ROI: Is HPC Worth It? What Can We Actually Measure?

By Addison Snell, Intersect360 Research

October 15, 2020

Editor’s Note: Intense disagreement and debate are powerful forces, which when productively applied, can often clarify issues. Though not always. At HPCwire, we’re hoping the arguments presented here clarify. Measuring ROI, it turns out, is often tricky and subject to dispute. This is very true for HPC whose deployment is rarely inexpensive or easy and whose influence on favorable outcomes may be difficult to quantify. The HPC payoff, we’re told, is worth the effort, and intuitively, this certainly seems the case. Think of breakthroughs (LIGO) enabled by HPC in science and payoffs delivered by HPC for industry (successful oil exploration and hedge fund trading).

In this commentary, Intersect360 Research CEO Addison Snell, disagrees with Hyperion Research’s approach to measuring ROI. Both Hyperion (formerly IDC’s HPC practice) and Intersect360 have long standing and significant influence in the HPC world. Both are well-respected. Hyperion’s ROI study – an ongoing effort begun with a government contract – is widely circulated including by HPCwire. It is because the Hyperion ROI measure is so widely circulated that HPCwire agreed to publish this commentary at Intersect360’s request. Hyperion argues its ROI tracking measure is well-considered and a good guide for HPC users.

HPC enables innovation and discovery. We all seem to agree on that. Is there a good way to quantify how much that’s worth?

Thanks to a sponsored white paper citing it, the annual “ROI of HPC” study from Hyperion Research is making the rounds again. It breathtakingly reports that organizations investing in HPC can expect a staggering, average return on investment of 4,300%: $44 dollars in profits and $463 in revenue for every dollar spent on high performance computing.

Let’s get this part out of the way now: Nothing in the corporate world has an average ROI of 4,300%. If there were such a thing, companies would do little else. The real goal of the study isn’t to measure actual ROI, but rather to make the case that HPC has quantifiable value. That brings up the interesting question: Does it?

The Real ROI of HPC

Addison Snell, CEO, Intersect360 Research

The true ROI of HPC investment isn’t nearly so high. The problem is, it is also terribly difficult to measure. The formula for ROI is simple: net profit over total investment. We have a good sense of total HPC investment, but for the types of projects in which HPC is deployed, this isn’t the same as total investment. There are costs beyond the HPC itself. I can’t sell an ice cream cone without ice cream, but I also can’t sell one without a cone, and what about the cost of the freezer?

ROI is therefore typically measured at the project or business unit level. We can assess the ROI of, say, opening a new store, or launching a new product line, but it’s hard to figure the ROI of individual expenses like computers.

For this reason, many companies will measure large investments against a corporate hurdle rate, maybe 12% or 15%, and will okay investments that are projected to beat it. Such calculations take into account the organizational discount rate, related to cost of capital, to account for the notion that a dollar today beats a dollar tomorrow.

Furthermore, any true ROI study measures marginal investment; i.e., the expected return of the next dollar spent. Going from zero to $100,000 will have a very different return than going from $100.0 million to $100.1 million.

Additionally, there’s a problem with addressing ROI at an industry level, because secondary demand stimulation (i.e., stealing market share) is zero sum. For certain investments, this can even lead to prisoner’s dilemmas.

Say Katherine and Mitchell operate competing lemonade stands on a beach, earning equal profits. If Katherine buys a sunshade, she can steal some of Mitchell’s customers, more than enough to pay for the sunshade. But if Mitchell also buys a sunshade, the profit shares don’t change, and no additional customers exist. Both spend money for no additional return.

All this is to suggest, (a) measuring ROI is complicated, (b) for something like HPC, it may be a flawed question, and (c) assuming companies are rational, the true ROI of HPC investments may be a healthy 20% to 40% (more than two orders of magnitude less than reported by Hyperion’s study).

What Can We Measure?

Companies that invest in HPC tend to continue to invest in HPC. There must be a financial reason why. This importance of HPC to U.S. industry was addressed in 2014 in a landmark Intersect360 Research study through the U.S. Council on Competitiveness, “Solve. The Exascale Effect: The Benefits of Supercomputing Investment for U.S. Industry.”

In that study, 86% of respondents agreed with the statement, “HPC is critical to the future direction of our business.” 79% agreed with “For some of our problems, HPC methods are the only practical solution.” (See Figure.)  But despite the significant assertion of value, companies often found it challenging to justify HPC investments internally, and they put forward a diversity of arguments for the justification. 19% of the time it’s ROI, but this is mixed in with time to solution, inability to solve the problem by other means, and lowered costs, among others. (See Figure.)

This left me to ponder other evidence to prove the value of HPC. It turns out, Intersect360 Research has already been running a study on this, for more than ten years.

Intersect360 Research has been surveying HPC users regularly since our founding (as Tabor Research) in 2007. In most surveys, we gather HPC budget data, in bands of spending, for demographic purposes. There are hundreds of organizations that have answered our surveys multiple times. Many of them are publicly-traded companies. In total, we identified 58 public companies that have provided HPC budget data to Intersect360 Research in more than one year, 2007 through 2018. (This excludes several Indian companies traded on the NSE, BSE, or OTC of India, which resulted in dramatic outliers. Furthermore, we exclude 2019 and 2020 responses to allow analysis of post-survey performance.)

In the charts below, we map these companies’ share prices, taking one data point per year, against the Dow Jones Industrial Average, grouping the companies into three categories: those that reported increases or temporary increases in HPC spending, those that reported decreases or temporary decreases in HPC spending, and those with stable HPC spending, according to the budget bands in our surveys. The results are intriguing.

Relative Stock Price by Year with HPC Budget Changes, Intersect360 Research, 2020

Relative Stock Price by Year with HPC Budget Changes – Increasing Budgets Only, Intersect360 Research, 2020

Relative Stock Price by Year with HPC Budget Changes – Stable Budgets Only, Intersect360 Research, 2020

Relative Stock Price by Year with HPC Budget Changes – Decreasing Budgets Only, Intersect360 Research, 2020

I’ll cut to the punch line: Some companies do well, and some not so well. Visually, there’s no correlation between increasing HPC budgets and increasing stock prices. We need to look at the numbers more carefully.

As a group, these are all HPC users. If you invested $1,000 across this portfolio of companies beginning in 2005, it would be worth $2,671 today. Investing in the Dow Jones portfolio would get you $2,590. The HPC users pictured here beat the DJIA by 0.2% per year. On average, the group tracks the market.

The best subgroup is those companies whose budgets increased over the time span. $1,000 invested in that subgroup would be worth $3,347—that’s a measurable 1.7% better than the DJIA.

Can we conclude the increase in budget is the cause of the stock price growth? Not yet.  We can also look at when the growth came: before or after the change in budget?

Across this data set, there are 82 points at which HPC budgets change from their previous bands—41 upward, and 41 downward. (This even distribution, it itself, implies there is no dramatic profit directly gained from HPC investment.) For each group, we looked at what happened to stock price in the two years prior to the reported change, and in the three years afterward.

On average, companies’ share prices do well—better than market performance—in the two years prior to a reported HPC budget increase. Conversely, average share prices are flat—worse than market performance—in the two years prior to a reported HPC budget decrease. There is a correlation between HPC budget changes and recent market performance.

This is no surprise. How many readers of this article have experienced this? Company does poorly one year; budgets get cut the next year. It’s commonplace. But here’s an interesting tidbit: Of those companies who reported budget increases, the recent stock price change was heavily polarized; some companies invested more in HPC when their stock prices were down sharply. This could be seen as an additional investment in HPC in order to change processes or to reduce costs.

Looking forward, however, there is no correlation. The three-year average stock performance of companies after an increase in HPC budget is no different from those following a decrease, a little below average market performance for the relevant years.

What It All Means

If there’s no indication that companies that increase their investments in HPC do better than companies that don’t, does that mean HPC isn’t worth it? Of course not. Just look at the Solve report. HPC is critical to those who use it. For many of these companies, HPC is part of the cost of doing business. At worst, it is the sunshades of the lemonade stands in the example above, spurring innovative competition that benefits consumers.

That said, any report that implies there is inherent automatic profitability in HPC investment (let alone 4,300%) is not only wrong, it’s irresponsible. Fortunately, most companies are managed intelligently, and we can assume that increases in HPC investment, on average, clear their hurdle rates. Companies keep buying HPC because they know it’s worth it, and more companies adopt HPC every year.

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industry updates delivered to you every week!

Empowering High-Performance Computing for Artificial Intelligence

April 19, 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents some of the most challenging demands in information technology, especially concerning computing power and data movement. As a result of these challenges, high-performance computing Read more…

Kathy Yelick on Post-Exascale Challenges

April 18, 2024

With the exascale era underway, the HPC community is already turning its attention to zettascale computing, the next of the 1,000-fold performance leaps that have occurred about once a decade. With this in mind, the ISC Read more…

2024 Winter Classic: Texas Two Step

April 18, 2024

Texas Tech University. Their middle name is ‘tech’, so it’s no surprise that they’ve been fielding not one, but two teams in the last three Winter Classic cluster competitions. Their teams, dubbed Matador and Red Read more…

2024 Winter Classic: The Return of Team Fayetteville

April 18, 2024

Hailing from Fayetteville, NC, Fayetteville State University stayed under the radar in their first Winter Classic competition in 2022. Solid students for sure, but not a lot of HPC experience. All good. They didn’t Read more…

Software Specialist Horizon Quantum to Build First-of-a-Kind Hardware Testbed

April 18, 2024

Horizon Quantum Computing, a Singapore-based quantum software start-up, announced today it would build its own testbed of quantum computers, starting with use of Rigetti’s Novera 9-qubit QPU. The approach by a quantum Read more…

2024 Winter Classic: Meet Team Morehouse

April 17, 2024

Morehouse College? The university is well-known for their long list of illustrious graduates, the rigor of their academics, and the quality of the instruction. They were one of the first schools to sign up for the Winter Read more…

Kathy Yelick on Post-Exascale Challenges

April 18, 2024

With the exascale era underway, the HPC community is already turning its attention to zettascale computing, the next of the 1,000-fold performance leaps that ha Read more…

Software Specialist Horizon Quantum to Build First-of-a-Kind Hardware Testbed

April 18, 2024

Horizon Quantum Computing, a Singapore-based quantum software start-up, announced today it would build its own testbed of quantum computers, starting with use o Read more…

MLCommons Launches New AI Safety Benchmark Initiative

April 16, 2024

MLCommons, organizer of the popular MLPerf benchmarking exercises (training and inference), is starting a new effort to benchmark AI Safety, one of the most pre Read more…

Exciting Updates From Stanford HAI’s Seventh Annual AI Index Report

April 15, 2024

As the AI revolution marches on, it is vital to continually reassess how this technology is reshaping our world. To that end, researchers at Stanford’s Instit Read more…

Intel’s Vision Advantage: Chips Are Available Off-the-Shelf

April 11, 2024

The chip market is facing a crisis: chip development is now concentrated in the hands of the few. A confluence of events this week reminded us how few chips Read more…

The VC View: Quantonation’s Deep Dive into Funding Quantum Start-ups

April 11, 2024

Yesterday Quantonation — which promotes itself as a one-of-a-kind venture capital (VC) company specializing in quantum science and deep physics  — announce Read more…

Nvidia’s GTC Is the New Intel IDF

April 9, 2024

After many years, Nvidia's GPU Technology Conference (GTC) was back in person and has become the conference for those who care about semiconductors and AI. I Read more…

Google Announces Homegrown ARM-based CPUs 

April 9, 2024

Google sprang a surprise at the ongoing Google Next Cloud conference by introducing its own ARM-based CPU called Axion, which will be offered to customers in it Read more…

Nvidia H100: Are 550,000 GPUs Enough for This Year?

August 17, 2023

The GPU Squeeze continues to place a premium on Nvidia H100 GPUs. In a recent Financial Times article, Nvidia reports that it expects to ship 550,000 of its lat Read more…

Synopsys Eats Ansys: Does HPC Get Indigestion?

February 8, 2024

Recently, it was announced that Synopsys is buying HPC tool developer Ansys. Started in Pittsburgh, Pa., in 1970 as Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc. (SASI) by John Swanson (and eventually renamed), Ansys serves the CAE (Computer Aided Engineering)/multiphysics engineering simulation market. Read more…

Intel’s Server and PC Chip Development Will Blur After 2025

January 15, 2024

Intel's dealing with much more than chip rivals breathing down its neck; it is simultaneously integrating a bevy of new technologies such as chiplets, artificia Read more…

Choosing the Right GPU for LLM Inference and Training

December 11, 2023

Accelerating the training and inference processes of deep learning models is crucial for unleashing their true potential and NVIDIA GPUs have emerged as a game- Read more…

Baidu Exits Quantum, Closely Following Alibaba’s Earlier Move

January 5, 2024

Reuters reported this week that Baidu, China’s giant e-commerce and services provider, is exiting the quantum computing development arena. Reuters reported � Read more…

Comparing NVIDIA A100 and NVIDIA L40S: Which GPU is Ideal for AI and Graphics-Intensive Workloads?

October 30, 2023

With long lead times for the NVIDIA H100 and A100 GPUs, many organizations are looking at the new NVIDIA L40S GPU, which it’s a new GPU optimized for AI and g Read more…

Shutterstock 1179408610

Google Addresses the Mysteries of Its Hypercomputer 

December 28, 2023

When Google launched its Hypercomputer earlier this month (December 2023), the first reaction was, "Say what?" It turns out that the Hypercomputer is Google's t Read more…


How AMD May Get Across the CUDA Moat

October 5, 2023

When discussing GenAI, the term "GPU" almost always enters the conversation and the topic often moves toward performance and access. Interestingly, the word "GPU" is assumed to mean "Nvidia" products. (As an aside, the popular Nvidia hardware used in GenAI are not technically... Read more…

Leading Solution Providers


Shutterstock 1606064203

Meta’s Zuckerberg Puts Its AI Future in the Hands of 600,000 GPUs

January 25, 2024

In under two minutes, Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, laid out the company's AI plans, which included a plan to build an artificial intelligence system with the eq Read more…

China Is All In on a RISC-V Future

January 8, 2024

The state of RISC-V in China was discussed in a recent report released by the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. The report, entitled "E Read more…

Shutterstock 1285747942

AMD’s Horsepower-packed MI300X GPU Beats Nvidia’s Upcoming H200

December 7, 2023

AMD and Nvidia are locked in an AI performance battle – much like the gaming GPU performance clash the companies have waged for decades. AMD has claimed it Read more…

Nvidia’s New Blackwell GPU Can Train AI Models with Trillions of Parameters

March 18, 2024

Nvidia's latest and fastest GPU, codenamed Blackwell, is here and will underpin the company's AI plans this year. The chip offers performance improvements from Read more…

Eyes on the Quantum Prize – D-Wave Says its Time is Now

January 30, 2024

Early quantum computing pioneer D-Wave again asserted – that at least for D-Wave – the commercial quantum era has begun. Speaking at its first in-person Ana Read more…

GenAI Having Major Impact on Data Culture, Survey Says

February 21, 2024

While 2023 was the year of GenAI, the adoption rates for GenAI did not match expectations. Most organizations are continuing to invest in GenAI but are yet to Read more…

The GenAI Datacenter Squeeze Is Here

February 1, 2024

The immediate effect of the GenAI GPU Squeeze was to reduce availability, either direct purchase or cloud access, increase cost, and push demand through the roof. A secondary issue has been developing over the last several years. Even though your organization secured several racks... Read more…

Intel’s Xeon General Manager Talks about Server Chips 

January 2, 2024

Intel is talking data-center growth and is done digging graves for its dead enterprise products, including GPUs, storage, and networking products, which fell to Read more…

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow