Calculating the Cost of Productivity

By Gabor Samu

June 6, 2018

If we set our sights on achieving the most cost-efficient solution, then it may not be true that the solution with the lowest initial purchase price wins.

For example, take flash storage. For years it has been easy to show that when you include in your evaluations various operational savings, productivity gains, reliability comparisons, maintenance expenses, and the list goes on – flash offers lower overall costs than mechanical hard disks. In fact, it’s not even close. Yet, still today you can find enterprise-level data storage users and decision-makers talking about the higher cost of flash – because the initial purchase price of flash storage is, indeed, higher than the lowest-priced hard drives.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is the industry term for considering all the costs of a solution. Here is how TCO is described by a popular IT information source.

Total cost of ownership (TCO) is an estimation of the expenses associated with purchasing, deploying, using and retiring a product or piece of equipment. TCO quantifies the cost of the purchase across the product’s entire lifecycle. Therefore, it offers a more accurate basis for determining the value – cost vs. ROI – of an investment than the purchase price alone. The overall TCO includes direct and indirect expenses, as well as some intangible ones that may be assigned a monetary value. For example, a server’s TCO might include an expensive purchase price, a good deal on ongoing support, and low system management time because of its user-friendly interface.”

Recently, the IT industry analysts at Edison Group conducted a TCO comparison between IBM Spectrum LSF – a suite of enterprise and high performance computing (HPC) application workload management solutions – and comparable open source software. The same online information outlet whose definition of TCO we used above also provides us with some thoughts about “open source”:

In general, open source refers to any program whose source code is made available for use or modification as users or other developers see fit. Open source software is usually developed as a public collaboration and made freely available.”2

IBM participates in many different open source initiatives – for example, providing major contributions to open source Spark – data analytics software that’s soaring in popularity right now.

The Edison TCO comparison between IBM Spectrum LSF and open source workload management software makes a great deal of sense when you note, as Edison did, that “…there is a persistent market perception that open source is always a less expensive alternative to any solution that contains proprietary software.3 And of course, Spectrum LSF is a proprietary software product offered by IBM.

This particular TCO comparison makes good sense for another reason – workload management is complicated. Early in the TCO comparison, the Edison authors note: “To complicate matters, IT infrastructure is in transition as companies move towards hybrid processing models which include traditional bare metal, virtual machines, cloud and containers…This complex infrastructure cannot function efficiently using simplistic workload scheduling tools. Each type of processing model requires a slightly different approach to achieve the highest level of efficiency, therefore creating potentially conflicting operational focus which a simple workload scheduling tool cannot satisfy.”

Complexity within the environment where a TCO analysis is being conducted means that there will be a number of cost variables involved – a lot more than just the initial purchase price. These are the environments where the concept of total cost of ownership is especially valuable to those who will actually be making purchase and deployment decisions. And HPC workload scheduling and management certainly qualifies in this regard, requiring job prioritization and scheduling, operations management, workload and resource balancing, and even handling of requests for additional resources from the cloud, which then adds complications caused by location of data for example.

Edison notes that the “IBM Spectrum LSF family addresses all of the challenges listed above. It is much more than a workload scheduler. It is a complete solution for HPC resource and workload management, designed for enterprise-grade productivity.”

Edison goes on to list some of the ways that IBM Spectrum LSF provides TCO advantages. The solution:

  • Provides a simple and effective User Interface
  • Is easy to integrate with all the other tools in an HPC processing environment
  • Provides valuable operational analytics
  • Automates job workflows
  • And even offers intelligent flexing into cloud resources.

These are just a few, but a key area where IBM Spectrum LSF really helps lower TCO is performance. When workloads are scheduled more efficiently, less infrastructure such as hardware is needed. Hardware can be the single biggest cost factor, and as the Edison analysis illustrates, IBM Spectrum LSF can require less of it to achieve similar productivity to that of open source software.

Productivity itself is not a simple concept, potentially spawning multiple cost variables within a TCO calculation. The Edison TCO analysis highlights an interesting cost factor called End-user Productivity Opportunity Cost, and it results in the biggest TCO advantage provided by IBM Spectrum LSF.

What factors did Edison consider when calculating the cost of End-user Productivity Opportunity? You should read the report yourself to get the full explanation. You’ll also want to learn more about all seven of the major cost factors considered in this particular TCO comparison.

And what was the bottom line? Well, we wouldn’t want to give away the very best part of this TCO story. Let’s just say that when it comes to cost, performance, and productivity, IBM Spectrum LSF has a lot to offer.

Read the full report here.

[3] Edison Group: Comparison of Open Source software vs. IBM Spectrum LSF Suite for Enterprise, June 2018 (URL TBD)

Subscribe to HPCwire's Weekly Update!

Be the most informed person in the room! Stay ahead of the tech trends with industy updates delivered to you every week!

Nvidia Debuts Turing Architecture, Focusing on Real-Time Ray Tracing

August 16, 2018

From the SIGGRAPH professional graphics conference in Vancouver this week, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang unveiled Turing, the company's next-gen GPU platform that introduces new RT Cores to accelerate ray tracing and new Tenso Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

HPC Coding: The Power of L(o)osing Control

August 16, 2018

Exascale roadmaps, exascale projects and exascale lobbyists ask, on-again-off-again, for a fundamental rewrite of major code building blocks. Otherwise, so they claim, codes will not scale up. Naturally, some exascale pr Read more…

By Tobias Weinzierl

STAQ(ing) the Quantum Computing Deck

August 16, 2018

Quantum computers – at least for now – remain noisy. That’s another way of saying unreliable and in diverse ways that often depend on the specific quantum technology used. One idea is to mitigate noisiness and perh Read more…

By John Russell

HPE Extreme Performance Solutions

Introducing the First Integrated System Management Software for HPC Clusters from HPE

How do you manage your complex, growing cluster environments? Answer that big challenge with the new HPC cluster management solution: HPE Performance Cluster Manager. Read more…

IBM Accelerated Insights

Super Problem Solving

You might think that tackling the world’s toughest problems is a job only for superheroes, but at special places such as the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, supercomputers are the real heroes. Read more…

NREL ‘Eagle’ Supercomputer to Advance Energy Tech R&D

August 14, 2018

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has contracted with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) for a new 8-petaflops (peak) supercomputer that will be used to advance early-stage R&a Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

STAQ(ing) the Quantum Computing Deck

August 16, 2018

Quantum computers – at least for now – remain noisy. That’s another way of saying unreliable and in diverse ways that often depend on the specific quantum Read more…

By John Russell

NREL ‘Eagle’ Supercomputer to Advance Energy Tech R&D

August 14, 2018

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has contracted with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) for a new 8-petaflops (peak Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

CERN Project Sees Orders-of-Magnitude Speedup with AI Approach

August 14, 2018

An award-winning effort at CERN has demonstrated potential to significantly change how the physics based modeling and simulation communities view machine learni Read more…

By Rob Farber

Intel Announces Cooper Lake, Advances AI Strategy

August 9, 2018

Intel's chief datacenter exec Navin Shenoy kicked off the company's Data-Centric Innovation Summit Wednesday, the day-long program devoted to Intel's datacenter Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

SLATE Update: Making Math Libraries Exascale-ready

August 9, 2018

Practically-speaking, achieving exascale computing requires enabling HPC software to effectively use accelerators – mostly GPUs at present – and that remain Read more…

By John Russell

Summertime in Washington: Some Unexpected Advanced Computing News

August 8, 2018

Summertime in Washington DC is known for its heat and humidity. That is why most people get away to either the mountains or the seashore and things slow down. H Read more…

By Alex R. Larzelere

NSF Invests $15 Million in Quantum STAQ

August 7, 2018

Quantum computing development is in full ascent as global backers aim to transcend the limitations of classical computing by leveraging the magical-seeming prop Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

By the Numbers: Cray Would Like Exascale to Be the Icing on the Cake

August 1, 2018

On its earnings call held for investors yesterday, Cray gave an accounting for its latest quarterly financials, offered future guidance and provided an update o Read more…

By Tiffany Trader

Leading Solution Providers

SC17 Booth Video Tours Playlist

Altair @ SC17

Altair

AMD @ SC17

AMD

ASRock Rack @ SC17

ASRock Rack

CEJN @ SC17

CEJN

DDN Storage @ SC17

DDN Storage

Huawei @ SC17

Huawei

IBM @ SC17

IBM

IBM Power Systems @ SC17

IBM Power Systems

Intel @ SC17

Intel

Lenovo @ SC17

Lenovo

Mellanox Technologies @ SC17

Mellanox Technologies

Microsoft @ SC17

Microsoft

Penguin Computing @ SC17

Penguin Computing

Pure Storage @ SC17

Pure Storage

Supericro @ SC17

Supericro

Tyan @ SC17

Tyan

Univa @ SC17

Univa

  • arrow
  • Click Here for More Headlines
  • arrow
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Share This