D-Wave Breaks New Ground in Quantum Simulation

By John Russell

July 16, 2018

Last Friday D-Wave scientists and colleagues published work in Science which they say represents the first fulfillment of Richard Feynman’s 1982 notion that simulating physical systems could be done most effectively on quantum computers. In this instance, the project was the simulation of a quantum magnetism problem called the transverse field Ising model (TFIM) that has potential practical application in materials science research.

Using a standard D-Wave 2,048-quibit processor, the researchers simulated interacting Ising spins on 3D cubic lattices up to dimensions of 8x8x8. In some sense, the lattice represents an imaginary ‘substance’ comprised solely of magnetic moments; put another way, you are simulating correlated electron systems.

As the authors explain, “By tuning the amount of disorder within the lattice and varying the effective transverse magnetic field, we demonstrate phase transitions between a paramagnetic (PM), an ordered anti-ferromagnetic (AFM), and a spin-glass (SG) phase. The experimental results compare well with theory for this particular SG problem, thus validating the use of a probabilistic quantum computer to simulate materials physics. This represents an important step forward in the realization of integrated quantum circuits at a scale that is relevant for condensed matter research.”

In essence they fiddled with the simulation dials to watch how nature would unfold under different conditions. Using D-Wave’s quantum annealing technology meant, in effect, that each simulation evolved just as it would naturally. D-Wave’s usual programming tools were used.

An illustration of one particular 8x8x8 cubic lattice studied in Science, July 13, 2018. Red and blue spheres represent two possible states of magnetic moments. Silver bars represent antiferromagnetic interactions that favor alternating (blue-red) ordering of the moments. Gold bars represent randomly added ferromagnetic interactions that favor uniform (blue-blue or red-red) ordering. These latter interactions serve to disorder antiferromagnetic (alternating) ordering of the moments.
Source: D-Wave; Science

At least one observer calls the research ground-breaking. “Characterization of the phase behavior of a genuinely new material not found in nature by a precisely controlled quantum computer used as a simulator…[is] the first truly useful application of a quantum computer. [I]t shows us how to explore the behavior of novel system designs without having to completely understand them first, as we must to write a useful digital simulation code,” said Ned Allen, chief scientist and corporate senior fellow at Lockheed Martin – admittedly a D-Wave customer – in the official announcement.

D-Wave CEO Vern Brownell told HPCwire, “One of the slight nuances here is in order to do this type of modeling you actually have to take advantage of the quantum mechanical effects of the machine. If you were to simulate this on a classical machine like a large HPC cluster, the only way to do that is to simulate the quantum mechanics and there are ways to do that; Monte Carlo simulation is probably the most common way of doing that. That’s incredibly intensive computationally. The advantage that this machine has is actually leveraging those quantum mechanical effects to do a more efficient modeling.”

D-Wave, of course, has been in the thick of the race to develop quantum computers. Its approach – quantum annealing – has advocates and skeptics. Unlike a traditional gate model, D-Wave system architecture relies on the tendency of quantum systems to find low-energy states. Here’s the company’s summary for its most current machine:

  • A lattice of 2,000 tiny superconducting devices, known as qubits, is chilled close to absolute zero to harness quantum effects.
  • A user models a problem into a search for the “lowest energy point in a vast landscape”.
  • The processor considers all possibilities simultaneously to determine the lowest energy and the values that produce it.
  • Multiple solutions are returned to the user, scaled to show optimal answers.

In last week’s paper (Phase transitions in a programmable quantum spin glass simulator), researchers emphasized, “[The] structure of the magnetic system studied was vastly different from the physical layout of qubits within the QPU.”

D-Wave System

Said Brownell, “There are certainly many ways you can build a quantum computer. You can build quantum annealers [like] we build. You can build a gate model, which is what most of the other large companies are trying to build. Then there’s a topological model which Microsoft is trying to build. They’re all quantum computers. The differences are the relative exposure or susceptibility to error. The gate model to quantum computing is the most susceptible to errors, so you’ll need tens of thousands of qubits to simulate one logical qubit and there’s a huge overhead to that. That’s why gate model computers are 5- or 10- or 15 years away from being able to do useful applications. Certainly very far away from the scale of being able to do anything like what we have demonstrated here. Maybe a decade away.”

No doubt D-Wave’s rivals would disagree. To a significant extent D-Wave has always been a small player jostling with giants. It’s often received faint praise designed to spotlight perceived weaknesses of its quantum annealing technology. That hasn’t stopped the Canada-based quantum computing pioneer from punching above its weight in terms of actually selling systems (Lockheed and NASA, for example). The company is perhaps understandably sensitive to criticism.

Brownell points to a report from Jülich Supercomputing Center, Germany, presented at a D-Wave User meeting last April. “They use IBM’s and our system and have done a comparison. On a scale of 1-to-9 – what they call the quantum technology readiness (QTR, detailed at end of article) – we are at  level 8 and they have IBM at 5 along with Google and pretty much everybody else in quantum computing. It’s good to see these reports. There’s a lot of talk from the other folks and a lot of bluster about what their quantum computers can do, but here they have to expose their quantum computers to third party scrutiny and people can now make fair comparisons.”

Source: Jülich; D-Wave

The first D-Wave system was a 128-qubit machine introduced in 2010 with larger systems introduced roughly every two years. The current state of the art is the D-Wave 2000Q, announced in September 2016 and officially launched in early 2017. While a new machine is not expected soon, Brownell promises more important news towards the end of the summer, likely a large-scale cloud program and new tools. He also said another landmark paper is in the works.

Given the tremendous noise surrounding quantum computing currently Brownell is determined that D-Wave not be lost in the din. Earlier this month, D-Wave hired Jennifer Houston as SVP, marketing. “We had effectively no marketing or very little marketing going on,” said Brownell. A year ago, the company hired Alan Baratz as SVP of software and applications. Previously president of JavaSoft (Sun Microsystems), Baratz is charged with ecosystem development and presumably we will see the fruits of his efforts in the cloud/tool rollout.

Last week’s paper, though important, doesn’t mean quantum computing of any sort is suddenly ready for real-world materials science applications. Brownell agreed, “It’s certainly scientifically relevant to materials science research but you would have to work with very deep scientists in order to take advantage of this capability. [But] it is the start of the ability to use a quantum computer to do something useful.”

Jülich Quantum Computing Technology Readiness Level (source: Forschungszentum Jülich)

A quantum computing technology is at QTRL1 when the theoretical framework for quantum computing (annealing) is formulated. Theoretical studies of the basic properties of the quantum computing (annealing) devices move towards applied research and development. The technology reaches QTRL2 once the basic device principles have been studied and applications or technologically relevant algorithms are formulated. QTRL2 quantum computing technology is speculative, as there are little to no experimental results supporting the theoretical studies.

Fabricated imperfect physical qubits, the basic building blocks of quantum computing devices, are at QTRL3. Laboratory studies aim to validate theoretical predictions of qubit properties. Theoretical and laboratory studies are required to determine whether these basic elements of the quantum computing technology are ready to proceed further through the development process.

During QTRL4, multi-qubit systems are fabricated and classical devices for qubit manipulation are developed. Both components of the quantum computing technology are tested with one another. QTRL5 quantum computing technology comprises components integrated in a small quantum processor without error correction. Quantum computing devices labeled as QTRL5 must undergo rigorous testing including running of various algorithms for benchmarking. Components integrated in a small quantum processor with error correction are at QTRL6. Rigorous testing and running algorithms is repeated for the QTRL6 quantum computing technology.

QTRL7 quantum computing technology is a prototype quantum computer (annealer) solving small but user-relevant problems. The prototype is demonstrated in a user environment. A scalable version of a quantum computer (annealer) completed and qualified through test and demonstration is at QTRL8. Once quantum computers (annealers) exceed the computational power of classical computers for general (specific) problems the quantum computing technology can be labeled with QTRL9.

Link to paper: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6398/162

Link to release: https://www.dwavesys.com/press-releases/d-wave-demonstrates-large-scale-programmable-quantum-simulation

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Nvidia Debuts Turing Architecture, Focusing on Real-Time Ray Tracing

August 16, 2018

From the SIGGRAPH professional graphics conference in Vancouver this week, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang unveiled Turing, the company's next-gen GPU platform that introduces new RT Cores to accelerate ray tracing and new Tenso Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Coding: The Power of L(o)osing Control

August 16, 2018

Exascale roadmaps, exascale projects and exascale lobbyists ask, on-again-off-again, for a fundamental rewrite of major code building blocks. Otherwise, so they claim, codes will not scale up. Naturally, some exascale pr Read more…

By Tobias Weinzierl

STAQ(ing) the Quantum Computing Deck

August 16, 2018

Quantum computers – at least for now – remain noisy. That’s another way of saying unreliable and in diverse ways that often depend on the specific quantum technology used. One idea is to mitigate noisiness and perh Read more…

By John Russell

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Introducing the First Integrated System Management Software for HPC Clusters from HPE

How do you manage your complex, growing cluster environments? Answer that big challenge with the new HPC cluster management solution: HPE Performance Cluster Manager. Read more…

IBM Accelerated Insights

Super Problem Solving

You might think that tackling the world’s toughest problems is a job only for superheroes, but at special places such as the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, supercomputers are the real heroes. Read more…

NREL ‘Eagle’ Supercomputer to Advance Energy Tech R&D

August 14, 2018

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has contracted with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) for a new 8-petaflops (peak) supercomputer that will be used to advance early-stage R&a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

STAQ(ing) the Quantum Computing Deck

August 16, 2018

Quantum computers – at least for now – remain noisy. That’s another way of saying unreliable and in diverse ways that often depend on the specific quantum Read more…

By John Russell

NREL ‘Eagle’ Supercomputer to Advance Energy Tech R&D

August 14, 2018

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has contracted with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) for a new 8-petaflops (peak Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

CERN Project Sees Orders-of-Magnitude Speedup with AI Approach

August 14, 2018

An award-winning effort at CERN has demonstrated potential to significantly change how the physics based modeling and simulation communities view machine learni Read more…

By Rob Farber

Intel Announces Cooper Lake, Advances AI Strategy

August 9, 2018

Intel's chief datacenter exec Navin Shenoy kicked off the company's Data-Centric Innovation Summit Wednesday, the day-long program devoted to Intel's datacenter Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

SLATE Update: Making Math Libraries Exascale-ready

August 9, 2018

Practically-speaking, achieving exascale computing requires enabling HPC software to effectively use accelerators – mostly GPUs at present – and that remain Read more…

By John Russell

Summertime in Washington: Some Unexpected Advanced Computing News

August 8, 2018

Summertime in Washington DC is known for its heat and humidity. That is why most people get away to either the mountains or the seashore and things slow down. H Read more…

By Alex R. Larzelere

NSF Invests $15 Million in Quantum STAQ

August 7, 2018

Quantum computing development is in full ascent as global backers aim to transcend the limitations of classical computing by leveraging the magical-seeming prop Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

By the Numbers: Cray Would Like Exascale to Be the Icing on the Cake

August 1, 2018

On its earnings call held for investors yesterday, Cray gave an accounting for its latest quarterly financials, offered future guidance and provided an update o Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

SC17 Booth Video Tours Playlist

Altair @ SC17

Altair

AMD @ SC17

AMD

ASRock Rack @ SC17

ASRock Rack

CEJN @ SC17

CEJN

DDN Storage @ SC17

DDN Storage

Huawei @ SC17

Huawei

IBM @ SC17

IBM

IBM Power Systems @ SC17

IBM Power Systems

Intel @ SC17

Intel

Lenovo @ SC17

Lenovo

Mellanox Technologies @ SC17

Mellanox Technologies

Microsoft @ SC17

Microsoft

Penguin Computing @ SC17

Penguin Computing

Pure Storage @ SC17

Pure Storage

Supericro @ SC17

Supericro

Tyan @ SC17

Tyan

Univa @ SC17

Univa

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This