D-Wave Embraces Gate-Based Quantum Computing; Charts Path Forward

By John Russell

October 21, 2021

Earlier this month D-Wave Systems, the quantum computing pioneer that has long championed quantum annealing-based quantum computing (and sometimes taken heat for that approach), announced it was expanding into gate-based quantum computing.

Surprised? Perhaps we shouldn’t be. Spun out of the University of British Columbia in 1999, D-Wave initially targeted gate-based quantum computing and discovered how hard it would be to develop. The company strategy morphed early on.

Mark Johnson, D-Wave

“I joined in 2005 when the company was first transitioning from a gate-model focus to quantum annealing focus,” recalled Mark Johnson, now vice president of quantum technologies and systems products. “There was still this picture that we wanted to find the most direct path to providing valuable quantum applications and we felt that quantum annealing was the was the way to do that. We felt the gate model was maybe 20 years away.”

That was then. Today, buoyed by its experience and success in building semiconductor-based superconducting qubits for annealing systems – notably its systems engineering and on-chip control circuitry expertise, according to Johnson – D-Wave seeks to enter the gate-based market. At its recent annual user meeting, Qubits (virtual), the company spelled out its plans under the banner of Clarity Roadmap.

Much of the roadmap is a continuation of D-Wave’s quantum annealing systems. While makers of gate-based quantum computers struggle to get to 100 qubits, D-Wave has a 5000-qubit system, with 15-way qubit interconnect technology, and is planning a 7000-qubit system. However, quantum annealing and gate-based systems are very different beasts. So-called universal gate-based system quantum computers of the kind being pursued by IBM, Rigetti, Google and others are more flexible and can handle wide range of applications They are the end game.

Quantum annealing systems, such as D-Wave’s Advantage system, have been shown they can solve select optimization problems very well, and in a more direct, less-complicated way than gate-based systems. D-Wave is hardly walking away from quantum annealing computing.

“There’s a growing body of theoretical work now highlighting the fact that quantum annealing is likely always going to be the best approach towards optimization and that’s not what I think we all thought five or ten years ago,” said Johnson, “That’s significant to us and we’ve seen that with a broad range of actually useful customer applications.” In this context, useful customer applications are really more proto-applications (logistics, biopharma, etc.) and no one is using them in production. Still, Johnson believes some apps will be in production in the 1-to-2-year timeframe.

Most of the news around D-Wave’s quantum annealing branch was covered in its press release, which HPCwire posted (D-Wave Details Product Expansion and Cross-Platform Roadmap.) Johnson’s briefing of HPCwire focused on D-Wave move into gate-based quantum computing: why do it now; considerations that drove sticking with superconducting qubit technology and not something else; and a walk-through D-Wave’s five-phase roadmap to develop gate-based systems.

“Let me say this. What we’re proposing to do is going to be hard, right, it’s going to be very hard. There are a lot of very strong competitors in that space. So it’s going to be challenging, but we think we think that our approach is really the strongest,” said Johnson.

So Why Now?

D-Wave contends its work building larger many-thousand-qubit quantum annealing systems has uniquely prepared it for tackling the scale-up problems bogging down gate-based quantum development. Most observers agree that cramming thousands (or millions) of cables into icy-cold dilution refrigerator to control qubits is impractical long-term, and there are many efforts (Intel and Microsoft are just two) to develop cryo-controller chips.

“It looks like we’re going to need hundreds of thousands of qubits and I don’t see how we can connect all the qubits to all the room temperature electronics [with cables]. The only practical, scalable way to develop a gate model system is with some kind of integrated fabrication stack. We think of superconducting-based qubits and a multilayer (3D), integrated circuit fabrication stack, that requires also a lot of investment and understanding of materials and understanding of how to improve coherence. This is exactly what we’re doing for quantum annealing,” said Johnson.

“When we started digging into it, there was a lot of overlap. Many of the problems were very similar. A lot of the technology that we had developed around on-chip integrated control circuitry –  for example, the cold superconducting classical circuits necessary for doing things like homogenizing manufacturing variations across multiple qubits that allowed us to scalable IO so you don’t have several wires for every qubit. The ability to do this sort of de-multiplexed, efficient control of many, thousands or tens of thousands of devices with a just few hundred wires. All of that was necessary to integrate and develop quantum annealing on a [large] scale,” said Johnson.

He didn’t detail the techniques that D-Wave has developed for noise mitigation and signal control but D-Wave has fielded much larger quantum annealing-based systems than those of its gate-based rivals whose systems still hover around 50-60 qubits. Quantum annealing qubits and controls are very different from their gate-based system counterparts, but Johnson says the lessons learned by D-Wave are broadly applicable.

Why Not Ion Trap or Photonics?

It’s perhaps not surprising that D-Wave has chosen to bet on semiconductor-based superconducting qubit technology. That’s what it knows. But there are other choices.

“We tried to take an open-minded look at other qubit technologies because there are some benefits there. There’s the trapped ion approach, and that has some benefits that nature’s ions are all the same. But you move the challenge to a different part of the system. There’s not really a way of getting more than 100 ions in one trap. Then you’re going to have to have multiple traps. And how much have we really demonstrated [the ability] of an algorithm that uses multiple traps? We’ve maybe demonstrated entanglement between them but not practical use of two or three in a single algorithm. When we looked at some of that, we saw difficult challenges in terms of scaling up,” he said.

PsiQuantum wafer

“Then photonics has its own set of challenges. Photons are nice and clean and you can hold information in coherence for a long time. But the flip side of that is it’s hard to do gates with them. They need to be able to interact, and you need some common nonlinearities, and you’ve got to now bring in some kind of atomics to do the interactions. Now, you’ve added another layer of complexity. There are good efforts on all of these different all these different qubit modality threads.”

Another factor in deciding to stick with superconducting quits, said Johnson, was looking at how the different qubit modalities perform on specific applications.

“One thing we did to try and understand [the potential of different qubit approaches] is to look at a problem. So, hypothetically, based on what we know now, factoring a 2000-bit number. You go out and look at the literature and what folks are doing on these system evaluations. With the superconducting model, just sort of using numbers that you can see from the Google effort or the IBM effort or what we can achieve with superconducting technology, you’ve got something on the order of quarter of a day [to perform the calculation].

“But if you do the same analysis, and I’m just looking at what’s been published for trapped ions [and] for photonics, you get to something like on the order of 100 days, once you build it out and look at all the overhead that’s necessary,” he said.

No doubt developers of ion trap such as IonQ and developers of photonics quantum computers such as PsiQuantum have a different view and in fairness to them, it seems like performance metrics, both generally and on specific applications, will improve as all of the qubit technologies advance. It will be interesting to monitor what kinds of benchmarks and qubit technology comparisons emerge from the DOE testbeds and the five National QIS Research Centers set up under the U.S. National Quantum Initiative (NQI).

D-Wave’s Five-Phase Roadmap

D-Wave is betting big on semiconductor-based superconducting. Johnson declined to offer any timelines. However, D-Wave has discussed its overall plan.

“We’ve laid out in our roadmap, this five phase approach. 1) There’s sort of developing our gate model qubit, but within the context of a superconducting integrated circuit stack. This is sort of the first phase. 2) The next phase is validating our model for error correction, and integrated control circuitry. This second phase is going to target a single logical error-corrected qubit comprising something like 16 physical qubits.

“3) The third phase is around demonstrating the scalability of our approach to logical qubit interaction. So that’s targeting a 1000-qubit, physical system, but configurable enough for logical qubits. What that basically will tell us is [if] we’re on the right track and whether we addressed adequately the system engineering problems that will allow us to scale up 4) to the fourth phase of [developing] task-specific components. So do we have a magic state factory, sort of the equivalent of an ALU for qubits, and some sort of memory, etc.? 5) That sets the stage for the first pass to the general purpose QPU, which initially would comprise an error-corrected more generic approach. You can then imagine taking those task-specific modules, and there may be different optimizations for an application, depending on the application.”

Johnson repeated a couple of times during the interview D-Wave’s desire to be a full stack quantum system provider. Just what that means is not entirely clear, particularly given the rapid growth of a varied QIS ecosystem. There are lots of folks trying to build tools that hide underlying quantum technology complexity and make life easier for developers. At this point, it didn’t sound like tapping into that growing community was a goal for D-Wave.

That said, D-Wave would eventually have a portfolio spanning quantum annealing, gate-based systems, and hybrid classical-quantum solvers. Knitting all of those together under a single tool set will be challenging and, at least for now, a go-it-(mostly)-alone approach may be the most efficient.

Of course, the broader question facing the QIS community, including D-Wave, is when will practical uses of quantum computingmove into production environments? There are a ton of “proto-type” efforts now, but nothing in production.

A few people still think that actualization of quantum computing is years away. Perhaps. But a quantum computing boomlet is definitely underway. Government funding. Competing qubit technologies. Advancing quantum networking approaches. Expanding ecosystem (software, hardware, consultants, portals). Industry engagements – indeed D-Wave has one of the largest commercial engagement programs in the industry. Given all of these moving parts, fueled at least in part by geopolitical rivalries, there’s a sense that something concrete and productive will emerge and that today’s quantum bloom won’t repeat the AI crash and long winter that preceded today’s AI boom.

Stay tuned.

Feature Image: D-Wave’s Advantage quantum processor chip

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

SC21 Was Unlike Any Other — Was That a Good Thing?

December 3, 2021

For a long time, the promised in-person SC21 seemed like an impossible fever dream, the assurances of a prominent physical component persisting across years of canceled conferences, including two virtual ISCs and the virtual SC20. With the advent of the Delta variant, Covid surges in St. Louis and contention over vaccine requirements... Read more…

The Green500’s Crystal Anniversary Sees MN-3 Crystallize Its Winning Streak

December 2, 2021

“This is the 30th Green500,” said Wu Feng, custodian of the Green500 list, at the list’s SC21 birds-of-a-feather session. “You could say 15 years of Green500, which makes it, I guess, the crystal anniversary.” Indeed, HPCwire marked the 15th anniversary of the Green500 – which ranks supercomputers by flops-per-watt, rather than just by flops – earlier this year with... Read more…

AWS Arm-based Graviton3 Instances Now in Preview

December 1, 2021

Three years after unveiling the first generation of its AWS Graviton chip-powered instances in 2018, Amazon Web Services announced that the third generation of the processors – the AWS Graviton3 – will power all-new Amazon Elastic Compute 2 (EC2) C7g instances that are now available in preview. Debuting at the AWS re:Invent 2021... Read more…

Nvidia Dominates Latest MLPerf Results but Competitors Start Speaking Up

December 1, 2021

MLCommons today released its fifth round of MLPerf training benchmark results with Nvidia GPUs again dominating. That said, a few other AI accelerator companies participated and, one of them, Graphcore, even held a separ Read more…

HPC Career Notes: December 2021 Edition

December 1, 2021

In this monthly feature, we’ll keep you up-to-date on the latest career developments for individuals in the high-performance computing community. Whether it’s a promotion, new company hire, or even an accolade, we’ Read more…

AWS Solution Channel

Running a 3.2M vCPU HPC Workload on AWS with YellowDog

Historically, advances in fields such as meteorology, healthcare, and engineering, were achieved through large investments in on-premises computing infrastructure. Upfront capital investment and operational complexity have been the accepted norm of large-scale HPC research. Read more…

At SC21, Experts Ask: Can Fast HPC Be Green?

November 30, 2021

HPC is entering a new era: exascale is (somewhat) officially here, but Moore’s law is ending. Power consumption and other sustainability concerns loom over the enormous systems and chips of this new epoch, for both cost and compliance reasons. Reconciling the need to continue the supercomputer scale-up while reducing HPC’s environmental impacts... Read more…

SC21 Was Unlike Any Other — Was That a Good Thing?

December 3, 2021

For a long time, the promised in-person SC21 seemed like an impossible fever dream, the assurances of a prominent physical component persisting across years of canceled conferences, including two virtual ISCs and the virtual SC20. With the advent of the Delta variant, Covid surges in St. Louis and contention over vaccine requirements... Read more…

The Green500’s Crystal Anniversary Sees MN-3 Crystallize Its Winning Streak

December 2, 2021

“This is the 30th Green500,” said Wu Feng, custodian of the Green500 list, at the list’s SC21 birds-of-a-feather session. “You could say 15 years of Green500, which makes it, I guess, the crystal anniversary.” Indeed, HPCwire marked the 15th anniversary of the Green500 – which ranks supercomputers by flops-per-watt, rather than just by flops – earlier this year with... Read more…

Nvidia Dominates Latest MLPerf Results but Competitors Start Speaking Up

December 1, 2021

MLCommons today released its fifth round of MLPerf training benchmark results with Nvidia GPUs again dominating. That said, a few other AI accelerator companies Read more…

At SC21, Experts Ask: Can Fast HPC Be Green?

November 30, 2021

HPC is entering a new era: exascale is (somewhat) officially here, but Moore’s law is ending. Power consumption and other sustainability concerns loom over the enormous systems and chips of this new epoch, for both cost and compliance reasons. Reconciling the need to continue the supercomputer scale-up while reducing HPC’s environmental impacts... Read more…

Raja Koduri and Satoshi Matsuoka Discuss the Future of HPC at SC21

November 29, 2021

HPCwire's Managing Editor sits down with Intel's Raja Koduri and Riken's Satoshi Matsuoka in St. Louis for an off-the-cuff conversation about their SC21 experience, what comes after exascale and why they are collaborating. Koduri, senior vice president and general manager of Intel's accelerated computing systems and graphics (AXG) group, leads the team... Read more…

Jack Dongarra on SC21, the Top500 and His Retirement Plans

November 29, 2021

HPCwire's Managing Editor sits down with Jack Dongarra, Top500 co-founder and Distinguished Professor at the University of Tennessee, during SC21 in St. Louis to discuss the 2021 Top500 list, the outlook for global exascale computing, and what exactly is going on in that Viking helmet photo. Read more…

SC21: Larry Smarr on The Rise of Supernetwork Data Intensive Computing

November 26, 2021

Larry Smarr, founding director of Calit2 (now Distinguished Professor Emeritus at the University of California San Diego) and the first director of NCSA, is one of the seminal figures in the U.S. supercomputing community. What began as a personal drive, shared by others, to spur the creation of supercomputers in the U.S. for scientific use, later expanded into a... Read more…

Three Chinese Exascale Systems Detailed at SC21: Two Operational and One Delayed

November 24, 2021

Details about two previously rumored Chinese exascale systems came to light during last week’s SC21 proceedings. Asked about these systems during the Top500 media briefing on Monday, Nov. 15, list author and co-founder Jack Dongarra indicated he was aware of some very impressive results, but withheld comment when asked directly if he had... Read more…

IonQ Is First Quantum Startup to Go Public; Will It be First to Deliver Profits?

November 3, 2021

On October 1 of this year, IonQ became the first pure-play quantum computing start-up to go public. At this writing, the stock (NYSE: IONQ) was around $15 and its market capitalization was roughly $2.89 billion. Co-founder and chief scientist Chris Monroe says it was fun to have a few of the company’s roughly 100 employees travel to New York to ring the opening bell of the New York Stock... Read more…

Enter Dojo: Tesla Reveals Design for Modular Supercomputer & D1 Chip

August 20, 2021

Two months ago, Tesla revealed a massive GPU cluster that it said was “roughly the number five supercomputer in the world,” and which was just a precursor to Tesla’s real supercomputing moonshot: the long-rumored, little-detailed Dojo system. Read more…

Esperanto, Silicon in Hand, Champions the Efficiency of Its 1,092-Core RISC-V Chip

August 27, 2021

Esperanto Technologies made waves last December when it announced ET-SoC-1, a new RISC-V-based chip aimed at machine learning that packed nearly 1,100 cores onto a package small enough to fit six times over on a single PCIe card. Now, Esperanto is back, silicon in-hand and taking aim... Read more…

US Closes in on Exascale: Frontier Installation Is Underway

September 29, 2021

At the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) meeting, held by Zoom this week (Sept. 29-30), it was revealed that the Frontier supercomputer is currently being installed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tenn. The staff at the Oak Ridge Leadership... Read more…

AMD Launches Milan-X CPU with 3D V-Cache and Multichip Instinct MI200 GPU

November 8, 2021

At a virtual event this morning, AMD CEO Lisa Su unveiled the company’s latest and much-anticipated server products: the new Milan-X CPU, which leverages AMD’s new 3D V-Cache technology; and its new Instinct MI200 GPU, which provides up to 220 compute units across two Infinity Fabric-connected dies, delivering an astounding 47.9 peak double-precision teraflops. “We're in a high-performance computing megacycle, driven by the growing need to deploy additional compute performance... Read more…

Intel Reorgs HPC Group, Creates Two ‘Super Compute’ Groups

October 15, 2021

Following on changes made in June that moved Intel’s HPC unit out of the Data Platform Group and into the newly created Accelerated Computing Systems and Graphics (AXG) business unit, led by Raja Koduri, Intel is making further updates to the HPC group and announcing... Read more…

Intel Completes LLVM Adoption; Will End Updates to Classic C/C++ Compilers in Future

August 10, 2021

Intel reported in a blog this week that its adoption of the open source LLVM architecture for Intel’s C/C++ compiler is complete. The transition is part of In Read more…

Killer Instinct: AMD’s Multi-Chip MI200 GPU Readies for a Major Global Debut

October 21, 2021

AMD’s next-generation supercomputer GPU is on its way – and by all appearances, it’s about to make a name for itself. The AMD Radeon Instinct MI200 GPU (a successor to the MI100) will, over the next year, begin to power three massive systems on three continents: the United States’ exascale Frontier system; the European Union’s pre-exascale LUMI system; and Australia’s petascale Setonix system. Read more…

Leading Solution Providers

Contributors

Hot Chips: Here Come the DPUs and IPUs from Arm, Nvidia and Intel

August 25, 2021

The emergence of data processing units (DPU) and infrastructure processing units (IPU) as potentially important pieces in cloud and datacenter architectures was Read more…

D-Wave Embraces Gate-Based Quantum Computing; Charts Path Forward

October 21, 2021

Earlier this month D-Wave Systems, the quantum computing pioneer that has long championed quantum annealing-based quantum computing (and sometimes taken heat fo Read more…

HPE Wins $2B GreenLake HPC-as-a-Service Deal with NSA

September 1, 2021

In the heated, oft-contentious, government IT space, HPE has won a massive $2 billion contract to provide HPC and AI services to the United States’ National Security Agency (NSA). Following on the heels of the now-canceled $10 billion JEDI contract (reissued as JWCC) and a $10 billion... Read more…

The Latest MLPerf Inference Results: Nvidia GPUs Hold Sway but Here Come CPUs and Intel

September 22, 2021

The latest round of MLPerf inference benchmark (v 1.1) results was released today and Nvidia again dominated, sweeping the top spots in the closed (apples-to-ap Read more…

Ahead of ‘Dojo,’ Tesla Reveals Its Massive Precursor Supercomputer

June 22, 2021

In spring 2019, Tesla made cryptic reference to a project called Dojo, a “super-powerful training computer” for video data processing. Then, in summer 2020, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted: “Tesla is developing a [neural network] training computer... Read more…

Three Chinese Exascale Systems Detailed at SC21: Two Operational and One Delayed

November 24, 2021

Details about two previously rumored Chinese exascale systems came to light during last week’s SC21 proceedings. Asked about these systems during the Top500 media briefing on Monday, Nov. 15, list author and co-founder Jack Dongarra indicated he was aware of some very impressive results, but withheld comment when asked directly if he had... Read more…

2021 Gordon Bell Prize Goes to Exascale-Powered Quantum Supremacy Challenge

November 18, 2021

Today at the hybrid virtual/in-person SC21 conference, the organizers announced the winners of the 2021 ACM Gordon Bell Prize: a team of Chinese researchers leveraging the new exascale Sunway system to simulate quantum circuits. The Gordon Bell Prize, which comes with an award of $10,000 courtesy of HPC pioneer Gordon Bell, is awarded annually... Read more…

Quantum Computer Market Headed to $830M in 2024

September 13, 2021

What is one to make of the quantum computing market? Energized (lots of funding) but still chaotic and advancing in unpredictable ways (e.g. competing qubit tec Read more…

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
HPCwire