvidia Bought Mellanox: ‘Future Datacenters Will Be…Like High Performance Computers’

March 14, 2019

“Future datacenters of all kinds will be built like high performance computers,” said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang during a phone briefing on Monday after Nvidia revealed scooping up the high performance networking company Mellanox for $6.9 billion. Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

ClusterVision in Bankruptcy, Fate Uncertain

February 13, 2019

ClusterVision, European HPC specialists that have built and installed over 20 Top500-ranked systems in their nearly 17-year history, appear to be in the midst o Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Intel Reportedly in $6B Bid for Mellanox

January 30, 2019

The latest rumors and reports around an acquisition of Mellanox focus on Intel, which has reportedly offered a $6 billion bid for the high performance interconn Read more…

By Doug Black

Looking for Light Reading? NSF-backed ‘Comic Books’ Tackle Quantum Computing

January 28, 2019

Still baffled by quantum computing? How about turning to comic books (graphic novels for the well-read among you) for some clarity and a little humor on QC. The Read more…

By John Russell

It’s Official: Aurora on Track to Be First US Exascale Computer in 2021

March 18, 2019

The U.S. Department of Energy along with Intel and Cray confirmed today that an Intel/Cray supercomputer, "Aurora," capable of sustained performance of one exaf Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Contract Signed for New Finnish Supercomputer

December 13, 2018

After the official contract signing yesterday, configuration details were made public for the new BullSequana system that the Finnish IT Center for Science (CSC Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

SC 18 Virtual Booth Video Tour

Advania @ SC18 AMD @ SC18
ASRock Rack @ SC18
DDN Storage @ SC18
HPE @ SC18
IBM @ SC18
Lenovo @ SC18 Mellanox Technologies @ SC18
NVIDIA @ SC18
One Stop Systems @ SC18
Oracle @ SC18 Panasas @ SC18
Supermicro @ SC18 SUSE @ SC18 TYAN @ SC18
Verne Global @ SC18

Deep500: ETH Researchers Introduce New Deep Learning Benchmark for HPC

February 5, 2019

ETH researchers have developed a new deep learning benchmarking environment – Deep500 – they say is “the first distributed and reproducible benchmarking s Read more…

By John Russell

IBM Quantum Update: Q System One Launch, New Collaborators, and QC Center Plans

January 10, 2019

IBM made three significant quantum computing announcements at CES this week. One was introduction of IBM Q System One; it’s really the integration of IBM’s Read more…

By John Russell

IBM Bets $2B Seeking 1000X AI Hardware Performance Boost

February 7, 2019

For now, AI systems are mostly machine learning-based and “narrow” – powerful as they are by today's standards, they're limited to performing a few, narro Read more…

By Doug Black

The Deep500 – Researchers Tackle an HPC Benchmark for Deep Learning

January 7, 2019

How do you know if an HPC system, particularly a larger-scale system, is well-suited for deep learning workloads? Today, that’s not an easy question to answer Read more…

By John Russell

HPC Reflections and (Mostly Hopeful) Predictions

December 19, 2018

So much ‘spaghetti’ gets tossed on walls by the technology community (vendors and researchers) to see what sticks that it is often difficult to peer through Read more…

By John Russell

Arm Unveils Neoverse N1 Platform with up to 128-Cores

February 20, 2019

Following on its Neoverse roadmap announcement last October, Arm today revealed its next-gen Neoverse microarchitecture with compute and throughput-optimized si Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

France to Deploy AI-Focused Supercomputer: Jean Zay

January 22, 2019

HPE announced today that it won the contract to build a supercomputer that will drive France’s AI and HPC efforts. The computer will be part of GENCI, the Fre Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Move Over Lustre & Spectrum Scale – Here Comes BeeGFS?

November 26, 2018

Is BeeGFS – the parallel file system with European roots – on a path to compete with Lustre and Spectrum Scale worldwide in HPC environments? Frank Herold Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This