HPC Reflections and (Mostly Hopeful) Predictions

By John Russell

December 19, 2018

So much ‘spaghetti’ gets tossed on walls by the technology community (vendors and researchers) to see what sticks that it is often difficult to peer through the splatter; in 2018 it felt like everyone was strong-arming AI offerings. The danger is not so much disappointing products; it’s that the AI idea becomes so stretched as to lose meaning. So it was something of a surprise, at least for me, that amid the endless spray of AI announcements last year, something fascinating happened – artificial intelligence (not the HAL kind) started irreversibly transforming HPC for scientists almost as quickly as the marketing hype predicted. I like the succinct quote below posted in October on the ORNL web site.

“Emergence of AI is a very rare type of event,” said Sergei Kalinin, director of ORNL’s Institute for Functional Imaging of Materials. “Once in a generation there is a paradigm shift in science, and this is ours.” Kalinin and his colleagues use machine learning to better analyze data streams from the laboratory’s powerful electron and scanning probe microscopes. https://www.ornl.gov/blog/ornl-review/ai-experimentalist-s-experience

How we do science is changing. AI (writ large) is the change. Don’t get the wrong idea. First-principle modeling and simulation is hardly defunct! And 2018 was momentous on many fronts – Big Machines (think Summit/Sierra for starters); Flaring of a Real Processor War (we’ll get to it later); Quantum Something (at least in spending); Rehabilitation of U.S. DoE Secretary Rick Perry (knew you’d come around Rick); Nvidia’s Continued Magic (DGX-2 and T4 introductions), Mergers & Acquisitions (IBM/Red Hat, Microsoft/GitHub) and Inevitable Potholes (e.g. Meltdown/Spectre and other nasty things). It was a very full year.

But the rise of AI in earnest is the key feature of 2018. Let’s not quibble about exactly what constitutes AI – broadly, it encompasses deep learning (neural networks), machine learning, and a variety of data analytics. One has the sense it will self-identify in the hands of users like Dr. Kalinin. Whatever it is, it’s on the verge of transforming not only HPC but all of computing. With regrets to the many subjects omitted (neuromorphic computing and the Exascale Computing Project’s (ECP) admirable output are just two) and apologies for the rapid-fire treatment (less technical) of topics tackled, here are a few reflections on 2018’s frenetic rush and thoughts on what 2019 may bring. Included at the end of each section are a few links to articles on the topic appearing throughout 2018.

  1. Congratulations IBM and Brace for the March of New BIG Machines

Let start with the excellent job done by IBM, its collaborators Nvidia and Mellanox (and others), and the folks at Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OCLF) and Lawrence Livermore Computing Center (LC) in standing up Summit (an IBM AC922 system) and Sierra supercomputers. Summit and Sierra are, for now, the top performers on the Top500 List. As important is the science they are already doing (produced the 2018 Gordon Bell winner and a number of GB finalists). Both systems also reinforce the idea that heterogeneous architectures will likely dominate near-term supercomputers.

IBM has taken lumps in this yearly wrap-up/look-ahead column. This year Big Blue (and partners) deserves a victory lap for these fantastic machines. Designing and standing up leadership machines isn’t for the faint-hearted – ask Intel about Aurora. IBM has plenty of challenges in the broader HPC server market which we’ll get to later.

Supercomputing is a notoriously boom-bust game. Right now, it’s booming driven largely by the global race to exascale computing and also by efforts to create large-scale compute infrastructures able to deliver AI capabilities. Japan’s just-completed AI Bridging Cloud Infrastructure (ABCI) is a good example of the latter. Proficiency at AI is likely to be a requirement for big machines going forward.

Barring unforeseen economic dips (at one point while writing this piece the Dow was down 500 points) the supercomputing boom will continue with a fair number of pre-exascale and exascale class machines under development worldwide and other leadership class or near-leadership class systems also in the pipeline or expected soon. Hyperion Research is forecasting supercomputer spending to basically double from $4.8B in 2017 to $9.5B in 2022. Let the good times roll while they may!

How well the U.S. is doing overall in the supercomputer fray is a matter of debate.

HPCwire noted in its coverage of the Top500 list at SC18 that, “China now claims 229 systems (45.8 percent of the total), while U.S. share fell has dropped to the lowest ever: 108 systems (21.6 percent). That wide delta in system count is offset by the U.S. having the top two systems and generally operating more powerful systems (and more real HPC systems, as opposed to Web/cloud systems), allowing the U.S. to enjoy a 38 percent performance share, compared to China’s 31 percent. Related to the rise in these non-HPC systems, Gigabit Ethernet ropes together 254 systems. 275 systems on the list are tagged as industry.”

There will always be debate over the value of the Top500 as a metric. Indeed there’s a good deal more to say about supercomputing generally. New architectures coming. Cray recently unveiled its new Shasta line. The HPC community continues speculating over what Aurora’s architecture will look like. There’s even a paper out of China with ideas for reaching Zettascale.

Instead of hammering away at further big machine dynamics, stop and enjoy the standing up of Summit and Sierra for a moment.

SUPERCOMPUTING LOOK-BACK 2018

US Leads Supercomputing with #1, #2 Systems & Petascale Arm

GW4, the MET Office, and Cray Power Up the Largest ARM-based Supercomputer in Europe

Summit Supercomputer is Already Making its Mark on Science

Berkeley Lab, Oak Ridge National Lab Share 2018 ACM Gordon Bell Prize

Zettascale by 2035? China Thinks So

HPC Under the Covers: Linpack, Exascale & the Top500

Australia Pumps Another $70 Million Into Tier-1 Supercomputing

GPUs Power Five of World’s Top Seven Supercomputers

Lenovo to Debut ‘Neptune’ Cooling Technologies at ISC

TACC’s ‘Frontera’ Supercomputer Expands Horizon for Extreme-Scale Science

 

  1. Handicapping the Arm(s) Race as Processor Wars Flare Up

One is tempted to write, “The King is Dead. Long Live the King” following Intel’s discontinuance of its Knights Landing line. That’s unfair. A knight is not a king and KNL was never king, nor perhaps, ever intended to be. Although Intel has travelled a more rugged landscape than usual this year, it is still the dominant force in processors. However, KNL’s misfortune does reflect the increasingly competitive fast-moving processor market. For the first time in years a real war among diverse processor alternatives is breaking out.

AMD’s Epyc line, just launched in June 2017, now has around two percent of the x86 server market according to IDC. Last June, Intel’s then CEO Brian Krzanich worried to analysts about how to keep AMD from capturing 15-20 percent of the market. Don’t snicker. He was right. AMD is on a roll.

AMD has major wins among the major systems and cloud providers. It’s in the game, and often enjoys a price advantage. In October, Cray unveiled its next-gen supercomputing architecture, Shasta, which was selected to be the next flagship system at NERSC. Named “Perlmutter” (after Nobel Prize winning astrophysicist Saul Perlmutter), the system will feature AMD Epyc processors and Nvidia GPUs offering a combined peak performance of ~100 petaflops and a sustained application performance equivalent to about 3X that of the Cray Cori (NERSC-8) supercomputer.

Moving on. Arm, so dominant in the mobile market, has struggled to achieve traction in HPC and the broader server marker. Lately the arrival of 64-bit chips is changing attitudes, helped by the filling out of the tool/support ecosystem.

Dell EMC HPC chief Thierry Pellegrino told HPCwire at SC18, “[J]ust like other OEMs out there – we had a SKU available that was 32-bit and didn’t really sell. But I think we are not one of those OEMs that will go out there and just design it and hope people will go and buy it. We depend upon our customers. I can tell you historically customers have asked questions about Arm but have not been very committal. Those discussions are now intensifying…The TX2 (Marvel/Cavium ThunderX2, available last May) looks good and the ThunderX3 roadmap looks great but they aren’t the only ones supplying Arm. Fujitsu has an offering. We also see Ampere with an offering coming up.”

Arm is winning a few key systems deals and turning up in some big machines, such as the Astra system from HPE for Sandia National Lab and in CEA’s selection of an Arm-based system from Atos. The Isambard System at the University of Bristol is another Arm-based large system (Cray XC50) and, of course, Japan’s post K supercomputer is based on an Arm chip from Fujitsu. Arm is slowly insinuating itself into the server (big and small) market. Cray, for example, has been promoting an on-demand webinar entitled, “Embrace Arm for HPC Confidently with the Cray Programming Environment.”

Then there’s IBM’s Power9. IBM is riding high on the success of Summit and Sierra. Its challenge is winning traction for Power in the broader server market. Here’s Pellegrino again: “I think right now we are very busy and focused on Intel, x86, and Arm. It’s not impossible that Power could become more relevant. We are always looking at technologies. The Power-Nvidia integration was a pretty smart move and we’ve seen some clusters won by Power. But it’s not an avalanche. I think it works great for purposeful applications. For general purpose, I think it’s still looked at as [less attractive] than AMD Intel and ARM.”

The overall picture is growing clearer. AMD and Arm will take some market share from Intel. It’s no doubt important that AMD’s ROME line (now sampling) impress potential buyers. So far AMD’s return to the datacenter has been without significant error. To some extent, IBM still has to prove itself (price competitive and easy to use) but is making progress and selling systems. Intel, of course, remains king but fate can move quickly.

Bottom line: Processor alternatives are available and for the first time in a long time, the market seems interested.

PROCESSOR LOOK-BACK 2018

Requiem for a Phi: Knights Landing Discontinued

Intel Confirms 48-Core Cascade Lake-AP for 2019

AMD’s EPYC Road to Redemption in Six Slides

Sandia to Take Delivery of World’s Largest Arm System

IBM at Hot Chips: What’s Next for Power

Cray Unveils Shasta, Lands NERSC-9 Contract

AMD Sets Up for Epyc Epoch

AWS Launches First Arm Cloud Instances

Nvidia T4 and HGX-2 Deployments Keep Piling Up

Dell EMC’s HPC Chief on Strategy and Emerging Processor Diversity

 

  1. After the CERN AI ‘Breakthrough’, Scientific Computing Won’t be the Same

No startling predictions here. Even so, AI is not only next year’s poster child but likely the poster child for the next decade as we work toward understanding its potential and developing technologies to deliver it. That said, because AI is being adopted or at least tested in so many different venues and applications, charting its many-veined course forward is challenging. Accelerator-driven, heterogeneous architectures with advanced mixed-precision processing capabilities is just the start, and mostly in top-of-line scientific computing systems. Embedded systems are likely to show greater AI variety.

A watershed moment of sorts occurred over the summer when work by CERN scientists was awarded a best poster prize at ISC18 for demonstrating that AI-based models have the potential to act as orders-of-magnitude-faster replacements for computationally expensive tasks in simulation. Their work is part of a CERN openlab project in collaboration with Intel. That project is just one of many projects demonstrating AI effectiveness in scientific computing. The CANcer Distributed Learning Environment (CANDLE) project is another. AI tools developed by CANDLE will find use across a broad range of DoE missions.

Events are moving fast. You may not know, for example, there’s a bona fide effort to develop a Deep500 benchmark underway led by Torsten Hoefler and Tal Ben-Nun of ETH in close collaboration with other distinguished researchers such as Satoshi Matsuoka, director of the Japan’s RIKEN Center for Computational Science .

“We are organizing a monthly meeting with leading researchers and interested parties from the industry. The meetings are open and posted on the Deep500 website (https://www.deep500.org/). Following that, the next step is to establish a steering committee for the benchmark. It is imperative that we fix the ranking and metrics of the benchmark, as the community is undecided right now on several aspects of this benchmark (see below). We intend to make considerable progress this year, reconvene at SC19,” Ben-Nun told HPCwire.

More than just bragging rights, such a benchmark may have eminently practical uses. Matsuoka described the difficult effort he and colleagues had developing procurement metrics for the ABCI system. HPCwire will have coverage of the emerging Deep500 Benchmark effort and its BOF session at SC18 early in the new year.

The user community does seem hungry for comparison metrics – an HPCwire article on the broader MLPerf standard’s introduction in May, led in part by Google, Baidu, Intel, AMD, Harvard, and Stanford, was one of the highest read articles of the year. Just last week Nvidia loudly trumpeted its performance on the first round of results released by the seven-month-old standard. (Yes, Nvidia fared well.)

AI’s challenges are mostly familiar. Model training is notoriously difficult. Required datasets are often massive and sometimes remote from the compute resource. Pairing CPUs with GPUs is the most common approach. No surprise, Nvidia has jumped onto AI as a best-use of its GPUs (scale up and scale out), DGX-2 computer, and assorted software tools including containerized aps, verticalized stacks, code compatibility across its products. Intel is likewise driving a stake deep into AI territory with chips and SOCs. Intel is also working intensely on neuromorphic technology (Loihi chip) which may eventually deliver greater deep learning efficiency and lower power consumption.

All of the systems houses, Dell EMC, HPE, IBM, Lenovo, Supermicro, etc. have ‘AI’ solutions of one or another flavor. Cloud providers and social networks, of course, have been deep into AI writ large for years. They have been busily developing deep learning, machine learning, and data analytics expertise for several years, often sharing their learnings in open source. It’s a virtuous cycle since they are all also heavy consumers of ‘AI’.

It’s really not clear yet how all of this will shake out. Heck, quantum computer pioneer D-Wave launched a machine learning business unit this year. Don’t ask me exactly what it does. What does seem clear is that AI technologies will take on many new tasks and, at least in HPC, increasingly work in concert with traditional modeling and simulation.

Prediction: Next year’s Gordon Bell prize finalists will likely (again) include some AI-driven surprises.

AI LOOK-BACK 2018

CERN Project Sees Orders-of-Magnitude Speedup with AI Approach

TACC Releases Special Report on Artificial Intelligence

ANL’s Rick Stevens on CANDLE, ARM, Quantum, and More

Nvidia Leads Alpha MLPerf Benchmarking Round

MLPerf – Will New Machine Learning Benchmark Help Propel AI Forward?

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Delivers Vision for the New HPC

Rise of the Machines – Clarion Call on AI by U.S. House Subcommittee

At HPC on Wall Street: AI-as-a-Service Accelerates AI Journeys

Intel Announces Cooper Lake, Advances AI Strategy

AI-Focused ‘Genius’ Supercomputer Installed at KU Leuven

Deep Neural Network from University of Illinois Accelerates aLIGO Research

Neural Networking Shows Promise in Earthquake Monitoring

IBM Adds V100 GPUs to IBM Cloud; Targets AI, HPC

Intel Pledges First Commercial Nervana Product in 2019

 

  1. Quantum’s Haze…Are We There Yet? No!

Where to start?

The $1.2 billion U.S National Quantum Initiative, first passed by the House of Representatives in September, was finally passed by the Senate on Dec. 14. It’s expected to reach the president’s desk by year end and to be signed. It’s a ten-year program covering many aspects of fostering a quantum computing ecosystem. And yes, it is driven in part by geopolitical worries of falling behind in a global quantum computing race. Indeed there are several other like-minded efforts around the globe.

Intel’s director of quantum hardware, Jim Clarke, holds the new 17-qubit superconducting test chip. (Credit: Intel Corporation)

Jim Clarke, director of quantum hardware, Intel Labs, issued a statement in support back when the House acted on the bill: “This legislation will allocate funding for public research in the emerging area of Quantum Computing, which has the potential to help solve some of our nation’s greatest challenges through exponential increases in compute speed. [We] look forward to working with leaders in the Senate to help keep the U.S. at the cutting edge of quantum information science and maintain the economic advantages of this technological leadership.”

HPCwire reported then, “As spelled out in the bill, 1) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Activities and Workshops would receive $400 million (2019-2023 at $80 million per year); 2) National Science Foundation (NSF) Multidisciplinary Centers for Quantum Research and Education would receive $250 million (2019-2023, at $50 million per year); and 3) Department of Energy Research and National Quantum Information Science Research Centers would receive $625 million (2019-2023 at $125 million per year).”

It’s a big, whole-of-government program and as in all such things the devil will be in the details.

Meanwhile, a report released on December 5th by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects) declares robust, error-corrected quantum computers won’t be practical for at least a decade! Until then, according to the report, noisy intermediate scale quantum computers (NISQ) will have to carry the load and, adds the report, no one is quite sure what NISQs will actually be able to do.

OK then.

A little like Schrodinger’s Cat, quantum computing is alive or not, depending upon which report you look at (bit of a stretch, I know). By now most of the HPC community is familiar in broad terms with quantum computing’s potential. Many are dabbling already in QC. I attended an excellent workshop at SC18 led by Scott Pakin (Los Alamos National Laboratory) and Eleanor Reiffel (NASA Ames Research Center) and one of our exercises, using an online toolbox, was to build a two-bit adder using gate-based quantum computing code. The show of hands denoting success at the task was not overwhelming.

Quantum computing is different and tantalizing and needs pursuing.

There is so much ongoing activity in quantum computing that it’s very possible the sober near-term outlook presented in the NASEM report is too pessimistic. At least three vendors – IBM, D-Wave Systems, and Rigetti Computing – have launched web-based platforms providing access to tools, instruction, and quantum processors. The (good) idea here is to jump start a community of developers working on quantum applications and algorithms. It seems likely other notable quantum pioneers such as Microsoft, Google, and Intel will follow suit with their own web-based quantum computing sand boxes.

Also the chase for quantum supremacy has been joined by quantum advantage. I rather like the NASEM report’s thoughts here:

“Demonstration of ‘quantum supremacy’—that is, completing a task that is intractable on a classical computer, whether or not the task has practical utility—is one [milestone]. While several teams have been focused on this goal, it has not yet been demonstrated (as of mid-2018). Another major milestone is creating a commercially useful quantum computer, which would require a QC that carries out at least one practical task more efficiently than any classical computer. While this milestone is in theory harder than achieving quantum supremacy—since the application in question must be better and more useful than available classical approaches—proving quantum supremacy could be difficult, especially for analog QC. Thus, it is possible that a useful application could arise before quantum supremacy is demonstrated.”

Rigetti is offering $1 million prize to the first group/individual to demonstrate quantum advantage using its web-platform.

Overall, there are many smart, experienced researchers working on quantum computing writ large and that includes many application areas (computing, sensors, communications, etc.). I like how John Martinis, who leads Google’s quantum effort and is a Stanford researcher, put it during the Q&A at release of the NASEM report which he helped write. He’s also a former HPCwire Person to Watch  (2017):

“Progress in the field has been quite good in the last few years, and people have been able not just to do basics physics experiments but [also] to start building quantum computing systems. I think there’s a lot more optimism that people can build things and get it to work properly. Of course there’s lot of work to be done to get them to work well and match them to problems but the pace [of progress] has picked up and there’s interesting things that have come out. I think that in the next year or two, [we] won’t get to solving actual problems yet but there will be a lot better machines out there,” said Martinis.

Somewhere, there’s a pony hidden in the quantum play room. Just don’t expect to find it in 2019. Listed below are links to just a few of the many articles HPCwire has published on QC this year. Also, the NASEM report isn’t a bad reference and is free to download.

QUANTUM LOOK-BACK ON 2018

House Passes $1.275B National Quantum Initiative

Robust Quantum Computers Still a Decade Away, Says Nat’l Academies Report

Europe Launches Ten-year, €1B Quantum Flagship Project

Hyperion Tackles Elusive Quantum Computing Landscape

Rigetti (and Others) Pursuit of Quantum Advantage

D-Wave Is Latest to Offer Quantum Cloud Platform

IBM Expands Quantum Computing Network

NSF Launches Quantum Computing Faculty Fellows Program

Google Charts Two-Dimensional Quantum Course

 

  1. Too Little Space for So Many Worthwhile Items

We start our roundup with remembrance of three prominent members of the HPC and science communities. In March, legendary physicist Stephen Hawking died at age 76. Hawking made lasting contributions in many areas and advanced cosmology as a computational science and led the launch of several UK supercomputers dedicated to cosmology and particle physics. In April, computer pioneer Burton J. Smith passed away at age 77. He was an MIT and Microsoft alum, a renowned parallel computing expert, and a leader in the HPC community. His 2007 ISC keynote detailed how computing would be reinvented for the multicore era.  A third loss of note was Bob Borchers, one of the founders of the Supercomputing Conference, who died in June. Among his many accomplishments, Borchers served as Director of the Division of Advanced Scientific Computing at the National Science Foundation (NSF).

There are always a few eye-catching M&As. Microsoft’s $7.5 billion gobbling up of GitHub in June is still being closely watched. Several analysts at the time said the move reaffirms Microsoft’s commitment to open-source development. We’ll see. In October, IBM announced plans to purchase Linux powerhouse Red Hat for $34 billion. Probably too soon to say much about the latter deal. Personnel shuffling is part of life in HPC (and everywhere) The wait continues for a new Intel CEO. That said Intel snapped up Jim Keller in April from Tesla to lead Intel’s system-on-chip development efforts. Keller had been leader in AMD’s x86 Zen architecture development and has worked extensively on Arm.

The Spaceborne Computer fully installed in the International Space Station

HPE’s Spaceborne Computer (based on the HPE Apollo 40) successfully completed its first year in space, demonstrating a system built with commercial off the shelf (COTS) parts could survive the rigors of space. Haven’t heard much lately from Pattern Computer which emerged from stealth in May sporting some familiar HPC names (Michael Riddle, James Reinders). In a nutshell, Pattern Computer says it has developed an approach to exploring data that permits very high dimensionality exploration in contrast to the pairwise approach that now dominates. It hasn’t spelled out details.

Some less praiseworthy moments: Daisuke Suzuki, GM of Pezy Computer, was sentenced (July) to three years in prison which was then reduced to a four-year suspended sentence. No, word yet on Pezy President Motoaki Saito, also on trial. Both were indicted in late 2017 for defrauding the Japanese government of roughly $5.8 million (¥653 million) in 2014. In February, a group of Nuclear scientists working at the All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics (RFNC-VNIIEF) have been arrested for using lab supercomputing resources to mine crypto-currency, according to a report in Russia’s Interfax News Agency.

It’s interesting what catches readers’ attention – an article about using DL to solve Rubik’s Cube received wide readership. Retro nostalgia? Questions about leading edge semiconductor fabrication capacity are still percolating through the community following Global Foundries announcement it has decided to put its 7 nm node on hold, and entirely stopped development of nodes beyond 7 nm. With Global Foundries shuttering development there are now only three companies left in the game at 10/7 nm; TSMC, Samsung and Intel. At both ISC18 and SC18 BeeGFS was drawing attention – it’s looking more and more like BeeGFS may become a viable option in the parallel file system market.

Chalk this up under Blasé but not Passé. Container technology has clearly gone mainstream in HPC (if that’s not an oxymoron); SyLabs released Singularity 3.0 in the fall. OpenHPC also continues forward. HPCwire ran a good interview with OpenHPC project leader Karl Schulz who said, among other things, that OpenHPC was planning to offer more automated functions; it has already increased the number of recipes (~dozen) and support Singularity and Charliecloud.

Supermicro has countered a news story (The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate U.S. Companies) that appeared on Bloomberg BusinessWeek claiming spies in China hacked Super Micro Computer servers widely distributed throughout the U.S. technology supply chain, including servers used by Amazon and Apple. Supermicro issued a report last week saying an investigation “found absolutely no evidence of malicious hardware on our motherboards.” Amazon also issued a denial, stating, “It’s untrue that AWS knew about a supply chain compromise, an issue with malicious chips, or hardware modifications.” No doubt there’s a dark side to the world.

Leaving the dark side to others, Happy Holidays and a hopeful new year to all. On to 2019!

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Intel’s Optane/DAOS Solution Tops Latest IO500

August 11, 2020

Intel’s persistent memory technology, Optane, and its DAOS (Distributed Asynchronous Object Storage) stack continue to impress and gain market traction. Yesterday, Intel reported an Optane and DAOS-based system finishe Read more…

By John Russell

Summit Now Offers Virtual Tours

August 10, 2020

Summit, the second most powerful publicly ranked supercomputer in the world, now has a virtual tour. The tour, implemented by 3D platform Matterport, allows users to virtually “walk” around the massive supercomputer Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Supercomputer Simulations Examine Changes in Chesapeake Bay

August 8, 2020

The Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in the continental United States, weaves its way south from Maryland, collecting waters from West Virginia, Delaware, DC, Pennsylvania and New York along the way. Like many major e Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Student Success from ‘Scratch’: CHPC’s Proof is in the Pudding

August 7, 2020

Happy Sithole, who directs the South African Centre for High Performance Computing (SA-CHPC), called the 13th annual CHPC National conference to order on December 1, 2019, at the Birchwood Conference Centre in Kempton Pa Read more…

By Elizabeth Leake

New GE Simulations on Summit to Advance Offshore Wind Power

August 6, 2020

The wind energy sector is a frequent user of high-power simulations, with researchers aiming to optimize wind flows and energy production from the massive turbines. Now, researchers at GE are preparing to undertake a lar Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

AWS Solution Channel

AWS announces the release of AWS ParallelCluster 2.8.0

AWS ParallelCluster is a fully supported and maintained open source cluster management tool that makes it easy for scientists, researchers, and IT administrators to deploy and manage High Performance Computing (HPC) clusters in the AWS cloud. Read more…

Intel® HPC + AI Pavilion

Supercomputing the Pandemic: Scientific Community Tackles COVID-19 from Multiple Perspectives

Since their inception, supercomputers have taken on the biggest, most complex, and most data-intensive computing challenges—from confirming Einstein’s theories about gravitational waves to predicting the impacts of climate change. Read more…

Research: A Survey of Numerical Methods Utilizing Mixed Precision Arithmetic

August 5, 2020

Within the past years, hardware vendors have started designing low precision special function units in response to the demand of the machine learning community and their demand for high compute power in low precision for Read more…

By Hartwig Anzt and Jack Dongarra

Intel’s Optane/DAOS Solution Tops Latest IO500

August 11, 2020

Intel’s persistent memory technology, Optane, and its DAOS (Distributed Asynchronous Object Storage) stack continue to impress and gain market traction. Yeste Read more…

By John Russell

Summit Now Offers Virtual Tours

August 10, 2020

Summit, the second most powerful publicly ranked supercomputer in the world, now has a virtual tour. The tour, implemented by 3D platform Matterport, allows use Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Research: A Survey of Numerical Methods Utilizing Mixed Precision Arithmetic

August 5, 2020

Within the past years, hardware vendors have started designing low precision special function units in response to the demand of the machine learning community Read more…

By Hartwig Anzt and Jack Dongarra

Implement Photonic Tensor Cores for Machine Learning?

August 5, 2020

Researchers from George Washington University have reported an approach for building photonic tensor cores that leverages phase change photonic memory to implem Read more…

By John Russell

HPE Keeps Cray Brand Promise, Reveals HPE Cray Supercomputing Line

August 4, 2020

The HPC community, ever-affectionate toward Cray and its eponymous founder, can breathe a (virtual) sigh of relief. The Cray brand will live on, encompassing th Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Machines, Connections, Data, and Especially People: OAC Acting Director Amy Friedlander Charts Office’s Blueprint for Innovation

August 3, 2020

The path to innovation in cyberinfrastructure (CI) will require continued focus on building HPC systems and secure connections between them, in addition to the Read more…

By Ken Chiacchia, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center/XSEDE

Nvidia Said to Be Close on Arm Deal

August 3, 2020

GPU leader Nvidia Corp. is in talks to buy U.K. chip designer Arm from parent company Softbank, according to several reports over the weekend. If consummated Read more…

By George Leopold

Intel’s 7nm Slip Raises Questions About Ponte Vecchio GPU, Aurora Supercomputer

July 30, 2020

During its second-quarter earnings call, Intel announced a one-year delay of its 7nm process technology, which it says it will create an approximate six-month shift for its CPU product timing relative to prior expectations. The primary issue is a defect mode in the 7nm process that resulted in yield degradation... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Supercomputer Modeling Tests How COVID-19 Spreads in Grocery Stores

April 8, 2020

In the COVID-19 era, many people are treating simple activities like getting gas or groceries with caution as they try to heed social distancing mandates and protect their own health. Still, significant uncertainty surrounds the relative risk of different activities, and conflicting information is prevalent. A team of Finnish researchers set out to address some of these uncertainties by... Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Supercomputer-Powered Research Uncovers Signs of ‘Bradykinin Storm’ That May Explain COVID-19 Symptoms

July 28, 2020

Doctors and medical researchers have struggled to pinpoint – let alone explain – the deluge of symptoms induced by COVID-19 infections in patients, and what Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Intel’s 7nm Slip Raises Questions About Ponte Vecchio GPU, Aurora Supercomputer

July 30, 2020

During its second-quarter earnings call, Intel announced a one-year delay of its 7nm process technology, which it says it will create an approximate six-month shift for its CPU product timing relative to prior expectations. The primary issue is a defect mode in the 7nm process that resulted in yield degradation... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Nvidia Said to Be Close on Arm Deal

August 3, 2020

GPU leader Nvidia Corp. is in talks to buy U.K. chip designer Arm from parent company Softbank, according to several reports over the weekend. If consummated Read more…

By George Leopold

Supercomputer Simulations Reveal the Fate of the Neanderthals

May 25, 2020

For hundreds of thousands of years, neanderthals roamed the planet, eventually (almost 50,000 years ago) giving way to homo sapiens, which quickly became the do Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

10nm, 7nm, 5nm…. Should the Chip Nanometer Metric Be Replaced?

June 1, 2020

The biggest cool factor in server chips is the nanometer. AMD beating Intel to a CPU built on a 7nm process node* – with 5nm and 3nm on the way – has been i Read more…

By Doug Black

Neocortex Will Be First-of-Its-Kind 800,000-Core AI Supercomputer

June 9, 2020

Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC - a joint research organization of Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh) has won a $5 million award Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Keeps Cray Brand Promise, Reveals HPE Cray Supercomputing Line

August 4, 2020

The HPC community, ever-affectionate toward Cray and its eponymous founder, can breathe a (virtual) sigh of relief. The Cray brand will live on, encompassing th Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

Nvidia’s Ampere A100 GPU: Up to 2.5X the HPC, 20X the AI

May 14, 2020

Nvidia's first Ampere-based graphics card, the A100 GPU, packs a whopping 54 billion transistors on 826mm2 of silicon, making it the world's largest seven-nanom Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Australian Researchers Break All-Time Internet Speed Record

May 26, 2020

If you’ve been stuck at home for the last few months, you’ve probably become more attuned to the quality (or lack thereof) of your internet connection. Even Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

15 Slides on Programming Aurora and Exascale Systems

May 7, 2020

Sometime in 2021, Aurora, the first planned U.S. exascale system, is scheduled to be fired up at Argonne National Laboratory. Cray (now HPE) and Intel are the k Read more…

By John Russell

‘Billion Molecules Against COVID-19’ Challenge to Launch with Massive Supercomputing Support

April 22, 2020

Around the world, supercomputing centers have spun up and opened their doors for COVID-19 research in what may be the most unified supercomputing effort in hist Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Joliot-Curie Supercomputer Used to Build First Full, High-Fidelity Aircraft Engine Simulation

July 14, 2020

When industrial designers plan the design of a new element of a vehicle’s propulsion or exterior, they typically use fluid dynamics to optimize airflow and in Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

John Martinis Reportedly Leaves Google Quantum Effort

April 21, 2020

John Martinis, who led Google’s quantum computing effort since establishing its quantum hardware group in 2014, has left Google after being moved into an advi Read more…

By John Russell

$100B Plan Submitted for Massive Remake and Expansion of NSF

May 27, 2020

Legislation to reshape, expand - and rename - the National Science Foundation has been submitted in both the U.S. House and Senate. The proposal, which seems to Read more…

By John Russell

Google Cloud Debuts 16-GPU Ampere A100 Instances

July 7, 2020

On the heels of the Nvidia’s Ampere A100 GPU launch in May, Google Cloud is announcing alpha availability of the A100 “Accelerator Optimized” VM A2 instance family on Google Compute Engine. The instances are powered by the HGX A100 16-GPU platform, which combines two HGX A100 8-GPU baseboards using... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This