Conversation: ANL’s Rick Stevens on DoE’s AI for Science Project

By John Russell

March 23, 2020

With release of the Department of Energy’s AI for Science report in late February, the effort to build a national AI program, modeled loosely on the U.S. Exascale Initiative, enters a new phase. Project leaders have already had early discussions with Congress on what such a program might look like. It is early days and the general thinking is AI for Science could be a 5-to-10-year platform from which to accelerate development of AI technologies and applications relevant to DoE and science broadly.

The report itself is fascinating. Written by six prominent DoE researchers – Rick Stevens and Valerie Taylor (Argonne National Laboratory); Jeff Nichols and Arthur Barney McCabe (Oak Ridge National Laboratory); and Kathy Yelick and David Brown (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) – the AI for Science reports seeks to summarize and prioritize the core ideas discussed by more than 1000 attendees to DoE’s series of town hall meetings held between July and October of last year. (HPCwire coverage)

Rick Stevens, Argonne National Laboratory

HPCwire recently had a chance to talk with Stevens, one of the report’s authors and associate laboratory director at ANL, about the scope of the potential AI project and a few particulars regarding the AI opportunity and challenge. He framed the project around three points:

  • Community. “First, like exascale, this is really a whole community coming together to build hardware and software. 1000 people participated – people from 17 Labs, from 90 universities, from 30 companies was, you know, very broad base four different meetings, 350 people plus at each of the meetings. The high-level thing that we wanted to accomplish with this is to get a baseline document that captures the excitement and the opportunity space and gives us a platform to start working on a program concepts.
  • Impact. “Second, this is the probably the most important direction for computing in science that we know about and we are significantly ahead of the curve of most other countries. We’ve got collaborations planned with the U.K. and other countries on this front, but relative to efforts happening in Asia, we don’t see that yet. So it’s not just an American thing, but the idea that we’re going to pivot pretty quickly from exascale to very large-scale applications of AI is interesting and strategic. We’re not seeing this happening in other places yet.
  • Commitment. “Third, to actually realize the benefits of AI is going to be a large-scale effort over many years. It’s not about a little bit of money for a couple years.”

It was a wide-ranging discussion encompassing hardware, software development, and what Stevens believes will become wider inclusion of experimentalists as HPC users as AI assumes a greater role during data collection and as an interface with HPC systems. Interestingly, one worry is we’ll rush to develop hardware based on the current crop of commonly-used algorithms and potentially get bogged down as new AI-centric algorithms emerge. Presented here are a few of Stevens observations.

HPCwire: Since you make the point that the AI effort will leverage the exascale efforts, let’s start with hardware.

Rick Stevens: Everybody’s talked about how the exascale machines are going to be excellent platforms for deep learning training because the lower precision we need for deep learning training is going to be amazingly fast on these machines. And that’s true. But as we look towards the future, we’re trying to understand what’s the mix going to be between simulation use cases for future hardware and machine learning use cases or AI use cases. In order to explore that more deeply we’re going set up a testbed for the advanced AI hardware coming out of startups like Cerebras, Samba Nova, Groq and Graphcore and others.

We’re interested in taking the models that we’re developing for scientific applications that might be dealing with types of data that are different from internet applications or just standard computer vision, and the types of architecture models that we need for those [scientific] problems, and use those as test cases on this new hardware. We’ll use those test cases on this new hardware and try to learn from their relative performance and functionality to feed forward into future architectures that would combine traditional processing elements with accelerators for AI. So that’s kind of how the hardware piece fits.

HPCwire: Are there any examples of the hardware you’re working with now and the problems you’ve now started to attack on it, and what advantages it brings to it?

Image courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory.

Stevens: My team’s been working a lot with Cerebras. We have Cerebas’ CS1. That’s the world’s largest chip with 1.2 trillion transistors, and hundreds of thousands of cores. We’ve got several different models running on that. We have a cancer-drug response prediction model that’s running many hundreds of times faster on that chip than it runs on a conventional GPU. We have a gravity wave detection code that’s also running many times faster than the GPU on this platform. That’s a code is used for processing things like LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory) data looking for signals to gravity waves. We have materials design [projects] as well. We have about a dozen projects in the pipeline.

HPCwire: This seems to suggests that even near term some of the better devices used for advanced AI will be different from traditional CPU-GPU approaches. Is that a fair assumption?

Stevens: I think the way to look at it is the architectures that we’re doing the bulk of the work on now, which are primarily CPU- GPU-based and have been around for a bunch of years, are proven. The software stack on them is quite good. The support for deep learning frameworks is very robust. It’s really the current standard platform, right. And, we’ve got machines coming, like Frontier and Aurora, and so on that will have next generation versions of that technology and they’re going to be super at that.

The great thing about the GPUs is they’re quite general purpose. We can use them for machine learning. We can also use them for vector processing, solving, simulations. If you look at how far can you push computer architecture, the only thing you’re trying to do, and it’s critically important to get this right, is if all you’re doing is deep learning training, or deep learning inference, how much faster can you go than a GPU? That’s more or less the question we’re trying to answer with these AI hardware platforms. There’s dozens of companies now making those platforms.

The thing to be careful of is that in the future we will still need to do an enormous amount of simulation and we’ll need general purpose machines for that. Everything that we invented over the last 20-30 years including HPC has been essentially on general purpose machines. What we’re trying to understand is what is the tradeoff between general purpose hardware – whether it’s a GPU or extensions to CPUs like vector extensions like on the Japanese machine – versus these very special purpose accelerators that essentially are good at only one thing, which is a training or inference in deep learning. How would they fit into the ecosystem? It’s unlikely that we would have a system that only has those accelerators, because it would be very limited in what we could do with it.

On the other hand, if we can learn what are the key features of those accelerators that give them the most of the of the bang for the buck if you want to think of it that way, we can think about how architectures might converge in the future? That’s really the end game that we’re aiming at. So it might be future hardware systems, like in the 2025 kind of timeframe, have not just CPUs and GPUs, but they might have a lot of these specialized accelerators also in the architecture. Getting that mix exactly right is one of the questions. Like what’s the right ratio? What are the types of applications that would be good or bad on that kind of architecture.

So that’s kind of the pathfinding work that we’re doing. It’s also likely that some of the accelerator ideas that are in dedicated hardware will find their way into more general-purpose platforms like future GPUs or CPUs. There’s a number of us have been spending a lot of time talking about that. There’s even a bet that I’ll tell you about some time over beer on how that might play out. I think that what we’re discovering, what’s so exciting about this, is that even though Moore’s Law is slowing down and it’s becoming harder to do things, the number of architectural ideas in circulation right now has never been greater in some sense. I mean, maybe back in the 60s, it was larger when people were inventing everything (IT-related) then.

HPCwire: That all sounds positive.

Stevens: Well, we’re suddenly in this realm where we literally have 100 companies trying to come up with new architectures all chasing the AI target. And it’s already unclear to me right now, in some fundamental sense, whether we have the right algorithms. If the hardware is prematurely optimized for the current algorithms, right, the current methods, that could backfire because we keep inventing new methods. At the same time, for certain problems, there may be cases where I can just do something I wanted to do on accelerators that I can also do on the other machine but it’s just taking a lot longer. It’s super important to actually have these [new devices] in our labs and made available to our community. We, and the DoE, have this incredible environment where we have access to the best of all these worlds and are in a great position to actually evaluate them.

HPCwire: Your point about algorithms is interesting. Along those lines will the AI for Science program have a software component, a sort of analog to the Exascale Computing Project which focuses on the needed software ecosystem to support exascale?

Stevens: We’re still trying to work out what the specific program elements are. Certainly we’ll need big pushes on what you would call an application, where there’s a domain facing activity. AI for specific kinds of problems, whether materials or chemistry or physics or astrophysics, or whatever. You can imagine there will be pieces like that. There is a need for a new type of software infrastructure that connects all this stuff together and helps us manage large amounts of data. Or it’s, you know, huge libraries of thousands of models or millions of models. It creates a whole ecosystem around a new currency, which is kind of data and models. That’s different from what we currently have.

Clearly there will be revisions of workflows too which include significant AI components, whether that’s in experimental science or whether it’s AI that helps us write code. The latter is already starting to happen, having AI systems that are helping debug codes or tune codes or translate codes or even sometimes writing code directly. That’s going to change the software development process, which in the context of like exascale is pretty much the same way we’ve been doing things for a long time. Exascale is not really changing how we do software development but the AI initiative will probably do that.

Of course, the [existing] simulation and the existing software stacks and libraries, none of that has to go away because much of how we’re going to use AI is actually coupled to the traditional scientific computing software stack.

HPCwire: But AI will itself become a major part of the software development paradigm?

Stevens: Probably the right way to think about this is that all these things [software development process and components] are going to be augmented with AI. There’ll be many applications that are kind of AI-centric, machine learning-centric; some that will still be simulation-centric; and some will be hybrid. Software environments [are likely] to evolve from the kind of batch oriented traditional simulation towards these more real time interactive, collaborative or shared, resources that support a much larger number of projects simultaneously. The underlying system software and the hardware will have to evolve to support these new workloads.

We know from the exascale [experience] that we can have reasonable success with the current organizational model, right, where in applications and software and kind of hardware investments as a project. And then the facilities, acquisitions kind of in the initiative. But I think with AI, the one thing that we’re starting to understand is that we need a bit more research. I say a bit more but probably a lot more research so rather than moving quickly to a formal kind of project, I think it will have to incubate in research mode a bit longer.

HPCwire: Are there good examples now of AI writing code or tuning code you can cite?

Stevens: There’s quite a few that are starting to pop up. One of the big use cases at Argonne, Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and Livermore is to use large scale computing, with deep learning, to optimize other deep learning network design. In deep learning, you write a lot of code, but you’re often trying to improve the model architecture; the number of layers and the topology of the neural network that you’re building. It turns out that deep learning is really good at doing that problem. So think of it as AI writing AI. That use case is becoming very common. We’re doing that now on Summit. We’re doing it now on Theta. This is a routine thing that we’re doing to improve our models by using a different AI model to actually design the new AI model. In some cases you get incredible boost in improvements in wall clock performance or accuracy. I mean by factors of two or five or something like that.

So the models were for a problem in cancer in natural language processing problems, and then another was for the climate data, and it was applied to a problem in cosmology. It’s a very general technique and can be used pretty much all domains in which deep learning can be applied. There’s actually a fair amount of work going on and not just in the labs. It’s happening in industry where this idea of having coded systems is gaining traction.

HPCwire: We haven’t talked much about applications. One area that has been receiving attention is the potential to use AI for facilities and systems management. Thoughts on how DoE could leverage that?

Stevens: DoE runs about 27 or so user facilities and many of these are experimental user facilities, like the light sources, neutron sources and things like that. There, the principal idea is we’re often collecting data that has to be post-processed. One thing you could do is use machine learning methods to do post processing very quickly. Or you could use machine learning or maybe reinforcement learning to control the configuration of the experiment to collect data in a more efficient way. There are many dozens of ways of using machine learning there. So that’s an experimental side. We can also use AI methods to monitor and manage HPC systems and to optimize data paths, data flows, workflows, and so on.

So we’re starting to see the need to think differently about how we operate these facilities. There’s applications in the kind of control data reduction space that are starting to gain traction. One of them is in what I call complex experiment control and there are two examples that are already out there.

One is in fusion where deep learning models are able to predict the future state of the plasma, you know, many milliseconds in advance. They can predict pretty accurately if that plasma is going to go unstable. The reason that’s kind of cool, is that humans can’t do that. We can’t look at the diagnostic data coming off the test reactors and predict what’s going to happen. I mean, it just happens too fast. Properly trained, the network can do that. The next step there is trying to interface that to the control system so not only is it going to predict when something’s going to go unstable, it can control the reactor to move away from that zone so maybe it would not crash. Doing that involves taking these deep neural networks and interfacing them with classical control systems or maybe replacing that class control system with a different way to do control.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

UT Dallas Grows HPC Storage Footprint for Animation and Game Development

October 28, 2020

Computer-generated animation and video game development are extraordinarily computationally intensive fields, with studios often requiring large server farms with hundreds of terabytes – or even petabytes – of storag Read more…

By Staff report

Frame by Frame, Supercomputing Reveals the Forms of the Coronavirus

October 27, 2020

From the start of the pandemic, supercomputing research has been targeting one particular protein of the coronavirus: the notorious “S” or “spike” protein, which allows the virus to pry its way into human cells a Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

AMD Reports Record Revenue and $35B Deal to Buy Xilinx

October 27, 2020

AMD this morning reported record quarterly revenue of $2.8 billion and a finalized deal to buy FPGA-maker Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction. The acquisition helps AMD keep pace during a time of consolida Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia-Arm Deal a Boon for RISC-V?

October 26, 2020

The $40 billion blockbuster acquisition deal that will bring chip maker Arm into the Nvidia corporate family could provide a boost for the competing RISC-V architecture. As regulators in the U.S., China and the Europe Read more…

By George Leopold

OpenHPC Progress Report – v2.0, More Recipes, Cloud and Arm Support, Says Schulz

October 26, 2020

Launched in late 2015 and transitioned to a Linux Foundation Project in 2016, OpenHPC has marched quietly but steadily forward. Its goal “to provide a reference collection of open-source HPC software components and bes Read more…

By John Russell

AWS Solution Channel

Rapid Chip Design in the Cloud

Time-to-market and engineering efficiency are the most critical and expensive metrics for a chip design company. With this in mind, the team at Annapurna Labs selected Altair AcceleratorRead more…

Intel® HPC + AI Pavilion

Berlin Institute of Health: Putting HPC to Work for the World

Researchers from the Center for Digital Health at the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) are using science to understand the pathophysiology of COVID-19, which can help to inform the development of targeted treatments. Read more…

NASA Uses Supercomputing to Measure Carbon in the World’s Trees

October 22, 2020

Trees constitute one of the world’s most important carbon sinks, pulling enormous amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing the carbon in their trunks and the surrounding soil. Measuring this carbon sto Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

AMD Reports Record Revenue and $35B Deal to Buy Xilinx

October 27, 2020

AMD this morning reported record quarterly revenue of $2.8 billion and a finalized deal to buy FPGA-maker Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction. Th Read more…

By John Russell

OpenHPC Progress Report – v2.0, More Recipes, Cloud and Arm Support, Says Schulz

October 26, 2020

Launched in late 2015 and transitioned to a Linux Foundation Project in 2016, OpenHPC has marched quietly but steadily forward. Its goal “to provide a referen Read more…

By John Russell

Nvidia Dominates (Again) Latest MLPerf Inference Results

October 22, 2020

The two-year-old AI benchmarking group MLPerf.org released its second set of inferencing results yesterday and again, as in the most recent MLPerf training resu Read more…

By John Russell

HPE, AMD and EuroHPC Partner for Pre-Exascale LUMI Supercomputer

October 21, 2020

Not even a week after Nvidia announced that it would be providing hardware for the first four of the eight planned EuroHPC systems, HPE and AMD are announcing a Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

HPE to Build Australia’s Most Powerful Supercomputer for Pawsey

October 20, 2020

The Pawsey Supercomputing Centre in Perth, Western Australia, has had a busy year. Pawsey typically spends much of its time looking to the stars, working with a Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

DDN-Tintri Showcases Technology Integration with Two New Products

October 20, 2020

DDN, a long-time leader in HPC storage, announced two new products today and provided more detail around its strategy for integrating DDN HPC technologies with Read more…

By John Russell

Is the Nvidia A100 GPU Performance Worth a Hardware Upgrade?

October 16, 2020

Over the last decade, accelerators have seen an increasing rate of adoption in high-performance computing (HPC) platforms, and in the June 2020 Top500 list, eig Read more…

By Hartwig Anzt, Ahmad Abdelfattah and Jack Dongarra

Nvidia and EuroHPC Team for Four Supercomputers, Including Massive ‘Leonardo’ System

October 15, 2020

The EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (JU) serves as Europe’s concerted supercomputing play, currently comprising 32 member states and billions of euros in funding. I Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Supercomputer-Powered Research Uncovers Signs of ‘Bradykinin Storm’ That May Explain COVID-19 Symptoms

July 28, 2020

Doctors and medical researchers have struggled to pinpoint – let alone explain – the deluge of symptoms induced by COVID-19 infections in patients, and what Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Nvidia Said to Be Close on Arm Deal

August 3, 2020

GPU leader Nvidia Corp. is in talks to buy U.K. chip designer Arm from parent company Softbank, according to several reports over the weekend. If consummated Read more…

By George Leopold

Intel’s 7nm Slip Raises Questions About Ponte Vecchio GPU, Aurora Supercomputer

July 30, 2020

During its second-quarter earnings call, Intel announced a one-year delay of its 7nm process technology, which it says it will create an approximate six-month shift for its CPU product timing relative to prior expectations. The primary issue is a defect mode in the 7nm process that resulted in yield degradation... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Google Hires Longtime Intel Exec Bill Magro to Lead HPC Strategy

September 18, 2020

In a sign of the times, another prominent HPCer has made a move to a hyperscaler. Longtime Intel executive Bill Magro joined Google as chief technologist for hi Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPE Keeps Cray Brand Promise, Reveals HPE Cray Supercomputing Line

August 4, 2020

The HPC community, ever-affectionate toward Cray and its eponymous founder, can breathe a (virtual) sigh of relief. The Cray brand will live on, encompassing th Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

10nm, 7nm, 5nm…. Should the Chip Nanometer Metric Be Replaced?

June 1, 2020

The biggest cool factor in server chips is the nanometer. AMD beating Intel to a CPU built on a 7nm process node* – with 5nm and 3nm on the way – has been i Read more…

By Doug Black

Aurora’s Troubles Move Frontier into Pole Exascale Position

October 1, 2020

Intel’s 7nm node delay has raised questions about the status of the Aurora supercomputer that was scheduled to be stood up at Argonne National Laboratory next year. Aurora was in the running to be the United States’ first exascale supercomputer although it was on a contemporaneous timeline with... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Is the Nvidia A100 GPU Performance Worth a Hardware Upgrade?

October 16, 2020

Over the last decade, accelerators have seen an increasing rate of adoption in high-performance computing (HPC) platforms, and in the June 2020 Top500 list, eig Read more…

By Hartwig Anzt, Ahmad Abdelfattah and Jack Dongarra

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

European Commission Declares €8 Billion Investment in Supercomputing

September 18, 2020

Just under two years ago, the European Commission formalized the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (JU): a concerted HPC effort (comprising 32 participating states at c Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Nvidia and EuroHPC Team for Four Supercomputers, Including Massive ‘Leonardo’ System

October 15, 2020

The EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (JU) serves as Europe’s concerted supercomputing play, currently comprising 32 member states and billions of euros in funding. I Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Google Cloud Debuts 16-GPU Ampere A100 Instances

July 7, 2020

On the heels of the Nvidia’s Ampere A100 GPU launch in May, Google Cloud is announcing alpha availability of the A100 “Accelerator Optimized” VM A2 instance family on Google Compute Engine. The instances are powered by the HGX A100 16-GPU platform, which combines two HGX A100 8-GPU baseboards using... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Microsoft Azure Adds A100 GPU Instances for ‘Supercomputer-Class AI’ in the Cloud

August 19, 2020

Microsoft Azure continues to infuse its cloud platform with HPC- and AI-directed technologies. Today the cloud services purveyor announced a new virtual machine Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Powers Fugaku’s Storage, Scores IO500 Win

August 28, 2020

In June, RIKEN shook the supercomputing world with its Arm-based, Fujitsu-built juggernaut: Fugaku. The system, which weighs in at 415.5 Linpack petaflops, topp Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

HPE, AMD and EuroHPC Partner for Pre-Exascale LUMI Supercomputer

October 21, 2020

Not even a week after Nvidia announced that it would be providing hardware for the first four of the eight planned EuroHPC systems, HPE and AMD are announcing a Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

DOD Orders Two AI-Focused Supercomputers from Liqid

August 24, 2020

The U.S. Department of Defense is making a big investment in data analytics and AI computing with the procurement of two HPC systems that will provide the High Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Oracle Cloud Deepens HPC Embrace with Launch of A100 Instances, Plans for Arm, More 

September 22, 2020

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) continued its steady ramp-up of HPC capabilities today with a flurry of announcements. Topping the list is general availabilit Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This