Conversation: ANL’s Rick Stevens on DoE’s AI for Science Project

By John Russell

March 23, 2020

With release of the Department of Energy’s AI for Science report in late February, the effort to build a national AI program, modeled loosely on the U.S. Exascale Initiative, enters a new phase. Project leaders have already had early discussions with Congress on what such a program might look like. It is early days and the general thinking is AI for Science could be a 5-to-10-year platform from which to accelerate development of AI technologies and applications relevant to DoE and science broadly.

The report itself is fascinating. Written by six prominent DoE researchers – Rick Stevens and Valerie Taylor (Argonne National Laboratory); Jeff Nichols and Arthur Barney McCabe (Oak Ridge National Laboratory); and Kathy Yelick and David Brown (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) – the AI for Science reports seeks to summarize and prioritize the core ideas discussed by more than 1000 attendees to DoE’s series of town hall meetings held between July and October of last year. (HPCwire coverage)

Rick Stevens, Argonne National Laboratory

HPCwire recently had a chance to talk with Stevens, one of the report’s authors and associate laboratory director at ANL, about the scope of the potential AI project and a few particulars regarding the AI opportunity and challenge. He framed the project around three points:

  • Community. “First, like exascale, this is really a whole community coming together to build hardware and software. 1000 people participated – people from 17 Labs, from 90 universities, from 30 companies was, you know, very broad base four different meetings, 350 people plus at each of the meetings. The high-level thing that we wanted to accomplish with this is to get a baseline document that captures the excitement and the opportunity space and gives us a platform to start working on a program concepts.
  • Impact. “Second, this is the probably the most important direction for computing in science that we know about and we are significantly ahead of the curve of most other countries. We’ve got collaborations planned with the U.K. and other countries on this front, but relative to efforts happening in Asia, we don’t see that yet. So it’s not just an American thing, but the idea that we’re going to pivot pretty quickly from exascale to very large-scale applications of AI is interesting and strategic. We’re not seeing this happening in other places yet.
  • Commitment. “Third, to actually realize the benefits of AI is going to be a large-scale effort over many years. It’s not about a little bit of money for a couple years.”

It was a wide-ranging discussion encompassing hardware, software development, and what Stevens believes will become wider inclusion of experimentalists as HPC users as AI assumes a greater role during data collection and as an interface with HPC systems. Interestingly, one worry is we’ll rush to develop hardware based on the current crop of commonly-used algorithms and potentially get bogged down as new AI-centric algorithms emerge. Presented here are a few of Stevens observations.

HPCwire: Since you make the point that the AI effort will leverage the exascale efforts, let’s start with hardware.

Rick Stevens: Everybody’s talked about how the exascale machines are going to be excellent platforms for deep learning training because the lower precision we need for deep learning training is going to be amazingly fast on these machines. And that’s true. But as we look towards the future, we’re trying to understand what’s the mix going to be between simulation use cases for future hardware and machine learning use cases or AI use cases. In order to explore that more deeply we’re going set up a testbed for the advanced AI hardware coming out of startups like Cerebras, Samba Nova, Groq and Graphcore and others.

We’re interested in taking the models that we’re developing for scientific applications that might be dealing with types of data that are different from internet applications or just standard computer vision, and the types of architecture models that we need for those [scientific] problems, and use those as test cases on this new hardware. We’ll use those test cases on this new hardware and try to learn from their relative performance and functionality to feed forward into future architectures that would combine traditional processing elements with accelerators for AI. So that’s kind of how the hardware piece fits.

HPCwire: Are there any examples of the hardware you’re working with now and the problems you’ve now started to attack on it, and what advantages it brings to it?

Image courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory.

Stevens: My team’s been working a lot with Cerebras. We have Cerebas’ CS1. That’s the world’s largest chip with 1.2 trillion transistors, and hundreds of thousands of cores. We’ve got several different models running on that. We have a cancer-drug response prediction model that’s running many hundreds of times faster on that chip than it runs on a conventional GPU. We have a gravity wave detection code that’s also running many times faster than the GPU on this platform. That’s a code is used for processing things like LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory) data looking for signals to gravity waves. We have materials design [projects] as well. We have about a dozen projects in the pipeline.

HPCwire: This seems to suggests that even near term some of the better devices used for advanced AI will be different from traditional CPU-GPU approaches. Is that a fair assumption?

Stevens: I think the way to look at it is the architectures that we’re doing the bulk of the work on now, which are primarily CPU- GPU-based and have been around for a bunch of years, are proven. The software stack on them is quite good. The support for deep learning frameworks is very robust. It’s really the current standard platform, right. And, we’ve got machines coming, like Frontier and Aurora, and so on that will have next generation versions of that technology and they’re going to be super at that.

The great thing about the GPUs is they’re quite general purpose. We can use them for machine learning. We can also use them for vector processing, solving, simulations. If you look at how far can you push computer architecture, the only thing you’re trying to do, and it’s critically important to get this right, is if all you’re doing is deep learning training, or deep learning inference, how much faster can you go than a GPU? That’s more or less the question we’re trying to answer with these AI hardware platforms. There’s dozens of companies now making those platforms.

The thing to be careful of is that in the future we will still need to do an enormous amount of simulation and we’ll need general purpose machines for that. Everything that we invented over the last 20-30 years including HPC has been essentially on general purpose machines. What we’re trying to understand is what is the tradeoff between general purpose hardware – whether it’s a GPU or extensions to CPUs like vector extensions like on the Japanese machine – versus these very special purpose accelerators that essentially are good at only one thing, which is a training or inference in deep learning. How would they fit into the ecosystem? It’s unlikely that we would have a system that only has those accelerators, because it would be very limited in what we could do with it.

On the other hand, if we can learn what are the key features of those accelerators that give them the most of the of the bang for the buck if you want to think of it that way, we can think about how architectures might converge in the future? That’s really the end game that we’re aiming at. So it might be future hardware systems, like in the 2025 kind of timeframe, have not just CPUs and GPUs, but they might have a lot of these specialized accelerators also in the architecture. Getting that mix exactly right is one of the questions. Like what’s the right ratio? What are the types of applications that would be good or bad on that kind of architecture.

So that’s kind of the pathfinding work that we’re doing. It’s also likely that some of the accelerator ideas that are in dedicated hardware will find their way into more general-purpose platforms like future GPUs or CPUs. There’s a number of us have been spending a lot of time talking about that. There’s even a bet that I’ll tell you about some time over beer on how that might play out. I think that what we’re discovering, what’s so exciting about this, is that even though Moore’s Law is slowing down and it’s becoming harder to do things, the number of architectural ideas in circulation right now has never been greater in some sense. I mean, maybe back in the 60s, it was larger when people were inventing everything (IT-related) then.

HPCwire: That all sounds positive.

Stevens: Well, we’re suddenly in this realm where we literally have 100 companies trying to come up with new architectures all chasing the AI target. And it’s already unclear to me right now, in some fundamental sense, whether we have the right algorithms. If the hardware is prematurely optimized for the current algorithms, right, the current methods, that could backfire because we keep inventing new methods. At the same time, for certain problems, there may be cases where I can just do something I wanted to do on accelerators that I can also do on the other machine but it’s just taking a lot longer. It’s super important to actually have these [new devices] in our labs and made available to our community. We, and the DoE, have this incredible environment where we have access to the best of all these worlds and are in a great position to actually evaluate them.

HPCwire: Your point about algorithms is interesting. Along those lines will the AI for Science program have a software component, a sort of analog to the Exascale Computing Project which focuses on the needed software ecosystem to support exascale?

Stevens: We’re still trying to work out what the specific program elements are. Certainly we’ll need big pushes on what you would call an application, where there’s a domain facing activity. AI for specific kinds of problems, whether materials or chemistry or physics or astrophysics, or whatever. You can imagine there will be pieces like that. There is a need for a new type of software infrastructure that connects all this stuff together and helps us manage large amounts of data. Or it’s, you know, huge libraries of thousands of models or millions of models. It creates a whole ecosystem around a new currency, which is kind of data and models. That’s different from what we currently have.

Clearly there will be revisions of workflows too which include significant AI components, whether that’s in experimental science or whether it’s AI that helps us write code. The latter is already starting to happen, having AI systems that are helping debug codes or tune codes or translate codes or even sometimes writing code directly. That’s going to change the software development process, which in the context of like exascale is pretty much the same way we’ve been doing things for a long time. Exascale is not really changing how we do software development but the AI initiative will probably do that.

Of course, the [existing] simulation and the existing software stacks and libraries, none of that has to go away because much of how we’re going to use AI is actually coupled to the traditional scientific computing software stack.

HPCwire: But AI will itself become a major part of the software development paradigm?

Stevens: Probably the right way to think about this is that all these things [software development process and components] are going to be augmented with AI. There’ll be many applications that are kind of AI-centric, machine learning-centric; some that will still be simulation-centric; and some will be hybrid. Software environments [are likely] to evolve from the kind of batch oriented traditional simulation towards these more real time interactive, collaborative or shared, resources that support a much larger number of projects simultaneously. The underlying system software and the hardware will have to evolve to support these new workloads.

We know from the exascale [experience] that we can have reasonable success with the current organizational model, right, where in applications and software and kind of hardware investments as a project. And then the facilities, acquisitions kind of in the initiative. But I think with AI, the one thing that we’re starting to understand is that we need a bit more research. I say a bit more but probably a lot more research so rather than moving quickly to a formal kind of project, I think it will have to incubate in research mode a bit longer.

HPCwire: Are there good examples now of AI writing code or tuning code you can cite?

Stevens: There’s quite a few that are starting to pop up. One of the big use cases at Argonne, Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and Livermore is to use large scale computing, with deep learning, to optimize other deep learning network design. In deep learning, you write a lot of code, but you’re often trying to improve the model architecture; the number of layers and the topology of the neural network that you’re building. It turns out that deep learning is really good at doing that problem. So think of it as AI writing AI. That use case is becoming very common. We’re doing that now on Summit. We’re doing it now on Theta. This is a routine thing that we’re doing to improve our models by using a different AI model to actually design the new AI model. In some cases you get incredible boost in improvements in wall clock performance or accuracy. I mean by factors of two or five or something like that.

So the models were for a problem in cancer in natural language processing problems, and then another was for the climate data, and it was applied to a problem in cosmology. It’s a very general technique and can be used pretty much all domains in which deep learning can be applied. There’s actually a fair amount of work going on and not just in the labs. It’s happening in industry where this idea of having coded systems is gaining traction.

HPCwire: We haven’t talked much about applications. One area that has been receiving attention is the potential to use AI for facilities and systems management. Thoughts on how DoE could leverage that?

Stevens: DoE runs about 27 or so user facilities and many of these are experimental user facilities, like the light sources, neutron sources and things like that. There, the principal idea is we’re often collecting data that has to be post-processed. One thing you could do is use machine learning methods to do post processing very quickly. Or you could use machine learning or maybe reinforcement learning to control the configuration of the experiment to collect data in a more efficient way. There are many dozens of ways of using machine learning there. So that’s an experimental side. We can also use AI methods to monitor and manage HPC systems and to optimize data paths, data flows, workflows, and so on.

So we’re starting to see the need to think differently about how we operate these facilities. There’s applications in the kind of control data reduction space that are starting to gain traction. One of them is in what I call complex experiment control and there are two examples that are already out there.

One is in fusion where deep learning models are able to predict the future state of the plasma, you know, many milliseconds in advance. They can predict pretty accurately if that plasma is going to go unstable. The reason that’s kind of cool, is that humans can’t do that. We can’t look at the diagnostic data coming off the test reactors and predict what’s going to happen. I mean, it just happens too fast. Properly trained, the network can do that. The next step there is trying to interface that to the control system so not only is it going to predict when something’s going to go unstable, it can control the reactor to move away from that zone so maybe it would not crash. Doing that involves taking these deep neural networks and interfacing them with classical control systems or maybe replacing that class control system with a different way to do control.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

U.S. CTO Michael Kratsios Adds DoD Research & Engineering Title

July 13, 2020

Michael Kratsios, the U.S. Chief Technology Officer, has been appointed acting Undersecretary of Defense for research and engineering. He replaces Mike Griffin, who along with his deputy Lis Porter, stepped down last wee Read more…

By John Russell

Supercomputer Research Reveals Star Cluster Born Outside Our Galaxy

July 11, 2020

The Milky Way is our galactic home, containing our solar system and continuing into a giant band of densely packed stars that stretches across clear night skies around the world – but, it turns out, not all of those st Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Max Planck Society Begins Installation of Liquid-Cooled Supercomputer from Lenovo

July 9, 2020

Lenovo announced today that it is supplying a new high performance computer to the Max Planck Society, one of Germany's premier research organizations. Comprised of Intel Xeon processors and Nvidia A100 GPUs, and featuri Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Xilinx Announces First Adaptive Computing Challenge

July 9, 2020

A new contest is challenging the computing world. Xilinx has announced the first Xilinx Adaptive Computing Challenge, a competition that will task developers and startups with finding creative workload acceleration solutions. Xilinx is running the Adaptive Computing Challenge in partnership with, a developing community... Read more…

By Staff report

Reviving Moore’s Law? LBNL Researchers See Promise in Heterostructure Oxides

July 9, 2020

The reality of Moore’s law’s decline is no longer doubted for good empirical reasons. That said, never say never. Recent work by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory researchers suggests heterostructure oxides may b Read more…

By John Russell

AWS Solution Channel

Best Practices for Running Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Workloads on AWS

The scalable nature and variable demand of CFD workloads makes them well-suited for a cloud computing environment. Many of the AWS instance types, such as the compute family instance types, are designed to include support for this type of workload.  Read more…

Intel® HPC + AI Pavilion

Supercomputing the Pandemic: Scientific Community Tackles COVID-19 from Multiple Perspectives

Since their inception, supercomputers have taken on the biggest, most complex, and most data-intensive computing challenges—from confirming Einstein’s theories about gravitational waves to predicting the impacts of climate change. Read more…

President’s Council Targets AI, Quantum, STEM; Recommends Spending Growth

July 9, 2020

Last week the President Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) met (webinar) to review policy recommendations around three sub-committee reports: 1) Industries of the Future (IotF), chaired be Dario Gil (d Read more…

By John Russell

Max Planck Society Begins Installation of Liquid-Cooled Supercomputer from Lenovo

July 9, 2020

Lenovo announced today that it is supplying a new high performance computer to the Max Planck Society, one of Germany's premier research organizations. Comprise Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

President’s Council Targets AI, Quantum, STEM; Recommends Spending Growth

July 9, 2020

Last week the President Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) met (webinar) to review policy recommendations around three sub-committee reports: Read more…

By John Russell

Google Cloud Debuts 16-GPU Ampere A100 Instances

July 7, 2020

On the heels of the Nvidia’s Ampere A100 GPU launch in May, Google Cloud is announcing alpha availability of the A100 “Accelerator Optimized” VM A2 instance family on Google Compute Engine. The instances are powered by the HGX A100 16-GPU platform, which combines two HGX A100 8-GPU baseboards using... Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Q&A: HLRS’s Bastian Koller Tackles HPC and Industry in Germany and Europe

July 6, 2020

In this exclusive interview for HPCwire – sadly not face to face – Steve Conway, senior advisor for Hyperion Research, talks with Dr.-Ing Bastian Koller about the state of HPC and its collaboration with Industry in Europe. Koller is a familiar figure in HPC. He is the managing director at High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS) and also serves... Read more…

By Steve Conway, Hyperion

OpenPOWER Reboot – New Director, New Silicon Partners, Leveraging Linux Foundation Connections

July 2, 2020

Earlier this week the OpenPOWER Foundation announced the contribution of IBM’s A21 Power processor core design to the open source community. Roughly this time Read more…

By John Russell

Hyperion Forecast – Headwinds in 2020 Won’t Stifle Cloud HPC Adoption or Arm’s Rise

June 30, 2020

The semiannual taking of HPC’s pulse by Hyperion Research – late fall at SC and early summer at ISC – is a much-watched indicator of things come. This yea Read more…

By John Russell

Racism and HPC: a Special Podcast

June 29, 2020

Promoting greater diversity in HPC is a much-discussed goal and ostensibly a long-sought goal in HPC. Yet it seems clear HPC is far from achieving this goal. Re Read more…

Top500 Trends: Movement on Top, but Record Low Turnover

June 25, 2020

The 55th installment of the Top500 list saw strong activity in the leadership segment with four new systems in the top ten and a crowning achievement from the f Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Supercomputer Modeling Tests How COVID-19 Spreads in Grocery Stores

April 8, 2020

In the COVID-19 era, many people are treating simple activities like getting gas or groceries with caution as they try to heed social distancing mandates and protect their own health. Still, significant uncertainty surrounds the relative risk of different activities, and conflicting information is prevalent. A team of Finnish researchers set out to address some of these uncertainties by... Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

[email protected] Turns Its Massive Crowdsourced Computer Network Against COVID-19

March 16, 2020

For gamers, fighting against a global crisis is usually pure fantasy – but now, it’s looking more like a reality. As supercomputers around the world spin up Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

[email protected] Rallies a Legion of Computers Against the Coronavirus

March 24, 2020

Last week, we highlighted [email protected], a massive, crowdsourced computer network that has turned its resources against the coronavirus pandemic sweeping the globe – but [email protected] isn’t the only game in town. The internet is buzzing with crowdsourced computing... Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Supercomputer Simulations Reveal the Fate of the Neanderthals

May 25, 2020

For hundreds of thousands of years, neanderthals roamed the planet, eventually (almost 50,000 years ago) giving way to homo sapiens, which quickly became the do Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

DoE Expands on Role of COVID-19 Supercomputing Consortium

March 25, 2020

After announcing the launch of the COVID-19 High Performance Computing Consortium on Sunday, the Department of Energy yesterday provided more details on its sco Read more…

By John Russell

Neocortex Will Be First-of-Its-Kind 800,000-Core AI Supercomputer

June 9, 2020

Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC - a joint research organization of Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh) has won a $5 million award Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Honeywell’s Big Bet on Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

April 7, 2020

Honeywell doesn’t spring to mind when thinking of quantum computing pioneers, but a decade ago the high-tech conglomerate better known for its control systems waded deliberately into the then calmer quantum computing (QC) waters. Fast forward to March when Honeywell announced plans to introduce an ion trap-based quantum computer whose ‘performance’ would... Read more…

By John Russell

10nm, 7nm, 5nm…. Should the Chip Nanometer Metric Be Replaced?

June 1, 2020

The biggest cool factor in server chips is the nanometer. AMD beating Intel to a CPU built on a 7nm process node* – with 5nm and 3nm on the way – has been i Read more…

By Doug Black

Leading Solution Providers


Nvidia’s Ampere A100 GPU: Up to 2.5X the HPC, 20X the AI

May 14, 2020

Nvidia's first Ampere-based graphics card, the A100 GPU, packs a whopping 54 billion transistors on 826mm2 of silicon, making it the world's largest seven-nanom Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

‘Billion Molecules Against COVID-19’ Challenge to Launch with Massive Supercomputing Support

April 22, 2020

Around the world, supercomputing centers have spun up and opened their doors for COVID-19 research in what may be the most unified supercomputing effort in hist Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

Australian Researchers Break All-Time Internet Speed Record

May 26, 2020

If you’ve been stuck at home for the last few months, you’ve probably become more attuned to the quality (or lack thereof) of your internet connection. Even Read more…

By Oliver Peckham

15 Slides on Programming Aurora and Exascale Systems

May 7, 2020

Sometime in 2021, Aurora, the first planned U.S. exascale system, is scheduled to be fired up at Argonne National Laboratory. Cray (now HPE) and Intel are the k Read more…

By John Russell

Summit Supercomputer is Already Making its Mark on Science

September 20, 2018

Summit, now the fastest supercomputer in the world, is quickly making its mark in science – five of the six finalists just announced for the prestigious 2018 Read more…

By John Russell

TACC Supercomputers Run Simulations Illuminating COVID-19, DNA Replication

March 19, 2020

As supercomputers around the world spin up to combat the coronavirus, the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) is announcing results that may help to illumina Read more…

By Staff report

$100B Plan Submitted for Massive Remake and Expansion of NSF

May 27, 2020

Legislation to reshape, expand - and rename - the National Science Foundation has been submitted in both the U.S. House and Senate. The proposal, which seems to Read more…

By John Russell

John Martinis Reportedly Leaves Google Quantum Effort

April 21, 2020

John Martinis, who led Google’s quantum computing effort since establishing its quantum hardware group in 2014, has left Google after being moved into an advi Read more…

By John Russell

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This